One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
How Many of Robert Mueller's Lawyers Gave Money to Democrats?
Page 1 of 2 next>
Dec 16, 2017 11:24:17   #
fullspinzoo
 
And they say "there is no bias". Horse manure! http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/12/how_many_of_robert_muellers_lawyers_gave_money_to_democrats.html

Reply
Dec 16, 2017 11:52:49   #
Kevyn
 
There is no reason in the world that a law enforcement officer investigating criminal activity needs to be a supporter of the suspect, in fact that alone would compromise the investigation.

Reply
Dec 16, 2017 11:56:24   #
fullspinzoo
 
Kevyn wrote:
There is no reason in the world that a law enforcement officer investigating criminal activity needs to be a supporter of the suspect, in fact that alone would compromise the investigation.


Do you remember the process potential jurors go through? If there is any bias whatsoever, there OUT. Get the picture? If you don't understand this concept, then you are really showing your bias.

Reply
 
 
Dec 16, 2017 13:42:55   #
Kevyn
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
Do you remember the process potential jurors go through? If there is any bias whatsoever, there OUT. Get the picture? If you don't understand this concept, then you are really showing your bias.

There’s are not jurors they are investigators, their job is to uncover evidence loyalty to a criminal suspect has never been a requirement for effective law enforcement, if anything it is a hinderence to justice. If Trump is not dirty he has nothing to fear.

Reply
Dec 16, 2017 16:55:13   #
Weasel Loc: In the Great State Of Indiana!!
 
Kevyn wrote:
There’s are not jurors they are investigators, their job is to uncover evidence loyalty to a criminal suspect has never been a requirement for effective law enforcement, if anything it is a hinderence to justice. If Trump is not dirty he has nothing to fear.


And if Trump is dirty, we would have an unremovable stain by now! ¥ ¥

Reply
Dec 16, 2017 18:18:15   #
fullspinzoo
 
Kevyn wrote:
There’s are not jurors they are investigators, their job is to uncover evidence loyalty to a criminal suspect has never been a requirement for effective law enforcement, if anything it is a hinderence to justice. If Trump is not dirty he has nothing to fear.


Their job is to impartial, something you and your ilk know nothing about.

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 08:44:16   #
Lonewolf
 
Evidence is evidence no matter who gathers it ask yourself this why is tru,p scared shirtless why does his lawyers have lawyers.why do they try and obstruct justice
,





Reply
 
 
Dec 17, 2017 10:39:08   #
Radiance3
 

===================
All of them gave money to Hillary Clinton's campaign funds.

They also created an insurance that in case Trump wins, the group has that "
Dossier", and the f**e malicious investigation to harass and remove Trump.

The American taxpayers have already paid them in tens of millions of dollars as they grip on this F**E DOSSIER and the f**e accusation of Russian collusion. Fact was it was Hillary who had the Russian collusion.

FBI needs to be drained out! It is dangerous to our country, corrupt, fraudulent, dishonest, liars to the American people who are the victims.

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 11:38:49   #
fullspinzoo
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Evidence is evidence no matter who gathers it ask yourself this why is tru,p scared shirtless why does his lawyers have lawyers.why do they try and obstruct justice
,


Any one with a half a brain realizes how corrupt it is. Maybe we should do the same, put a team of strong Trump supporters/lawyers together and see how long Hillary stays out of prison. Now you have the biggest azzhat lawyer during the scandalous Obama tenure threatening to create WWIII if Mueller is fired. It's nice to see Obama and his i***t team trying to throw a wrench in the great things Trump is doing.

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 14:01:45   #
mactheknife
 
It is interesting to follow the thread leading to the insurance policy that was (and has) been enacted if President T***p w*n. Well, it sounds to me that the FBI, aided and abetted by our "loyal opposition" (the Democrats) were conspiring to remove an elected president by a C**p d’état, also called "C**p". This is how Encyclopedia Britannica defines a C**p d’état; "the sudden, violent o*******w of an existing government by a small group. The chief prerequisite for a c**p is control of all or part of the armed forces, the police, and other military elements. Unlike a revolution, which is usually achieved by large numbers of people working for basic social, economic, and political change, a c**p is a change in power from the top that merely results in the abrupt replacement of leading government personnel. A c**p rarely alters a nation’s fundamental social and economic policies, nor does it significantly redistribute power among competing political groups. Among the earliest modern c**ps were those in which Napoleon o*******w the Directory on Nov. 9, 1799 (18 Brumaire), and in which Louis Napoleon dissolved the assembly of France’s Second Republic in 1851. C**ps were a regular occurrence in various Latin American nations in the 19th and 20th centuries and in Africa after the countries there gained independence in the 1960s." Conspiring to enact a C**p is treasonous and those who were the conspirators (FBI, la resistance leaders, etc) should be held accountable. To let them off the hook would be unconscionable. Does anyone else think this way?

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 17:42:07   #
peter11937 Loc: NYS
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Evidence is evidence no matter who gathers it ask yourself this why is tru,p scared shirtless why does his lawyers have lawyers.why do they try and obstruct justice
,


Evidence of what, exactly? The h**e Trump have been digging and digging for over a year now and still nothing. Exactly what do they expect to find? Will they just make something up ? Get someone to lie by threatening them with jail for "lying" while being questioned? F*****t tactics is all that's left to the leftwingnutbars.

Reply
 
 
Dec 17, 2017 18:49:53   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Mueller isn't investigating anything. He's building a phony case to remove Trump from office. This is a c**p.

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 19:22:34   #
peter11937 Loc: NYS
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Mueller isn't investigating anything. He's building a phony case to remove Trump from office. This is a c**p.


It will be a failed unconstitutional attempt.

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 21:40:13   #
Mikeyavelli
 
peter11937 wrote:
It will be a failed unconstitutional attempt.


Everyone involved with the constitution is for the removal of Trump. The c**p started when obama slithered into the Whitehouse. Trump is the intruder. Everyone in Washington wants to cancel our decision.

Reply
Dec 17, 2017 21:57:04   #
peter11937 Loc: NYS
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Everyone involved with the constitution is for the removal of Trump. The c**p started when obama slithered into the Whitehouse. Trump is the intruder. Everyone in Washington wants to cancel our decision.


Exactly!

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.