Propagand on Seriods Tonight! mana for lemings (Page 4): I love political discussion. Don't you h**e the whores that do it for money. Like with sex, it's just not as good.

typhoon

I love political discussion. Don't you h**e the whores that do it for money. Like with sex, it's just not as good.

Patty wrote:

V the person who referred me here emailed me last night and explained why Jon keeps calling me by different names. He thinks I have several names here.
The funny part is if he thinks he has that information which is incorrect but never the less he has exposed himself as an admin. stooge here. He is just a paid provoker. A nickel a post provocateur. If we all ignore him/her then he/she loses all power to collect more nickels.

Ve'hoe

Would he not have to be effective to be paid??

Patty wrote:

V the person who referred me here emailed me last night and explained why Jon keeps calling me by different names. He thinks I have several names here.
The funny part is if he thinks he has that information which is incorrect but never the less he has exposed himself as an admin. stooge here. He is just a paid provoker. A nickel a post provocateur. If we all ignore him/her then he/she loses all power to collect more nickels.

Btfkr Loc: just outside the Mile High City

Joe McCarthy was a paranoid drunk

Patty

Ve'hoe wrote:

Would he not have to be effective to be paid??

I think so. It is interesting that he claims "middle ground" I guess that is so he can stir the conflict from both sides when he gets his orders to do so. I guess that is why there is no "ignore" button like on other forums.

Ve'hoe

But,,, he was apparently correct too!!

Btfkr wrote:

Joe McCarthy was a paranoid drunk

Skyhook

jonhatfield wrote:

Important but not more important than freedom. Do you see it as a choice between these two? Actually I'm more conservative than any right wingy radical on OPP, including you, Mac. In fact, many of those you label left wingers who are not extremists or radicals are much more 'conservative' than you and your right wingy radical extremists. Radicalisms and extremisms are by definition not conservative, or don't you and OPP RWEs understand that basic t***h?

Wow. Holy cow! Planet Contradiction/Confusion.

And I'll bet some here still do not believe aliens visited earth decades ago!

:lol:

BTW, some here might wish to review this informed person's views: http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2007-11-07.html

Patty

Skyhook wrote:

Wow. Holy cow! Planet Contradiction/Confusion.

And I'll bet some here still do not believe aliens visited earth decades ago!

:lol:

I imagine he gets a nickel a post no matter which side he takes. ;)

typhoon

Liberalism is smoke and mirrors, they can not even define what it is and yet they all follow OZ

Patty wrote:

:thumbup: This person is so right.
http://www.angelfire.com/emo2/republican/Manual.htm

Skyhook

typhoon wrote:

Liberalism is smoke and mirrors, they can not even define what it is and yet they all follow OZ

That angelfire link is priceless.. thanks!

Btfkr Loc: just outside the Mile High City

Ve'hoe wrote:

But,,, he was apparently correct too!!

No he was not. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_McCarthy. Easy research. Unless you consider censure by the US Senate for inability to substantiate claims as being correct, and in the mean time ruining untold lives with his ridiculous hearings. Who was un American here? I haven't a clue what right wing crap you guys are reading so as to take one of our countries darkest times and making a hero out of the perp? Not to get too personal here, but you of all people should be able to see the fallacy here.

typhoon

Yes you should round us all up and shoot us like Mao or starve us to death like Stalin. Only a 100 million murdered for the cause of c*******m, nothing to see here. Bobby Kennedy worked with McCarthy shoot him um oh sorry they already did.

Btfkr wrote:

No he was not. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josep... (show quote)

Skyhook

McCarthy was correct. Period.

With TIME putting 'Uncle Joe' Stalin on it's cover as 'Man of the Year', it is perhaps understandable why some today are still deeply conflicted and confused about the real business of the CPUSA of the '40s & '50s.
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=369

Stalin was an ally of necessity in the '40s as N**is were ravaging the entire European continent, so lots of folks mistakenly considered him-Stalin- to "be just like an American dressed in furs.."

Perhaps Time magazine editors were ignorant, perhaps they were engrossed in propaganda, but there seems to be little logic to their naming that brutal murderer as 'Man of the Year' had they known of the Holodomor. http://holodomorct.org/

Btfkr Loc: just outside the Mile High City

typhoon wrote:

Yes you should round us all up and shoot us like Mao or starve us to death like Stalin. Only a 100 million murdered for the cause of c*******m, nothing to see here. Bobby Kennedy worked with McCarthy shoot him um oh sorry they already did.

your wired wrong phoony. your response has nothing to do with what I said. sorry your attempt at being clever gets a D and thats really stretching it.

arpy2912

Not yours typhoon, but a question on the stated subject.
Why would a headline of such few words contain 4
misspellings?

typhoon

I lived in those times with the bomb drills in school are you saying there was no such thing as c*******t influence in the United States? Sean Penn's daddy was one of the flaming c*******t under investigation in Hollywood and Sean is a flaming c*******t too. Address the issue of Mao, and c*******t nuclear proliferation. They had every right to be concerned and God bless them if they went a little overboard. If you want to get in a put down pissing match how is that manna, you washing it down with a little cool aid. Please make your case with historical references.

Btfkr wrote:

your wired wrong phoony. your response has nothing to do with what I said. sorry your attempt at being clever gets a D and thats really stretching it.