Look at Bill Cosby just for an example. Apparently is was proven that Bill, drugged these girls. That is self apparent from the court records. However, he paid dearly when his son died. That was a punishment he has to live with the rest of his life. Yet, to add insult to injury, they went after him and brought more pain to him. What kind of dirty underhanded people are we? I mean really lets just get a true reality check here. No wonder Iran calls us evil. And the fight against Donald Trump is proving them right.

The phrase, "Indian Giver", was created here by the United States Government, yet it was the US Government who was the Indian giver, not the Indians. But educated people, would know that. It shouldn't be the racial slur, "Indian giver", it should be called "Government giver".

Well, anyways, Trump is cleaning them out one person at a time, but how long can it last? I mean really? The "Press", "Media" or what have you, seem to not have to abide by the constitution at all. They can pry into the private life of anyone(which is very scary), and if the "Media" doesn't like you, they can make up any story they want about compromising circumstances we all seem to get into at one time or another. That is C*******t, Socialist, and down right evil. Yet Pete you are OK with that.

Well, I'm not! Not at all. There is a such thing as privacy. And the Privacy of Donald Trump is being c*********d and I wish that he would go after the Reporters. The Democrat Sheep tend to hang on to every word the president Tweets or says. Like you did in this last comment to me. Like you never talked "Guy talk" before? Really? I believe you did, does that make you guilty of sexual harassment, assault etc?


Trump made it clear that it was "Locker-room talk", ie, "Guy Talk", talk that is not intended in mixed company. But just because a blow heart, self-indulged person, comments to a reporter in that manner, does not mean that he really feels that way. That reporter used that interview of gossip as testimony and evidence against Trump, that is very low. And not honorable. Am I to believe, that it is wrong and illegal, to talk to other men one way, and talk to women in another way and mixed company is a third way? Hell, if I can't speak my mind, then what is the point of being real, and ever speaking?

Trump has a good heart, and strong belief in freedom, that you cannot even fathom. Why do I say that? Because you want control. All liberal/progressives seek control. Well, you are witnessing what happens when control is ripped away from you. Obama used the federal government, for private profit. Trump is not doing that. But Clinton, Hillary and Bill, did the same. It is simply amazing, that now the people have a real true president. Not a perfect one. And this real president is being real. Obama was perfect but not real. There's your difference. It is better to be real, than perfect.

Hilarious! Please detail the contents of your virulent strain of thought! There just might be something to it if you admit that Trump is doing the tasks we conservatives wanted done at a goodly pace, and you resent these tasks because you are in the progressive camp. He is erasing Obama's creations step by step, and that may well lie at the heart of your assumption of a virulent strain.

But then, the thesis your partner in crime stated, that we won't be coming together because of your perception of Trump, is sheer madness, a overreach for effect, and all in all rather stupid. Trump is our president for the next years, and to opt out is to lose your voice in the nation's affairs. I find that reassuring, since I personally do not want your progressive ideas to take hold any more.

As to a corrupt soul, I seriously doubt you could recognize one, since you apparently wanted Clinton to be elected, and many people of all political bents saw her as a highly degraded soul, so high that they v**ed for TRUMP.

This is, of course, a lie. I v**ed for Trump, and I most certainly would not have v**ed for Hillary in any circumstances. I heartedly approve of Trump's agenda for legislation, and his use of Executive Orders to erase much of Obama's unconstitutional and unnecessary, cost-producing works, and his departments' regulation swamp that greatly burdened small businesses. I also approve of his steps to pull the US our of damaging treaties and agreements that were initiated by the clowns of Obama's administration or Obama himself, especially that concerning the C*****e C****e s**m.

Further, I believe he has been set up on his accused sexual harassments by money-seeking broads. A recent post here lays out the accusers and their f**e accusations. And, I do not really give a damn about his Tweets, except when he uses them to go around the MSM to reach the citizenry with important information, which I find to be an exceptionally good thing. Fact is, I'd believe a Trump Tweet over any MSM story, as they are inveterate liars. slanters and make up artists, with an unnatural hatred of Trump to begin with. If all of this is grounds for never coming together, it means that the Left is so biased it cannot see the woods for the trees.

Let's get our definitions straight here ...
Wikipedia definition:
F*****m /ˈfæʃɪzəm/ is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism, characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and control of industry and commerce that came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.
Socialism is a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
(in Marxist theory) a t***sitional social state between the o*******w of capitalism and the realization of c*******m.

We have in this country some things socialistic and some parts f*****t. That means that both sides in this argument have partial validity. Medical care is trending socialistic, because people believe that health care is a basic right. We have a president that tends f*****t and is authoritarian and a Congress that wants to become more anarchic with less control over anything except defense.

How this all plays out is still open to question, but I would bet on some sort of compromise where nobody gets a complete control over how the society works.

This is, of course, a lie. I v**ed for Trump, and I most certainly would not have v**ed for Hillary in any circumstances. I heartedly approve of Trump's agenda for legislation, and his use of Executive Orders to erase much of Obama's unconstitutional and unnecessary, cost-producing works, and his departments' regulation swamp that greatly burdened small businesses. I also approve of his steps to pull the US our of damaging treaties and agreements that were initiated by the clowns of Obama's administration or Obama himself, especially that concerning the C*****e C****e s**m.

Further, I believe he has been set up on his accused sexual harassments by money-seeking broads. A recent post here lays out the accusers and their f**e accusations. And, I do not really give a damn about his Tweets, except when he uses them to go around the MSM to reach the citizenry with important information, which I find to be an exceptionally good thing. Fact is, I'd believe a Trump Tweet over any MSM story, as they are inveterate liars. slanters and make up artists, with an unnatural hatred of Trump to begin with. If all of this is grounds for never coming together.

Let's get our definitions straight here ...
Wikipedia definition:
F*****m /ˈfæʃɪzəm/ is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism, characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and control of industry and commerce that came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.
Socialism is a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
(in Marxist theory) a t***sitional social state between the o*******w of capitalism and the realization of c*******m.

We have in this country some things socialistic and some parts f*****t. That means that both sides in this argument have partial validity. Medical care is trending socialistic, because people believe that health care is a basic right. We have a president that tends f*****t and is authoritarian and a Congress that wants to become more anarchic with less control over anything except defense.

How this all plays out is still open to question, but I would bet on some sort of compromise where nobody gets a complete control over how the society works.

is unfounded and immaterial?

However, the American people, the v**ers still want him. We sent Trump to Washington to give us a voice and fight back against the "mob" commonly called the "Establishment". The "Establishment" what a joke. You know what the "Establishment" is a den of thieves. These i***ts want us, the American Public to believe, that Obama Care is the greatest triumph of the 21st century but it makes the poor, poorer, the rich, richer, and the middle class poorer.

Meanwhile, they gave North Korea, nuclear weapons and even sold them Uranium. And to cover it up, they said that Trump Colluded with the Russians.
We, the people were watching. We watched as angry gossips started to believe their gossip and even try and convict people of crimes that they never committed or crimes that were committed so many years ago. Ever hear of statute of limitations? They didn't obviously.

Look at Bill Cosby just for an example. Apparently is was proven that Bill, drugged these girls. That is self apparent from the court records. However, he paid dearly when his son died. That was a punishment he has to live with the rest of his life. Yet, to add insult to injury, they went after him and brought more pain to him. What kind of dirty underhanded people are we? I mean really lets just get a true reality check here. No wonder Iran calls us evil. And the fight against Donald Trump is proving them right.

The phrase, "Indian Giver", was created here by the United States Government, yet it was the US Government who was the Indian giver, not the Indians. But educated people, would know that. It shouldn't be the racial slur, "Indian giver", it should be called "Government giver".

Well, anyways, Trump is cleaning them out one person at a time, but how long can it last? I mean really? The "Press", "Media" or what have you, seem to not have to abide by the constitution at all. They can pry into the private life of anyone(which is very scary), and if the "Media" doesn't like you, they can make up any story they want about compromising circumstances we all seem to get into at one time or another. That is C*******t, Socialist, and down right evil. Yet Pete you are OK with that.

Well, I'm not! Not at all. There is a such thing as privacy. And the Privacy of Donald Trump is being c*********d and I wish that he would go after the Reporters. The Democrat Sheep tend to hang on to every word the president Tweets or says. Like you did in this last comment to me. Like you never talked "Guy talk" before? Really? I believe you did, does that make you guilty of sexual harassment, assault etc.?

Trump made it clear that it was "Locker-room talk", ie, "Guy Talk", talk that is not intended in mixed company. But just because a blow heart, self-indulged person, comments to a reporter in that manner, does not mean that he really feels that way. That reporter used that interview of gossip as testimony and evidence against Trump, that is very low. And not honorable. Am I to believe, that it is wrong and illegal, to talk to other men one way, and talk to women in another way and mixed company is a third way? Hell, if I can't speak my mind, then what is the point of being real, and ever speaking?

Trump has a good heart, and strong belief in freedom, that you cannot even fathom. Why do I say that? Because you want control. All liberal/progressives seek control. Well, you are witnessing what happens when control is ripped away from you. Obama used the federal government, for private profit. Trump is not doing that. But Clinton, Hillary and Bill, did the same. It is simply amazing, that now the people have a real true president. Not a perfect one. And this real president is being real. Obama was perfect but not real. There's your difference. It is better to be real, than perfect.

Let me ask you something Ranger. When your representative can only v**e for something you approve of or you will try to v**e him out of office how is a Republic any different that a democracy?

The original premise behind a Republic was to put the best and brightest in power and then let them work for the common good. They may v**e the way you like and they may not but in an enlightened populace that wouldn't determined how you v**ed. We've abandoned the premise behind a Republic long ago and for better or worse we are as much a democracy as if we had the direct v**e.