eagleye13 wrote:
No history lesson today, Dummy Boy.
BUT go study the migrations of the 10 tribes of Israel, from the Assyrian captivity on. Study the heraldry of England, Scotland, etc. Study their king's bloodlines. That would be a start.
I agree, "history" for you is pejorative.
Note: the quote is from Thomas Jefferson, not from me.
Learn to read.
Kazudy wrote:
How about those bakers that would not bake a cake with homosexuals as the theme on the cake becouse it goes against their religion(and mine)? Now citizens will be forced to go contrary to their religion or go to prison and pay fines. That's just a start, you guys won't be happy till all the Church's that preach God's Word are shut down. Who is behind that movement?
We'll see how it turns out. The most recent is a baker versus bakers, I believe though, in Colorado.
In any event, I agree, his "Christian Values" are supported by the constitution and he should be free to discriminate due to his views. I believe that he should have posted it, but maybe that would have "screamed" discrimination?
If the "church" wants to weigh it on it, I support their right to disagree with the state and with his right to express himself. The gay couple is infringing on his right to conduct his business the way he sees fit. I don't see in any way that the supreme court could decide otherwise, unless they don't understand the constitution.
Equally, it is not ridiculous for a gay couple to sue anyone for any violation of their civil rights. They were just asking for a cake and that's the end of the t***saction. If the state of Colorado feels that this is a violation of their laws they will have to explain it in court. And in support of that, they will stand by it if they lose by paying all of the fees.
Dummy Boy wrote:
We'll see how it turns out. The most recent is a baker versus bakers, I believe though, in Colorado.
In any event, I agree, his "Christian Values" are supported by the constitution and he should be free to discriminate due to his views. I believe that he should have posted it, but maybe that would have "screamed" discrimination?
If the "church" wants to weigh it on it, I support their right to disagree with the state and with his right to express himself. The gay couple is infringing on his right to conduct his business the way he sees fit. I don't see in any way that the supreme court could decide otherwise, unless they don't understand the constitution.
Equally, it is not ridiculous for a gay couple to sue anyone for any violation of their civil rights. They were just asking for a cake and that's the end of the t***saction. If the state of Colorado feels that this is a violation of their laws they will have to explain it in court. And in support of that, they will stand by it if they lose by paying all of the fees.
We'll see how it turns out. The most recent is a ... (
show quote)
It's just as easy for the L**T'S to go somewhere else, as you stated under the Constitution both sides have a undeniable right to not want to do business or anything else in support of each sides position...the very common rule in business is "we reserve the right to refuse business to anyone".... that's so some pampered brat or brats can't come in and run roughshod over the proprietor...and courtesy used to be, the rejects leave...
Dummy Boy wrote:
We'll see how it turns out. The most recent is a baker versus bakers, I believe though, in Colorado.
In any event, I agree, his "Christian Values" are supported by the constitution and he should be free to discriminate due to his views. I believe that he should have posted it, but maybe that would have "screamed" discrimination?
If the "church" wants to weigh it on it, I support their right to disagree with the state and with his right to express himself. The gay couple is infringing on his right to conduct his business the way he sees fit. I don't see in any way that the supreme court could decide otherwise, unless they don't understand the constitution.
Equally, it is not ridiculous for a gay couple to sue anyone for any violation of their civil rights. They were just asking for a cake and that's the end of the t***saction. If the state of Colorado feels that this is a violation of their laws they will have to explain it in court. And in support of that, they will stand by it if they lose by paying all of the fees.
We'll see how it turns out. The most recent is a ... (
show quote)
Here is the thing on discrimination. The bakers did not refuse " to make or sell them a cake" they would have sold them a birthday cake, or a cake that does not go against their religious convictions. I promise you this, had Hillary been elected the homosexual community would get everything they want, with her selecting Supreme Court Judges. Thank God Almighty that she lost.
byronglimish wrote:
It's just as easy for the L**T'S to go somewhere else, as you stated under the Constitution both sides have a undeniable right to not want to do business or anything else in support of each sides position...the very common rule in business is "we reserve the right to refuse business to anyone".... that's so some pampered brat or brats can't come in and run roughshod over the proprietor...and courtesy used to be, the rejects leave...
"Rejects", really...really?
We'll see how the court weighs in, if you don't like the decision try opening a business that rejects, "rejects".
Kazudy wrote:
Here is the thing on discrimination. The bakers did not refuse " to make or sell them a cake" they would have sold them a birthday cake, or a cake that does not go against their religious convictions. I promise you this, had Hillary been elected the homosexual community would get everything they want, with her selecting Supreme Court Judges. Thank God Almighty that she lost.
I think the homosexual community got..as you say..."..everything they want(ed)...", that is the rights they are warranted by being a citizen.
Your ilk only perceives what?, that you would have been "forced" into a homosexual union. Why don't you care about any else's rights?
eagleye13 wrote:
"See insults that’s all you have" - Airforceone
Nope; but I must have some fun also with time wasters.
Again you’re afraid to post anything only insults. You can’t justify Pedaphile’s so you insult, you can’t justify Trump sexual abuse so you insult, you can’t justify Trump middle class tax cut so you insult, you can’t justify Trump crime family connection to Russia so you use f**e news.
It’s easy for republicans just deny blame f**e news and when all else fails blame Clinton
Airforceone wrote:
Again you’re afraid to post anything only insults. You can’t justify Pedaphile’s so you insult, you can’t justify Trump sexual abuse so you insult, you can’t justify Trump middle class tax cut so you insult, you can’t justify Trump crime family connection to Russia so you use f**e news.
It’s easy for republicans just deny blame f**e news and when all else fails blame Clinton
Airhead; your ignorance and hypocrisy is just to much to address. It has been many times already.
For starters; go after the rapist, Bill Clinton, and his enabler wife.
The Dead list would be another thing for you to consider. Over 50 such victims.
Dummy Boy wrote:
"Rejects", really...really?
We'll see how the court weighs in, if you don't like the decision try opening a business that rejects, "rejects".
Yeah like a basketball gets rejected but faster.. refused business is over very quickly in a civilized society..no means no, you know??
byronglimish wrote:
You know, some l*****t's are the biggest hypocrites and h**ers the world has ever seen...and you support this theory with sound evidence...
What the hell are you talking about. Republicans make up the KKK, White Supremist, Neo N**ies and White evangelicals. You h**e anybody that’s not fat, White, rich, r****t, Pedaphile’s, Sex molestors, and practicing incest. (THATS THE NEW REPUBLICAN PARTY)
PoppaGringo wrote:
Not only are you dumb, but profoundly stupid, for which there is no cure. So just keep trolling for your own amusement.
Just keep insulting you’re ignorance is showing more and more with you’re insults.
Airforceone wrote:
What the hell are you talking about. Republicans make up the KKK, White Supremist, Neo N**ies and White evangelicals. You h**e anybody that’s not fat, White, rich, r****t, Pedaphile’s, Sex molestors, and practicing incest. (THATS THE NEW REPUBLICAN PARTY)
Lay off the found in the trash can wine...I mean, I hope you're not sober while spewing such vomit...
Airforceone wrote:
What the hell are you talking about. Republicans make up the KKK, White Supremist, Neo N**ies and White evangelicals. You h**e anybody that’s not fat, White, rich, r****t, Pedaphile’s, Sex molestors, and practicing incest. (THATS THE NEW REPUBLICAN PARTY)
As per usual, you have it bassackwards. You definitely referenced the new Democrats aka Progressive L*****ts. Or, Democratic Socialists, if you prefer.
byronglimish wrote:
Lay off the found in the trash can wine...I mean, I hope you're not sober while spewing such vomit...
Okay Per Trump White Supremist and Neo N**ies are good people. Trump Quote:
Trump came out in support of a Pedaphile Roy Moore
Evangelicals also supported Roy the Pedaphile and we all know Trump is a serial molestor he has been his whole life. Evangelical’s are the major cause of incest. These are very very sick people
Airforceone wrote:
Okay Per Trump White Supremist and Neo N**ies are good people. Trump Quote:
Trump came out in support of a Pedaphile Roy Moore
Evangelicals also supported Roy the Pedaphile and we all know Trump is a serial molestor he has been his whole life. Evangelical’s are the major cause of incest. These are very very sick people
When did Moore become a p*******e? Who did Trump molest?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.