The Dutchman wrote:
What will the f*****t gay lobby say now?
Governor of New Mexico, Susana Martinez, has been told by her gay hairdresser that he will no longer be working on her coif. It seems that her hairdresser, Mr. Antonio Darden, does not appreciate the Governors stance on homosexuality and gay marriage. Because of this he will no longer cut her hair.
Darden told a local news station that he cut the governors hair three times, but wont do it again as long as she continues to oppose gay marriage.
The governors aides called not too long ago, wanting another appointment to come in, he told KOB-TV. Because of her stances and her views on this, I told her aides no. They called the next day, asking if Id changed my mind about taking the governor in and I said no.
Its just e******y, dignity for everyone, he said. Everybody should be allowed the right to be together.
Gov Martinez: Thats interesting. I think Mr. Darden is well within his rights to refuse service to anyone he chooses but given the recent spate of lawsuits against Christian business owners for not serving at gay weddings it seems like the outcry from the liberal community should be immediate. Theyve been the ones saying that Christians refusal to perform at gay weddings amounted to a new kind of Jim Crow so wouldnt this be similar?
The fact is that the gay lobby and the liberal community have overplayed their hand. They have been refusing service (and worse) to conservatives FOR YEARS. Whether the issue has been homosexuality, immigration, a******n, etc. they have always found reasons to marginalize and attack us. Now that Christians have turned the tables and refused to perform at gay weddings, the gay lobby has gotten litigious.
For years (especially in 80s movies about the beach) we were told No Shoes, No Shirt, No Service and we all assumed that businesspeople had the right to refuse service to anyone they didnt want to serve. In years past we also understood the free market better and knew that for the free market to operate fairly and justly, both parties had to CHOOSE to be part of the t***saction.
Forcing business owners to serve everyone no matter what is just as f*****t and despotic as the government saying that some people CANT be served.
Apparently, liberals are now openly embracing f*****m.
What will the f*****t gay lobby say now? br br G... (
show quote)
I could attend to your argument better if your language was more precise: regardless of the fact that I don't agree with you.