kankune Loc: Iowa

This isn't about how a t*********r child feels....this is about politics..If the progressives are so worried about t*********r children using the bathroom of the g****r that they feel like, then why can't they make a bathroom for just t*********rs??
Problem solved. I'm all about who ever they want to be...but don't force that attitude and way of thinking on the MAJORITY OF THE CHILDREN!!!

PARENTS REPUDIATE G****R INDOCTRINATION IN SCHOOL Sue to prevent mixing boys, girls who say they are boys Published: 2 hours ago

image: http://mobile.wnd.com/files/2012/04/Locker32.jpg

WASHINGTON – Americans are fed up with public school curricula that incorporate g****r ideology in the name of civil rights and are fighting legal battles across the country to end the indoctrination.

Parents in Portland, Oregon, filed a federal lawsuit to reverse a Dallas School District policy allowing a b********l f****e to use the bathroom and locker room for males.

Allowing the 16-year old t*********r female, Elliot Yoder, to use the boys’ facilities violates the civil rights of the majority of students who are not t*********r, the lawsuit argues.

Two years ago, Yoder requested to change her clothes before gym class in the boys’ locker room because other students noticed when she left to change in the g****r-neutral facility, which was inconveniently located two floors away.

The Dallas district accommodated her request, igniting parents to protest at a school board meeting.

The attorney representing the parents, Herb Grey, argues boys are embarrassed to get undressed in front of b********l f****es and that it is unfair to make the majority of students feel uncomfortable to satisfy the demands of a small minority.

See what American education has become, in “Crimes of the Educators: How Utopians Are Using Government Schools to Destroy America’s Children.”

“The key to this whole thing is not just the privacy and the rights of just one student,” Grey explained. “It’s the rights of all the students and their parents, and you can’t interpret federal law and state law and impose it on everyone else and say you’re accommodating everyone — because you’re not accommodating everyone.”

The American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon and the group Basic Rights held a news conference Thursday, condemning the parents’ lawsuit.

“The case targets t*********r youth for simply existing and seeking an education,” said Mat dos Santos, legal director for ACLU Oregon. “This lawsuit is senseless and cruel, but it is not a meaningful threat to the right of t*********r students in Oregon.”

The Oregon Department of Education and Oregon Gov. Kate Brown are named in the lawsuit because the state guidelines issued in 2016 specify which districts are required to do to accommodate t*********r students.

The guidelines are not the law but were implemented after the Obama administration issued a guidance memorandum reinterpreting Title IX of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to extend to t*********r students.

That guidance later was reversed by the Trump administration.

The lawsuit also names the Department of Education and Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos.

Meanwhile, students in grades K-5 in Seattle will be assigned books and short lessons that teach the new g****r ideology according to updated state health education requirements.

“For kindergarten, there’s a book called ‘Introducing Teddy.’ In it, a bear named Thomas is sad and finally tells a friend, ‘I’m a girl teddy, not a boy teddy.’ Thomas asks to be called Tilly instead. The friend, Errol, says that he doesn’t care and that ‘what matters is that you are my friend,'” reports public radio station KNKX.

Numerous court opinions on t*********r rights have interpreted Title IX protections as extending to t*********r students.

The Portland lawsuit is similar to a suit filed in Palatine, Illinois, in which U.S. Magistrate Judge Jeffery Gilbert sided against children and parents demanding their children’s privacy.

Gilbert ruled last October that high school students “do not have a constitutional right not to share restrooms or locker rooms with t*********r students whose sex assigned at birth is different than theirs.”

See what American education has become, in “Crimes of the Educators: How Utopians Are Using Government Schools to Destroy America’s Children.”




http://mobile.wnd.com/2017/11/parents-repudiate-g****r-indoctrination-in-schools/#buuRHlYfOOG0XzRQ.99

E

Personally I've written about this many times including to the school board in Palatine that you mentioned. The reasons are many, but until someone has g****r reassignment surgery, and looks virtually indistinguishable from the sex they want to be, they have no right to force themselves on others who are what they were born as. And even then, it is not a right but, can only be a voluntary accommodation. It is totally without logic. Yes, schools should help a vulnerable student with separate facilities. That argument that the other students will see them go elsewhere to pee or change is ridiculous. If you are changing in front of them, they know who and what you are, so there can't be any harm in going to a private room. If one totally natural person objects to this invasion, anywhere, any time, it is wrong

kankune Loc: Iowa

Totally agree E.....

Patsaco1

When is this insanity going to stop!!! It was so much easier in the 50's. A girl was a girl and a boy was a boy...PERIOD!
This is madness! Now I just read that in my state of Maine, the liberals are taking this issue to the school board in Portland in the near future. Instead of teaching children what they NEED to learn, they teach them about g****r issues. No wonder they can't read or write. This is not education, this is brainwashing!!

Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX

There is a site on YT called "Now You See TV"... it had a man from Australia on who explains all this perversion really well... it's hard to watch and might make you sick but you will understand this topic much much better after watching it. I think the title of the show was "Disturbing" dated about two days ago. It runs 2:19:40. If there are any lawyers or activist here, and I know there are, he gives case numbers, dates, time, names and places for everything he states, both in Australia and America.

kankune Loc: Iowa

The whole thing is totally sick Peewee. It hasn't come here yet, and it better not. Parents in my town, I'm afraid ...would burn down the school before they would let something like that happen to our children....Im going to watch the vid. Thank you.

Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX

Well, it's just what they do... they are sick perverts who are serving Satan, even if they don't know it.

Gatsby

U.S. Magistrate Judge Jeffery Gilbert appears to have really stepped in it this time.

In his statement that; students do not have a constitutional right not to share restrooms or locker rooms with "t*********r" students,

he appears to have granted a special catagory of "rights" (the right to use the facilities of their choice)

exclusively to a small one small minority of students.

If t*********r students have the "right" to use the restrooms and locker rooms of their choice,

how can such a "right" be denied to the majority?

Under this perverted ruling, shouldn't all restrooms and locker rooms in the nation mandated to be unisex?

kankune Loc: Iowa

I believe they DO have a constitutional right. It's called the right of privacy....

E

Have to agree with you totally. While U.S. Magistrate Judge Jeffery Gilbert may have declared "students do not have a constitutional right not to share restrooms or locker rooms with "t*********r" students," The opposite is also true. T*********r students do not have a constitutional right to share restrooms or locker rooms with students of another biological sex. To make that plain, he is l*****t while we are rightists. We are right while he is wrong. XX does not equal XY no matter how much you butcher up or drug up or indoctrinate a human body. Got that now judgie. And a special message to the judge. F. O.

kankune Loc: Iowa