One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Al Gore Sued by 30,000 Scientists for G****l W*****g Fraud Video
Page <prev 2 of 2
Apr 12, 2013 18:22:44   #
Slingblade68 Loc: Charleston SC
 
I brought this whole (Going Green Agenda) to light 6 months ago. On a radio program. I contacted a NASA representative to see if they would come corroborate Dr Mann from Penn State University and his Hockey stick theory. They declined my invitation. I said there was not enough Quantitative , Qualitative , Empirical evidence to back up his Theory. Especially, considering the (fact) that there were significant flaws and voids in his research. The weather is cyclical just like the stock Market. It has Ebbs and Flow. Peaks and Valleys. I found it convenient that Dr Manns theory was being questioned by hundreds of other scientist throughout the world. My biggest concern was Al (Going Green Gore) Based his entire (Crockumentary on the Hockey stick theory). Then sells his stake in the Media company to Al Gezeera. One of the Largest Oil producers in the world. Seriously, Something smells like fish. And it's not Al's breath.
Have you noticed that (G****l W*****g ) is not mentioned anymore.. Now it's (C*****e C****e). Don't misunderstand me. I am all for being a responsible steward of the Planet. But Man Made G****l W*****g is a Farce. Like everything else that involves a scandal, in this universe. Just follow the Money. This is another perfect example of Government intervention in the Market place where it has no responsibility being. Light Bulbs, Toilets, Cars, Again, I don't even have to see the Video. This is much deeper than Al Gore.
He was the ill-informed fabricator of a (Convenient Lie).
A convenient lie that made him, and a lot of other companies Rich. As a matter of fact it still is...Now everyone reading this Go hug a Frigging Tree:)

Reply
Apr 12, 2013 18:27:49   #
Slingblade68 Loc: Charleston SC
 
TheChardo wrote:
Not true....Do you people fact check anything before you spout off? http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100729214718AAMg6oH


Fact check is an understatement on my part. I have researched this Lie for over a year. I don't need to post a Web site or Video to reinforce the facts I have. I'll gladly provide same. In time , on my schedule. I wasn't paid to research it, and I have spent endless hours doing just that.

Reply
Apr 13, 2013 13:56:05   #
Cedarstrip Loc: Michigan
 
Slingblade68 wrote:
Fact check is an understatement on my part. I have researched this Lie for over a year. I don't need to post a Web site or Video to reinforce the facts I have. I'll gladly provide same. In time , on my schedule. I wasn't paid to research it, and I have spent endless hours doing just that.


I too have spent considerable time researching this warming thing. I was in the weather service in the Air Force (just an "observer", not a meteorologist), but it gave me an abiding interest in the field. This will someday be a textbook example of mass delusion and the folly of agenda based science.

I just found another item for Chardo and others who want fact checking. This from a federally financed study: G****l w*****g did not cause last years drought
http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2013/04/12/study-reveals-global-warming-not-to-blame-for-last-years-crippling-drought/

Another myth shot down.

Reply
 
 
Apr 13, 2013 15:00:01   #
Slingblade68 Loc: Charleston SC
 
Cedarstrip wrote:
I too have spent considerable time researching this warming thing. I was in the weather service in the Air Force (just an "observer", not a meteorologist), but it gave me an abiding interest in the field. This will someday be a textbook example of mass delusion and the folly of agenda based science.

I just found another item for Chardo and others who want fact checking. This from a federally financed study: G****l w*****g did not cause last years drought
http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2013/04/12/study-reveals-global-warming-not-to-blame-for-last-years-crippling-drought/

Another myth shot down.
I too have spent considerable time researching thi... (show quote)


Yes, quite unsettling when you consider the amount of erroneous information (Spoon fed to the Masses) and they bought it. Hook , Line and sinker. I never believed a frigging word of it. What I find even more compelling is when the scientific community determines what is to be labeled endangered. Ie Polar Bears population has steadily increased. I think the numbers where ten fold in that same number of years. I don't have the data directly in front of me. However, Now they have them on that list.. Why, because they originally blamed their demise on "G****l W*****g". But wait, there population has increased. So why put them on the list now? Why weren't they put on the list when their population was ten times less...
I have spent endless hours trying to have an interview with the People at NASA that rubber stamped this blatant "G****l W*****g" fraud. As I previously stated. The weather is Cyclical, furthermore, to blame this warming on Man (That would be evil rich Americans) I have looked at the "Who's Who" at the United Nations. You would be surprised how many Chinese Scientist "Specializing in G****l w*****g" are registered as such.
Where is the AP on this Topic, or CNN<ABC<CBS> all the other major News outlets. You remember Journalists who are supposed to be (Objectively informing the American people) .
I just came in from a long walk in the New England woods, Turkeys everywhere, a few Moose tracks , couple of Beautiful Hawks. As I previously stated I am all for preserving the environment. However, Fly across this Country (Open space ) and Forrest abound. The tree huggers out there can "Cling to their Fabricated , erroneous information." Hell, even convince themselves that somehow putting the Pipeline through will disrupt the mating ritual of the one eyed newt. These lobbyist and environmental groups need a frigging wake up call from mother nature. A good old fashioned Gas crunch , might help. Or better yet. See how many could actually survive without Bottled water and their I-Phone. Again , Endless hours of research on The EPA and these groups, that are sometimes funded by the EPA . It's shocking what I uncovered. Will the Mass Media provide this information. Hell no. It would crush their Advertisers and as far as NPR is concerned . They would lose 500 million a year in Government Money.

Reply
Apr 13, 2013 15:18:41   #
Slingblade68 Loc: Charleston SC
 
TheChardo wrote:
Not true....Do you people fact check anything before you spout off? http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100729214718AAMg6oH


Richard-
Why the incessant need to provide a video or web site to view. Just come clean and Provide the people with the facts. I have researched this. Endless hours. Look I likened it to "Lance Armstrong" and "Jo Pa" . Hell, it broke my heart to find out how what happened to those two. However, It is the t***h. As disheartening as it may be. Dr Mann has so many holes in his "Theory" that someone should have put his "theory" in Water a long time ago. There are over 400 years he can't account for in his Frigging Data. Not to mention the Fact. That Science is not perfect. There are variables that Change. His whole thesis was built on "Man Made G****l W*****g" . Now Penn State doesn't need anymore "Bad Publicity" . Perhaps that is why the Media is keeping it's mouth shut.. I seriously doubt that. They would be chomping at the Bit to take down another American Icon.. Provided it wasn't part of the (Omnipotent ones) Going Green Agenda.....I have three Monkeys you might want to talk too:)

Reply
Apr 22, 2013 09:55:24   #
Cedarstrip Loc: Michigan
 
"G****l W*****g Update"
Two more recent news events of interest to "g****l w*****g' advocates and deniers.

New data falsifies basis of man-made g****l w*****g alarm, shows water vapor feedback is negative
Physicist Clive Best has analyzed the latest NASA satellite and radiosonde data to find that global water vapor has declined despite the consensus belief among climate scientists that it would rise in response to man-made carbon dioxide. Dire predictions of g****l w*****g all rely on positive feedback from water vapor. Source: http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2013/04/new-data-falsifies-basis-of-man-made.html
(Water vapor is a stronger greenhouse gas than CO2.)

Western Washington Univ. Professor under attack for questioning consensus science

In 1999, NASA data showed the 1930s were the hottest decade of the century and 1936 the hottest year. In 2012, NASA subtracted temperatures from the 1930s data and added to recent temperatures to claim that recent years were "unprecedented and the warmest ever recorded." Check NASA data tampering at http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/data-tampering-at-ushcngiss/. This lies behind all of the false claims that recent g****l w*****g is "unprecedented."

The authors claim a "vast consensus of the science community." However, 31,487 U.S. scientists (including 9,000 with doctorates) with degrees in atmospheric, Earth sciences, physics, chemistry, biology and computer science have signed a statement that reads: "There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing, or will in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate." Check names and expertise at http://www.petitionproject.org/

Read more here: http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2013/04/14/2958336/easterbrook-disputes-wwu-faculty.html#storylink=misearch#storylink=cpy#storylink=cpy

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.