Tgards79 wrote:
You are a strange dude. I'm sorry that you are so confused by this discussion.
If you regard someone who despises garbage, filth and smut as strange, then you should not be allowed in normal society without a muzzle, chains and handcuffs!
Loki wrote:
They don't wish to appear in public. Their word should be sufficient.
Yep! They told me about it, too.
Tgards79 wrote:
No, Roy Moore is. That is what he is accused of doing -- to teenage girls.
And? There's not the slightest chance this isn't a snow job? Right.
BigMike wrote:
And? There's not the slightest chance this isn't a snow job? Right.
There is a slight chance, of course. That's what Alabama v**ers have to decide. There is not time for a trial or for all the facts to come out, so you have to use your own brains. He may be innocent or he may be guilty....you have to figure that out for yourself.
BigMike wrote:
And? There's not the slightest chance this isn't a snow job? Right.
That yearbook entry with the sleazy message purportedly from Moore has been judged a forged signature. Another c*******t libtoid house of cards comes tumbling down.
SGM B
Loc: TEXAS but live in Alabama now
Tgards79 wrote:
There is a slight chance, of course. That's what Alabama v**ers have to decide. There is not time for a trial or for all the facts to come out, so you have to use your own brains. He may be innocent or he may be guilty....you have to figure that out for yourself.
I already have, I will be v****g for Judge Roy Moore on 12 Dec - my conscience is clear in the matter and unlike the women who may, or may not, be telling the t***h, I have no problem sleeping at night.
Tgards79 wrote:
Go ahead, send your pervert to the Senate, if that is who you want to represent you to the nation.
Hey! That is not what I said. I just think the timing is too coincidental. Also, why are people suddenly so willing to find someone guilty until they prove they're innocent. By the way, did you v**e -- twice -- for Slick Willy. Did he represent you? How about Kennedy?
Kevyn wrote:
When a politician molests children and is called out for it, it is not called a charactor assassination it’s called political suicide.
kevyn: You need to stop convicting steadfast individuals and work on you're own Sodom & Gomorrah issues!
Carol Kelly wrote:
No, but I do believe that he's in a same sex marriage and that is why he fought so hard to "change " America. Among other things. Look at how the L***Q have grown in influence. And my standard is the law. In England, you are guilty til proven innocent.
We use their law of precedent, but here we are innocent until proven guilty. That's the way it should be. If I'm accused wrongly, I hope someone remembers that and I have a chance. Did I answer your question? Where do you find fault with me on this?
No, but I do believe that he's in a same sex marri... (
show quote)
I believe you are incorrect on several of your declarations, my friend.
But I will comment only on your callout about English law, which is wrong.
You may be referring to a botched pamphlet that seemed to indicate otherwise, but like in the U.S. one is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/ministry-of-justice-gets-law-terribly-wrong-in-its-guide-to-courts-10016086.html
Loki wrote:
They don't wish to appear in public. Their word should be sufficient.
I know a
bunch of greasy Bill's victims appeared on camera. It didn't go well for them.
McConnell is behind this crap. I suggest every red blooded American contribute to whoever opposes the old
vampire.I wonder when his term is up and how much t*****rous, selfish bulls**t he'll get away with in the meantime.
Tgards79 wrote:
There is a slight chance, of course. That's what Alabama v**ers have to decide. There is not time for a trial or for all the facts to come out, so you have to use your own brains. He may be innocent or he may be guilty....you have to figure that out for yourself.
True that...and I'm not an Alabaman. Perspective is always good to maintain.
It's likely they won't believe this and they're going to blame McConnell no matter what Moore does.
SGM B wrote:
I already have, I will be v****g for Judge Roy Moore on 12 Dec - my conscience is clear in the matter and unlike the women who may, or may not, be telling the t***h, I have no problem sleeping at night.
If he wins and gets in trouble later who gets to appoint a temp? Just curious...NV may be different.
Now, it's starting to make sense of what I just learned and suspected:
It appears to be about Power, control and who pulls the strings of, by and for the people.
The established politicians want Luther Strange to remain in the Senate. Senator Strange is no stranger to Washington DC; he's an Ex-Lobbyist Who Thrived in the nation's cesspool of Special Interest. He's entrenched and has been rubbing elbows with the Elites for years.
McConnell is calling for a write in v**e for Luther Strange; and if he's not elected, they will welcome another contender, Democrat candidate Doug Jones. Doug Jones will keep the cesspool intact.
Judge Moore only has a fraction of the money as his opponents, Luther Strange or Democrat candidate Doug Jones. It's difficult to fight without funds and within a restricted time.
McConnell and his cronies threaten to withhold the Senate Seat if he's elected by the people of Alabama. This will discourage v**ers from electing Judge Moore.
Ultimately, who controls the people, the elites or the people?
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/09/us/politics/luther-strange-senate-jeff-sessions-alabama.html
jSmitty45
Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana
Heard this morning, he and his wife are suing a news network over the accusations. I still think the women were paid well to accuse him. If he is guilty, shame on him, but when you see these women having to read, and stumble over the words tells me something isn't right here. I want proof. Trying to destroy him and his family is what the lefties do best.
May God help him get through this, and let the true story be told.
Carol, For G-ds sakes, the man was banned from a mall for bothering teen girls. If there ever was a perv hypocrite, it was Moore!
Carol Kelly wrote:
Here goes another character assassinated by the left. Why can't people wait for proof of guilt? This one was really dumb. The evidence against the accusers was significant.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.