thebigp

47jh.,b43
In a break with the Clinton-loving American establishment media, the UK’s Daily Mail recently detailed how Marc Elias, a Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer who launched what would become known as the anti-Trump “dirty dossier” denied involvement in the project for a year, even as reporters pressed him for information.
But a pair of New York Times reporters said Tuesday night on Twitter that Elias and others involved had lied about their ties to the arrangement.
“Folks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year,” Times reporter Maggie Haberman tweeted after The Washington Post linked the dossier to Elias and his law firm Perkins Coie.
Kenneth Vogel, another Times journalist, tweeted: 'When I tried to report this story, Clinton campaign lawyer @marceelias pushed back vigorously, saying "You (or your sources) are wrong".'
This kind of lying has become par for the course in Washington, but it is especially prevalent about anything that involves the Clintons.
The Uranium One scandal that has broken wide open this week isn’t new – it goes back to 2010 – and the relationship between foreign government contributions to the Clinton Foundation, Bill Clinton’s speaking fees and policy-making by Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State were all detailed in Peter Schweizer's book “Clinton Cash.”
As our friend Matt Boyle put it in his 2016 coverage of Peter Schweizer’s appearance on ABC News’ This Week with George Stephanopoulosabc,
During the show’s roundtable panel after “Clinton Cash” author Peter Schweizer appeared for a lengthy interview, Stephanopoulos teamed with Democratic strategist Donna Brazile in an attempt to discredit Schweizer.
This, by the way, is the same Donna Brazile who lied about trying to tilt the Democratic primaries to Hillary Clinton and lied about feeding debate questions to the Clinton campaign.
Brazile admitted she hadn’t read “Clinton Cash.” Yet, without having read it, she proceeded to drop a series of rhetorical attacks on Schweizer. She also offered the Clinton campaign advice on how to attempt to get past Clinton Cash.
“You had a sitting Secretary of State [husband] who radically increased his speech fees and there is a whole series of dots on the wall now where people gave millions of dollars who oh, by the way, happened to get taken care of by the State Department. You raised a good standard.
“And of course, having been on the Watergate Committee, she knew exactly what to do. She erased 33,000 emails. Richard Nixon only erased 18 minutes. So, you’re going to have a prima facie case that any jury would look at…”
Stephanopoulos and Brazile flatly refused to countenance any notion that what Hillary and Bill Clinton did was not just potentially illegal or presented a prima fascia appearance of illegality; they refused to even accept that it was wrong for a government official to accept money from a foreign government.
To his great credit Gingrich continued to press the point. “My point is they took money from foreign governments while she was Secretary of State—that is clearly illegal,” Gingrich said. “This is not about politics. It’s illegal. It’s dangerous to America to have foreign governments get in the habit of bribing people who happen to be the husband of the Secretary of State or next president of the United States.”
“I think there’s a very simple case here—the Constitution says you can’t take this stuff, we have federal laws that say you can’t take this stuff,” Gingrich said. “If this was any person but Hillary Clinton, they’d be under indictment right now for a clearly straightforward problem.”
Fast forward to 2017, House Republicans announced on Tuesday that the House Oversight Committee will investigate how the Obama administration’s Justice Department handled the deal that gave Russia control over 20 percent of the U.S. uranium supply.
Parroting the same tactics Democrats used when these allegations surfaced in “Clinton Cash” back in 2016, Democrats today were quick to charge that the GOP-led probes were “designed to distract attention” from the various investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 e******n, including alleged ties between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin.
The Uranium One deal took the cooperation of dozens of high-level Democratic appointees, the acquiescence of the FBI and various intelligence agencies, and then the active interference of the FBI and Obama Justice Department to cover up the bribery and pay-to-play by stopping the informant from testifying.
Now, as far as we can tell, as of today none of have come out publicly and said the conduct of Bill and Hillary Clinton documented by Peter Schweizer in “Clinton Cash,” and now apparently confirmed by an FBI informant is wrong, regardless of whether it proves to be illegal.
Democrats have become so corrupted by Hillary and Bill Clinton that the ability to speak for the t***h and reject what Diana West calls “normalizing the a******l” has died. Until Democrats rid themselves of the Clintons, and stop covering for them, the Democratic Party cannot be considered a legitimate political party; it is merely one cog in a vast conspiracy to justify and cover up the Clintons' crimes.
source-conservative hq, uk daily, marcnelais, nyt, wash post, kenneth vogel, times, matt boyle,

atomikmom Loc: Burien, Washington

Y'all sure got that Right!!!!That's the Clinton's Way!!!!. They hide behind the t***h!!!!.