proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

No ifs ands or buts about!!! They have committed the biggest crime of all..They lied to us about selling 20% of uranium1 to our biggest enemies and got paid for it $10 million Not only that her husband got paid $ 500.000 for speech in Moscow,,,We have prove, who is going to sing like a canary hopefully very very soon!!! And i also wonder how did CNN got this news about charges, when its supposed to be big secret .Somebody leaked it again!!....And what if its a big h**x to divert attention from Clintons because they are in big trouble!!!

vernon

MY PRESIDENT IS GOING NOWHERE!

emarine

the Clintons are history... what difference do they make but a diversion from the big guy in the hot seat now... hopefully all this bickering won't lead to our own demise ...

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

I wish she was history, but she keeps commenting.Its not a diversion, she and dems keep accusing our President of exactly the same thing that they been doing their whole career ..Dont you care that they lied about 20% of our uranium to Russians???

Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas

It all boils down to whose got the best lawyers.

I'm sure that Trump has got a few aces up his sleeve.

Its gonna be an interesting showdown.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

I v**ed for Trump because I thought that Hillary was too corrupt to be president. Am I a bigot?

James Maivald, studied at University of Illinois at Chicago
Answered Oct 23
I dont know why you would be a bigot. But you certainly are uninformed or just stupid. The information regarding Trump and Clinton was easily available to anyone before the e******n and yet you still v**ed for a known thief, r****t, homophobe and misogynist but thought that a woman who had been constantly investigated for 25 years and never indicted or even charged with a crime was too corrupt.

You v**ed for a man who had at least 3 bankruptcies and hundreds of lawsuits from contractors he stiffed for payment! You v**ed for a man who divorced two of his previous wives and c***ted on all of them.

On the other hand, Hillary was a successful first lady, senator and secretary of state. As senator and secretary of state she received universal plaudits from all side, even Republicans.

You dont have to like your president. You dont have to have a beer with your president. But you should be able to know that your president can do the job they were elected to.

debeda

Armageddun Loc: The show me state

Beware of anyone who uses fine print to make a point. hehehehehhehhehehehehe

Gener

And yet it is very likely they will get off scot free. Nobody cares about the Clinton's because they are part of the cartel and have very powerful friends. Trump is not likely to be so likely. They will attach something to him true or false and get rid of him. Do I think Trump is a good guy? Not really, but he is way better than either Clinton, and even if a criminal he is a good angel compared to the Clinton's. But of course the liberals will never believe that.

Airforceone

They never lied about the Uranium one sale. If you got offered $500,000 to speak would you say no.

kankune Loc: Iowa

Geeze you think they gave him 500,000 because he was so popular with them??
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Armageddun Loc: The show me state

Good point.

Airforceone

Would you say no

debeda

Ya know this is an argument I ONLY hear repeatedly from lefty loons. NO I WOULDN'T ROLL OVER FOR GRAFT AND CORRUPTION. NO, IN A POSITION OF RESPONSIBILITY I WOULDN'T ROLL OVER FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND NO I WOULDN'T SELL NATIONAL SECURITY DOWN THE RIVER FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND POWER. But this is always what l*****ts say when you point out the corruption of Obama, HRC, BC, COMEY, MUELLER, HOLDER, LYNCH ETC ETC AD NAUSEUM. It's always "Well given the opportunity you would too." Can't express what a d********g argument that is. Are we truly that morally bereft?

kankune Loc: Iowa

You're right. I'd say no. They paid him that money because they wanted something in return and they got it!