mwdegutis Loc: Illinois

Do you think that the lamestream media will report this in this light?

Brittany Hughes ~ October. 25. 2017
The ACLU’s Jane Doe, a 17-year-old i*****l a***n who’d crossed the border unlawfully and is being held at a federal detention facility in lieu of a sponsor, obtained an a******n early Wednesday morning after a court ruled in favor of her pro-a******n lawyers.

And of course, the pro-“choice” crowd praised the child's fate as a celebratory moment, stopping just shy of physically dancing around a sacrificial altar like some sick and twisted death cult.

Ok. I'll bite. If a******n really is no big deal, if deliberately terminating the life of a developing child is a “right” that we shouldn’t think twice about, if it's really "justice," then let’s talk about what really happened to Jane’s baby. Let's face the t***h with facts instead of hashtags.

For the sake of argument (because they’ll never tell us, that would damage the narrative) let’s assume Jane's baby was a girl. Here's a good idea of what Jane’s baby looked like at 16 weeks:



According to WebMD, Jane’s baby had had a heartbeat for about three months, and measurable brain activity for longer than that. She already had well-developed fingers and toes, eyelashes and fingernails. She could stretch. She could yawn. She could even suck her thumb and make facial expressions. At about 6 inches long, she would have already had a functioning nervous system and fully developed reproductive organs of her own.

Given she was already well into her second trimester, it’s likely Jane Doe underwent what’s called a dilation and evacuation a******n. In this method, Jane would have been given a drug called misoprostol several hours beforehand to help soften her cervix, which the a******nist then manually forced open using a device called an osmotic dilator.

A hollow tube was then injected into Jane’s womb to literally vacuum out her baby. The larger pieces that won't fit in the tube were pulled out with forceps in bloody chunks, all without anesthesia for the child. If the a******nist's done his job right, he left nothing behind. He would then have used a curved blade to scrape out the inside of Jane’s uterus, a dangerous procedure that carries the risk of internal scarring and possible infertility.

The baby's dismembered body would've been disposed of as biological waste, and Jane would have left the clinic the mother of a dead child.

Of course, it’s also possible Jane underwent a medical a******n using a combination of a******n-inducing drugs, a method sometimes used in the early stages of the second trimester. It’s much less likely given her circumstances, living situation, and how far along she was, but let’s consider the possibility anyway.

If this is the case, then it’s likely that Jane hasn’t yet completed the two-day medical a******n process. In this scenario, here’s what’s happening right now.
Ad Feedback

Under this method, the drug mifepristone was most probably administered to her vaginally by an a******nist at the clinic, though it’s possible she took it by mouth. Also known as RU-486, here’s what mifepristone does to a developing preborn baby:

RU-486 is an artificial steroid that interferes with the action of progesterone, a hormone crucial to the early progress of pregnancy. Progesterone stimulates the increased development of the uterine lining, which nourishes the developing child. It also suppresses normal uterine contractions, which could dislodge the child implanted and growing on the wall of the mother’s womb.

This a******n-inducing procedure RU-486 fills the chemical receptor sites normally reserved for progesterone and blocks the progesterone signal. Failing to receive that signal, a woman’s body shuts down the pr********n of the uterus and initiates the menstrual process.

The pre-born child, deprived of necessary nutrients, starves to death.

Jane’s baby’s heart, which has been beating for the past three months, will eventually stop.

In this event, it’s likely the a******n clinic has already sent Jane back to the detention facility to complete the a******n process in roughly 48 hours using a drug called misoprostol, which will induce premature labor and expel the now-shriveled dead baby a full five months early. She will likely bleed heavily, vomit, and experience quite a lot of pain. She may require medical intervention to stop from hemorrhaging.

This method certainly isn’t without its risks. The U.S. National Library of Medicine warns that “irrespective of the medication used for second trimester termination there is a considerable risk of surgical intervention because of vaginal bleeding or incomplete a******n.”

One of these two methods happened this morning in a Texas a******n clinic. A child, with its own unique fingerprints, who could suck her thumb and yawn and make faces, was either starved to death slowly only to be born dead on a bathroom floor, or she was ripped from her mother in pieces. And the ACLU is celebrating it.

That's what they fight for. That's what they call “justice.”

God help those who think it so.

out of the woods Loc: to hell and gone New York State

I was brought to anti a******n rallies in Washington, by my father in the 80s. I was @13. The images of garbage bags full of aborted baby parts never left me. So Thank You for that, it is SO important for people to actually see what a******n means. The pro choice people want the dead baby invisible, just a group of cells, but the reality would give all but the most heinously evil overwhelming revulsion. It is a horrible brutality, on a larger scale then Muslim atrocities. What does this say about our Nation? I shutter to think...

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

How is this anything but barbaric? How can anyone claim they have a heart, let alone a conscience, who can condone such an atrocity, and then applaud themselves for it? How is this civilized? Ancient cultures literally sacrificed their children at their altars, and we shake our heads in disbelief. A demon-god by any other name is just as evil! What have we gained when now the same child-sacrifice is done in the name of "choice"? And then these people want to run our country and call the rest of us who cringe at such evil, backwards!

"Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; who put darkness for light, and light for darkness; who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!" Isaiah 5:20

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Let's just mind our own business and leave BIG govment out of it.

out of the woods Loc: to hell and gone New York State

Amen.

PeterS

So you're telling me it's justice for the government to control the bodies of it's citizens?

Here's a simple question: suppose I am dying, need a kidney, and you are a perfect match. Does the government have a right to force you to give me a kidney or should you only give me one if it is your choice?

The point is: who has a right to control your body in times of life or death--your or the government? Right now you are saying the government does because a cute little fetuses life depends on it. I'm asking you--what is justice???

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

You are making the assumption that an unborn baby is not human. That is your fundamental problem. Would you sacrifice a 1 year old under the same argument?

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

I thought the right wingnuts were all for freedom, liberty,little govment and constitutional rights.

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

Yep, and unborn babies are human.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Do you support birth control?

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

C'mon mwdegutis, how dare you argue scientific facts especially against such august and formidable authorities as tdsrnest, Kevyn and the rest of the progressives who infest this venue?

out of the woods Loc: to hell and gone New York State

We have a problem with brutalty and murder as well. Take a look at an aborted baby and tell me whose rights were infringed upon.

MatthewlovesAyn Loc: Ohio

I struggled with this question most of my adult life. As a libertarian, how could I asked a women to cede control of her body to the government? I searched for a logical, sectarian answer to this question for years. It was several years ago after listening to the two "It's my body/it's murder" sides of the coin, that it was pointed out to me, that if it's the woman's body, take a DNA test of the fetus. It turns out that it isn't the woman's body, but a unique individual.

The last forty-odd years, we have k**led tens of millions of potential assets to the human race. I believe that is the difference between the left and right in this country. The left seems to believe humans are a burden and a blight on the planet. I've heard more than one say the world population should be 250 million souls. They seem to believe in the inability of man to sustain the planet. They know best. I think otherwise.

If you don't want some people reproducing, don't subsidize it. Don't let the government pay for bad behavior. When a young girl gets pregnant these days, Big Brother is there to bail them out (with your tax dollars). Before all these subsidies, unwanted pregnancies were a fraction of what they are now. It is human nature to do that which is rewarded. Like getting pregnant.

On top of everything else, a******n is r****t. There have been 15 million a******ns of b****s since 1973. They are aborted at a much higher rate than w****s or Hispanics. Thank Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood for that. So, my black brethren, when you step into a v****g booth, know that the left doesn't believe in your worth. We on the right want to work with you, sell to you, and buy from you. That's really all we care about.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Here we go again, time for another check of $100 to Planned Parenthood.

boatbob2

Say anything you want,BUT,no matter how you cut it,A******N IS MURDER, And Jesus,Is waiting,to say the last word,GO TO HELL FOREVER.....