crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

Some conservative pundit warned about just this. He said, the deeper they plunge into the supposed Trump-Putin connection, the more likely it is that Hillary & the DNC will become implicated in something worse. It has come true with the Uranium One that Hillary continues to scoff at as nothing.

One OPP Democratic/progressive chronic apologist declared emphatically that the uranium did not leave the USA. Now it's known, it did, through Canada. Where is it now? It can be used for nuclear weapons! The Clinton Foundation and/or the Clintons themselves received about $147 million. What more is necessary? It can not be dismissed.

I make one prediction now. This one will go to the Oval Office. There is no way that Barack H. Obama did not know of this. I can not even remotely imagine that he was not aware of it. And what does that say about him if he wasn't aware of it?

pafret Loc: Northeast

Some conservative pundit warned about just this. He said, the deeper they plunge into the supposed Trump-Putin connection, the more likely it is that Hillary & the DNC will become implicated in something worse. It has come true with the Uranium One that Hillary continues to scoff at as nothing.

One OPP Democratic/progressive chronic apologist declared emphatically that the uranium did not leave the USA. Now it's known, it did, through Canada. Where is it now? It can be used for nuclear weapons! The Clinton Foundation and/or the Clintons themselves received about $147 million. What more is necessary? It can not be dismissed.

I make one prediction now. This one will go to the Oval Office. There is no way that Barack H. Obama did not know of this. I can not even remotely imagine that he was not aware of it. And what does that say about him if he wasn't aware of it?[/quote]


_____________________
Like every other activity of significance during his tenure, "he read it in the newspapers". Let us hope the next news he reads is his indictment.

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

Some conservative pundit warned about just this. He said, the deeper they plunge into the supposed Trump-Putin connection, the more likely it is that Hillary & the DNC will become implicated in something worse. It has come true with the Uranium One that Hillary continues to scoff at as nothing.

One OPP Democratic/progressive chronic apologist declared emphatically that the uranium did not leave the USA. Now it's known, it did, through Canada. Where is it now? It can be used for nuclear weapons! The Clinton Foundation and/or the Clintons themselves received about $147 million. What more is necessary? It can not be dismissed.

I make one prediction now. This one will go to the Oval Office. There is no way that Barack H. Obama did not know of this. I can not even remotely imagine that he was not aware of it. And what does that say about him if he wasn't aware of it?[/quote]



You may have heard of the scandal brewing in Washington. P**********l advisers cutting sweetheart deals with a foreign power, signing million dollar lobbying contracts with that foreign power, bribes being proffered, and the foreign government gained unprecedented access to government agencies and crucial U.S. natural resources? And what if I told you that foreign power was Russia?

Collusion you say? Perhaps. Collusion with Trump? Nope.

I’m talking about a news story that fittingly is coming back from the dead just before Halloween to scare a lot of Democrats, Bill and Hillary Clinton and Obama administration officials. If you want to take a deeper dive on this issue, read the book "Clinton Cash," by Peter Schweizer, president of the Government Accountability Institute. But here are the basics.

A decade ago, a long-time Clinton Foundation donor, Frank Giustra, sold his uranium company to another firm, Uranium One. With that deal, Uranium One now owned uranium mines in the western U.S., including Wyoming, with about 20 percent of U.S. uranium production capacity, and about ten percent of the actual uranium mined in the U.S.

In 2009, Rosatom, Russia’s nuclear agency, took a 17-percent position in Uranium One. A year later, in the summer of 2010, Rosatom bought majority control of the Uranium One, effectively giving the Russian government-controlled entity proprietary access to one-fifth of the U.S. uranium supply.

Consider this: Russia got its generous foothold in the U.S. uranium market in less time than it takes most 16-year-olds to get a driver’s license.

All of this was taking place after years of what could best be categorized as challenging times in U.S.-Russia relations, as Russia attempted to annex Georgia, intimidated Ukraine and threatened the former-captive nations of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia with short-range nuclear weapons. In short, Russia was doing nothing that would indicate it was a country unwilling to build and potentially use nuclear weapons; the signs of aggression were everywhere.

Now there is a process that the U.S. government uses to ensure that any business deal that may include significant national security issues is given serious, in-depth and careful review and approval. That review is run through the Treasury Department’s Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CIFIUS), which includes representatives from Homeland Security, Commerce, Defense, Energy, Justice, and State, as well as the U.S. trade representative and director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, and National Security Council. In addition, the director of national intelligence also has input to the review.

CIFIUS and Congressional reviews k**led deals like the Rosatom purchase before. In 2006 it helped k**l the deal by a Dubai owned company to buy U.S. ports, in part because of the national security risks it presented, and it k**led multiple deals with Chinese companies as well in 2009 and 2010. Yet, between the first week of August 2010 and October 22, 2010, the Obama Administration in expedited time approved the sale of crucial national security resources to Russia by rubber stamping the sale of Uranium One to Rosatom. In 2015, Senator Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, noted the expedited time of the deal's approval in a letter to then Attorney General Loretta Lynch, calling it a deal that was "apparently approved in record speed."

According to most law firms that deal in such matters, CIFIUS reviews involving sensitive national security matters can take up to 120 days. The Rosatom deal took fewer than 90 days. More outrageous: it appears there were no Congressional oversight hearings. Even more outrageous – and puzzling – members of the CIFIUS review board were aware of attempts by Russian government efforts to bribe U.S.-based executives in the U.S. uranium industry at the time this deal was being approved.

This wasn’t simply your typical Clinton back room deal. This was a deal that was reviewed by virtually every senior Obama administration official, many of whom were aware of the Clinton connection, the FBI bribery investigation, and Rosatom’s history.

On October 5th of 2010, Republicans in Congress demanded that the Obama Administration review the Rosatom deal more closely, citing a host of national security issues. For example, one rationale cited by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for approving the deal was that Rosatom did not have an export license to sell or ship the U.S. uranium overseas. But as the Congressional letter noted, Russia’s government-controlled nuclear companies had been sanctioned numerous times for breaking uranium import-export deals, particularly to the countries they aid in building nuclear capacity, such as Iran (yes, Rosatom helped build the Iranian Bushere nuclear plant and trained Iranian nuclear scientists). To paraphrase a pop culture reference Vladamir Putin would appreciate: “An export license? Russia doesn’t need a stinkin’ export license!”

Consider this: Russia got its generous foothold in the U.S. uranium market in less time than it takes most 16-year-olds to get a driver’s license. Russia got its deal moved through the Obama Administration faster than it took the Obama Administration Department of Justice’s Anti-Trust Division to approve any of the mergers of two U.S. companies it reviewed.

How is that possible? Clearly there were motivated folks to get the deal done. One of those was clearly Hillary Clinton, whose family foundation raked in millions from donors with ties to Russia, as well as the uranium industry. Some media outlets have pointed out that the total take for the foundation may have been as “little” as $4 million. But for a cash-starved foundation that can’t even afford to give back $250,000 from serial sex-offender Harvey Weinstein, $4 million is a decent cash reserve.

But let’s be clear, this wasn’t simply your typical Clinton back room deal. This was a deal that was reviewed by virtually every senior Obama administration official, many of whom were aware of the Clinton connection, the FBI bribery investigation, and Rosatom’s history. And let's not forget either: controlling the global supply chain is the very obvious goal of Putin's. To make matters worse, President Barack Obama reviewed the case.

Why would such a deal go through? Sometimes the easiest explanation is the right one: maybe it was nothing more than a payback to Democrat and Clinton donors. When nothing makes sense in Washington D.C., just follow the money.

While this scandal's original focus was on Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation, it goes far deeper into a Democratic administration than anyone within the party wants to admit. Which is perhaps why President Obama seemed less than excited about pushing the Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Perhaps in a rare moment of self-recollection and awareness, he realized that eventually the breadth of this story would end up exactly where we are today, with all eyes looking at Obama's appointees, wondering why they sold America’s national security for the uranium-market equivalent of 30 pieces of silver.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Uh...that it may have been a mistake to give him two terms in office?

DamnYANKEE

fraud v**es gave him his 2nd

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

It's a mistake to give any politician too much power. We need to bring balance back between the three branches and lessen the influence and impact the Federal government has over the states and our lives, while also allowing the government to do only what it is constitutionally mandated to do; Immigration control for one. The so-called sanctuary cities and states need to feel the thumb of the ICE on their jugular and have any federal funding removed until they comply with the law. The Socialist Republic of California is the perfect place to start with.

mongo Loc: TEXAS

I think that question should be directed at his Bath-House Boyfriend.
Probably the only one that could tell the whole story, you know,
it's referred to as "Pillow Talk!"

SEMPER FI

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

You mean that Florida guy named Sinclair?

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Since they all already have too much power I'd say we have our work cut out for us.

samtheyank

The only thing Black Sambo knows how to do is stir the kettle. He knows nothing about the ingredients. Only the Massa, Hillary & Bill, know what’s in the Kettle. Sambo only gets a taste. When the Massa says jump, Mr. Sambo says, “How high Massa, how high”! If this makes me a r****t, then I is one. The t***h is the t***h and it is what it is. The t***h will set you, The American People, free indeed. Free indeed!

Radiance3

====================
I believe on all of these:
Here are the players and their ultimate plots.

The US Uranium One, 20% of which was sold to Russia, the most potent enemy of the US. This well-planned scheme has varied purposes, from all the sk**led corrupt lawyers you've put into power.

Here are the major plotters: ***THEY ARE ALL LAWYERS SK**LED IN CORRUPTIONS running the US, from 2009-2016.
1. Sec. of State Hillary Clinton- She has been corrupting since 1989, in Arkansas. Learned so much sk**ls in corruptions after so many years doing similar activities.
2. Pres. Barack Obama, whose goals are not only wealth but the destruction of the US, to put it down so as his underground power right now. Proof: His many of his executive actions wrong for our country, now reversed by president Trump.
3. DOJ, Erick Holder
4. FBI Director, Mueller
5. FBI Director, Comey
6. Asst. FBI Director, Rosenstein
7. DOJ, Loretta Lynch
8. DCN Campaign Manager, John Podesta
9. BILL CLINTON

Their objectives were:
1. To earn hundreds of millions of dollars, by selling our country's Uranium One, to the enemy Russia. Proceeds of about $145 million, proceeds went to f**e Clinton Foundation, 3% went only to charity, 98% went to their bank accounts. Plus a double speaking fee to Bill Clinton of $500,000 for 15 minutes.
2. To help elect Hillary Clinton, to cover-up their various crimes committed to the American people for their own greed of wealth and power.
3. To destroy the United States of America as shown by the various executive actions of Mr. Obama during his term. Many of them now are reversed by president Trump.
4. To create "F**E dossier" in order to accuse president Trump instead, that his victory was due to collusion with Russia, and thereby treasonous. The purpose was to create f**e impeachable offense of "treason", so that Trump could be impeached, and Hillary takes over. The goal of putting Hillary as president is to forever cover their crimes while the corrupt Hillary is in power.

Methods how their plots were created.
A.
1. CREATED FALSIFIED "DOSSIER" AGAINST TRUMP.
2. Then hired previous FBI Mueller, one of the planners and witnesses to investigate Trump.
3. Rosenstein, Asst. FBI, another member of the plotters, appointed Mueller, who himself was part of the plotter.
4. Hired all democrat lawyers and jurists to render verdict on president Trump to be impeached.
5. Dug all the presidents historical and business records for several years, none of which were found relevant to his e******n victory.
6. Investigated all his family members and including his son Donald, as part of the f**e collusion charges.
7. Investigated all presidents Trump's members and associates on his campaign e******n.

B: Hillary Clinton while Sec. of State violated all protocols of messaging
1. by creating personal files where she secretly used to t***sfer CLASSIFIED emails, memo to avoid tracking. This was ultimate violation of US policy on national security.
2. Shredded hundreds of thousands of emails from her server to avoid tracking.
3. Bleach bitted 33,000 emails to ensure that no other could read those emails.
4. Hired IT tech to use hammer to pound into pieces, the two hard drives of her systems.
5. All these were done while all the documents were under subpoena by Congress.

C. Hired and paid staff to continue cover-ups of her crimes even until after the e******n.
D. Paid the agents, who planned the scheme of creating F**E "dossier" for president Trump.

ALL OF THOSE ARE CRIMINAL TREASONOUS OFFENSES. The people involved must all be convicted.
I believe they all will use the "5th" to protect themselves from their own crimes. They are corrupt lawyers.

Now, MSM are all silent, never mentioned these crimes now that facts are coming out, and smelling toxin to all of us, the American people.

America, please be vigilant. I hope Sean Hannity, or the FBI informant, gets security guards because history has proven that those who exposed Hillary's and Bill's crimes just disappeared or died of the so-called accidents.

Cerby1

What can we do to get this before a judge and jury and get legal justice determination, and appropiate punishment or dismissal?

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

Of course he knew. Several governmental agencies had to recommend the deal for it to.move forward. There weren't even any hearings on it and the speed with which it moved forward was remarkably fast.

That needs high level support to all come together as it did.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

I think it interesting that of all your list of Hillary's actions, one which likely she may be convicted of is the illegal use of campaign funds to help pay for the creation of the phoney dossier against Trump.

I wonder if any of the left will ever admit they have been lied to and used by their leaders.

There is enough proof now that they should be outraged but what I see is their continued spreading of what we now know are blatant lies.

It appears that when the democratic leadership needed mindless tools they chose well.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

We'll find out if anyone in Washington is personally clean enough and has the cajones to prosecute any of this.