B****sheep wrote:
DANG! You really don't like hearing the t***h about him, do you!
I accept t***h when I hear it, but I throw the BS f**g when I see lies, particularly right wing lies that offer no proof to back-up those lies.
alex wrote:
shhhh don't let him know that or that's exactly what he will do
:D :D :thumbup: :thumbup:
3jack wrote:
I accept t***h when I hear it.
No you don't. That's a lie.
B****sheep wrote:
No you don't. That's a lie.
Believe what you wish...it matters not to me.
3jack wrote:
I accept t***h when I hear it, but I throw the BS f**g when I see lies, particularly right wing lies that offer no proof to back-up those lies.
All one hears when proof is offered is chirp, chirp, chirp.
mwdegutis wrote:
All one hears when proof is offered is chirp, chirp, chirp.
When has proof been offered?
3jack wrote:
When has proof been offered?
Too numerous to mention. My personal experience has been when I've offered factual proof with conclusions based on those facts, I have either been attacked with nothing to support the attack or have been responded to with silence.
mwdegutis wrote:
Too numerous to mention. My personal experience has been when I've offered factual proof with conclusions based on those facts, I have either been attacked with nothing to support the attack or have been responded to with silence.
Here is one fact: An anti-military, narcissistic, arrogant community organizer has "warned" an experienced KGB operative to "watch his step." I know who I'm betting on.
3jack wrote:
When has proof been offered?
Jack- off in the not too distant past there has been a number of people offering proof.
The proof is out there...open your mind...put down that cup of Kool-Aid.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7GHsvptqXc
banjojack wrote:
Here is one fact: An anti-military, narcissistic, arrogant community organizer has "warned" an experienced KGB operative to "watch his step." I know who I'm betting on.
:lol: :lol: :lol: Me too!
mwdegutis wrote:
Too numerous to mention. My personal experience has been when I've offered factual proof with conclusions based on those facts, I have either been attacked with nothing to support the attack or have been responded to with silence.
If you post it as fact, back it up with proof. Pulling it from a favorable websights and posting it as fact does not work if there are no other credible sites to prove the facts. The first thing most shady posters says is "don't shoot the messenger". I feel that if the messenger does not know for sure that what they're posting is the t***h, and they're too lazy to research what they're posting, or what they're posting is an obvious lie, he/she deserves to be called on the carpet. Look at what the Republicans did to Susan Rice. Her testimony was more about the unknown than a lie, but they proceeded to destroy her reputation just the same. Talk about shooting the messenger!!!!!
Some sites are credible while others post opinions disguised as facts just to support their positions, and to get i***ts to re-post those opinions as t***hs. This happens on both sides, and I don't trust either side to be remotely t***hful.
banjojack wrote:
Here is one fact: An anti-military, narcissistic, arrogant community organizer has "warned" an experienced KGB operative to "watch his step." I know who I'm betting on.
Not arrogant but "uppity"
If you get your "facts" off youtube.......
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.