Constitutional Carry Bill
Oct 14, 2017 12:31:22 #
Since you’re reading this, I know that you likely have very strong feelings about Constitutional carry. Most people on either side of gun issues do, but much of the press that you’re likely to have heard is firmly against Constitutional carry.
Fortunately, though, it looks like not all politicians are listening to the foolishness coming out of the mainstream media about this issue. At least, not in Wisconsin, where, on September 19 (2017), their Senate Judiciary Committee passed a Constitutional carry bill for the state of Wisconsin.
Now, Wisconsin already has an open carry law, but the bill, if passed into law, would extend the rights of legal gun owners to carry concealed. Dean Weingarten writes,
The Constitutional Carry bill, SB 169 and its companion in the Assembly, AB247, will bring the Wisconsin statutes in compliance with the Wisconsin State Constitution and with the Second Amendment. No fee would be required to carry a firearm either loaded or concealed. That was the state of the nation when the Second Amendment was ratified on December 15, 1781. Constitutional Carry is only a small additional step for Wisconsin. Wisconsin does not require a permit to carry firearms openly. No permit is required to carry knives openly or concealed.
So, it looks like Wisconsin is a good deal of the way to full Constitutional carry, and, based on the current laws and their tendency to support gun owners’ rights, it seems likely that this Constitutional carry bill will pass into law. To be fair, though, it’s not a done deal yet, and anti-gunners aren’t always known to play fair and honest when trying to restrict the rights of gun owners.
What this means for you is that, if you live in Wisconsin, start calling your state representatives and get this passed. If you don’t live in Wisconsin, consider giving to pro-gun lobbies in Wisconsin to help your fellow gun owners in Wisconsin, and remember to call your own representatives in your state. Because every gun owner should be free and clear to carry their firearm everywhere in the United States to protect themselves and their families from those who don’t abide by the laws of this land.
Fortunately, though, it looks like not all politicians are listening to the foolishness coming out of the mainstream media about this issue. At least, not in Wisconsin, where, on September 19 (2017), their Senate Judiciary Committee passed a Constitutional carry bill for the state of Wisconsin.
Now, Wisconsin already has an open carry law, but the bill, if passed into law, would extend the rights of legal gun owners to carry concealed. Dean Weingarten writes,
The Constitutional Carry bill, SB 169 and its companion in the Assembly, AB247, will bring the Wisconsin statutes in compliance with the Wisconsin State Constitution and with the Second Amendment. No fee would be required to carry a firearm either loaded or concealed. That was the state of the nation when the Second Amendment was ratified on December 15, 1781. Constitutional Carry is only a small additional step for Wisconsin. Wisconsin does not require a permit to carry firearms openly. No permit is required to carry knives openly or concealed.
So, it looks like Wisconsin is a good deal of the way to full Constitutional carry, and, based on the current laws and their tendency to support gun owners’ rights, it seems likely that this Constitutional carry bill will pass into law. To be fair, though, it’s not a done deal yet, and anti-gunners aren’t always known to play fair and honest when trying to restrict the rights of gun owners.
What this means for you is that, if you live in Wisconsin, start calling your state representatives and get this passed. If you don’t live in Wisconsin, consider giving to pro-gun lobbies in Wisconsin to help your fellow gun owners in Wisconsin, and remember to call your own representatives in your state. Because every gun owner should be free and clear to carry their firearm everywhere in the United States to protect themselves and their families from those who don’t abide by the laws of this land.
Oct 14, 2017 13:46:39 #
ron vrooman wrote:
Since you’re reading this, I know that you likely ... (show quote)
Yes Ron, all 52 states should have reciprocity concerning constitutional carry 2nd Amendment. But the disarmament Democrats and the closet GOP need the arms from the people for their agenda. Of course we can only speculate what that agenda is until total revocation is come to fruition. It says nothing about the criminal element though.
Oct 14, 2017 14:17:02 #
Hello plainlogic, Actually Oregon or maybe Kansas is the last lawful state to become one of the several States of the u(U)nited States of/for America. As we have had color of law legal fiction since 1860 -61. Apart from that, I have been on the land in 49 of the 50 known states of the US inc. Please identify the other two. Not the bogus DC I hope!
With full faith and credit of our Constitution there would be concealed or open carry of all arms among the several states. Each state with an infringement law needs to be challenged. I took all 36 Oregon Sheriffs to federal court as defendants in their infringement rule/laws/statutes that apply only to US Inc citizens.
There is no speculation UN agenda 21 and the latest one from that corrupt organization.
The criminal element has nothing to do with my right to bear arms.
Consider yourself politely schooled on a couple of items.
With full faith and credit of our Constitution there would be concealed or open carry of all arms among the several states. Each state with an infringement law needs to be challenged. I took all 36 Oregon Sheriffs to federal court as defendants in their infringement rule/laws/statutes that apply only to US Inc citizens.
There is no speculation UN agenda 21 and the latest one from that corrupt organization.
The criminal element has nothing to do with my right to bear arms.
Consider yourself politely schooled on a couple of items.
plainlogic wrote:
Yes Ron, all 52 states should have reciprocity concerning constitutional carry 2nd Amendment. But the disarmament Democrats and the closet GOP need the arms from the people for their agenda. Of course we can only speculate what that agenda is until total revocation is come to fruition. It says nothing about the criminal element though.
Oct 15, 2017 21:18:17 #
plainlogic wrote:
Yes Ron, all 52 states should have reciprocity concerning constitutional carry 2nd Amendment. But the disarmament Democrats and the closet GOP need the arms from the people for their agenda. Of course we can only speculate what that agenda is until total revocation is come to fruition. It says nothing about the criminal element though.
Where did the other 2 states come from?
Oct 15, 2017 21:24:53 #
some US citizen in corporate governance declared DC a state and something else a state. Like these stupid fvcks don't remember what it takes to make a state. i busted him on it also.
Loki wrote:
Where did the other 2 states come from?
Oct 16, 2017 05:31:00 #
ron vrooman wrote:
some US citizen in corporate governance declared DC a state and something else a state. Like these stupid fvcks don't remember what it takes to make a state. i busted him on it also.
DC is our 51st state. Our 52nd, apparently is Mexico.
Oct 16, 2017 09:47:11 #
DC is not a state. the corporate governance cannot circumvent the constitution and make a state. Oregon or maybe Kansas was the last lawful state.
Loki wrote:
DC is our 51st state. Our 52nd, apparently is Mexico.
Oct 16, 2017 13:29:46 #
ron vrooman wrote:
DC is not a state. the corporate governance cannot circumvent the constitution and make a state. Oregon or maybe Kansas was the last lawful state.
You don't have much of a sense of humor, do you? I KNOW DC is not a state. Mexico, I am not so sure.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.