SCOTUS dismisses travel ban case...
Oct 11, 2017 00:55:31 #
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court dismissed a major challenge to President Trump's travel ban on majority-Muslim countries Tuesday because it has been replaced by a new version, sending the controversy back to the starting block. The ruling is a victory for the Trump administration, which had asked the court to drop the case after Trump signed a proclamation Sept. 24 that replaced the temporary travel ban on six nations with a new, indefinite ban affecting eight countries. That action made the court challenge moot, the justices ruled.
https://apple.news/AqDKRHm8SQpWO3B_3VYcxig
https://apple.news/AqDKRHm8SQpWO3B_3VYcxig
Oct 11, 2017 04:11:12 #
Worried for our children wrote:
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court dismissed a major c... (show quote)
That's the best news I've heard in for some time.
Oct 11, 2017 05:31:10 #
Worried for our children wrote:
Trump tucked his tail and ran from a high court decision by backing down on his unconstitutional travel ban, the new ban is already being challenged in court by Hawaii and will come to a similar fate.WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court dismissed a major c... (show quote)
Oct 11, 2017 08:50:52 #
Kevyn wrote:
Trump tucked his tail and ran from a high court decision by backing down on his unconstitutional travel ban, the new ban is already being challenged in court by Hawaii and will come to a similar fate.
LOL.
America and Trump winning really pisses you off, doesn't it?
Oct 11, 2017 09:13:09 #
although an untrustworthy "F**e News Source",,,,http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/obama-mocks-trump-but-has-barred-immigrants-many-muslim-6-times/article/2594016
The first time Obama used section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, reports the Examiner, was to stop "immigrants or nonimmigrants" from emigrating to the U.S. under a broader ban instituted by the United Nations in 2011. According to the Examiner, Obama's executive actions on stopping immigration have involved people helping Iran, Syria, and Crimea. Iran and Syria are predominately Muslim countries.
The first time Obama used section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, reports the Examiner, was to stop "immigrants or nonimmigrants" from emigrating to the U.S. under a broader ban instituted by the United Nations in 2011. According to the Examiner, Obama's executive actions on stopping immigration have involved people helping Iran, Syria, and Crimea. Iran and Syria are predominately Muslim countries.
Kevyn wrote:
Trump tucked his tail and ran from a high court decision by backing down on his unconstitutional travel ban, the new ban is already being challenged in court by Hawaii and will come to a similar fate.
Oct 11, 2017 09:13:37 #
He forced the NFL off their knees too
Super Dave wrote:
LOL.
America and Trump winning really pisses you off, doesn't it?
America and Trump winning really pisses you off, doesn't it?
Oct 11, 2017 09:54:04 #
Open boarder lover are you?
Kevyn wrote:
Trump tucked his tail and ran from a high court decision by backing down on his unconstitutional travel ban, the new ban is already being challenged in court by Hawaii and will come to a similar fate.
Oct 11, 2017 10:26:35 #
Kevyn wrote:
Trump tucked his tail and ran from a high court decision by backing down on his unconstitutional travel ban, the new ban is already being challenged in court by Hawaii and will come to a similar fate.
Thank you for supplying my morning chuckle .
Oct 11, 2017 11:56:14 #
Kevyn wrote:
Trump tucked his tail and ran from a high court decision by backing down on his unconstitutional travel ban,
I'm no constitutional scholar, maybe you could help me out and show me which part makes the travel ban unconstitutional.
Quote:
the new ban is already being challenged in court by Hawaii and will come to a similar fate.
You mean the same state's court whose case was just dismissed? No worries, by the time that case gets to court, Trump will just write another, and that case will become moot as well, and the process will start all over, coming to a similar fate.
Oct 11, 2017 12:01:34 #
Title 8, Chapter 12, US Code 1182, courtesy of Cornell University Law’s website:
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens t***sported to the United States by such airline.
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens t***sported to the United States by such airline.
Oct 11, 2017 12:04:46 #
however,,,,, by so doing they will use judges with political views, not constitutional concerns, to delay and obviscate the rulings,,,,,
Worried for our children wrote:
You mean the same state's court whose case was just dismissed? No worries, by the time that case gets to court, Trump will just write another, and that case will become moot as well, and the process will start all over, coming to a similar fate.
Oct 11, 2017 12:05:18 #
I posted a message this morning explaining how Judicial Canons can apply to these district judge who continue to knowingly file "frivolous complaints or injunctions, but it was deleted...??? They can be sanctioned and kicked the hell out...lol
Oct 11, 2017 12:10:59 #
Part of the new rules no doubt??
JIM BETHEA wrote:
I posted a message this morning explaining how Judicial Canons can apply to these district judge who continue to knowingly file "frivolous complaints or injunctions, but it was deleted...??? They can be sanctioned and kicked the hell out...lol
Oct 11, 2017 12:35:50 #
JIM BETHEA wrote:
Title 8, Chapter 12, US Code 1182, courtesy of Cor... (show quote)
Exactly so. I was just wondering if Kev could show something from the constitution that makes the ban unconstitutional. Thanks for posting that, Jim.
Oct 11, 2017 12:38:16 #
Ve'hoe wrote:
however,,,,, by so doing they will use judges with political views, not constitutional concerns, to delay and obviscate the rulings,,,,,
Sad isn't, Ve'hoe... but one bright light is that behind the scenes, Trump has been filling the lower courts with more judges that have an originalist view point.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.