D********g
Oct 12, 2017 16:25:47 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
That's exactly what they are going to do.
If they do I hope a few of them get ousted in the primaries. I'm gonna do my part with Heller.
Oct 13, 2017 07:59:31 #
BigMike wrote:
It's going to take time and it's more up to us than Trump. 
I'm sure you're right. This Weinstein incidence is doing untold damage to the left. Hellary looks terrible in this.
Oct 13, 2017 09:43:52 #
Big Bass wrote:
I'm sure you're right. This Weinstein incidence is doing untold damage to the left. Hellary looks terrible in this.
Yup, ole Hill looks like, well, a souless moron... but what's new, right?
Oct 13, 2017 09:49:58 #
S. Maturin wrote:
Yup, ole Hill looks like, well, a souless moron... but what's new, right?
Her true self is showing... If hellary had won, she would have pardoned this monster, Weinstein.
Oct 13, 2017 09:58:49 #
Big Bass wrote:
Her true self is showing... If hellary had won, she would have pardoned this monster, Weinstein.
Being the sort of female who will sell anything for money... well, of course she would have pardoned him... for a few $million.
Oct 13, 2017 10:11:43 #
S. Maturin wrote:
Yup, ole Hill looks like, well, a souless moron... but what's new, right?
I don't know about new, but it's becoming harder and harder for the left to look like anything other than what they are...amoral, hypocritical perverts.
Oct 13, 2017 10:17:41 #
BigMike wrote:
I don't know about new, but it's becoming harder and harder for the left to look like anything other than what they are...amoral, hypocritical perverts.
And tool for the jihadists.
Oct 13, 2017 10:34:10 #
S. Maturin wrote:
Being the sort of female who will sell anything for money... well, of course she would have pardoned him... for a few $million.
Good point!
Oct 13, 2017 10:34:18 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
Big Bass wrote:
I'm sure you're right. This Weinstein incidence is doing untold damage to the left. Hellary looks terrible in this.
Hell, she's probably one of his "babes."
Oct 13, 2017 10:35:02 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
S. Maturin wrote:
Yup, ole Hill looks like, well, a souless moron... but what's new, right?
Exactly.
Oct 13, 2017 10:38:02 #
Oct 13, 2017 11:10:48 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
Hell, she's probably one of his "babes."
Yuk!
Then again... those two do look like a perfect match.
Oct 13, 2017 20:49:31 #
Big Bass wrote:
I'm sure you're right. This Weinstein incidence is doing untold damage to the left. Hellary looks terrible in this.
Why does Hilliary look terrible. Will you people get off this obsession for the Clinton's and focus on the molester in Chief. Trump was worse than Weinstein. At least Weinstein asked Trump just molest. Stop hiding from the pervert you elected and blaming everything on Clinton.
Oct 13, 2017 20:59:15 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
tdsrnest wrote:
Why does Hilliary look terrible. Will you people get off this obsession for the Clinton's and focus on the molester in Chief. Trump was worse than Weinstein. At least Weinstein asked Trump just molest. Stop hiding from the pervert you elected and blaming everything on Clinton.
We would get off of Hillary if she goes back to the woods....And how is Trump is worse then this d********g Weinstein???? Explain your stupidity,please........if you can
Oct 13, 2017 22:44:52 #
proud republican wrote:
We would get off of Hillary if she goes back to the woods....And how is Trump is worse then this d********g Weinstein???? Explain your stupidity,please........if you can
Here's how Trump is worse than Weinstein, or Weiner, Trump never thought of hilliar as a sex object, Weinstein and Weiner at least felt an obligation, but never followed through, for visually obvious reasons. But, they were obligated to lust after hilliar, and develop at least a fondness for massive ankles. Trump had no obligation to lust after illiar.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.