Theophilus

By Robert Velarde

While the Bible is the bestselling book in history, it's arguably also the most criticized. There are, of course, different kinds of biblical criticism. Some are considered scholarly disciplines and, at their best, seek to bring to light valuable insights about the biblical manuscripts and their meaning. But more often than not, critics of the Bible are not out to praise it, but to put it down.

The next article in this series – "How do I handle Bible difficulties?" – will offer specific tips on dealing with common critical approaches and passages meant to confound Christians. But this article is more about how to go about responding in general to criticisms leveled against the Bible. As such, we'll look at some common criticisms of the Bible and offer an overview of some of the more scholarly objections.

Christians believe the Bible contains God's words to us – words that contain ideas related to the nature of God, the nature of Christ, the nature of human beings, the nature of salvation, and more. All of these topics are of great significance. If the Bible is in error in any one of these areas, then the insights of the critics are of supreme importance. But if the Bible is trustworthy in what it says, then we'd do well to heed what it says. What, then, do the critics claim and how can we respond?
What About Miracles?

The first criticism we will address has to do with miracles. Contemporary critics sometimes claim that since the Bible contains so many miracles, it just can't be true. Either these are just made up stories, they argue, or simple people were just tricked. In reality, just one miracle is too much for the modern mind. Why? Unfortunately, much of Western thinking in particular is grounded in naturalism – a worldview that believes that only the physical or material world exists. Based on this perspective, anything supernatural such as a miracle, is immediately suspect. As a result, this sort of critical approach to the Bible immediately casts doubt on key Christian beliefs such as the bodily resurrection of Christ.

There are many ways to respond to this sort of critic. It will be helpful to point out that it is the presupposition that naturalism is true that rules out miracles. But if God exists, then miracles are possible. Another approach involves turning the tables, so to speak, and casting doubt on naturalism. What are the reasons the critic believes in naturalism? This is also a helpful time to offer positive arguments for the existence of God. It may also be beneficial to take the resurrection of Christ as a historical example of an event that cannot be explained reasonably by any other means other than by calling it what it was – a miracle.
Is the Bible "full of contradictions?"

Another popular approach of Bible critics is to claim that since the Bible is full of so many contradictions, it just can't be trusted. At this juncture it is often helpful to ask for a specific example of a contradiction. Often, causal critics of the Bible will just claim it is "full of contradictions" as a rhetorical method. In other words, they may not have any specific examples in mind, but are just posturing and hoping no one will challenge them. If the critic does not have a specific example of what they consider a contradiction in the Bible, then politely ask them to offer one, otherwise they are making claims without proof.

But what if they do have one or more specific contradictions that they can cite, chapter and verse? This is where it is helpful for the Christian to have a good understanding of what they believe, why they believe it, as well as some general knowledge on interpreting the Bible correctly.
1
If a critic points out a specific apparent contradiction and you are not able to resolve it on the spot, be gracious and admit that you don't have an answer right away, but will look into it and get back to the person.
2

Rest assured, Bible scholars have spent years studying alleged contradictions and discrepancies in the Bible and have offered reasonable answers. There are no instances of such alleged contradictions that would negate the foundations of Christianity or its essential beliefs.
What About Academic Criticism?

Academic criticism in and of itself is not hostile to Christianity. It is merely a field that studies the biblical texts and tries to interpret them or make sense of them. Such criticism becomes a problem when it casts doubt on the reliability of the Bible. For instance, scholars who question the authorship of the first five books of the Old Testament hold to what is called the documentary hypothesis. This calls into question the authorship of portions of the Old Testament traditionally attributed to Moses and instead argues that several authors wrote the text.

The end result is usually to weaken the force of what the Bible has to say by claiming that it is not really divinely inspired, but a product of many different people and ideas that don't always agree with one another. Biblically speaking, Christ established the authority of the Old Testament repeatedly not only by often citing specific passages, but by general statements such as Matthew 5:17: "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them" (NIV).
3
New Testament Mythology?

Another academic criticism of the Bible has to do with the New Testament. These critics claim that the New Testament documents can't really be trusted as true history, but are more like legends or myths. Rudolf Bultmann (1884-1976), for instance, sought to demythologize the New Testament, meaning that since modern people cannot accept the sorts of miracles and supernatural stories contained in the Bible, they must be made relevant. The end result, however, is to cast serious doubt on the biblical record and its claims.

But is the New Testament legendary or mythological? Hardly. The Gospels, for instance, record real places, real people, and real events in historical context. They do not read as myths or legends, but as historical records. The New Testament writers were familiar with contemporary myths and knew the difference between what they believed and the myths of their day, prompting Paul the Apostle to warn against "godless myths," for instance (1 Timothy 4:7, NIV; "worldly fables" in the NASB).
"Always Being Ready"

First Peter 3:15 calls every Christian to always be "ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you." This means that we all need to be equipped to some degree to respond to Bible critics. Not everyone is called to be an expert in this field, but we should all be ready to make a defense of the truth of Christ as recorded in Scripture.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Why must there be so much complexity to God and what we personally expierence of He..

Miracles themself are cast full of judgement simply because others lack the incite to believe they are real or possible and do happen...I know they are real having had enough to prove them.. Will my explanation of what I expierenced convince anyone, no, but they none the less took place and my knowing it solidifies them...I do not question but I am not the one that questions Gods agaping love either..

If we can't identify with it, it is not real...So it goes..

People have formed opinions that prohibit their ability to understand or even rationalize it..

Like the innocent infant or small child who is not yet stigmatized by negative they see and hear so much more in the simplicity of their innocence...

Equipped to handle attacks?? The best equipped are those whom speak with conviction of their belief without chastising the other who questions to learn or to attack..Personal conviction can not be attacked, successfully anyway..

Recitation of personal knowledge and expierence is not enough to the nonbeliever and no matter what we are equipped with it will never ever change the fundamental difference of the nonbeliever who rationalize away God because He is not verifiable.. I wish we could but we see it simply does not manifest into anything more than stronger attack...

Theophilus

The vast majority of people will never come to know God. It is because they want to be lord of their own lives. It is not because they do not believe in God. They simply reject Him for their own selfish reasons.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Are they not lord of their own lives anyway?? How does including God in their lives force them into submission of God or is that what you are intimating?? To accept God is to surrender ones self to the will of God, not their own way of life??!

Theophilus

God is sovereign over all of Creation. We sinned against Him, and deserve death as a result. God gave us a way out. All we have to do is say we're sorry and agree to love Him and follow his will. Not a bad deal for a get out of Hell free card. He doesn't even charge us for it. How cool is that?

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Very cool and rather cute too you are..
I like your simplified logic of explanation..It is refreshing!!! Very refreshing.. I see other threads I must visit too..

Do you minister someplace or are you a minster of a church on top of being a theologist???

Theophilus

Not any of that. I simply find a topic and research it. One of the articles I posted tells you how. Mostly, it's about context. Whenever you read something in the Bible that doesn't seem clear, you must look to see what the rest of the Bible says about it. There is also historical and cultural context to consider. It's a bit of work, but didn't Jesus tell us to search the Scriptures? I believe this is what He meant.