One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Why the left want to k**l the 1st amendment.
Sep 19, 2017 10:26:18   #
cold iron Loc: White House
 
Why the left want to k**l the 1st amendment.

http://dailysignal.com/2017/08/15/the-3-step-argument-the-left-makes-to-justify-violence-against-conservative-speakers/

Reply
Sep 19, 2017 10:55:58   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 


f*****m at its finest


f*****m
Also found in: Thesaurus, Legal, Financial, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
Related to f*****m: Neo f*****m
fas·cism (făsh′ĭz′əm)
n.
1. often F*****m
a. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls, violent suppression of the opposition, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and r****m.
b. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.
2. Oppressive, dictatorial control.
[Italian f*****mo, from fascio, group, from Late Latin fascium, from Latin fascis, bundle.]
Word History: It is fitting that the name of an authoritarian political movement like F*****m, founded in 1919 by Benito Mussolini, should come from the name of a symbol of authority. The Italian name of the movement, f*****mo, is derived from fascio, "bundle, (political) group," but also refers to the movement's emblem, the fasces, a bundle of rods bound around a projecting axe-head that was carried before an ancient Roman magistrate by an attendant as a symbol of authority and power. The name of Mussolini's group of revolutionaries was soon used for similar nationalistic movements in other countries that sought to gain power through violence and ruthlessness, such as National Socialism

Reply
Sep 19, 2017 13:07:12   #
Noraa Loc: Kansas
 


The left want to k**l the first amendment because they don't want people to hear anything that disagrees with their views and they don't want people thinking for themselves.

Reply
 
 
Sep 19, 2017 13:37:43   #
Randy131 Loc: Florida
 
Most of what you have commented on is true, but there is one huge mistake that you have made, and is proven false by the history of all f*****t countries down through history. "...a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls..." All f*****t countries in world history have been either socialist or c*******t, that have taken over the capitalist system of government in said country, were changed it to either socialism or c*******m system of government, such as Mussolini did in Italy, Hitler did in Germany, Lenin & Stalin did in Russia, Mao did in China, Jun Un did in North Korea, Castro did in Cuba, and Chavez did in Venezuella (and there has been a few others), all previous capitalistic economies that were taken over by f*****t and changed to either socialism or c*******m economies, in order to be able to control the people. The following are examples of f*****ts down through world history:


Accusations Of "F*****M" From Both Political Parties, But Who Are The Real "F*****TS" ???

The American Left Is Now The Party Of F*****m !!! History Repeats It's-Self !!!

August 9, 2017

The American Left Is Now The Party Of F*****m. The Democrats’ 'big lie', blaming own F*****t sins on Trump and Republicans.
(This is what Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi and all Democrats, who are now real socialists and c*******ts, want to change the USA into. So when Democrats mention changing the USA, this is what they are trying to change it to, by A****a & B*M f*****t methods. So will the USA be the next Venezuella in the western hemisphere, only if Democrats like Bernie Sanders, Chuck Schumer, and Nancy Pelosi keep winning e******ns.)

Dinesh D'Souza
http://www.wnd.com/2017/08/sick-twist-american-left-is-now-party-of-f*****m/

We hear the word “f*****t” a whole lot these days: Trump is a f*****t, if not a N**i; The Republican Party is the f*****t party.

As for the left, the Democrats, they present themselves as the anti-f*****ts, the people fighting f*****m. We can see this in the names of l*****t groups like A****a, which stands for anti-f*****m. Yet, when we look around, we see the Democratic and l*****t protesters who are disrupting the inauguration. Who are organizing violent rallies around the country, who are stopping campus speakers from speaking.

These are people who seem to be using f*****t and N**i tactics. The masked A****a thugs carrying weapons seem eerily similar to the f*****t B****shirts and the N**i Brownshirts.

So isn’t it strange that the people purporting to fight f*****m resemble the f*****ts in shutting down speech. And disrupting democratic debate through the use, or threats, of violence?

We need to look at f*****m more closely and ask: Is f*****m really a phenomenon of the left or of the right? Let’s begin with the remarkable statement by Adolf Hitler in a 1927 speech. “We are socialists,” he said. “We are the enemies of today’s capitalist system of exploitation and we are determined to destroy the system under all conditions.” Does that sound like Donald Trump? Actually, it sounds a lot more like Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders.

Hitler changed the name of the German Workers Party to the National Socialist German Workers Party. He wanted to emphasize that the N**is were socialists, and that N**i economic policy involved complete state control of the private sector. Indeed, the very name N**i is a compression of the two terms “national” and “socialist.”

All the leading figures of early f*****m, not merely in Germany, but also in Italy, France and England – were men of the left. Most of them moved seamlessly from Marxism and socialism, to f*****m and N**ism during the 1920s and 1930s.

Here are some examples. Jean Allemane, famous for his role in the Dreyfus case, one of the great figures of French socialism, became a f*****t. So did the socialist organizer Georges Valois. Marcel Deat, the founder of the Parti Socialiste de France, eventually quit and started a pro-f*****t party in 1936. Jaques Dor**t, a French c*******t, moved his Parti Populaire Francais into the f*****t camp. Belgian socialist writer Henri de Man t***sitioned into becoming a f*****t theoretician. In England, Oswald Mosley, a socialist and Labor Party Member of Parliament, broke with the laborites because he found them insufficiently radical. He later founded the British Union of F*****ts and became the country’s leading N**i sympathizer.

In Germany, there was a similar traffic from socialism to f*****m. To give a single example, the socialist playwright Gerhart Hauptmann embraced Hitler’s National Socialism and produced plays during the Third Reich. After the war, he called himself a c*******t and staged his productions in Soviet-dominated East Berlin.

In Italy, philosopher Giovanni Gentile moved from Marxism to become f*****m’s leading intellectual. Many Italian labor organizers made the same journey: Ottavio Dinale, Tullio, Masotti, Carlo Silvestri and Umberto Pasella. The socialist writer Agostino Lanzillo joined Mussolini’s parliament as a member of the f*****t party.

Nicola Bombacci, one of the founders of the Italian Community Party, became Mussolini’s top adviser in 1943.

Gentile’s disciple Ugo Spirito, who also served Mussolini, moved from Marxism to f*****m and then back to Marxism. Like Hauptmann, Spirito became a c*******t sympathizer after World War II and called for a new “synthesis” between c*******m and f*****m.

All of this is incomprehensible if f*****m is considered somehow “right wing.” None of these men saw it that way. They didn’t “convert” from left to right. Rather, they viewed themselves as moving seamlessly from one form of socialism to another. From a purely class-based socialism to a broader form of socialism that took into account class as well as national loyalties.

We can see this in the example of Mussolini, who established the world’s first f*****t regime in Rome, a decade before Hitler came to power. Mussolini was the leading Marxist in Italy, the recognized leader of Italian socialism. After his successful March on Rome, Lenin sent his congratulations, praising Mussolini as a fellow revolutionary on the left. Mussolini’s career shows how f*****m grew out of Marxism. Marx had predicted that the increased impoverishment of workers would cause a socialist revolution to erupt in the most advanced industrial countries: Germany and Great Britain.

That didn’t happen. This created the famous “crisis of Marxism” in the late 19th and early 20th century. Out of that crisis came two new forms of socialism: Leninist Bolshevism and Mussolini’s F*****m.

“The foundation of f*****m,” Mussolini writes in his “Autobiography,” “is the conception of the state. F*****m conceives the State as an absolute. In comparison to which all individuals or groups are relative, only to be conceived of in their relation to the State. For us F*****ts, the State … represents the immanent spirit of the nation.” Replace the word “f*****m” with “progressivism,” and we could be hearing these words recited at a Democratic National Convention.

Mussolini broke with Marx on a single point. Marx insisted that workers are loyal only to their class. “The working man,” Marxists liked to say, “has no country.” Mussolini knew that people are no less attached to their nation than to their occupation. Consequently, Mussolini, like Hitler, embraced socialism of a special kind, namely national socialism.

Like the Marxists, the f*****ts and the N**is also embraced violence as a revolutionary concept. N**i violence involved disrupting campus events, threatening and beating up dissenters. And enforcing a conformity of thought and practice in line with the regnant ideology. Notice the close similarity between this f*****t bullying and the conduct of the American left today.

In ideology and in tactics, the American left today is the party of f*****m. The only difference is that it denies its true pedigree. Their big lie is to blame their own sins on Trump and the Republicans. In a sick twist, the real f*****ts in America pretend to be anti-f*****ts. And accuse the true anti-f*****ts of being f*****ts.



no propaganda please wrote:
f*****m at its finest

f*****m
Also found in: Thesaurus, Legal, Financial, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
Related to f*****m: Neo f*****m
fas·cism (făsh′ĭz′əm)
n.
1. often F*****m
a. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls, violent suppression of the opposition, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and r****m.
b. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.
2. Oppressive, dictatorial control.
[Italian f*****mo, from fascio, group, from Late Latin fascium, from Latin fascis, bundle.]
Word History: It is fitting that the name of an authoritarian political movement like F*****m, founded in 1919 by Benito Mussolini, should come from the name of a symbol of authority. The Italian name of the movement, f*****mo, is derived from fascio, "bundle, (political) group," but also refers to the movement's emblem, the fasces, a bundle of rods bound around a projecting axe-head that was carried before an ancient Roman magistrate by an attendant as a symbol of authority and power. The name of Mussolini's group of revolutionaries was soon used for similar nationalistic movements in other countries that sought to gain power through violence and ruthlessness, such as National Socialism
f*****m at its finest br br f*****m br Also found... (show quote)

Reply
Sep 20, 2017 09:25:29   #
cold iron Loc: White House
 
Noraa wrote:
The left want to k**l the first amendment because they don't want people to hear anything that disagrees with their views and they don't want people thinking for themselves.



Also, God. our Constitution declares that our rights come from the creator! Think now, if they can do away with "our creator" then the next thing is "our laws come from the government" After that YOU are chattel.

Reply
Sep 20, 2017 13:00:36   #
Noraa Loc: Kansas
 
cold iron wrote:
Also, God. our Constitution declares that our rights come from the creator! Think now, if they can do away with "our creator" then the next thing is "our laws come from the government" After that YOU are chattel.



Reply
Sep 21, 2017 03:10:54   #
Ricktloml
 
Randy131 wrote:
Most of what you have commented on is true, but there is one huge mistake that you have made, and is proven false by the history of all f*****t countries down through history. "...a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls..." All f*****t countries in world history have been either socialist or c*******t, that have taken over the capitalist system of government in said country, were changed it to either socialism or c*******m system of government, such as Mussolini did in Italy, Hitler did in Germany, Lenin & Stalin did in Russia, Mao did in China, Jun Un did in North Korea, Castro did in Cuba, and Chavez did in Venezuella (and there has been a few others), all previous capitalistic economies that were taken over by f*****t and changed to either socialism or c*******m economies, in order to be able to control the people. The following are examples of f*****ts down through world history:


Accusations Of "F*****M" From Both Political Parties, But Who Are The Real "F*****TS" ???

The American Left Is Now The Party Of F*****m !!! History Repeats It's-Self !!!

August 9, 2017

The American Left Is Now The Party Of F*****m. The Democrats’ 'big lie', blaming own F*****t sins on Trump and Republicans.
(This is what Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi and all Democrats, who are now real socialists and c*******ts, want to change the USA into. So when Democrats mention changing the USA, this is what they are trying to change it to, by A****a & B*M f*****t methods. So will the USA be the next Venezuella in the western hemisphere, only if Democrats like Bernie Sanders, Chuck Schumer, and Nancy Pelosi keep winning e******ns.)

Dinesh D'Souza
http://www.wnd.com/2017/08/sick-twist-american-left-is-now-party-of-f*****m/

We hear the word “f*****t” a whole lot these days: Trump is a f*****t, if not a N**i; The Republican Party is the f*****t party.

As for the left, the Democrats, they present themselves as the anti-f*****ts, the people fighting f*****m. We can see this in the names of l*****t groups like A****a, which stands for anti-f*****m. Yet, when we look around, we see the Democratic and l*****t protesters who are disrupting the inauguration. Who are organizing violent rallies around the country, who are stopping campus speakers from speaking.

These are people who seem to be using f*****t and N**i tactics. The masked A****a thugs carrying weapons seem eerily similar to the f*****t B****shirts and the N**i Brownshirts.

So isn’t it strange that the people purporting to fight f*****m resemble the f*****ts in shutting down speech. And disrupting democratic debate through the use, or threats, of violence?

We need to look at f*****m more closely and ask: Is f*****m really a phenomenon of the left or of the right? Let’s begin with the remarkable statement by Adolf Hitler in a 1927 speech. “We are socialists,” he said. “We are the enemies of today’s capitalist system of exploitation and we are determined to destroy the system under all conditions.” Does that sound like Donald Trump? Actually, it sounds a lot more like Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders.

Hitler changed the name of the German Workers Party to the National Socialist German Workers Party. He wanted to emphasize that the N**is were socialists, and that N**i economic policy involved complete state control of the private sector. Indeed, the very name N**i is a compression of the two terms “national” and “socialist.”

All the leading figures of early f*****m, not merely in Germany, but also in Italy, France and England – were men of the left. Most of them moved seamlessly from Marxism and socialism, to f*****m and N**ism during the 1920s and 1930s.

Here are some examples. Jean Allemane, famous for his role in the Dreyfus case, one of the great figures of French socialism, became a f*****t. So did the socialist organizer Georges Valois. Marcel Deat, the founder of the Parti Socialiste de France, eventually quit and started a pro-f*****t party in 1936. Jaques Dor**t, a French c*******t, moved his Parti Populaire Francais into the f*****t camp. Belgian socialist writer Henri de Man t***sitioned into becoming a f*****t theoretician. In England, Oswald Mosley, a socialist and Labor Party Member of Parliament, broke with the laborites because he found them insufficiently radical. He later founded the British Union of F*****ts and became the country’s leading N**i sympathizer.

In Germany, there was a similar traffic from socialism to f*****m. To give a single example, the socialist playwright Gerhart Hauptmann embraced Hitler’s National Socialism and produced plays during the Third Reich. After the war, he called himself a c*******t and staged his productions in Soviet-dominated East Berlin.

In Italy, philosopher Giovanni Gentile moved from Marxism to become f*****m’s leading intellectual. Many Italian labor organizers made the same journey: Ottavio Dinale, Tullio, Masotti, Carlo Silvestri and Umberto Pasella. The socialist writer Agostino Lanzillo joined Mussolini’s parliament as a member of the f*****t party.

Nicola Bombacci, one of the founders of the Italian Community Party, became Mussolini’s top adviser in 1943.

Gentile’s disciple Ugo Spirito, who also served Mussolini, moved from Marxism to f*****m and then back to Marxism. Like Hauptmann, Spirito became a c*******t sympathizer after World War II and called for a new “synthesis” between c*******m and f*****m.

All of this is incomprehensible if f*****m is considered somehow “right wing.” None of these men saw it that way. They didn’t “convert” from left to right. Rather, they viewed themselves as moving seamlessly from one form of socialism to another. From a purely class-based socialism to a broader form of socialism that took into account class as well as national loyalties.

We can see this in the example of Mussolini, who established the world’s first f*****t regime in Rome, a decade before Hitler came to power. Mussolini was the leading Marxist in Italy, the recognized leader of Italian socialism. After his successful March on Rome, Lenin sent his congratulations, praising Mussolini as a fellow revolutionary on the left. Mussolini’s career shows how f*****m grew out of Marxism. Marx had predicted that the increased impoverishment of workers would cause a socialist revolution to erupt in the most advanced industrial countries: Germany and Great Britain.

That didn’t happen. This created the famous “crisis of Marxism” in the late 19th and early 20th century. Out of that crisis came two new forms of socialism: Leninist Bolshevism and Mussolini’s F*****m.

“The foundation of f*****m,” Mussolini writes in his “Autobiography,” “is the conception of the state. F*****m conceives the State as an absolute. In comparison to which all individuals or groups are relative, only to be conceived of in their relation to the State. For us F*****ts, the State … represents the immanent spirit of the nation.” Replace the word “f*****m” with “progressivism,” and we could be hearing these words recited at a Democratic National Convention.

Mussolini broke with Marx on a single point. Marx insisted that workers are loyal only to their class. “The working man,” Marxists liked to say, “has no country.” Mussolini knew that people are no less attached to their nation than to their occupation. Consequently, Mussolini, like Hitler, embraced socialism of a special kind, namely national socialism.

Like the Marxists, the f*****ts and the N**is also embraced violence as a revolutionary concept. N**i violence involved disrupting campus events, threatening and beating up dissenters. And enforcing a conformity of thought and practice in line with the regnant ideology. Notice the close similarity between this f*****t bullying and the conduct of the American left today.

In ideology and in tactics, the American left today is the party of f*****m. The only difference is that it denies its true pedigree. Their big lie is to blame their own sins on Trump and the Republicans. In a sick twist, the real f*****ts in America pretend to be anti-f*****ts. And accuse the true anti-f*****ts of being f*****ts.
Most of what you have commented on is true, but th... (show quote)


Dinesh D'Souza is a national treasure. There are very few real political prisoners in America, but Dinesh D'Souza is one. He is brilliant and fearless. Every word of this is true.

Reply
 
 
Sep 21, 2017 07:33:13   #
Randy131 Loc: Florida
 
My opinions exactly, we must think alike.



Ricktloml wrote:
Dinesh D'Souza is a national treasure. There are very few real political prisoners in America, but Dinesh D'Souza is one. He is brilliant and fearless. Every word of this is true.

Reply
Sep 21, 2017 09:36:53   #
cold iron Loc: White House
 
Ricktloml wrote:
Dinesh D'Souza is a national treasure. There are very few real political prisoners in America, but Dinesh D'Souza is one. He is brilliant and fearless. Every word of this is true.



Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.