CIA Agent Confesses On Deathbed: "We Blew Up WTC7 On 9/11" #2 (Page 2): You only believe you have the final answer and you have a long ways to go to prove it. So far you haven't proven...

This topic was split up because it has reached high page count.
You can find the follow-up topic here.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Steve700 wrote:

Of course I have the final answer and I proven it again and again. I'm just trying to shake you out of your denial, get you to man up, stop suppressing t***h, repent and admit you see the Jews now and have been a stupid obstinate and contrary ass hole.

You only believe you have the final answer and you have a long ways to go to prove it. So far you haven't proven a damned thing.

If you are serious about finding the answers to all your questions, you're going to have to go much deeper than just looking for pictures and watching t***her videos.

whole2th

100 pages of back-and-forth ... evidence proving controlled demolition countered by ridicule, distraction and denial.

Good and evil in action.

Some here can tell nothing but lies. Lies are their very essence--their winning formula and the basis of their being.

The ugly t***h is an existential threat to these 'occupied' (soul-less?) aliens.

http://ReThink911.org

whole2th

You want whistleblowers?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHbrOg092GA

Steve700

Blade_Runner wrote:

You only believe you have the final answer and you have a long ways to go to prove it. So far you haven't proven a damned thing.

If you are serious about finding the answers to all your questions, you're going to have to go much deeper than just looking for pictures and watching t***her videos.

I would say I have proven as much as needs to be proven, which is exactly why you haven't been able to provide any pictures, since the only pictures that exist are the ones that show there is no airliner wreckage at either the Pentagon or out in that field. And I showed you the jet powered missle that to the different single jet engine that was found answers everything else from your sightings to the single smaller jet engine that was found. You're such an incorrigibly defiant and obstinate delusional Dick Head.

STOPS WITH THE BULL S**T & SHOW THE PICTURES or AERIAL VIDEO FOOTAGE PROVING YOUR ASSERTIONS or ADMIT YOU JUST DON'T KNOW

Steve700

whole2th wrote:

You want whistleblowers?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHbrOg092GA

No, I want to tell me why you are sucha cowardly punk that you had to put me on your ignore list so you would have to deal with true assertions I was making that make you look like an i***t with no way of countering what was obviously true.

whole2th

Steve700 wrote:

No, I want to tell me why you are sucha cowardly punk that you had to put me on your ignore list so you would have to deal with true assertions I was making that make you look like an i***t with no way of countering what was obviously true.

Great presentation by a CIA whistleblower, yes? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHbrOg092GA

You have your priorities screwed up--or you are one of (((them))) pretending to be about exposing 9-11.

In either case, Chico chihuahua, you are carrying water for those who did 9-11. IGNORING YOU is the right thing for me to have done. You confirm my suspicions with each of your self-absorbed, harassing posts.

whole2th

Almost 5 years old, but a very good, concise review of the available evidence, and proof positive that the imminent and necessary New York Laws - the modern day Nuremberg Laws - must forever ban Jewish ownership and control of ANY media - newspapers, tv, radio, magazines, movies, books, Internet.....

If (((they))) didn't control the media, (((they))) never would have gotten away with IX XI.

And so much else.

Hitler's Lament was the gullibility of the German Volk and their susceptibility to The Big Lie.

If America's gullibility continues, we're done as a country. We, the people, have been manipulated by t*****rs within our government and the mass media/Hollywood.

https://mark1marti2.wordpress.com/2012/09/17/kourosh-ziabari-and-fars-news-agency-of-iran-a-conversation-with-mark-dankof-on-israel-and-9-11/

Mark Dankof has it right. He has no axe to grind other than speaking t***h from his perspective as a Lutheran Pastor.

payne1000

Blade_Runner wrote:

Not that 5 minute piece of s**t again. Must be a f... (show quote)

It's telling that you can't refute even one fact which the 5-minute video reveals.
Denial is not rebuttal.

Jean Deaux

Blade_Runner wrote:

What kind of missile was it? From where was it launched? Who launched it? Why was it never tracked by any radar?

As I pointed out, it was a USAF AGM 86D cruise missile as proved by the part number match on the turbine wheel that was found at the site. If I could tell you who launched it I could tell you who was responsible for a large part of 9-11. Since it was a USAF missile, I would presume it was military originated and probably from a military site. Perhaps it was tracked on radar but never reported. I don't know but you'll have to let logic play a role. People in the military still follow orders from on high and since whoever launched it had to program its destination, I don't imagine they are coming forward to admit anything.

Jean Deaux

whole2th wrote:

100 pages of back-and-forth ... evidence proving controlled demolition countered by ridicule, distraction and denial.

Good and evil in action.

Some here can tell nothing but lies. Lies are their very essence--their winning formula and the basis of their being.

The ugly t***h is an existential threat to these 'occupied' (soul-less?) aliens.

:

In a word, Exactly!

Jean Deaux

Blade_Runner wrote:

A FURY FOR GOD: The Islamist Attack on America

The Looming Tower: Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11

The Evolution of Al Qaeda and the Intertwining Paths Leading to 9/11

“The Looming Tower,” the title of Lawrence Wright’s remarkable new book about Al Qaeda and 9/11, refers not only to the doomed towers of the World Trade Center, but also to a passage in the Koran, which Osama bin Laden quoted several times in a speech exhorting the 19 hijackers to become martyrs to their cause: “Wherever you are, death will find you/even in the looming tower.”

Mr. Wright’s book, based on more than 500 interviews — ranging from Mr. bin Laden’s best friend in college, Jamal Khalifa, to Yosri Fouda, a reporter for Al Jazeera, to Richard A. Clarke, the former White House counterterrorism chief — gives the reader a searing view of the tragic events of Sept. 11, 2001, a view that is at once wrenchingly intimate and boldly sweeping in its historical perspective.

Though the broad outlines of his story have been recounted many, many times before, Mr. Wright fleshes out the narrative with myriad new details and a keen ability to situate the events he describes in a larger cultural and political context. And by focusing on the lives and careers of several key players on the “road to 9/11” — namely, Mr. bin Laden; his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri; the former head of Saudi intelligence, Prince Turki al-Faisal; and the F.B.I.’s former counterterrorism chief, John O’Neill — he has succeeded in writing a narrative history that possesses all the immediacy and emotional power of a novel, an account that indelibly illustrates how the political and the personal, the public and the private were often inextricably intertwined.

Mr. Wright’s book suggests that “the charisma and vision of a few individuals shaped the nature” of the contest between Islam and the West. While “the tectonic plates of history were certainly shifting,” promoting a period of conflict between those two cultures, he contends, the emergence of Al Qaeda “depended on a unique conjunction of personalities” — most notably, Mr. Zawahri, who promoted the apocalyptic notion that only violence could change history, and Mr. bin Laden, whose global vision and leadership “held together an organization that had been bankrupted and thrown into exile.”

The book also suggests that the events of Sept. 11 were not inevitable. Rather, bad luck, the confluence of particular decisions and chance encounters, dithering on the part of United States officials and a series of absurd turf wars between the C.I.A. and F.B.I. all contributed to Al Qaeda’s success in pulling off its nefarious plans that sunny September day.

The Plot Against America
When Mohamed Atta and his four Saudi confederates commandeered a Boeing 767 and steered it into the north tower of the World Trade Center, they began a story that still consumes us nearly five years on, and one that seems, on bad days, to promise war without end.

But the events of Sept. 11, 2001, were in many ways less the start of a tale than the end of one, or at least the climax of one, begun many years before in many different precincts: in the middle-class suburbs of Cairo, in the mosques of Hamburg, in Jidda, in Islamabad, in the quiet university town of Greeley, Colo.

In its simplest terms, this is the story of how a small group of men, with a frightening mix of delusion and calculation, rose from a tormented civilization to mount a catastrophic assault on the world’s mightiest power, and how another group of men and women, convinced that such an attack was on the way, tried desperately to stop it.

What a story it is. And what a riveting tale Lawrence Wright fashions in this marvelous book. “The Looming Tower” is not just a detailed, heart-stopping account of the events leading up to 9/11, written with style and verve, and carried along by villains and heroes that only a crime novelist could dream up. It’s an education, too — though you’d never know it — a thoughtful examination of the world that produced the men who brought us 9/11, and of their progeny who bedevil us today. The portrait of John O’Neill, the driven, demon-ridden F.B.I. agent who worked so frantically to stop Osama bin Laden, only to perish in the attack on the World Trade Center, is worth the price of the book alone. “The Looming Tower” is a thriller. And it’s a tragedy, too.

url=https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-86207-... (show quote)

I didn't see a repudiation of the Lt Cols witnessing of the Pentagon scene. Have you given up on that effort?

payne1000

Jean Deaux wrote:

I didn't see a repudiation of the Lt Cols witnessing of the Pentagon scene. Have you given up on that effort?

Blade has a habit of ignoring evidence which doesn't offer opportunity for easy obfuscation.
He didn't comment on April Gallop's testimony either.

Steve700

whole2th wrote:

Great presentation by a CIA whistleblower, yes? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHbrOg092GA

You have your priorities screwed up--or you are one of (((them))) pretending to be about exposing 9-11.

In either case, Chico chihuahua, you are carrying water for those who did 9-11. IGNORING YOU is the right thing for me to have done. You confirm my suspicions with each of your self-absorbed, harassing posts.

Of course Bush didn't think the 911 plan of all by himself. When one knows much about how world politics works, one realizes some members of the illuminati, CIA and the g*******t CFR are the real planners and orchestrator's of the whole thing too, which of course includes a lot of Jews. That does not mean that it is a "Jewish conspiracy". It's a g*******t conspiracy.

No, putting me on your ignore list was NOT the right thing to do. It was a cowardly act because you had nothing to say that could rebut what I said about those evil Palestinians who you support over the average Israeli who only wants peace and has nothing to do with the evil Luciferian g*******t plan. You're a Cowardly Chicken S**t PUNK who is no better than those evil nasty demented cowardly people of the left who use Political Correctness to scream R****T! at innocent good people in order to avoid debate. Like an undisciplined disorderly obstinate little child, you need to admit to your unfair actions coming out of your chicken s**t cowardice.. (Otherwise you'll remain stuck in your stunted development, never becoming a man)

I want to you to tell me why you are such a cowardly punk that you had to put me on your ignore list so you would not have to deal with the true assertions I was making that make you look like an i***t with no way of countering what was obviously true.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Jean Deaux wrote:

As I pointed out, it was a USAF AGM 86D cruise mis... (show quote)

The AGM-86B air-launched cruise missiles and AGM-86C/D conventional air-launched cruise missiles were developed to increase the effectiveness of B-52H bombers.

The AGM 86D was designed and engineered to penetrate deeply buried targets.

The AGM 86D was developed to maneuver and dive onto its target in a near vertical orientation. (The AGM 86D is not aerodynamically configured for horizontal target penetrations.)

The AGM 86D is fitted with a penetrating warhead (two forward shaped charges) and a 3000 pound blast fragmentation primary warhead.

Production of the AGM 86D began in the 3rd quarter of the year 2000.

The first flight test of an AGM 86D was conducted in November 2001 at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico. It was launched from a B52.

In summary. Conspiracy theorists have totally ignored many critical factors in their attempts to identify the engine components found inside the Pentagon.

1) the AGM 86D was not available for operational deployment until November, 2001.

2) the AGM 86D must be air-launched from a B52. The B52 is not a stealth bomber. There is no radio or radar data showing a primary radar target anywhere over the continental United States that is consistent with the flight of a B52 on a launch mission. Nor is there any radar data consistent with the launch and flight of an AGM 86D terminating at the Pentagon.

3) had an AGM 86D been configured for a low level horizontal strike into the Pentagon, the missile's unitary 1200 pound penetrator charge would have blown open the walls through which the 3000 pound primary warhead would have entered the building and exploded at some distance within. Such an explosion never occurred, but even if it had, it would have done a hell of lot more internal damage to the building, probably k**led a lot more people, and would have destroyed completely the missile's single engine.

4) the AGM 86D has a wing span of 12 feet, is 20 feet in length, 2.5 feet in diameter, and weighs 2.2 tons. This size and weight are not consistent with the external and internal damage sustained by the Pentagon. By comparison, a Boeing 757-200 has a wing span of 124 feet, is 154 feet in length, and has a maximum take-off weight of 127 tons. This size and weight is consistent with the measured damage to the Pentagon.

5) The AGM 86D power plant is a Williams Research Corp. F-107-WR-10 turbofan engine.

6) the engines installed on Boeing 757-200. registration #N644AA, designated Flight 77 were Rolls Royce RB211-535E4B triple-shaft turbofans. The engine components found inside the Pentagon were identified as those of this engine. A complete analysis of these components can be studied HERE.

7) The Flight Data Recorder installed on Boeing 757-200, registration # N644AA, designated Flight 77 was recovered from the rubble inside the Pentagon. The data on this FDR was analyzed thoroughly. The resulting AA77 Flight Path Study was based on data recorded on this FDR as well as radar data obtained from FAA ARTC centers, approach control at Washington Dulles airport, and the USAF 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron.

Flight AA77 on 9/11: New FDR Analysis Supports the Official Flight Path Leading to Impact with the Pentagon

NOTE: Various groups of 9/11 conspiracy theorists are not in agreement on what hit the Pentagon. Some say it was a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior or a Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk--probably configured as an unmanned drone. In every aspect of their claims, the entire 9/11 conspiracy movement is loaded with such inconsistencies and contradictions. They just can't seem to get everybody on the same page.

whole2th

A better thing to do with our time is discuss this CIA whistleblower who mentions 9-11 lies in his exposure of unconstitutional and illegal actions taken by the CIA.

He recommends dismantling the CIA.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHbrOg092GA