jonhatfield Loc: Green Bay, WI

The fairy gal thumbs in again ignoramusing the ignored jon. Who are the "ignoramus's" now? Oops, I'm not supposed to comment on the lower class grammar, am I? Sorry, I can't help noticing you people aren't quite the class of people I'm used to associating with. Yucky people.

jonhatfield Loc: Green Bay, WI

"for heavens sack" you missed the point.....you nuts are the people in a nutshell. :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

pixie

if we don't meet your standards....like you don't meet ours.....and you sure are in a class by yourself....ignore us!...won't hurt my feelings for real! :hunf: :hunf: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown:

PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

jonhatfield Loc: Green Bay, WI

You're supposed to be ignoring me, silly Pixie, instead of thumbing at or about me for 2 pages now.

You have orders from OG and Faither...Did they need to spell it out? It's spelled i g n o r e .

jonhatfield Loc: Green Bay, WI

Hey Stan, Old G, Pix, Faith, MoreProp, SoRINO, Fungus--did you get tired of fantasizing about the c*******t tyrant plot to destroy America? That's spelled f a n t a s y . Another spelling for it is p a r a n o i d . I abbreviate that as R W E N U T S .

faithistheword

If you're asking ME (ARE WE NUTS?) --Yeah--you are !

jonhatfield Loc: Green Bay, WI

I hadn't thought of the abbeviation that way.....I meant Right Wingy Extremist Nuts. Yes, RWEs have a large camp of nutty people on OPP and some who are quite sane in their opinions. You RWENUTs on this particular thread discredit the smaller more sane group. LWEs have a tendency to conspiracy nutty fantasies too, of course.

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

In addition to Obama making every effort to change the country into a socialist state, he has ordered his henchman AG Holder to tell the state AGs to stop defending gay marriage bans that are laws in their respective states. Obama has told him that if you don't like the law you do not have to do your job as AG to enforce it. Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring stood by as a US District Court ruled against his state's prohibition of same sex marriage. Whether the AG likes the laws that have passed in his state or not, it is his JOB to defend the law. Apparently if you are a Democrat you don't have to defend the law if it goes against your sensibilities. Just another version of "I have a pen and I have a phone" to which should be added, "and I have no integrity"

PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

Holder: You Don’t Have to Enforce Laws You Disagree With
Posted on February 25, 2014

Picking and choosing laws is not how things are supposed to work.
Check it out:

Attorney General Eric Holder is taking the lawless attitude of the Obama administration and passing it down to state attorneys general. Yesterday during an interview with The New York Times, Holder said state attorneys general do not have to enforce laws they disagree with, specifically when it comes to the issue of gay marriage.

It is highly unusual for the United States attorney general to advise his state counterparts on how and when to refuse to defend state laws. But Mr. Holder said when laws touch on core constitutional issues like equal protection, an attorney general should apply the highest level of scrutiny before reaching a decision on whether to defend it. He said the decision should never be political or based on policy objections.

“Engaging in that process and making that determination is something that’s appropriate for an attorney general to do,” Mr. Holder said.


Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2014/02/holder-dont-enforce-laws-disagree/#wIsE2XHpR6HfhJMr.99
Attorney General Eric Holder is taking the lawless attitude of the Obama administration and passing it down to state attorneys general. Yesterday during an interview with The New York Times, Holder said state attorneys general do not have to enforce laws they disagree with, specifically when it comes to the issue of gay marriage.

It is highly unusual for the United States attorney general to advise his state counterparts on how and when to refuse to defend state laws. But Mr. Holder said when laws touch on core constitutional issues like equal protection, an attorney general should apply the highest level of scrutiny before reaching a decision on whether to defend it. He said the decision should never be political or based on policy objections.

“Engaging in that process and making that determination is something that’s appropriate for an attorney general to do,” Mr. Holder said.
In 2011, the Obama administration announced attorneys in the Department of Justice would not enforce the Defense of Marriage Act, which was later struck down in 2013 by the Supreme Court.

pixie

exactly right!!!.... :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

funguy1949

OMG can't wait for the NOV.e******ns hope every last one of those dam demwits are outstead out of office.there nothing but brainwashed/braindead ass holes liberals.