pana
Loc: are we there yet?
Brian Devon wrote:
When it is used as a verb capitalization is not necessary...Einstein...
Nope still Google.
"Usage: 'Google' as verb referring to searching for information via any conduit other than Google.
pana wrote:
Nope still Google.
"Usage: 'Google' as verb referring to searching for information via any conduit other than Google.
If you look up google (as a verb), on the Merriam-Webster online dictionary, you will see that the first "g" is lower case...Einstein...
pana
Loc: are we there yet?
Brian Devon wrote:
If you look up google (as a verb), on the Merriam-Webster online dictionary, you will see that the first "g" is lower case...Einstein...
Trying to get on my good side by repeating your admiration for me will not make you right. Google is the name of a company dear. That makes it a proper noun.
pana wrote:
Trying to get on my good side by repeating your admiration for me will not make you right. Google is the name of a company dear. That makes it a proper noun.
Go fight with Merriam-Webster. I'm sure they will appreciate your telling them how to run their business.
pana
Loc: are we there yet?
Brian Devon wrote:
Go fight with Merriam-Webster. I'm sure they will appreciate your telling them how to run their business.
Why would I want to do that? I already know Google is the name of a publically owned company. I actually bought GOOG at around $710.00 $720.00. I have been very pleased with its performance.
vernon wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup:i think we might see the end of bonnier and thet will see a great change.
Get rid of Bonnier? Has the right declared war again against another popular republican leader? Is it just a matter of time before the right wing black lists so many people, most of America will be labeled liberal or a democrat. Is it possible that this moral police tactic used by many radical right will make it obsolete and irrelevant? Rand Paul's in an article below says as much.
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2014/0209/Rand-Paul-warns-Texas-Republicans-Your-state-could-turn-blueSpeaking to the county Republican organization in Houston Saturday evening, Rand Paul warned that Texas "will be a Democratic state within 10 years if you don't change."
"That doesn't mean we give up on what we believe in, but it means we have to be a more welcoming party, Paul said, as reported by CNN. We have to welcome people of all races. We need to welcome people of all classes business class, working class.
We need to have people with ties and without ties, with tattoos and without tattoos; with earrings, without earrings, he said. We need a more diverse party. We need a party that looks like America.
It seems so "American", ....a subsidy/entitlement that benefits the rich and the poor.
Brian Devon wrote:
Your English are truly wonderful. You must make your parents very proud.
at least i know who they are more than i can say about you you no good basterd.
Brian Devon wrote:
Yeah...this is sure going to convince all the tens of millions of Democrats who subscribe to the National Review. Why not just publish it in the "Weekly Recycler"?
BTW, actually it wasn't the Democratic party who left Reagan...it was his mind that left him...and long before the rightwing puppeteers made him into a p**********l Charley McCarthy.
you proved his statement the only creeps in the party are pussies like you and bojob and 669 and the others .your just i***ts that want a free hand out no matter who you steal it from.
rhomin57 wrote:
I only have one issue with your post, otherwise it read to me as a good post with lots of important points.
Re: Bhoener, what is it that people expect him to do? He is not the majority. Is he suppose to pick Obama up by the collar and seat of his pants and toss him out of the White House. Throw water on Pelosi so she will dissolve? Smack Reid on the chubby red cheeks and say no-no? I don't get it because the expectations for this one man: Bhoener, in the position he's in, is simply unrealistic.
I only have one issue with your post, otherwise it... (
show quote)
John Boehner likes to say that he only has control of one half of one third of thengovernment. An absolutely moronic statement, meant for the dolts who do not understand the beauty of our Constitution. The idea was that one party would not be able to control all parts of the government. Thus, there would be a check on one party running rough shod over the other.
And there is the problem with John Boehner. He has folded too often and in many cases worked to assist President Pookie and Dingy Harry pass their agenda. Boehner has for too long been an establishment, go along to get along guy.
I do not expect Boehner to get anything done. What I expect from him is to not allow Pookie and the dems to get anything done either. He does have that ability.
Art wrote:
According to polls, doing nothing is not very popu... (
show quote)
Art: Its not that I'm an ideologue , I probably am; but I'm bright enough to see through most of the guano to realize the Republicans didn't shutdown the Government! The American people have become so sheeple that you can pull the wool over their eyes! We have been so dumb down that evil people will play these games and place the blame where ever they want. What we had better watch out for in the 2014 e******n is v***r f***d!!!! See; "When a well packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the t***h will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.
The midterm e******ns are meaningless It makes no difference which party controls the congress. The republicans have proved during the last congress they have no intention to return this country to constitutional government. As it stands now there is no difference.
LAwrence wrote:
The midterm e******ns are meaningless It makes no difference which party controls the congress. The republicans have proved during the last congress they have no intention to return this country to constitutional government. As it stands now there is no difference.
Lawrence: We better pray for a difference...until the American people put a stop to these agendas at play... we are approaching revolution!
I'm on Google, and googling.
I'm on google, and googling.
I'm on Google, and Googling.
I'm on Google to google for a while.
I'm on Google to Google for a while. !!! The only one that did not get redlined as improper spelling. It is a proper noun beginning with a capitol G no matter how you use it.
I just had to see.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.