One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Government Spending an Addiction
Feb 9, 2014 08:22:35   #
Grampy
 
Ok How does Washington justify an increase in spending of 2.6 % (2014 budget) and what happened to all the savings from reduced war efforts in Iraq & Afghanistan.
Spending

Federal outlays are expected to increase by 2.6 percent this year, to $3.5 trillion, or 20.5 percent of GDP—their average percentage over the past 40 years. CBO projects that under current law, outlays will grow faster than the economy during the next decade and will equal 22.4 percent of GDP in 2024. With no changes in the applicable laws, spending for Social Security, Medicare (including offsetting receipts), Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, and subsidies for health insurance purchased through exchanges will rise from 9.7 percent of GDP in 2014 to 11.7 percent in 2024, CBO estimates. Net interest payments by the federal government are also projected to grow rapidly, climbing from 1.3 percent of GDP in 2014 to 3.3 percent in 2024, mostly because of the return of interest rates to more typical levels. However, the rest of the government’s noninterest spending—for defense, benefit programs other than those mentioned above, and all other nondefense activities—is projected to drop from 9.4 percent of GDP this year to 7.3 percent in 2024 under current law.

Reply
Feb 9, 2014 09:48:40   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Grampy wrote:
Ok How does Washington justify an increase in spending of 2.6 % (2014 budget) and what happened to all the savings from reduced war efforts in Iraq & Afghanistan.
Spending

Federal outlays are expected to increase by 2.6 percent this year, to $3.5 trillion, or 20.5 percent of GDP—their average percentage over the past 40 years. CBO projects that under current law, outlays will grow faster than the economy during the next decade and will equal 22.4 percent of GDP in 2024. With no changes in the applicable laws, spending for Social Security, Medicare (including offsetting receipts), Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, and subsidies for health insurance purchased through exchanges will rise from 9.7 percent of GDP in 2014 to 11.7 percent in 2024, CBO estimates. Net interest payments by the federal government are also projected to grow rapidly, climbing from 1.3 percent of GDP in 2014 to 3.3 percent in 2024, mostly because of the return of interest rates to more typical levels. However, the rest of the government’s noninterest spending—for defense, benefit programs other than those mentioned above, and all other nondefense activities—is projected to drop from 9.4 percent of GDP this year to 7.3 percent in 2024 under current law.
Ok How does Washington justify an increase in spen... (show quote)


Wh**ever happened to the "balanced budget act" of the Clinton era?

Reply
Feb 9, 2014 10:08:09   #
Winter Solstice Loc: Salt Lake City
 
I don't know how Clinton era equals a "balanced Budget". During his two terms the National Debt increased $1.0tirllion in his first tern and $0.4trillion in his second term. I agree these numbers are small but the Government still had to borrow (increase the National Debt) during both of Clinton's terms.

lpnmajor wrote:
Wh**ever happened to the "balanced budget act" of the Clinton era?

Reply
 
 
Feb 9, 2014 10:40:20   #
Unclet Loc: Amarillo, Tx
 
Winter Solstice wrote:
I don't know how Clinton era equals a "balanced Budget". During his two terms the National Debt increased $1.0tirllion in his first tern and $0.4trillion in his second term. I agree these numbers are small but the Government still had to borrow (increase the National Debt) during both of Clinton's terms.


Just words from the Gov't to placate the masses; no substance to any of it.

Reply
Feb 9, 2014 14:30:09   #
Winter Solstice Loc: Salt Lake City
 
Unclet wrote:
Just words from the Gov't to placate the masses; no substance to any of it.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 9, 2014 18:49:47   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Winter Solstice wrote:
I don't know how Clinton era equals a "balanced Budget". During his two terms the National Debt increased $1.0tirllion in his first tern and $0.4trillion in his second term. I agree these numbers are small but the Government still had to borrow (increase the National Debt) during both of Clinton's terms.


The point is, they sold a balanced budget act to us, and then promptly ignored it. Relying on those knuckleheads to act responsibly is never going to happen. They said they would only pass bills that were paid for and immediately pretended they never said any such thing. They honestly think we're stupid.

Reply
Feb 10, 2014 11:08:58   #
Grampy
 
lpnmajor wrote:
The point is, they sold a balanced budget act to us, and then promptly ignored it. Relying on those knuckleheads to act responsibly is never going to happen. They said they would only pass bills that were paid for and immediately pretended they never said any such thing. They honestly think we're stupid.


You're right - they can get away with it because most people are not paying attention ...... McConnell will pay a price in va the Democrat is in the lead and conservatives are tired of his leadership unfortunately this is a high price to pay to have republicans realize they should respect their conservative supporters

Reply
 
 
Feb 10, 2014 17:07:38   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Grampy wrote:
You're right - they can get away with it because most people are not paying attention ...... McConnell will pay a price in va the Democrat is in the lead and conservatives are tired of his leadership unfortunately this is a high price to pay to have republicans realize they should respect their conservative supporters


It would be surprising to find a politician respecting anyone who was not rich and/or powerful.

Reply
Feb 10, 2014 20:43:38   #
Winter Solstice Loc: Salt Lake City
 
Remember, We the People selected these people to act according to our preferences. We sent them to Washington. If they don't perform as expected "We the People" need to select a different person to represent us. When we don't do that, it is all our fault.

lpnmajor wrote:
It would be surprising to find a politician respecting anyone who was not rich and/or powerful.

Reply
Feb 10, 2014 23:38:21   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Winter Solstice wrote:
Remember, We the People selected these people to act according to our preferences. We sent them to Washington. If they don't perform as expected "We the People" need to select a different person to represent us. When we don't do that, it is all our fault.


Yep.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.