One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
This is way above any progressive / liberals ability to understand
Page <<first <prev 14 of 15 next>
Feb 13, 2014 16:50:05   #
Artemis
 
emarine wrote:
Sorry Dutch... I could not stop myself :lol:



I think that as a sheep abduction :shock:

Reply
Feb 13, 2014 17:09:23   #
cant beleve Loc: Planet Kolob
 
maelstrom wrote:
I think that as a sheep abduction :shock:


:XD: he definitely wasn't a "willing partner "

Reply
Feb 13, 2014 18:25:27   #
Glaucon
 
WHAT IF WE ALL FOLLOWED THIS ADVICE?

I'm not entitled to have an opinion unless I can state the arguments against my position better than the people who are in opposition. I think that I am qualified to speak only when I've reached that state. Charlie Munger

Reply
Feb 13, 2014 18:34:23   #
jonhatfield Loc: Green Bay, WI
 
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
"Dutchman", who's the q***r in the picture? That looks like the result of generations of "inbreeding". Obviously all brawn and no brains. Are you still married to your sister, or did you two finally get a divorce? You know, I didn't think i***ts, like you, actually existed. I thought people, like you, were all out of Hollywood casting, so they could have actors for "Duck Dynasty". Just kidding "Dutchman" I realize they have "inbreeds", like you, all over Arkansas. We're you the star "hillbilly" in Deliverance? And knock off that Senior Chief Petty Officer crap, you were never in the Navy. And how many times do I have to keep telling you, quit embarrassing the Dutch, change your user name to "Cretin", heaven knows you look like one.
"Dutchman", who's the q***r in the pictu... (show quote)


Brawn? Where? :lol: :lol: Quit insulting us hillbillies, Bruce. We don't look like that, no way.

Reply
Feb 13, 2014 18:50:07   #
emarine
 
The Dutchman wrote:
Good photo of you......


Dutch... you are very lucky that sheep can't talk :shock:

Reply
Feb 13, 2014 19:01:40   #
Bruce Kennedy Loc: Kansas
 
jonhatfield wrote:
Brawn? Where? :lol: :lol: Quit insulting us hillbillies, Bruce. We don't look like that, no way.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 13, 2014 19:01:59   #
Bruce Kennedy Loc: Kansas
 
emarine wrote:
Dutch... you are very lucky that sheep can't talk :shock:


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 14, 2014 23:26:49   #
Hungry Freaks
 
WTF are these two photos?

Which one is you DBQB? The top, a pudgy little guy trying his best Hank Williams Jr imitation. Standing besides a railing, usually 40-42 inches tall, indicates that this person is about 5' 6", 5' 7" at most.

Fat slob photoed below is another of the "I'm a man, I ride a Harley" types who are mostly insecure males trying to prove their masculinity by purchasing a motorcycle with built in "manliness" for reasons beyond my ken. Harleys have such low centers of gravity I know a 110-pound guy who can keep a full-dress hog rubber-side down.

Harley has done well selling that "outlaw" image to those who try to prove something by what they own and what they drive. Anybody with $10,000-$15,000 can by a Harley. No amount of money can buy a man's way out of sexual insecurities.

"Bring it on f*ggot" and those two photos say all one needs to know about you.



The Dutchman wrote:
Bring it on F*ggot... Or in your case you better send one of your big bad queens cause I doubt you have the spine to back up your mouth you little queen.

Reply
Feb 15, 2014 17:50:56   #
GEM lucas Loc: TRIADELPHIA ,WV
 
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
"Dutchman", who's the q***r in the picture? That looks like the result of generations of "inbreeding". Obviously all brawn and no brains. Are you still married to your sister, or did you two finally get a divorce? You know, I didn't think i***ts, like you, actually existed. I thought people, like you, were all out of Hollywood casting, so they could have actors for "Duck Dynasty". Just kidding "Dutchman" I realize they have "inbreeds", like you, all over Arkansas. We're you the star "hillbilly" in Deliverance? And knock off that Senior Chief Petty Officer crap, you were never in the Navy. And how many times do I have to keep telling you, quit embarrassing the Dutch, change your user name to "Cretin", heaven knows you look like one.
"Dutchman", who's the q***r in the pictu... (show quote)

Hey Bruce. Your wasting your time , the Dutchman is to far off the trail.He probably will never find his way back . Let him go on his merry way. Gem.

Reply
Feb 15, 2014 18:24:32   #
cant beleve Loc: Planet Kolob
 
GEM lucas wrote:
Hey Bruce. Your wasting your time , the Dutchman is to far off the trail.He probably will never find his way back . Let him go on his merry way. Gem.


Good riddence to bad rubbish.

Reply
Feb 15, 2014 19:20:07   #
Bruce Kennedy Loc: Kansas
 
GEM lucas wrote:
Hey Bruce. Your wasting your time , the Dutchman is to far off the trail.He probably will never find his way back . Let him go on his merry way. Gem.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 15, 2014 20:14:05   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
Hungry Freaks wrote:
jon-I don't believe we can substitute Internet-based education for actual bricks and mortar education. Students need actual contact with others-a community where they learn how to deal with others, opposing points of view, social and cultural differences, etc.

The 'net, while useful, doesn't allow this type of intra-personal contact. A good adjunct, but not a replacement. Community stil matters.


I do not perceive Jon is saying to replace "bricks and mortar". His point is, as I see it, with current technology more flexible ciriccullums can be written to provide the teacher more ways to convey educational materials. Our current educational system is one size fits all. The teacher is handed a ciriccullum and allowed very little, if any, leeway in presentation of materials to students. With a more flexible, the teacher has a higher chance of success for all students or a greater percentage.

Reply
Feb 15, 2014 20:20:11   #
jonhatfield Loc: Green Bay, WI
 
AuntiE wrote:
I do not perceive Jon is saying to replace "bricks and mortar". His point is, as I see it, with current technology more flexible ciriccullums can be written to provide the teacher more ways to convey educational materials. Our current educational system is one size fits all. The teacher is handed a ciriccullum and allowed very little, if any, leeway in presentation of materials to students. With a more flexible, the teacher has a higher chance of success for all students or a greater percentage.
I do not perceive Jon is saying to replace "b... (show quote)



Thank you, AuntiE. Very gracious of you to be considerate for me considering how downright mean I've been to you on occasion. Apologies for my past t***sgressions toward you.

Reply
Feb 15, 2014 20:27:41   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
jonhatfield wrote:
Excellent summary of past economic policies leading up to today's situation. Debt accumulated mainly from Reagonomics. ha. Ironic. I consider myself a Hamiltonian conservative and Reagan was the basis of my switching to Dem in 1984.

In terms of investment in education, now with the internet and virtual universal access to knowledge, it's a relatively simple matter of creating many and varied multiple curriculum threads and sides and materials on the internet so that education can be individualized and teachers become guides and advisers instead of drill sergeants. Simple and relatively inexpensive but requiring a program set up to get it started. Curriculum development could make every teacher effective, which depends more than anything else on effective materials and curriculum. Merit pay for special teachers, the Obama/Duncan idea, simply creates ill feeling. What is needed is curriculum that makes it possible for all teachers to be effective.
Excellent summary of past economic policies leadin... (show quote)


You and I have had the discussion on more flexible curriculum before and are in agreement on it being beneficial for both teacher and student.

Merit pay is a bad idea, except, possibly, for teachers willing to teach math and science in disadvantaged areas.

School systems continue encountering problems in removal of "poor performing" teachers. I do not advocate tossing them out arbitrarily; however, they need to be mentored, coached and provided tools to succeed. Upon determination success will not be forthcoming, they need to be terminated.

An idea that public schools do not utilize, but has shown success in Waldorf based education, is students having the same teacher during certain grades. It provides continuity and stability. The teacher learns the students strengths, weaknesses, way of processing information (verbal or visual). It can create a team approach, as parents establish a relationship as well. Communication becomes more open in the partnership.

Reply
Feb 15, 2014 20:32:32   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
jonhatfield wrote:
Thank you, AuntiE. Very gracious of you to be considerate for me considering how downright mean I've been to you on occasion. Apologies for my past t***sgressions toward you.


I have had mean before and probably will again.

You and I have had prior commentary on education. It seems we have both given it great thought. I must say this. One has to wonder why the Dept. ofEducation spends so little time actually talking to teachers as opposed to administrators?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 14 of 15 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.