S. Maturin wrote:
FIRST: You quoted me without giving me credit- That is theft of intellectual property and makes you a thief. (It seem to boil down to the simple t***h: I can splain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. ) <Actually, I got it from another poster here a while ago and, well, I am feigning injury.>
SECOND: You are obviously ashamed of your sources since they are most likely voices within your head.
First, I want to congratulate you for using the statement , “ I can explain it to you, but I can’t understand it for you.” That was a very clever and I am able to be aware of cleverness where ever and from whomever I find it. I knew when I read and admired the comment it was way the hell above your mental functioning, so I did a search of it and it is attributed to Ed Koch and he was wise to say it and you were more perceptive than you led us to believe by using it as your own. Apparently we both used Ed’s clever statement without attribution.
I don't think many of us hear voices in our heads and sorry about your head voices. Danger: Don't put any validity in what the voices tell you. They have been lying to you for a long time.