One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
will The Royal Family all be pardoned?
Page <prev 2 of 2
Aug 1, 2017 10:58:30   #
Glaucon
 
proud republican wrote:
Not officially. And even if we are at war, what treason did President Trump commited????


Trump as conspired with a country that is hostile to America to manipulate our e******n so that T***p w*n. Also, Trump has obstructed justice in blocking the investigations of his conspiracy.

Reply
Aug 1, 2017 11:06:16   #
boatbob2
 
Im thinking you made a mistake,when you said Trump,you really meant obozo and the clintons............

Reply
Aug 1, 2017 11:22:10   #
S. Maturin
 
Glaucon wrote:
You have to expend energy and be constantly vigilant to avoid news. You are apparently able to actually be unaware of what is going on in the world. News is all around you. What air are you breathing?



So, what is your 'news' source?? Why did you duck that simple question? Could it be that you feel embarrassed?

Reply
Aug 1, 2017 11:52:32   #
Glaucon
 
S. Maturin wrote:
So, what is your 'news' source?? Why did you duck that simple question? Could it be that you feel embarrassed?


It seem to boil down to the simple t***h: I can splain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.

You ask, "what my news source is" and I think that may be the core of our miscommunication . Anyone who has a "news source," one news source is ill informed. I have a great many sources of news, opinion and propaganda and, fortunately, I have the motivation, self awareness, and mental faculties to sort through all of the sources in order to make my estimations of T***H. Obviously, my estimation of t***h needs adjustments when information and circumstances change. I hope you are able to try to understand and think before your programming causes you to react .

Reply
Aug 1, 2017 11:56:54   #
Glaucon
 
boatbob2 wrote:
Im thinking you made a mistake,when you said Trump,you really meant obozo and the clintons............


That is a very cute switch-a-roo. You did say one thing that is obviously not true: you said, " I am thinking." You are not very bright, but you are cute.

Reply
Aug 1, 2017 12:22:39   #
S. Maturin
 
Glaucon wrote:
It seem to boil down to the simple t***h: I can splain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.

You ask, "what my news source is" and I think that may be the core of our miscommunication . Anyone who has a "news source," one news source is ill informed. I have a great many sources of news, opinion and propaganda and, fortunately, I have the motivation, self awareness, and mental faculties to sort through all of the sources in order to make my estimations of T***H. Obviously, my estimation of t***h needs adjustments when information and circumstances change. I hope you are able to try to understand and think before your programming causes you to react .
It seem to boil down to the simple t***h: I can sp... (show quote)


FIRST: You quoted me without giving me credit- That is theft of intellectual property and makes you a thief. (It seem to boil down to the simple t***h: I can splain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. ) <Actually, I got it from another poster here a while ago and, well, I am feigning injury.>

SECOND: You are obviously ashamed of your sources since they are most likely voices within your head.

Reply
Aug 1, 2017 16:03:20   #
Glaucon
 
S. Maturin wrote:
FIRST: You quoted me without giving me credit- That is theft of intellectual property and makes you a thief. (It seem to boil down to the simple t***h: I can splain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. ) <Actually, I got it from another poster here a while ago and, well, I am feigning injury.>

SECOND: You are obviously ashamed of your sources since they are most likely voices within your head.


First, I want to congratulate you for using the statement , “ I can explain it to you, but I can’t understand it for you.” That was a very clever and I am able to be aware of cleverness where ever and from whomever I find it. I knew when I read and admired the comment it was way the hell above your mental functioning, so I did a search of it and it is attributed to Ed Koch and he was wise to say it and you were more perceptive than you led us to believe by using it as your own. Apparently we both used Ed’s clever statement without attribution.

I don't think many of us hear voices in our heads and sorry about your head voices. Danger: Don't put any validity in what the voices tell you. They have been lying to you for a long time.

Reply
Aug 1, 2017 16:04:12   #
Glaucon
 
Glaucon wrote:
It seem to boil down to the simple t***h: I can splain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.

You ask, "what my news source is" and I think that may be the core of our miscommunication . Anyone who has a "news source," one news source is ill informed. I have a great many sources of news, opinion and propaganda and, fortunately, I have the motivation, self awareness, and mental faculties to sort through all of the sources in order to make my estimations of T***H. Obviously, my estimation of t***h needs adjustments when information and circumstances change. I hope you are able to try to understand and think before your programming causes you to react .
It seem to boil down to the simple t***h: I can sp... (show quote)


NO RESPONSE?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.