thebigp

--47JH.,B43
Newly released documents from the FBI’s criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of highly classified materials highlight a “serious, but flawed investigation hindered by a lack of cooperation,” according to a new report.
Some of the 42 pages are marked “grand jury material,” indicating that the FBI considered the investigation serious enough to prosecute before a grand jury, according to a report by Fox News.
One document shows that one of Clinton’s private attorneys, Katherine Turner, had agreed to turn over one of Clinton’s non-secure Apple iPads and two of her BlackBerrys to the FBI.
However, neither smartphone had SIM cards or Secure Digital (SD) cards, the report said. A total of 13 mobile devices identified by the FBI as potentially using clintonemail.com addresses were never located by Clinton’s lawyers, according to government watchdog group Judicial Watch’s President Tom Fitton.
Some of those devices were pounded with hammers after Clinton’s homebrew servers went down or after news that Clinton aide Sidney Blumenthal’s email had been hacked, the report said.
“We are presuming there are still 13 devices at issue,” Fitton told Fox News. “The new records show how badly the Obama Justice Department and FBI mishandled the Clinton email investigation.”
There are 177 redactions in the documents, including of information that would “disclose investigation techniques.”
Fitton said the FBI was played by Clinton’s lawyers and didn’t care, and he called for an audit of the investigation.
“The Trump Justice Department needs to audit this mess and figure out if the Clinton matters need to be reopened or reinvigorated,” he said.
The report notes then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s meeting on the tarmac with Bill Clinton in Phoenix, Arizona, just eight days before then-FBI Director James Comey announced he would not recommend prosecution of Clinton.
Comey would later testify that Lynch, his then-boss, directed him to use the term “matter” instead of “investigation” when discussing the investigation into Clinton, and he complied.
The documents were released just before the nominee for FBI Director Christopher Wray appeared before his confirmation hearing.
Two former FBI agents told Fox News they hope that “the atmosphere is changed with a new director.”
source--breitbart, kristina, wong, fox, katherine turner, christopher wray

Babsan

We all know that Hillary is a criminal like many in DNC.The v**ers are stupid and the Crime syndicate knows it.2016 was an Atom bomb hit for the Crime Syndicate

Ricktloml

I think Hillary, Obama, the Democrats and the media all thought Hillary would be elected and all of this evidence would disappear.

Gatsby

Don't blame the FBI, the FBI only investigates crime, it is the duty of the justice department prosecutors to determine wether or not

there is sufficient evidence to support an indictment. If the prosecutors assigned to the case find the evidence sufficient, it is their duty to

present such evidence to a Grand Jury.

These prosecutors also will determine which evidence will be presented, and which may be suppressed.

Clinton's email case was under the control of justice department attorney's, and please note that AG Lynch at no time

referred to the attorney's assigned to this case as prosecutors.

Are these the same justice department attorneys tasked with defending Obamas

other abuses of power before the courts? Has AG Lynch placed a Hillary / Obama defense team in charge of this investigation?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/02/25/lynch-confirms-career-justice-department-attorneys-involved-in-clinton-email-probe.html

Hillary Clinton has recieved nearly $75,000 in donations from justice department employees.

Were the prosecutors assigned to this case among those who have made maximum contributions to the Clinton campaign?
http://freebeacon.com/issues/hillary-rakes-nearly-75000-justice-department-employees/

Considering the history of justice department lawyers and their ethical behavior, I ask you,

Has there ever been a case which cried out more loudly for the appointment of a special prosecutor?

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2016/05/20/Texas-judge-blasts-Justice-Department-lawyers-orders-ethics-training/9061463753014/

moldyoldy

Actually, Clinton Should Have Destroyed Her Phones Better

http://www.wired.com/2016/09/actually-clinton-destroyed-phones-better/

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

FBI - Ms Clinton, give us your electronic devices you used while being SOS and afterward, during the campaign.

Clinton - No.

FBI - Ok.

Saying the FBI is wanting something but are being turned down is just not plausible. If the FBI wants something, they usually just go get it before they tell you they want it. These claims of "not cooperating" are just plain stupid. Clinton is hiding things. She is not just going to hand you the evidence to prove your case against her. Add to that, the fact that they can hack her phones just as they can hack yours and mine, and even more, this "story" begins to really stink like fiction. Lets just admit it. The FBI has the evidence they need. They can get the evidence they want. There is no true investigation.

moldyoldy

The hones of US officials are routinely relaced and the old ones destroyed. Judicial watch knows this but they also know how to stir up the right.

kankune Loc: Iowa

Someone like you WOULD say that.....

kankune Loc: Iowa

It's getting old hearing investigation.....investigation. How about some results.

Randy131 Loc: Florida

It has all been a 'COVER_UP' by the DOJ and FBI (or at least the FBI Director and his right hand man, who is now temporarily running the FBI).

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

There will be results the day the republicans repeal Obamacare. I wouldn't hold my breath.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

I'm tending to agree. Both the dems and the repugs are jointly covering up and jointly trying to get rid of Trump.

kankune Loc: Iowa

That slimy swamp on the hill runs deep on both sides!

Randy131 Loc: Florida

What did the Republicans cover-up, and why, and how? It was Obama and the Democrats, and their minions, who were in power and running the show, so what and how did the Republicans cover-up anything, and for who and what did they cover-up, since we've been talking about Hillary Clinton's crimes and the Obama administration's cover-up to protect the criminal Hillary Clinton?

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

Lynch was in charge regardless of what the record says and you know it. It is evidenced by her instruction to Comey to use the word matter, and when Comey overstepped his authority by saying there would be no charges filed, you can bet it was directed by Lynch so she could drop the case.

Lynch is a large part of this conspiracy against America and most certainly was in charge.