carolyn

Most Americans believe that we should help the one's that actually need help but have no sympathy for the bums that are just too lazy to get and hold a job. These dregs will stand beside a "Manpower" sign that advertises $15.00 an hour jobs holding their signs that say they will work for food. But I assure you that if you stop and offer to feed them for a menial job you might have, they will come up with an excuse that they can't work because of some "hidden disability." It has happened.

I wonder how many of these conscienceless louts are already on welfare and doing this as a "side job."

cant beleve Loc: Planet Kolob

"And pookie won't it be nice to have all this time together building our relationship? " UGH!!!

Hungry Freaks

Newspaper "legals" of which you speak don't really provide that much revenue these days. Look at the paper and tell me how much space is contributed to legals. In the past, small town newspapers with large circulate in a small area got significiant revenue from legal ads by municipal, county and state legal notices. I don't think the federal government really spends much money on legal Info is printed in the National Registry, which acts as the fed's publication of record.

There is no such thing as government subsidized advertising outside of legal notices. Maybe military recruitment ads, but I don't think the military is doing much advertising at this point in time.

Considering a full-page ad in the NYT costs around $300,000 the piddling space taken by legals ain't much. And none of that is federal legal notices.

I don't know where Faux would get any revenue from legals.

Besides, as I noted, the feds don't spend much, if anything, on legals.

Again, raging rabid right paranoia.

Glen Beck got the ax because he's insane even by Faux standards. HIs anti-Semetic "Protocol of Zion" rants probably insulted Rupert Murdoch, who I believe is Jewish.

Your totally ignorant rants surprise even me. Making a statement that government business profits Faux through "subsidized" adverts indicates a total lack of knowledge about the "legal" notices of which you speak. Or the NYT which may get some revenue from city, county or state legal notices.

Besides, I thought that Faux was always right. The only "fair and balanced" "news" out there. Glad to see that even Faux is target for the rabid right's self-reigteous indignation. If anyone deserves it, Faux "News" does.

carolyn

Who was talking about "legals?" I guess you have never heard about bribes, being the Sunday school teacher that you evidently are. But you see, a bribe is something, including great sums of money paid for an illegal service rendered. So are you saying that the Obummer administration is above and beyond offering bribes to have something authored and printed? If you are, then you are indeed more naïve than even I thought you to be.

An administration that would refuse to send help to an embattled embassy when the Americans there BEGGED for help, all to cover their own asses in their gun-running plot are nothing more than the lowest form of humanity. Then have a lower than human AG to thwart every attempt inspectors have tried to get to the bottom of what actually happened, plus make key witnesses to this planned plot disappear and refuse to give up information to their whereabouts is nothing but Chicago mafia tactics at work. But what can one expect when the people are no more intelligent than to elect this POS and his henchmen to the office of president?

And all for being able to say they helped to make history by electing the first black man to this office. And to top off the rest of their stupidity, he was only a very small part of being black.

Now that is stupidity at it's greatest example.