One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
CIA Agent Confesses On Deathbed: "We Blew Up WTC7 On 9/11"
This topic is locked to prevent further replies.
This discussion is continued in a new topic. You can find it here.
Page <<first <prev 65 of 99 next> last>>
 
This topic was split up because it has reached high page count.
You can find the follow-up topic here.
 
Aug 4, 2017 00:15:53   #
whole2th
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6IwqntKCNM The evidence linking Mossad and Israel to 9-11 crimes far exceeds the scant evidence that muslims did 9-11.

It wasn't muslims. http://www.takeourworldback.com/itwasntmuslims.htm

If you think this is an indictment of "all Jews", then are you saying that "all Jews" are complicit in the 9-11 crimes? I don't buy it that all Jews are complicit--yet, your argument seems designed to convince me it is all Jews who did 9-11.

Reply
Aug 4, 2017 00:23:47   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
whole2th wrote:
The evidence points to Mossad and t*****rous neocons who did 9-11. If the evidence is false, surely there is some rebuttal you have other than to call names ... "N**i", "Adolf" and "anti-Semite". The name calling does not refute the evidence.

The only evidence on the table here is your hatred of Israel and Jews. To say you are an Anti-Semite is not calling you names, it's merely identifying your h**eful ideology.

The Longest Hatred
Anti-Semitism is resurgent. Where did this poison come from – and is there an antidote?

The Hatred That Will Not Die : Television: PBS' 'The Longest Hatred' effectively and eloquently demonstrates that anti-Semitism fills a uniquely bloody niche in history.

The Longest Hatred

'The Longest Hatred'

Reply
Aug 4, 2017 05:07:20   #
Steve700
 
Super Dave wrote:
It's real incredulity.

Why don't you just shut the fuck up. You are such a Hard Core Unsuper Moron -- You & that Bad Blunder

Reply
 
 
Aug 4, 2017 05:13:07   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
Steve700 wrote:
Why don't you just shut the fuck up. You are such a stupid Dick Head


LOL

Reality pisses you off, doesn't it?

If you don't want people to make fun of your h**eful stupidity, you should vomit your conspiracies where there are no adults to reply.

Reply
Aug 4, 2017 05:38:18   #
Steve700
 
0
Super Dave wrote:
LOL

Reality pisses you off, doesn't it?

If you don't want people to make fun of your h**eful stupidity, you should vomit your conspiracies where there are no adults to reply.

It's not a h**eful stupidity. It's righteous anger over seeing the level of the sort of dumbed down stupidity that has allowed the embedded corruption and shadow government to exist in the 1st place and the useful i***ts that work diligently to accomplish their diabolical agenda as they are believing they are working for a noble cause. You and that stupid blade that been shown mountains of evidence, and you still persist in nonsense. You to seem as demon control has any liberals and demons controlled seems to be about the only thing that explains it. It's like were hypnotized to not see what you are seeing. You see pillars or columns of smoke being ejected from the twin towers (about 9 across the face of the building) The signature demolition explosive plumes of smoke and you've seen them in both pictures and videos and in fact, in the videos you see them occurring several floors below the floors collapsing in on each other as the building is coming down and your answers are the windows are being blown out from compression. But there is 56 windows, but only 9 plumes of smoke and all being ejected several floors below the floor that is collapsing in the one below. That proves there is something wrong with you. Plus the facts there is no hijackers on any servalence videos. And No reason for building 7 to have fallen. And the owner said that they were going to pull the building, but that can't be done without preset explosives. ---- An impossibility of those small oxygen start localized fighters to melt through 4 and 6 inch beams. No more plane wreckage than what could that in the back of a pickup truck at either the Pentagon were out in that field , etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. You're just plain crazy.

Reply
Aug 4, 2017 05:51:47   #
Steve700
 
whole2th wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6IwqntKCNM The evidence linking Mossad and Israel to 9-11 crimes far exceeds the scant evidence that muslims did 9-11.

It wasn't muslims. http://www.takeourworldback.com/itwasntmuslims.htm

If you think this is an indictment of "all Jews", then are you saying that "all Jews" are complicit in the 9-11 crimes? I don't buy it that all Jews are complicit--yet, your argument seems designed to convince me it is all Jews who did 9-11.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6IwqntKCNM The e... (show quote)

What's the deal that you put on your ignore list. I have no idea what I did that so offended you. Were you one of the liberals that I confronted with those goals of the C*******t to accomplish the o*******w of America, demanding that they explain and justify their sickness of deliberately aligning themselves with the destruction of America. Is that it?. Tell me what caused you to put me on your ignore list. And then how about taking me off of it. I mean if that's what it was, that's a really chicken s**t thing to do to avoid dealing with my question with some honesty. And yes, I do respond harshly with the willfully blind, and those who insult and mock or ignore, rather than answering a question. And I can still always catch you on most of the topics. . So what's the deal??? What did I do?

Reply
Aug 4, 2017 06:44:18   #
whole2th
 
A renounced Jew, Benjamin Freedman made a speech at the Willard Hotel in 1961. The devils here ignore the substance of that speech.

Gilad Atzmon writes about Jewish identity politics in his book, THE WANDERING WHO, and shows clear evidence of a "collective psychopathy" which is endemic in Jewish society. The devils here ignore the substance of the Atzmon writings.

Then they ridicule.

Then they divert attention.

Then they accuse of failings which are prominently and obviously their own failings.

Wash, rinse, repeat.

The cycle continues of ignore, ridicule, and accuse.

And all the while, the harvest of the 9-11 lies continues.

John 8:44 describes the devils here to a 't'.

Reply
 
 
Aug 4, 2017 07:03:55   #
Steve700
 
whole2th wrote:
A renounced Jew, Benjamin Freedman made a speech at the Willard Hotel in 1961. The devils here ignore the substance of that speech.

Gilad Atzmon writes about Jewish identity politics in his book, THE WANDERING WHO, and shows clear evidence of a "collective psychopathy" which is endemic in Jewish society. The devils here ignore the substance of the Atzmon writings.

Then they ridicule.

Then they divert attention.

Then they accuse of failings which are prominently and obviously their own failings.

Wash, rinse, repeat.

The cycle continues of ignore, ridicule, and accuse.

And all the while, the harvest of the 9-11 lies continues.

John 8:44 describes the devils here to a 't'.
A renounced Jew, Benjamin Freedman made a speech a... (show quote)

What's the deal that you put on your ignore list. I have no idea what I did that so offended you. Were you one of the liberals that I confronted with those goals of the C*******t to accomplish the o*******w of America, demanding that they explain and justify their sickness of deliberately aligning themselves with the destruction of America. Is that it?. Tell me what caused you to put me on your ignore list. And then how about taking me off of it. I mean if that's what it was, that's a really chicken s**t thing to do to avoid dealing with my question with some honesty. And yes, I do respond harshly with the willfully blind, and those who insult and mock or ignore, rather than answering a question. And I can still always catch you on most of the topics. . So what's the deal??? What did I do?

Reply
Aug 4, 2017 07:47:41   #
whole2th
 
Steve700 wrote:
What's the deal that you put on your ignore list. I have no idea what I did that so offended you. Were you one of the liberals that I confronted with those goals of the C*******t to accomplish the o*******w of America, demanding that they explain and justify their sickness of deliberately aligning themselves with the destruction of America. Is that it?. Tell me what caused you to put me on your ignore list. And then how about taking me off of it. I mean if that's what it was, that's a really chicken s**t thing to do to avoid dealing with my question with some honesty. And yes, I do respond harshly with the willfully blind, and those who insult and mock or ignore, rather than answering a question. And I can still always catch you on most of the topics. . So what's the deal??? What did I do?
What's the deal that you put on your ignore list. ... (show quote)


With your strategic sense, you may as well be one of them.

Reply
Aug 4, 2017 08:09:02   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
Why is it that we have gone back and forth on this multiple times now and you have yet to back up what you claim about the psi strength of steel.
Can you expect readers to believe your unsourced claims when you yourself are an unknown source?

You backed up your lack of knowledge for me putz... You can blab about your super strong 100psi steel all you want when in reality its 100,000psi yield steel you're talking about... it proves the lack of understanding in your argument... this has nothing to do with someone's identity ...its all about the credibility of your posts& you suck @ credibility... Office fires can reach 2000F it's commonplace...
Why is it that we have gone back and forth on this... (show quote)


Again you refuse to source your lies.
Username emarine represents two layers of unsourced lies.

Reply
Aug 4, 2017 10:23:18   #
whole2th
 
Defenders of the Jews ... emarine, Blade_Runner and not-so-super dave use tactics which are unbecoming of upright, forthright people of integrity. Lying, deceiving, misleading and ridiculing aren't nearly as effective as cogent debate.

In this way, it casts a shadow on all Jews.

Reply
 
 
Aug 4, 2017 12:47:36   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
whole2th wrote:
Defenders of the Jews ... emarine, Blade_Runner and not-so-super dave use tactics which are unbecoming of upright, forthright people of integrity. Lying, deceiving, misleading and ridiculing aren't nearly as effective as cogent debate.

In this way, it casts a shadow on all Jews.

HAHAHA..


Casts a shadow on all Jews...

You're hilarious

Reply
Aug 4, 2017 12:55:16   #
whole2th
 
Super Dave wrote:
HAHAHA..


Casts a shadow on all Jews...

You're hilarious


And you are t***sparent ... slimy, evasive, deceiving--a defender and one of the real perpetrators of 9-11 in your efforts to cover-up the crime of 9-11.

Building 7 was a controlled demolition. The simplest answer is that inside elements of the US combined with foreign covert agencies to commit 9-11.

Israel did 9-11 (in short).

President Cossiga of Italy said as much.



Reply
Aug 4, 2017 14:11:40   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
whole2th wrote:
Defenders of the Jews ... emarine, Blade_Runner and not-so-super dave use tactics which are unbecoming of upright, forthright people of integrity. Lying, deceiving, misleading and ridiculing aren't nearly as effective as cogent debate.

In this way, it casts a shadow on all Jews.
So, you are saying that attacking Jews is the what upright, forthright people of integrity must do?


The Conspiracy Industry
On February 7, 2005, I became a member of the Bush/Halliburton/Z*****t/CIA/New World Order/ Illuminati conspiracy for global domination. It was on that day the March 2005 issue of Popular Mechanics, with its cover story debunking 9/11 conspiracy theories, hit newsstands. Within hours, the online community of 9/11 conspiracy buffs--which calls itself the "9/11 T***h Movement"--was aflame with wild fantasies about me and my staff, the magazine I edit, and the article we had published.

The Web site www.911research.wtc7.net, an organization that claims that questioning the "official" story of 9/11 is "an act of responsible citizenship," fired one of the first salvos: "Popular Mechanics Attacks Its 9/11 LIES Straw Man," read the headline of a piece by a leading conspiracy theorist named Jim Hoffman.

We had begun our plunge down the rabbit hole. Within hours, a post on www.portland.indymedia.org, which claims to be dedicated to "radical, accurate, and passionate tellings of t***h," called me "James Meigs the Coward and T*****r." Not long afterward, another prominent conspiracy theorist produced an analysis that concluded that Popular Mechanics is a CIA front organization. Invective and threats soon clogged the comments section of our Web site and poured in by e-mail:

I was amused at your attempts to prove the conspirator theorists wrong by your interviewing people who work for the government. Face it: The U.S. government planned this attack to further its own agenda in the Middle East. Rest assured, puppet boys . . . when the hammer comes down about the biggest crime ever perpetrated in the history of man--AND IT WILL--it will be VERY easy to identify the co-conspirators by their flimsy, awkwardly ignorant of reality magazine articles. Keep that in mind the next time you align yourself with evil scum. YOU HAVE DECLARD YOURSELF ENEMY OF AMERICANS AND FRIEND OF THE MOSSAD!

I shouldn't have been surprised. In researching the article we'd spent enough time studying the conspiracy movement to get a feel for its style: the tone of outraged patriotism, the apocalyptic rhetoric, the casual use of invective. A common refrain in conspiracy circles is the claim that "We're just asking questions." One would think that at least some quarters of the conspiracy movement might welcome a mainstream publication's serious, nonideological attempt to answer those questions. One would be wrong.

It was only a matter of time before the N**is got d**gged in. Christopher Bollyn, a prominent conspiracy theorist affiliated with the far-right American Free Press, weighed in a few weeks later with a piece titled "The Hidden Hand of the CIA, 911 And Popular Mechanics." The article begins with a brief history of Hitler's consolidation of power following the Reichstag fire in 1933. "Like N**i Germany of 1933," Bollyn wrote, "American newsstands today carry a mainstream magazine dedicated to pushing the government's t***h of 9/11 while viciously smearing independent researchers as extremists who peddle fantasies and make poisonous claims."

In a few short weeks, Popular Mechanics had gone from being a 100-year-old journal about science, engineering, car maintenance, and home improvement to being a pivotal player in a global conspiracy on a par with N**i Germany.

Not all the responses were negative, of course. One visitor to our website, after plowing through dozens of angry comments, left a supportive post that included this astute observation:

Some people are open to any possibility, and honestly examine all evidence in a rational manner to come to a conclusion, followed by a moral evaluation. Others start with a desire for a specific moral evaluation, and then work backwards assembling any fact that supports them, and dismissing any fact that does not.

Reply
Aug 4, 2017 17:34:10   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
So, you are saying that attacking Jews is the what upright, forthright people of integrity must do?


The Conspiracy Industry
On February 7, 2005, I became a member of the Bush/Halliburton/Z*****t/CIA/New World Order/ Illuminati conspiracy for global domination. It was on that day the March 2005 issue of Popular Mechanics, with its cover story debunking 9/11 conspiracy theories, hit newsstands. Within hours, the online community of 9/11 conspiracy buffs--which calls itself the "9/11 T***h Movement"--was aflame with wild fantasies about me and my staff, the magazine I edit, and the article we had published.

The Web site www.911research.wtc7.net, an organization that claims that questioning the "official" story of 9/11 is "an act of responsible citizenship," fired one of the first salvos: "Popular Mechanics Attacks Its 9/11 LIES Straw Man," read the headline of a piece by a leading conspiracy theorist named Jim Hoffman.

We had begun our plunge down the rabbit hole. Within hours, a post on www.portland.indymedia.org, which claims to be dedicated to "radical, accurate, and passionate tellings of t***h," called me "James Meigs the Coward and T*****r." Not long afterward, another prominent conspiracy theorist produced an analysis that concluded that Popular Mechanics is a CIA front organization. Invective and threats soon clogged the comments section of our Web site and poured in by e-mail:

I was amused at your attempts to prove the conspirator theorists wrong by your interviewing people who work for the government. Face it: The U.S. government planned this attack to further its own agenda in the Middle East. Rest assured, puppet boys . . . when the hammer comes down about the biggest crime ever perpetrated in the history of man--AND IT WILL--it will be VERY easy to identify the co-conspirators by their flimsy, awkwardly ignorant of reality magazine articles. Keep that in mind the next time you align yourself with evil scum. YOU HAVE DECLARD YOURSELF ENEMY OF AMERICANS AND FRIEND OF THE MOSSAD!

I shouldn't have been surprised. In researching the article we'd spent enough time studying the conspiracy movement to get a feel for its style: the tone of outraged patriotism, the apocalyptic rhetoric, the casual use of invective. A common refrain in conspiracy circles is the claim that "We're just asking questions." One would think that at least some quarters of the conspiracy movement might welcome a mainstream publication's serious, nonideological attempt to answer those questions. One would be wrong.

It was only a matter of time before the N**is got d**gged in. Christopher Bollyn, a prominent conspiracy theorist affiliated with the far-right American Free Press, weighed in a few weeks later with a piece titled "The Hidden Hand of the CIA, 911 And Popular Mechanics." The article begins with a brief history of Hitler's consolidation of power following the Reichstag fire in 1933. "Like N**i Germany of 1933," Bollyn wrote, "American newsstands today carry a mainstream magazine dedicated to pushing the government's t***h of 9/11 while viciously smearing independent researchers as extremists who peddle fantasies and make poisonous claims."

In a few short weeks, Popular Mechanics had gone from being a 100-year-old journal about science, engineering, car maintenance, and home improvement to being a pivotal player in a global conspiracy on a par with N**i Germany.

Not all the responses were negative, of course. One visitor to our website, after plowing through dozens of angry comments, left a supportive post that included this astute observation:

Some people are open to any possibility, and honestly examine all evidence in a rational manner to come to a conclusion, followed by a moral evaluation. Others start with a desire for a specific moral evaluation, and then work backwards assembling any fact that supports them, and dismissing any fact that does not.
So, you are saying that attacking Jews is the what... (show quote)


"The magazine pushing the government's 9/11 propaganda, Popular Mechanics (PM), is published by the Hearst family. Its March cover story, Debunking 9/11 Lies, has been exposed by credible researchers to contain numerous distortions and flawed conclusions. American Free Press revealed that Benjamin Chertoff, the 25-year-old senior researcher who authored the 9/11 article, is related to Michael Chertoff, the new Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The PM article illustrates how a propaganda method, used by dictatorships, is now being employed by the U.S. government: controlling mainstream media outlets to promote its version of 9/11.

THE C**P AT POPULAR MECHANICS

In the months leading up to the Chertoff article in PM, a brutal take-over occurred at the magazine. In September 2004, Joe Oldham, the magazines former editor-in-chief was replaced by James B. Meigs, who came to PM with a deputy, Jerry Beilinson, from National Geographic Adventure. In October, a new creative director replaced PMs 21-year veteran who was given ninety minutes to clear out of his office.

A former senior editor at PM, who is forbidden from openly discussing the c**p at PM, told AFP that the former creative director was abruptly told to leave and given severance pay of two weeks wages for every year spent at PM. Three or four people have been similarly dismissed every month since, he said. He said he was astounded that the c**p at PM had not been reported in the mainstream media.

PM has long been a supporter of the U.S. military. The magazine ran a full page ad in support of the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan in May 2003. Since the purge last September, however, PM readers have noticed that government propaganda has replaced scientific writing. A letter to the editor in the current issue says, I think you guys are just another tool in the governments propaganda machine."
http://www.rense.com/general63/brutalpurgeofpmstaff.htm

Reply
Page <<first <prev 65 of 99 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.