One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Distrust of Fox News Hits Record High
Page <prev 2 of 2
Mar 20, 2013 15:55:40   #
Yankee Clipper
 
grazeem wrote:
O'Riley:

He was chiding a guest about Obama, and him not being serious about the trillion Dollar cuts. He asked exactly what programs he would cut.

He was told Medacare and Medacade.

He retorted, but they aren't programs.

That shows how dumb he is.

Lamebrain:

Well where do I start.

How about his going after the girl that had testified, before Congress, on Birth control.

Linbaugh said she was a whore, that wanted the government to pay her each time she had sex. He completely twisted her position.

This is his mantra. Twist and distort.
O'Riley: br br He was chiding a guest about Obama... (show quote)


O'Riley is a blowhard and more than somewhat pompous and I rarely watch him any longer. I think what he was getting at on the Medicare and Medicade issue was they were entitlements and as such were not programs. I think he was trying to split hairs and made an issue out of semantics. Any cuts in those programs will hurt the old, poor and retired. I don't think Obama has cut anything and neither has any other democrats.

If she is having promiscuous sex with more than one male and or is charging for it, she's a whore. If she is having sex with just on male on a regular basis, again semantics, either way I don't care, but I do not owe paying for her birth control. Rush who I also do not listen to very often could be right with his definition. However I come from the school of thought that "the only good girls were the ones who did not get caught. Most wanted you to think they were pure, but like the guys fooled around some.

Both sides twist and distort when possible just as you are constantly try to do to other respondents on this site.

Reply
Mar 20, 2013 16:09:46   #
Dave Loc: Upstate New York
 
I find O'Reilly to often seem arrogant, and certainly wrong on more than one issue - and if I were to critize him more than that I would be more specific.

As to Limbaugh - as I said I don't get a chance to listen to him much - the little I have would suggest his words are distorted significanlty - and as I don't know much about his positions I don't have much of an opinion.

The l*****t useful i***ts, however, have far less real knowledge and far stronger opinions - all issued to them by the minders.

Reply
Mar 20, 2013 19:25:37   #
Yankee Clipper
 
Dave wrote:
I find O'Reilly to often seem arrogant, and certainly wrong on more than one issue - and if I were to critize him more than that I would be more specific.

As to Limbaugh - as I said I don't get a chance to listen to him much - the little I have would suggest his words are distorted significanlty - and as I don't know much about his positions I don't have much of an opinion.

The l*****t useful i***ts, however, have far less real knowledge and far stronger opinions - all issued to them by the minders.
I find O'Reilly to often seem arrogant, and certai... (show quote)


It seems we sort of agree on this issue. I have found that most of them (the wanabe Marxists on this site) haven't even read up on Karl Marx, Engels, Lennin, Mao, Stalin, and so on. I wonder how many of them have studied the Hegelian Dialectic and understand how it works. I am not even sure some of the Marxist on here have even read Saul Alinski's works or know the Cloward/Piven strategy. I've read a lot of this stuff, but do not entertain the notion that I am any kind of expert on it.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.