One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
What if the US Constitution had the same prohibitions against changes as the Bible does.
Jun 23, 2017 21:33:43   #
son of witless
 
Now before you Liberals go ape manure, yes I do know about Amendments. That is not my meaning here. I am speaking of changing the meaning of the words as written into the Constitution. I am speaking of Liberal Judges who change the meaning of the English Language that is written into the Constitution. Example:Nowhere in the Constitution is a word said about Gay Marriage or A******n. If it is not in there, legally the Supreme Court cannot add it to the Constitution. That has to be done by a Constitutional Convention.

On Gay Marriage:
Justice Kennedy cites nonsense about Consenting adults and not being condemned to live in loneliness. No one is trying to stop anyone from living with whomever they want. WTF is he talking about? Marriage was left to the states to regulate originally by the writers of the Constitution. There is no legal basis for the Supreme Court to even rule on gay marriage.

Then there is a******n. The Supreme Court used the due process parts of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to shoe horn in A******n Rights. HTF does that work? Why not expand the privacy and due process to allow post birth murder? Legally they are the same. If Infanticide is not legal, then how can a******n be legal?

Gay Marriage and A******n should have been settled legislatively not by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is supposed to uphold the Constitution and make rulings according to what is actually written into the document.

Now what if Constitutional Supreme Judges were held to the same standards as the Bible holds it's defenders?


Revelation 22:18-19 Revelation 22: 18-19


18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophesy of this book. If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book.

19 And if any man shall take away from the words of this book of this prophesy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

Reply
Jun 23, 2017 23:37:04   #
Raylan Wolfe Loc: earth
 
son of witless wrote:
Now before you Liberals go ape manure, yes I do know about Amendments. That is not my meaning here. I am speaking of changing the meaning of the words as written into the Constitution. I am speaking of Liberal Judges who change the meaning of the English Language that is written into the Constitution. Example:Nowhere in the Constitution is a word said about Gay Marriage or A******n. If it is not in there, legally the Supreme Court cannot add it to the Constitution. That has to be done by a Constitutional Convention.

On Gay Marriage:
Justice Kennedy cites nonsense about Consenting adults and not being condemned to live in loneliness. No one is trying to stop anyone from living with whomever they want. WTF is he talking about? Marriage was left to the states to regulate originally by the writers of the Constitution. There is no legal basis for the Supreme Court to even rule on gay marriage.

Then there is a******n. The Supreme Court used the due process parts of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to shoe horn in A******n Rights. HTF does that work? Why not expand the privacy and due process to allow post birth murder? Legally they are the same. If Infanticide is not legal, then how can a******n be legal?

Gay Marriage and A******n should have been settled legislatively not by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is supposed to uphold the Constitution and make rulings according to what is actually written into the document.

Now what if Constitutional Supreme Judges were held to the same standards as the Bible holds it's defenders?


Revelation 22:18-19 Revelation 22: 18-19


18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophesy of this book. If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book.

19 And if any man shall take away from the words of this book of this prophesy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
Now before you Liberals go ape manure, yes I do kn... (show quote)



Reply
Jun 24, 2017 07:39:48   #
Cool Breeze
 
son of witless wrote:
Now before you Liberals go ape manure, yes I do know about Amendments. That is not my meaning here. I am speaking of changing the meaning of the words as written into the Constitution. I am speaking of Liberal Judges who change the meaning of the English Language that is written into the Constitution. Example:Nowhere in the Constitution is a word said about Gay Marriage or A******n. If it is not in there, legally the Supreme Court cannot add it to the Constitution. That has to be done by a Constitutional Convention.

On Gay Marriage:
Justice Kennedy cites nonsense about Consenting adults and not being condemned to live in loneliness. No one is trying to stop anyone from living with whomever they want. WTF is he talking about? Marriage was left to the states to regulate originally by the writers of the Constitution. There is no legal basis for the Supreme Court to even rule on gay marriage.

Then there is a******n. The Supreme Court used the due process parts of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to shoe horn in A******n Rights. HTF does that work? Why not expand the privacy and due process to allow post birth murder? Legally they are the same. If Infanticide is not legal, then how can a******n be legal?

Gay Marriage and A******n should have been settled legislatively not by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is supposed to uphold the Constitution and make rulings according to what is actually written into the document.

Now what if Constitutional Supreme Judges were held to the same standards as the Bible holds it's defenders?


Revelation 22:18-19 Revelation 22: 18-19


18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophesy of this book. If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book.

19 And if any man shall take away from the words of this book of this prophesy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
Now before you Liberals go ape manure, yes I do kn... (show quote)


Seriously? Hypocritical POS! http://blog.encyclopediavirginia.org/2015/09/was-the-original-u-s-constitution-a-r****t-document/

Reply
 
 
Jun 24, 2017 10:10:20   #
son of witless
 


Thank you for the honor of commenting on my humble post. You and your side had better fall in love with that sacred document, the US Constitution, and you do it pretty quick. The Constitution is there to protect the political minority from the evil majority. Each group that takes power tries to royally screw the minorities formerly in charge. Guess what? We are in charge, at least for a short while. We are not as vicious as Obama and his mob were, but we still have long memories. That Constitution protects you now from us as it protected us from you during the dark years of Obama and no that is not a r****t remark.

You better thank God that your hero Obama did not shred that document, because it is your best friend right now.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.