Perhaps President Trump was making a point.
The true issue is not c*****e c****e, the issue is bringing down the U.S.A.
The instant reaction to that suggestion was, hell no, there will not be any adjustments accepted to obamas
unlawfull "treaty". Proof that their only real intent is the financial destruction of the U.S. economy.
If the U.S. is not going to fully fund this "gravy train for the third world", then they want no part of it.
Lacking the trillions of dollars that obama committed us to supply, the paris climate accord is DEAD.
Man-Made G****l W*****g is a man-made theory, not proven science, the "weighting formula" that you declare
proves" man made CO2 emissions are soley responsible is not science, it is an opinion, based on
theory. All of your assumptions and conclussions are based upon that foundation of shifting sand.
If this weighting formula cannot be scientifically proven, you have nothing.
Small wonder that you constantly whine that the matter has been settled.
True science can withstand critical examination and open debate, propoganda cannot.
True science is based upon facts that can be proven, not a theoretical "weighting formula"
pre-determined by a "weighted panel" of alleged experts.
DJRich wrote:
Perhaps you are right, but then answer the the question, if there is NO g****l w*****g/c*****e c****e, then why did the i***t trump say that he wants to negotiate a better deal?
If the is no such thing, why worry about making a better deal? Or maybe he just lied to i***ts like you, and most conservatives, and all limbah listeners, since they are far too stupid to understand science