"Pocahontas" Warren may shoot herself down of 2020 by claiming Indian blood: Liahontas wants very badly to win the next Senator race in 2018. Her opponent thinks she has no Indian...

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Liahontas wants very badly to win the next Senator race in 2018. Her opponent thinks she has no Indian blood and is willing to work on her about it. That race in 2018 will be laughably funny since her opponent does have Indian blood. Lets all get together and give her a big haw, haw.

http://greatamericandaily.com/elizabeth-warren-asked-question-it-could-ruin-her/

PeterS

oldroy wrote:

Liahontas wants very badly to win the next Senator race in 2018. Her opponent thinks she has no Indian blood and is willing to work on her about it. That race in 2018 will be laughably funny since her opponent does have Indian blood. Lets all get together and give her a big haw, haw.

http://greatamericandaily.com/elizabeth-warren-asked-question-it-could-ruin-her/

Good idea, I'm sure as a conservative he's unable to beat her with a standard argument...

son of witless

oldroy wrote:

Liahontas wants very badly to win the next Senator race in 2018. Her opponent thinks she has no Indian blood and is willing to work on her about it. That race in 2018 will be laughably funny since her opponent does have Indian blood. Lets all get together and give her a big haw, haw.

http://greatamericandaily.com/elizabeth-warren-asked-question-it-could-ruin-her/

When did lying and hypocrisy hurt a Democrat. Wait, , , , , , , Hillary in 2016. Never mind.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

PeterS wrote:

Good idea, I'm sure as a conservative he's unable to beat her with a standard argument...

When dealing with a liar no argument is necessary. Her lies will defeat her.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

oldroy wrote:

Liahontas wants very badly to win the next Senator race in 2018. Her opponent thinks she has no Indian blood and is willing to work on her about it. That race in 2018 will be laughably funny since her opponent does have Indian blood. Lets all get together and give her a big haw, haw.

http://greatamericandaily.com/elizabeth-warren-asked-question-it-could-ruin-her/

I thought it was already settled that she had no Indian blood. As an issue, it's pretty much gone by the boards and will not be resurrected with the connivance of the media. Were she a conservative, it would be trotted out, above the fold, for months during the campaign.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

crazylibertarian wrote:

I thought it was already settled that she had no Indian blood. As an issue, it's pretty much gone by the boards and will not be resurrected with the connivance of the media. Were she a conservative, it would be trotted out, above the fold, for months during the campaign.

One organization did a thorough ancestry search on her and found no link to any Native Americans. One of the two tribes she claimed.lineage to says she is not registered anywhere as being blood linked to them.

She quickly changed her tune and said she has a 1/32 blood linkage. The BOIA says a 1/32 blood quanta is far below the minimum needed to claim heritage. She then offered the name of a female ancestor who married a Native American. A search revealed that the marriage certificate listed both parties as white, both families were well known as white, and her death certificate listed her as white.

Her response is that her NA lineage has been handed down as word of mouth in her family for years.

This woman is a cum laude graduate of the Clinton School of Responsible Interviewing. She would publicly undergo polygraph testing then deny she had the test.

The fascinating thing about people like her, including our libprogs here, is how t***sparent their lies are and how they see people as being so dumb and naive as to believe them.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

PeterS wrote:

Good idea, I'm sure as a conservative he's unable to beat her with a standard argument...

A standard argument? Would that be something like the media tried to defeat the man in Montana the other day? You know body slam a reporter and watch the media attack. That e******n was a real loss for the Democrat and the media.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

crazylibertarian wrote:

I thought it was already settled that she had no Indian blood. As an issue, it's pretty much gone by the boards and will not be resurrected with the connivance of the media. Were she a conservative, it would be trotted out, above the fold, for months during the campaign.

She will have to fight that once forever, I fear. She got by with that claim at the school Obama got his MS from but I think you may find later in this thread that Inidians don't consider 1/32, as she claimed, as enough to be considered part native American. My across the street neighbor says his wife if 1/32 Cherokee but she never mentions it.

One of our better football players at the school I taught at was 1/8 NA and he got all his bills paid for in a college to play football. Several tried to recruit him but he didn't want to go to those schools and play football. I think that 1/8 is as low as the US allows you to go.

Hang on and hope that all the nicknames she has earned will be forgotten before the e******n. I say No.

son of witless

Docadhoc wrote:

One organization did a thorough ancestry search on... (show quote)

I bet a DNA test would show she really is part Native American. Don't laugh, , , , well go ahead, but if you torture logic until it screams uncle, you can make this work. Now think about it, Leif Erickson and the Vikings landed in North America. Now just suppose they left a few behind. Prove they di-int! They could have reproduced and survived. Prove they di-int! Then maybe 7 or 800 years later they finally intermarried with the native population, just before Warren's ancestor married one of them. I bet if there are any Scandinavian genetic markers in Warrens DNA, that would prove her case. I mean look at her. Can you get more white than her? So there you go. She has to have some Viking in her. Prove that it was not North American Vikings.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

oldroy wrote:

A standard argument? Would that be something like the media tried to defeat the man in Montana the other day? You know body slam a reporter and watch the media attack. That e******n was a real loss for the Democrat and the media.

Maybe the v**ers thought the reporter had it coming.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

son of witless wrote:

I bet a DNA test would show she really is part Nat... (show quote)

I'm not laughing. DNA testing has been suggested to her more than once and she has refused.

She is counting on blind followers to keep her going and to me that is tantamount to her thinking people are incredibly ignorant or just don't care that she is a liar.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

son of witless wrote:

I bet a DNA test would show she really is part Nat... (show quote)

She tried to be Cherokee and they came out of the southeast part of the US. I doubt that your Vikings moved that far south.

son of witless

oldroy wrote:

She tried to be Cherokee and they came out of the southeast part of the US. I doubt that your Vikings moved that far south.

Come on. I tortured logic pretty hard to get where I am. A few more turns of the thumb screws and I can get them Vikings to be be good old Southern boys.

Lizzy Warren is the only Democrat of the right age and political standing to run against Trump in 3 and a half years. In that time ssssomebody ought to be able to get a sample somehow that could be sent to a lab. Now let me think. Who has the people with the talent? Ooooo, I know, I know, the Russians. Donald should call up Vlad on the hot line. Vlad would be glad to do it. Democrats believe he sank Hillary. Might was well go for two blonds.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

son of witless wrote:

Come on. I tortured logic pretty hard to get where... (show quote)

You think in 3.5 years the v****g public will have forgotten her lies and behavior?

She refused DNA testing. You need to work on that one.

Besides, I thought you were going to impeach Trump. What happened??

son of witless

Docadhoc wrote:

You think in 3.5 years the v****g public will have forgotten her lies and behavior?

She refused DNA testing. You need to work on that one.

Besides, I thought you were going to impeach Trump. What happened??

Impeach Trump? Where ever did you get that impression? As far as the v****g public forgetting her lies, come on. Obama got reelected and did nothing but lie. Even though Hillary lost, she still got more total v**es than my boy Donald, so at least 50% of the v****g public do not care if a Democrat lies. It is more a case of whether they care enough to send in at least one absentee b****t during an e******n. The only group Democrats can reliably count on showing up are the dead.

I think Senator Warren is the only bench person they got. I think she is sensitive about her Indian Heritage and may not want to subject herself to the larger ridicule of a P**********l bid. It is one thing to run for Senator in a friendly Uber Liberal state like Taxechussettes. On the P**********l scene running against Donald, who will say anything, her nerves might crack.