America Only Loc: From the right hand of God

Trump Won, YOU lost...spin and rotate!

Sicilianthing

>>>>>>

Put a slug in his head and move onto the next scumbag.

There is no negotiating with Islam or Muslim Scum

ZERO Tolerance

NO DEAL

Mr Bombastic

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the Constitution supersede any international treaties?

Ricko Loc: Florida

America Only-In his speech today, Trump told the Muslim nations that we would not impose our way of life
on them. Similarly, as long as Trump is president the Muslims in this country will not impose their way of
life on us. If the v**ers, were to err in electing a liberal do gooder to the presidency that could all change and
what the Muslim leader declares could become reality in due time but not two years. America First !!!

sherrycw1

Why would you even say or do anything like that. Islam is a religion of peace. If you truly want peace in the world that just feeds h**e. Grow up.

Mr Bombastic

If Islam is a religion of peace, then why does it instruct it's followers to k**l all non-believers? Get a clue.

Homestead

Not exactly. Our forefathers assumed that the American people would not allow an international treaty that would violate the Constitution. Our government is forced to uphold all national treatise, by the Constitution itself.

What Obama was trying to pull with the small arms treaty was to get it signed and then create the international bureaucracy that would enforce it.

The UN could demand America's small arms as a safety issue under the authority of the treaty.

The US government would then allow the UN to confiscate America's small arms, under the protection of the federal government.

To pull it off would have required some bureaucratic gymnastics, but, they were planning on Hillary being president and as president stacking the judicial deck with liberal Supreme Court Justices.

Mr Bombastic

Any treaties must conform to our Constitution, or they are not valid. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, Nothing, including treaties, can supersede that.

Homestead

Then you haven't been watching how Obama has manipulated the Constitution and got around it.

The Constitution is the Supreme law of the land.

The Constitution itself demands that all international treatise be enforced.

So if you have a corrupt congress and a corrupt president and they pass a corrupt treaty, then that treaty becomes international law, under the authority of the Constitution and the Constitution demands that it be enforced.

There is a reason our forefathers said that our liberty and freedom must be jealously guarded.

Under our Constitution, health care is not an enumerated federal power.

So how did we get ObamaCare?

Sicilianthing

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Correct answer but most dumbasses can't figure that out or how to enforce it.

Sicilianthing

>>>>>>>>

You still don't get it do you ?

Muslims were banned twice so far from coming to the Republic.

They are no longer welcome here
No assimilation means annihilation

You need a course in these references again?

how many times do we have to post it.

Sicilianthing

>>>>>

Islam is Not a religion would you like references and facts ?

Sicilianthing

>>>>>>

Sherry has been misled by the greatest propaganda machine in human history...

Sherry is the bi product of this campaign.

You oan't untrain a brainwashed pupil.

Sicilianthing

>>>>>>

Wrong Answer,

Evidence is being revealed to show that Congress was Tricked, bi passed and bought off by T*****rs and so none of the Treaties are sound by way of Fraud.

The Republic was Hijacked by the Crown and it's minions...

More later.

Homestead

Then your just not paying attention.

ObamaCare is not Constitutional, but, they passed it.

All taxes must start in the House of representatives, that's in the Constitution. ObamaCare started in the Senate and never went through the House.

The Supreme Court has no authority to write legislation, but, they rewrote ObamaCare to make fines become taxes, in order to claim that ObamaCare was Constitutional.
**************************************************************

Obama’s parting shot

The U.N. Arms Trade Treaty gives away the rights of all Americans

Another of President Obama’s brazen acts as he leaves office is a “parting shot” at American gun owners by submitting the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty to the U.S. Senate for ratification. For the uninitiated, the term refers to turning around in your saddle as you ride away from a losing battle and firing one last round at your enemy.

The Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) was negotiated from 2006, during the Bush administration, through 2013 with the Obama administration. The original intent of the treaty was theoretically to prohibit arms t***sfers to regimes that abused human rights. From the very start though, gun control groups looked upon the treaty as an end run around America’s domestic reluctance to adopt their agenda — if Congress and the state legislatures wouldn’t pass gun control why not get the U.N. to make it a permanent part of its agenda or even better part of international law? Gun control groups have pursued their agenda at the organization since 1995 but were frustrated by the likes of Ambassador John R. Bolton who single-handedly stopped a U.N. treaty effort in 2001 that would have regulated U.S. civilian firearms.

The proposed ATT gave them the opportunity they had been waiting for, a legally binding treaty imposing regulation and conditions on the t***sfer and maybe possession of any weapon from a pistol to a battle ship. As incredible as it seems, the U.N. Human Rights Commission has already interpreted lack of gun control as a human rights abuse. The treaty is now in effect and the United States has signed it.

The Bush administration and its chief negotiator Ambassador Donald Mahley recognized the danger of a treaty whose scope included civilian firearms. During early negotiations Mr. Mahley convinced the U.N., and countries supporting the treaty, to exempt firearms held under “national Constitutional protection,” i.e. the American Second Amendment. This language was in the U.N. reports that were the basis for the final negotiations at the ATT Conferences in 2012.

The e******n of Barack Obama and the appointment of Hillary Clinton as secretary of State changed everything. Mrs. Clinton demoted Mr. Mahley and replaced him with Under Secretary of State Tom Countryman, a shaggy-haired disarmament specialist who had no interest in protecting American gun rights. Mr. Mahley himself fell ill with pancreatic cancer and died in 2013, an unsung hero for American rights. The NRA and other gun rights groups lobbied the new administration in good faith not to give away what Mr. Mahley had accomplished. In 2011 Executive-Vice President of the NRA Wayne La Pierre appeared before the U.N. and bluntly told them that the ATT would be opposed unless there were protections of American gun rights. He was ignored. Fifty-seven U.S. senators wrote the Obama administration and made essentially the same point. They were ignored. In negotiations with the State Department, and treaty supporters, we pointed out time after time that a treaty that included American civilian firearms would never be ratified by the United States. We were ignored.

The “national Constitutional protection” language for the treaty was slowly but surely removed by anti-gun forces without objection by Mrs. Clinton or Mr. Countryman. The U.S. could have objected and had its way and preserved the language as the conference drafting the treaty operated under the “consensus rule” whereby all the major powers had to agree on the final text.

What happened was not just part of the usual give and take of such negotiations, but a deliberate act of bad faith by Hillary Clinton. The firearms community was under the impression that the Department of State was negotiating in good faith. However, release of Mrs. Clinton’s B******i emails revealed the t***h. As it turned out one of the reasons she supported the treaty was because it was opposed by the NRA. She wrote this in an email in March, 2011: “You know we’ve tried to support the U.N. small arms treaty but we have run into, as usual, fierce NRA and congressional opposition. But, I believe we have to keep trying. All the best, H.” Other emails showed her actively working with and meeting with anti-gun groups supporting the treaty at the U.N.illary herself identified that the treaty was about “small arms,” the U.N. term for gun control.

Unfortunately, there is neither time nor space here to go into the onerous provisions of the treaty, which themselves would merit rejection of the instrument. In the final analysis, the fact that American rights were deliberately given away should be more than sufficient reason for it never to be adopted.

• Thomas L. Mason is co-author with David Keene of “Shall Not Be Infringed: The New Threats to Your Second Amendment” (Skyhorse Publications, 2016).
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/15/un-arms-trade-treaty-gives-away-rights-of-american/