Are g****l w*****g deniers mentally unstable?
May 13, 2017 10:10:51 #
G****l w*****g deniers all seem to have a particular specific they point to in support of their position. They avoid looking at the big picture. They believe there is a great conspiracy to prove them wrong. They claim scientists who believe in the t***h of g****l w*****g are doing so for money and that these scientists have no integrity as do the deniers. All of these are signs of mental instability.
May 13, 2017 10:35:10 #
Chocura750 wrote:
G****l w*****g deniers all seem to have a particular specific they point to in support of their position. They avoid looking at the big picture. They believe there is a great conspiracy to prove them wrong. They claim scientists who believe in the t***h of g****l w*****g are doing so for money and that these scientists have no integrity as do the deniers. All of these are signs of mental instability.
You keep starting these threads, and never come back to defend your own position. You are obviously a paid troll. I think that is why you were so upset about not being able to get into invite only discussions.
How does this work? Do you get paid for the number of your own posts, number of responses to your topics, or both? I might want some of that action myself.
May 13, 2017 10:43:40 #
Chocura750 wrote:
G****l w*****g deniers all seem to have a particular specific they point to in support of their position. They avoid looking at the big picture. They believe there is a great conspiracy to prove them wrong. They claim scientists who believe in the t***h of g****l w*****g are doing so for money and that these scientists have no integrity as do the deniers. All of these are signs of mental instability.
It's in no way called mental instability. Good grief!!!! It's called having your own OPINION!!!!! Some people don't care to be sheeple.....
May 13, 2017 10:46:14 #
kankune wrote:
It's in no way called mental instability. Good grief!!!! It's called having your own OPINION!!!!! Some people don't care to be sheeple.....
This is from the i***t who said people who aren't liberal aren't Americans. Another tolerant l*****t here.
May 13, 2017 10:46:34 #
donrent
Loc: SW Florida -Born Texas-Lived Panama & Alaska
There have been many ice ages during the last 2.6 million years but when people talk about the Ice Age, they are often referring to the most recent glacial period, which peaked about 21,000 years ago and ended about 11,500 years ago.
If a person uses what brains He or She has it might dawn on them that glaciers etc form in what is known as the "Ice Age".. When not in one, then our glaciers will melt. Our glaciers have been melting at a normal steady rate UNTIL the next "ICE AGE" starts again.
So therefore, we are in the phase of"G****l W*****g... A Natural happening. Basically man has little to do with it.
If a person uses what brains He or She has it might dawn on them that glaciers etc form in what is known as the "Ice Age".. When not in one, then our glaciers will melt. Our glaciers have been melting at a normal steady rate UNTIL the next "ICE AGE" starts again.
So therefore, we are in the phase of"G****l W*****g... A Natural happening. Basically man has little to do with it.
May 13, 2017 10:52:22 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
Chocura750 wrote:
G****l w*****g deniers all seem to have a particular specific they point to in support of their position. They avoid looking at the big picture. They believe there is a great conspiracy to prove them wrong. They claim scientists who believe in the t***h of g****l w*****g are doing so for money and that these scientists have no integrity as do the deniers. All of these are signs of mental instability.
OK...you convinced me with the browbeating...And now I'll have to admit Al Gore invented the internet too..
How many magnanimous "stories" would One have to absorb ...to become...Liberal?..that's a concern..
May 13, 2017 11:01:14 #
Ricko
Loc: Florida
Chocura750 wrote:
G****l w*****g deniers all seem to have a particular specific they point to in support of their position. They avoid looking at the big picture. They believe there is a great conspiracy to prove them wrong. They claim scientists who believe in the t***h of g****l w*****g are doing so for money and that these scientists have no integrity as do the deniers. All of these are signs of mental instability.
Chocura-the only mental disability that I am aware of is "Left Wing Progressiveness" formerly known
as "Liberalism". Everyone believes in c*****e c****e as it has occurred for centuries. However, only the
most gullible among us believe in man-made c*****e c****e. It is a scare tactic used to illicit taxpayer dollars
to fund pipe dreams. Anyone who believes that sending 2billion taxpayer dollars to the UN ,for supposed re-distribution to countries who will then attempt to curb the production of CO2 which the proponents believe cause g****l w*****g, is living in fantasy land while the money is pocketed by the leaders of those countries. You lemmings are all alike and continue to spread the left wing BS. America First !!!
May 13, 2017 11:02:06 #
archie bunker wrote:
This is from the i***t who said people who aren't liberal aren't Americans. Another tolerant l*****t here.
This person is nothing but a troll.
Starts these threads with an inflaming comment and then disappears..Hardly ever reponds in one, obviousy because they can not and just goes on to making another thread...
A waste of time this is...
May 13, 2017 11:12:30 #
imbobbyc
Loc: Montana
Chocura750 wrote:
G****l w*****g deniers all seem to have a particular specific they point to in support of their position. They avoid looking at the big picture. They believe there is a great conspiracy to prove them wrong. They claim scientists who believe in the t***h of g****l w*****g are doing so for money and that these scientists have no integrity as do the deniers. All of these are signs of mental instability.
Not likely but you are. I admire your commitment to it.
May 13, 2017 11:12:42 #
no propaganda please
Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
kankune wrote:
It's in no way called mental instability. Good grief!!!! It's called having your own OPINION!!!!! Some people don't care to be sheeple.....
The difference is that those who deny man made g****l w*****g are aware that the science is on our side, not the side of Al Gores one world government Marxist dictatorship goals, with millions of dollars going into Gores pocket.
May 13, 2017 11:55:08 #
So your saying 300 Scientists are all nut cases. You got it backward. You Al Gore ass kissers been suckered once again.
Chocura750 wrote:
G****l w*****g deniers all seem to have a particular specific they point to in support of their position. They avoid looking at the big picture. They believe there is a great conspiracy to prove them wrong. They claim scientists who believe in the t***h of g****l w*****g are doing so for money and that these scientists have no integrity as do the deniers. All of these are signs of mental instability.
May 13, 2017 12:11:36 #
lindajoy wrote:
This person is nothing but a troll.
Starts these threads with an inflaming comment and then disappears..Hardly ever reponds in one, obviousy because they can not and just goes on to making another thread...
A waste of time this is...
Starts these threads with an inflaming comment and then disappears..Hardly ever reponds in one, obviousy because they can not and just goes on to making another thread...
A waste of time this is...
Linda.... I think you are on to something about this joker.... It could also be that he or she is just not smart enough and without enough knowledge to defend his diatribes with facts and history.
Either way.... such a pathetic poster.... best to (as you say) best leave it to melt in its own g****l w*****g....
BTW.... Hi girl. (happy mothers day to you)
May 13, 2017 12:22:03 #
ghostgotcha wrote:
Linda.... I think you are on to something about this joker.... It could also be that he or she is just not smart enough and without enough knowledge to defend his diatribes with facts and history.
Either way.... such a pathetic poster.... best to (as you say) best leave it to melt in its own g****l w*****g....
BTW.... Hi girl. (happy mothers day to you)
Either way.... such a pathetic poster.... best to (as you say) best leave it to melt in its own g****l w*****g....
BTW.... Hi girl. (happy mothers day to you)
Hello to you ghost~~Very nice to see you as always...
Yes, I don't bother with this troll~~ Just likes to post garbage and then move on to another...Probably gets paid a penny a post..Can't imagine this one being able to demand more~~~
Thank You for the Mothers Day wish~~..It will be glorious..I had to wait to plant because of the temps here and yesterday my son took me to the nursery and told me get wh**ever I wanted for Mothers Day.. Got a couple of things , then he went picking out things..I think anything I even barely looked at he got for me...And we spent some of the afternoon building my wooden planters I love so much..Had more sawdust on me than the ground..but it was fun doing it with my son..Today we actually plant and tomorrow he's taking me to Outback for their fablous blooming onion I loveeeeeeee so much...Actually thats after the baseball game Rockeys go, go ,go .lolol Not really I'm a Red Sox fan at heart...lolol But I love the game so it will be fun...
Hoping you and your lovely enjoy the weekend and Happy Mothers Day to she as well...
May 13, 2017 12:25:39 #
Little info here,
New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In G****l W*****g Alarmism
James Taylor , CONTRIBUTOR
I am president of the Spark of Freedom Foundation. Opinions expressed by
Forbes Contributors are their own.
NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth's
atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist
computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed
science journal Remote Sensing
The study indicates far less future g****l w*****g will occur than United
Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies
indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists
have claimed.
Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the
University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the
Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA's Aqua satellite, reports
that real-world data from NASA's Terra satellite contradict multiple
assumptions fed into alarmist computer models.
"The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to
space during and after warming than the climate models show," Spencer said in a
July 26 University of Alabama press release. "There is a huge discrepancy
between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans."
In addition to finding that far less heat is being trapped than alarmist
computer models have predicted, the NASA satellite data show the atmosphere
begins shedding heat into space long before United Nations computer models
predicted.
The new findings are extremely important and should dramatically alter the
g****l w*****g debate.
Scientists on all sides of the g****l w*****g debate are in general
agreement about how much heat is being directly trapped by human emissions of
carbon dioxide (the answer is "not much"). However, the single most important
issue in the g****l w*****g debate is whether carbon dioxide emissions will
indirectly trap far more heat by causing large increases in atmospheric
humidity and cirrus clouds.
Alarmist computer models assume human carbon dioxide emissions indirectly
cause substantial increases in atmospheric humidity and cirrus clouds (each
of which are very effective at trapping heat), but real-world data have
long shown that carbon dioxide emissions are not causing as much atmospheric
humidity and cirrus clouds as the alarmist computer models have predicted.
The new NASA Terra satellite data are consistent with long-term NOAA and
NASA data indicating atmospheric humidity and cirrus clouds are not
increasing in the manner predicted by alarmist computer models. The Terra satellite
data also support data collected by NASA's ERBS satellite showing far more
longwave radiation (and thus, heat) escaped into space between 1985 and
1999 than alarmist computer models had predicted. Together, the NASA ERBS and
Terra satellite data show that for 25 years and counting, carbon dioxide
emissions have directly and indirectly trapped far less heat than alarmist
computer models have predicted.
In short, the central premise of alarmist g****l w*****g theory is that
carbon dioxide emissions should be directly and indirectly trapping a certain
amount of heat in the earth's atmosphere and preventing it from escaping
into space. Real-world measurements, however, show far less heat is being
trapped in the earth's atmosphere than the alarmist computer models predict,
and far more heat is escaping into space than the alarmist computer models
predict.
When objective NASA satellite data, reported in a peer-reviewed scientific
journal, show a "huge discrepancy" between alarmist climate models and
real-world facts, climate scientists, the media and our elected officials
would be wise to take notice.
Whether or not they do so will tell us a great deal about how honest the
purveyors of g****l w*****g alarmism truly are.
James M. Taylor is senior fellow for environment policy at The Heartland
Instituteand managing editor of Environment & Climate News.
New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In G****l W*****g Alarmism
James Taylor , CONTRIBUTOR
I am president of the Spark of Freedom Foundation. Opinions expressed by
Forbes Contributors are their own.
NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth's
atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist
computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed
science journal Remote Sensing
The study indicates far less future g****l w*****g will occur than United
Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies
indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists
have claimed.
Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the
University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the
Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA's Aqua satellite, reports
that real-world data from NASA's Terra satellite contradict multiple
assumptions fed into alarmist computer models.
"The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to
space during and after warming than the climate models show," Spencer said in a
July 26 University of Alabama press release. "There is a huge discrepancy
between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans."
In addition to finding that far less heat is being trapped than alarmist
computer models have predicted, the NASA satellite data show the atmosphere
begins shedding heat into space long before United Nations computer models
predicted.
The new findings are extremely important and should dramatically alter the
g****l w*****g debate.
Scientists on all sides of the g****l w*****g debate are in general
agreement about how much heat is being directly trapped by human emissions of
carbon dioxide (the answer is "not much"). However, the single most important
issue in the g****l w*****g debate is whether carbon dioxide emissions will
indirectly trap far more heat by causing large increases in atmospheric
humidity and cirrus clouds.
Alarmist computer models assume human carbon dioxide emissions indirectly
cause substantial increases in atmospheric humidity and cirrus clouds (each
of which are very effective at trapping heat), but real-world data have
long shown that carbon dioxide emissions are not causing as much atmospheric
humidity and cirrus clouds as the alarmist computer models have predicted.
The new NASA Terra satellite data are consistent with long-term NOAA and
NASA data indicating atmospheric humidity and cirrus clouds are not
increasing in the manner predicted by alarmist computer models. The Terra satellite
data also support data collected by NASA's ERBS satellite showing far more
longwave radiation (and thus, heat) escaped into space between 1985 and
1999 than alarmist computer models had predicted. Together, the NASA ERBS and
Terra satellite data show that for 25 years and counting, carbon dioxide
emissions have directly and indirectly trapped far less heat than alarmist
computer models have predicted.
In short, the central premise of alarmist g****l w*****g theory is that
carbon dioxide emissions should be directly and indirectly trapping a certain
amount of heat in the earth's atmosphere and preventing it from escaping
into space. Real-world measurements, however, show far less heat is being
trapped in the earth's atmosphere than the alarmist computer models predict,
and far more heat is escaping into space than the alarmist computer models
predict.
When objective NASA satellite data, reported in a peer-reviewed scientific
journal, show a "huge discrepancy" between alarmist climate models and
real-world facts, climate scientists, the media and our elected officials
would be wise to take notice.
Whether or not they do so will tell us a great deal about how honest the
purveyors of g****l w*****g alarmism truly are.
James M. Taylor is senior fellow for environment policy at The Heartland
Instituteand managing editor of Environment & Climate News.
May 13, 2017 12:29:23 #
Chocura750 wrote:
G****l w*****g deniers all seem to have a particular specific they point to in support of their position. They avoid looking at the big picture. They believe there is a great conspiracy to prove them wrong. They claim scientists who believe in the t***h of g****l w*****g are doing so for money and that these scientists have no integrity as do the deniers. All of these are signs of mental instability.
Where did the Pied Piper take all those children? All he had to do was play the tune and all the little tykes danced and sang, sang and danced and not a one questioned where they were being taken. Remarkable story; all about oceans rising and cities floating away and polar bears drowning and money. Remarkable story...
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.