Steve700

Being a liberal more often than not means being godless and anti-Christian. Since the liberal agenda is to rid the world of Christians and conservatives forever and since the attainment of that agenda and making Marxist revolution in America seem desirable is all totally built on lies just how do you justify being both Christian and liberal? Read my definition on the liberal idea of political correctness and tell me that liberalism is not based on lies and that they seek to fulfill their agenda through deceit:

The Progressives would have you believe P.C. is a noble effort to foment fairness & e******y. --- Here is the reality.
Political Correctness is Suppression of the T***h for the Purpose of Advancing the Left Wing Agenda. P.C. Is, in fact, a war on t***h disguised as being polite, considerate and not being offensive. Political Correctness is a form of mind control, meant to limit and control free speech and to undermine public opinion. It intends to weaken the defenses of a free democracy and reeducate our children. It is cultural Marxism as It is a well known and well documented C*******t subversion tactic and procedure, designed to avoid debate and shut up the opposition.
The t***h must come 1st, last and always. Stand for t***h. Don't let them get away with it ! Call it what it is --- Trickery -- A Tactic in the Dismantling of Traditional America and Suppression of the T***h for the Purpose of Advancing the Left Wing Agenda.

-This tells you a lot about the integrity or lack thereof of the left. What scumbagery to institutionalize deceit like this. What will be the character of a "L*****t Utopia" born out of deceit ? ?? ??? PC has nothing to do with being kind or not being offensive. This is what political correctness is designed to do.

Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton

"Progressive Liberal Christian". That's a figure of speech in which contradictory terms appear in conjunction. Better known as an oxymoron. You may claim to be a 'progressive', you may claim to be a 'liberal', or you may claim to be a 'Christian'; you may not claim to be any two, or all three together. Each is a fundamental contradiction of the other two.

To understand the basic difference in the thinking of liberals and progressives, one can see how differently they react to abuse of the Palestinians by the Israelites. Progressives do not have any fear while criticizing Israel’s actions, while liberals can be seen supporting Israel as they are afraid of being labeled anti-Semitic. One cannot be both. There are many more instances of contradiction, but that on its own is sufficient to illustrate the schism.

Once a proud ideal, Liberalism has been hijacked by bizarre special-interest thugs who defy the Word of God and believe that the Bible has no place in public life (except maybe in a museum where people can look at it from time to time, from a distance, of course). For the Christian who believes that unfeigned faith in Christ should correspond with Jesus’ high view of Scripture, it is impossible to be a follower of Jesus and be an adherent to this schlock.

Hence, we are confronted with the impossibility of being a Christian, a liberal or a progressive all at the same time, or any two together, for that matter.


I disagree entirely. It is patently obvious that Christianity does not mandate any political beliefs or system, rather provides a certain moral guidance for the promotion of peaceful co-existence. In the total absence of government or political authority, Christianity is perfectly suited to the maintenance of peace and prosperity. In the face of political totalitarianism, it is an effective tool of resistance, just ask any influential c*******t.


Right-wing evangelical Christians suffer the same conundrum that Muslims do. They are attempting to meld religious belief with political dogma. Whenever faced with a political question, I always refer to the Constitution first. This is a document written by men who had a first-hand understanding of tyranny and its roots in religious conformity. It was certainly intolerable enough that they risked their lives to be freed of it. That's one reason they wrote the First Amendment, to ensure that legislative authority is not abused by religious zealots to force their beliefs on the population, regardless of the intent or ideal.

Mr Bombastic

No one will ever tell me what I can or cannot think or say. They can imprison me, torture me. It doesn't matter. I will speak the t***h, as I see it. By the way, Grammarly found and fixed five errors in your post. You might want to try it out. It's a free download. It also found three errors in my own post.