I can't stand them, myself. So here is a gif, just for you.
Nitpicking every little grammer infraction is probably not the right thing to do. We are here for political discussions and sometimes a little error slips through even with proof reading and real intelligent people.
On the other hand, rambling nonsense with no punction and appropriate capital letters and thoughts running together, interspersed with a generous offering of what is generally considered foul lauguage is not appropriate in reasoned political discussions.
Every thing that we post should be proof read before hitting send, and even written somewhere where simple spelling corrections are highlighted.
Now, what mistake did I make?
cheers
E wrote:
Nitpicking every little grammer infraction is probably not the right thing to do. We are here for political discussions and sometimes a little error slips through even with proof reading and real intelligent people.
On the other hand, rambling nonsense with no punction and appropriate capital letters and thoughts running together, interspersed with a generous offering of what is generally considered foul lauguage is not appropriate in reasoned political discussions.
Every thing that we post should be proof read before hitting send, and even written somewhere where simple spelling corrections are highlighted.
Now, what mistake did I make?
cheers
Nitpicking every little grammer infraction is prob... (
show quote)
I believe you missed a comma, after the word language. Am I correct? Do I get a prize?
Every thing is one word and you don't need a comma after "send". I still understood what you were saying. Mike
E wrote:
Nitpicking every little grammer infraction is probably not the right thing to do. We are here for political discussions and sometimes a little error slips through even with proof reading and real intelligent people.
On the other hand, rambling nonsense with no punction and appropriate capital letters and thoughts running together, interspersed with a generous offering of what is generally considered foul lauguage is not appropriate in reasoned political discussions.
Every thing that we post should be proof read before hitting send, and even written somewhere where simple spelling corrections are highlighted.
Now, what mistake did I make?
cheers
Nitpicking every little grammer infraction is prob... (
show quote)
Thanks. I'm not perfect. But I try to get it right and we all need to do that. Some don't try at all.
E wrote:
Nitpicking every little grammer infraction is probably not the right thing to do. We are here for political discussions and sometimes a little error slips through even with proof reading and real intelligent people.
On the other hand, rambling nonsense with no punction and appropriate capital letters and thoughts running together, interspersed with a generous offering of what is generally considered foul lauguage is not appropriate in reasoned political discussions.
Every thing that we post should be proof read before hitting send, and even written somewhere where simple spelling corrections are highlighted.
Now, what mistake did I make?
cheers
Nitpicking every little grammer infraction is prob... (
show quote)
maybe
when you opened your mouth???
Was that two comments or one?
E wrote:
Nitpicking every little grammer infraction is probably not the right thing to do. We are here for political discussions and sometimes a little error slips through even with proof reading and real intelligent people.
On the other hand, rambling nonsense with no punction and appropriate capital letters and thoughts running together, interspersed with a generous offering of what is generally considered foul lauguage is not appropriate in reasoned political discussions.
Every thing that we post should be proof read before hitting send, and even written somewhere where simple spelling corrections are highlighted.
Now, what mistake did I make?
cheers
Nitpicking every little grammer infraction is prob... (
show quote)
Did you mean punctuation?
Mr Bombastic wrote:
I can't stand them, myself. So here is a gif, just for you.
Brings to mind Mead Lux Lewis, or maybe even fats Domino.
AuntiE
Loc: 45th Least Free State
E wrote:
Nitpicking every little grammer infraction is probably not the right thing to do. We are here for political discussions and sometimes a little error slips through even with proof reading and real intelligent people.
On the other hand, rambling nonsense with no punction and appropriate capital letters and thoughts running together, interspersed with a generous offering of what is generally considered foul lauguage is not appropriate in reasoned political discussions.
Every thing that we post should be proof read before hitting send, and even written somewhere where simple spelling corrections are highlighted.
Now, what mistake did I make?
cheers
Nitpicking every little grammer infraction is prob... (
show quote)
Your second sentence requires less
"and" and commas to replace the
"and".
Should I mention the useless/questionable phrase in your third sentence?
AuntiE wrote:
My "gif, just for you." is...
That's not a gif. It's a jpg. Gifs are animated. Gif? Jpg's? I wonder what someone from 100 years ago would think of the English language today.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.