One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
IS this Anti first amendment?I had my comment removed and i wonder why.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: 1 2 next>>
Apr 16, 2017 12:49:41   #
vernon (a regular here)
 
jelun wrote:
The man who wants to swear that he will defend the Constitution ignores it repeatedly, this latest is a blanket dismissal of the First Amendment.


http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/06/donald-trump-just-banned-washington-post-covering-his-campaign

Donald Trump Just Banned the Washington Post From Covering His Campaign
The Post joins a long list of blacklisted publications (including Mother Jones).

PATRICK CALDWELL JUN. 13, 2016 5:13 PM



Carlo Allegri/ZUMA
Donald Trump issued an edict on his Facebook page Monday afternoon: The Washington Post will no longer be credentialed to cover his campaign. "Based on the incredibly inaccurate coverage and reporting of the record setting Trump campaign," Trump wrote, "we are hereby revoking the press credentials of the phony and dishonest Washington Post."



you are not the one to protect the first amendment. face it when you select statements that you dont like and delete it that is anti first amendment.That just goes to show what a hypocrite you really are.

| Reply
Apr 16, 2017 12:53:14   #
vernon (a regular here)
 
vernon wrote:
jelun wrote:
The man who wants to swear that he will defend the Constitution ignores it repeatedly, this latest is a blanket dismissal of the First Amendment.


http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/06/donald-trump-just-banned-washington-post-covering-his-campaign

Donald Trump Just Banned the Washington Post From Covering His Campaign
The Post joins a long list of blacklisted publications (including Mother Jones).

PATRICK CALDWELL JUN. 13, 2016 5:13 PM



Carlo Allegri/ZUMA
Donald Trump issued an edict on his Facebook page Monday afternoon: The Washington Post will no longer be credentialed to cover his campaign. "Based on the incredibly inaccurate coverage and reporting of the record setting Trump campaign," Trump wrote, "we are hereby revoking the press credentials of the phony and dishonest Washington Post."



you are not the one to protect the first amendment. face it when you select statements that you dont like and delete it that is anti first amendment.That just goes to show what a hypocrite you really are.
jelun wrote: br The man who wants to swear that he... (show quote)


I had my post deleted because Jelund complained I asked administration why and they didn't to answer.

| Reply
Apr 16, 2017 12:55:56   #
vernon (a regular here)
 
vernon wrote:
I had my post deleted because Jelund complained I asked administration why and they didn't to answer.


I don't think the first amendment protects liars and these msm are the worst liars on record liars in history.

| Reply
Apr 16, 2017 13:01:03   #
maureenthannon
 
vernan, Don't dis liars by comparing them with the msm.

| Reply
Apr 16, 2017 14:31:32   #
Super Dave
 
vernon wrote:
jelun wrote:
The man who wants to swear that he will defend the Constitution ignores it repeatedly, this latest is a blanket dismissal of the First Amendment.


http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/06/donald-trump-just-banned-washington-post-covering-his-campaign

Donald Trump Just Banned the Washington Post From Covering His Campaign
The Post joins a long list of blacklisted publications (including Mother Jones).

PATRICK CALDWELL JUN. 13, 2016 5:13 PM



Carlo Allegri/ZUMA
Donald Trump issued an edict on his Facebook page Monday afternoon: The Washington Post will no longer be credentialed to cover his campaign. "Based on the incredibly inaccurate coverage and reporting of the record setting Trump campaign," Trump wrote, "we are hereby revoking the press credentials of the phony and dishonest Washington Post."



you are not the one to protect the first amendment. face it when you select statements that you dont like and delete it that is anti first amendment.That just goes to show what a hypocrite you really are.
jelun wrote: br The man who wants to swear that he... (show quote)




They're not being banned from covering anything.

The WH always restricts access to the POTUS.

But the nutbag left can still report any lie that they want.


Need a hanky?

| Reply
Apr 16, 2017 14:54:45   #
georgejc
 
I think the Washing Post should be banned period.
Semper Fi

| Reply
Apr 16, 2017 15:26:08   #
lpnmajor (a regular here)
 
vernon wrote:
jelun wrote:
The man who wants to swear that he will defend the Constitution ignores it repeatedly, this latest is a blanket dismissal of the First Amendment.


http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/06/donald-trump-just-banned-washington-post-covering-his-campaign

Donald Trump Just Banned the Washington Post From Covering His Campaign
The Post joins a long list of blacklisted publications (including Mother Jones).

PATRICK CALDWELL JUN. 13, 2016 5:13 PM

Trump resents the fact that he doesn't have absolute control of the media like his idol Putin does, but he's trying to make it so. The WOP should sue in DC Federal court, and make Trump show just cause. POTUS does NOT have unlimited power - although the idiots "advising" him tell him he does. He's a very dangerous man and ignorant.

Carlo Allegri/ZUMA
Donald Trump issued an edict on his Facebook page Monday afternoon: The Washington Post will no longer be credentialed to cover his campaign. "Based on the incredibly inaccurate coverage and reporting of the record setting Trump campaign," Trump wrote, "we are hereby revoking the press credentials of the phony and dishonest Washington Post."



you are not the one to protect the first amendment. face it when you select statements that you dont like and delete it that is anti first amendment.That just goes to show what a hypocrite you really are.
jelun wrote: br The man who wants to swear that he... (show quote)

| Reply
Apr 16, 2017 15:48:07   #
vernon (a regular here)
 
Super Dave wrote:


They're not being banned from covering anything.

The WH always restricts access to the POTUS.

But the nutbag left can still report any lie that they want.


Need a hanky?



thanks

| Reply
Apr 16, 2017 15:49:38   #
saltwind 78
 
georgic, I don't believe that Semper Fi is quite in tune with shitcanning the US Constitution!
georgejc wrote:
I think the Washing Post should be banned period.
Semper Fi

| Reply
Apr 16, 2017 21:44:34   #
georgejc
 
salt wind 78:
It is georgejc, by the way.
The WP has been a liberal generator of fake, misleading, dis-informational, misinformational news and commentary long before today. Even John Kennedy couldn't stand them. By the way, when was the last time you read the Constitution?
Semper, Semper, Semper Fi

| Reply
Apr 17, 2017 09:59:13   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
It does protect the liar in the white house

| Reply
Apr 17, 2017 11:20:26   #
Larry the Legend
 
vernon wrote:
jelun wrote:
The man who wants to swear that he will defend the Constitution ignores it repeatedly, this latest is a blanket dismissal of the First Amendment.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/06/donald-trump-just-banned-washington-post-covering-his-campaign

Donald Trump Just Banned the Washington Post From Covering His Campaign
The Post joins a long list of blacklisted publications (including Mother Jones).

PATRICK CALDWELL JUN. 13, 2016 5:13 PM

Carlo Allegri/ZUMA
Donald Trump issued an edict on his Facebook page Monday afternoon: The Washington Post will no longer be credentialed to cover his campaign. "Based on the incredibly inaccurate coverage and reporting of the record setting Trump campaign," Trump wrote, "we are hereby revoking the press credentials of the phony and dishonest Washington Post."

you are not the one to protect the first amendment. face it when you select statements that you dont like and delete it that is anti first amendment.That just goes to show what a hypocrite you really are.
jelun wrote: br The man who wants to swear that he... (show quote)


OK, let's just get this in perspective. The first amendment guarantees you the right to speak your mind any time any where, at your choosing. You can stand in the middle of a crowd and orate about whatever your pet subject is, all day long, and government cannot stop you. Of course, if you insult or threaten people, they might react in a manner to your detriment. The people are not government. Remember that. Moving on, the first amendment does not guarantee you a platform. You can speak all you want, no-one has to listen to you or engage you in discourse (right to remain silent, anyone?). The first amendment does not guarantee you the ability to force anyone to accept your presence or engage you at their gatherings, whether public or private. That especially applies to private citizens.

Now, the Washington Post tried very hard to (negatively) misinform the populace, in their reporting and their editorial pages, about the Trump campaign and what the candidate was saying about the issues of the day. Donald Trump made it very clear to them, several times, if they continued, they would not be welcome at his gatherings. For whatever reasons, they did not heed his warnings. It would appear that the Washington Post was having the same delusions about their constitutional rights and powers as most socialist leaning organizations (basically, whatever they want them to be). They seemed to assume that the constitutional right to free speech was applicable to them in their efforts to libel and slander (then) candidate Trump. He was happy to correct their erroneous assumption and they didn't like it. "Based on the incredibly inaccurate coverage and reporting of the record setting Trump campaign," Trump wrote, "we are hereby revoking the press credentials of the phony and dishonest Washington Post." Although it was not required or, at that point, even necessary, he even gave a reason for this exclusion. As the English would say, that's their 'hard cheese'.

"Hypocrite"? Not at all. The Washington Post revealed themselves as a partisan organization bent on demeaning the Trump campaign as much as possible. They outed themselves as the enemy, and were therefore excluded. Case closed.

| Reply
Apr 17, 2017 13:22:12   #
bggamers (a regular here)
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
OK, let's just get this in perspective. The first amendment guarantees you the right to speak your mind any time any where, at your choosing. You can stand in the middle of a crowd and orate about whatever your pet subject is, all day long, and government cannot stop you. Of course, if you insult or threaten people, they might react in a manner to your detriment. The people are not government. Remember that. Moving on, the first amendment does not guarantee you a platform. You can speak all you want, no-one has to listen to you or engage you in discourse (right to remain silent, anyone?). The first amendment does not guarantee you the ability to force anyone to accept your presence or engage you at their gatherings, whether public or private. That especially applies to private citizens.

Now, the Washington Post tried very hard to (negatively) misinform the populace, in their reporting and their editorial pages, about the Trump campaign and what the candidate was saying about the issues of the day. Donald Trump made it very clear to them, several times, if they continued, they would not be welcome at his gatherings. For whatever reasons, they did not heed his warnings. It would appear that the Washington Post was having the same delusions about their constitutional rights and powers as most socialist leaning organizations (basically, whatever they want them to be). They seemed to assume that the constitutional right to free speech was applicable to them in their efforts to libel and slander (then) candidate Trump. He was happy to correct their erroneous assumption and they didn't like it. "Based on the incredibly inaccurate coverage and reporting of the record setting Trump campaign," Trump wrote, "we are hereby revoking the press credentials of the phony and dishonest Washington Post." Although it was not required or, at that point, even necessary, he even gave a reason for this exclusion. As the English would say, that's their 'hard cheese'.

"Hypocrite"? Not at all. The Washington Post revealed themselves as a partisan organization bent on demeaning the Trump campaign as much as possible. They outed themselves as the enemy, and were therefore excluded. Case closed.
OK, let's just get this in perspective. The first... (show quote)


very nicely put thank you

| Reply
Apr 17, 2017 13:59:54   #
Docadhoc
 
vernon wrote:
jelun wrote:
The man who wants to swear that he will defend the Constitution ignores it repeatedly, this latest is a blanket dismissal of the First Amendment.

A1 gives you the right to speak. It does not say I have to provide you what to speak about. This is just another specious argument for lack of something real to whine about.


http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/06/donald-trump-just-banned-washington-post-covering-his-campaign

Donald Trump Just Banned the Washington Post From Covering His Campaign
The Post joins a long list of blacklisted publications (including Mother Jones).

PATRICK CALDWELL JUN. 13, 2016 5:13 PM



Carlo Allegri/ZUMA
Donald Trump issued an edict on his Facebook page Monday afternoon: The Washington Post will no longer be credentialed to cover his campaign. "Based on the incredibly inaccurate coverage and reporting of the record setting Trump campaign," Trump wrote, "we are hereby revoking the press credentials of the phony and dishonest Washington Post."



you are not the one to protect the first amendment. face it when you select statements that you dont like and delete it that is anti first amendment.That just goes to show what a hypocrite you really are.
jelun wrote: br The man who wants to swear that he... (show quote)


Banning them has zero to do with A1. They can print what they wish regardless of where it comes from.

Your source is mother jones..lolol.

| Reply
Apr 17, 2017 14:01:43   #
Larry the Legend
 
Docadhoc wrote:
Your source is mother jones..lolol.


Shhh! If you tell him then he'll wise up and we'll have nothing to laugh at...

| Reply
Page: 1 2 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.