The TRUTH About John Mccain’s Shameful Legacy is GOING VIRAL!
Okay, people…before John McCain dies and the ridiculous “tributes” to the man make me vomit, let’s remember what McCain’s real legacy is: His father was the Admiral in charge of the Pacific fleet prosecuting the war in Vietnam Nam.

Because of this McCain got preferential treatment in the Navy. He was allowed to become a Navy pilot. But he was a terrible pilot.
McCain crashed two navy Jets in his early career. Then while aboard the Aircraft Carrier USS Forrestal, McCain got angry because he had to wait in line to take off on a bombing run.
He shut off his engines, opened the cockpit, and in his haste to exit the aircraft to chew someone out about his having to ” wait”, he hit the button that released his live bombs onto the deck of the Forrestal.He took off running, as the bombs exploded, which set off a chain reaction of bombs from adjacent aircraft, and the ensuing explosions and fires killed 133 sailors aboard the Forrestal.
While his fellow sailors were fighting the fire, McCain went to the pilot’s lounge below decks and watched the men fight the fire on closed circuit TV.
Hours later, McCain took off with a New York Times reporter buddy of his, and went on to say that after seeing the effects of those bombs on the Forrestal, he was beginning to question the morality of dropping those bombs on the Viet Cong.
McCain was the direct cause of 133 deaths on his own ship, and was never reprimanded. He was nowhere to be found as the Forrestal had to limp to the Philippines for months of repair work.
McCain was married then. His wife was stricken with debilitating injuries in an automobile accident. And was hospitalized for more than 5 months. McCain was off gallivanting with anything in a skirt.Upon returning from Vietnam Nam, McCain found his wife was disfigured by her injuries, which included a shattered pelvis, arm, and legs. In order to save her legs, doctors performed 23 surgeries on her, and had to remove significant portions of the bones in her legs, which left he shorter, and unable to walk, and in a wheelchair, she had to use a catheter.
McCain was disinterested in his first wife’s predicament. She had to go through grueling physical therapy to learn to walk again.
After McCain left the Navy, he was intent on a career in politics. He and His wife Carol had gotten to know Ronald and Nancy Reagan, and McCain was eager to jump into politics.
But he decided he needed a more visually pleasing young woman by his side. He callously divorced Carol, the mother of his three children, and immediately jumped into the sack with new wife Cindy, who was 18 years younger.
Upon learning of this, the Reagans were shocked and angered by how he had treated Carol.
While campaigning for congress, McCain used pictures of himself posing with Mr. And Mrs. Reagan, but there was no hearty endorsement offered by the Reagans.
McCain’s new young wife was also an heiress to an Arizona Brewing fortune.
And let us not forget McCain was one of the Keating 5, who had helped swindle life savings from countless Americans in the Savings and Loan scandal of the 1980’s. McCain was in it up to his eyeballs.
Yet McCain was well-connected in Washington, and parlayed his connections into a seat in the United States Senate.
So before the tearful tributes to John McCain, be sure you remember the facts about this self-proclaimed Maverick. The facts do not agree with that portrait of a heroic patriot and great American.With due respect to his family, John McCain was never the great man so many portray him as.
I do not wish the man any harm or ill-will. But neither should we allow this false narrative fairy-tale about this scoundrel of a man as he faces his eternal fate.
JJMcarthy

Because Welfare is NOT Christian, it's stealing. When God tells us to give to the poor, it's "WE/US" that individually give not our Government that is funded by hardworking taxpayers!!!.......and when socialism enters the picture, it opens the door nothing but a free ride for millions, plus tuns of fraud and abuse!!!

Only perverted brain dead liberal communist driven dip shits!!

Now that an open socialist has been chosen by the Democratic Party as their newest rising star, socialists are getting off their sofas and couches (where they have been lying for decades whining for their handouts), opening their windows, and shouting to the sky all of their hopes and dreams and most of all, their lists of demands.

But sometimes, their demands go so far beyond the pale that all one can do is burst out laughing. Case in point, courtesy of Twitchy:

I literally don’t care about “how will we pay for this?!?!!!?” We paid for a $1 trillion plus tax cut and increased the defense budget. We paid trillions of dollars on wars that we lost. We can afford whatever we want, and every smug MBA cheese dick in the mentions knows it.
— Nate (@inthesedeserts) July 1, 2018

we could not spend $800+ billion a year on “defense.” We could raise taxes on the super wealthy and have financial transaction taxes (and close the loopholes!) we could nationalize our healthcare system and provide better care for far less. Every other developed country does this
— Nate (@inthesedeserts) July 1, 2018

We’re the wealthiest country in the history of humanity and our currency is the global reserve. We could absolutely do this, and in fact if we don’t do this then our country is headed for a hideous and murderous decline
— Nate (@inthesedeserts) July 1, 2018

And now the list of demands:

I want:
• nationalized health care free for all (to include abortion!) at the point of use with no fees for anyone
• free public university / trade school / vocational school with no fees for anyone
• a federal jobs guarantee that explicitly is not military or law enforcement
— Nate (@inthesedeserts) July 1, 2018

• a massive cut to defense spending closing all our bases abroad in the next 5 years
• full decriminalization of all drugs with cannabis being legalized nationwide
• nationwide ban on cash bail and for-profit prisons
• automatic voter registration and a nat’l voting holiday
— Nate (@inthesedeserts) July 1, 2018

He's just getting warmed up:

• a guaranteed right to housing with a total and complete ban on subsidizing private landlords. Build more public housing and maintain it everywhere
• DC and PR statehood
• Pack the SCOTUS
• Abolish ICE, CBP, and DHS
• Immigration amnesty and a path to citizenship for all
— Nate (@inthesedeserts) July 1, 2018

• 100 percent renewable energy by 2030
• fight climate change with the same level of national commitment as the war effort in World War II
• community led policing nationwide
• an Iraq Truth and Reconciliation Commission
• expunge records for everyone with drug convictions
— Nate (@inthesedeserts) July 1, 2018

• a Marshall Plan level effort to rebuild our infrastructure nationwide
• rebuild public education and end for-profit charter schools and testing
• public campaign financing, ban dark money / corporate donations, limit individual donation amounts
— Nate (@inthesedeserts) July 1, 2018

• Free public broadband
• Free public transportation
• Free public childcare
• Actually enforce laws making same-sex marriage and adoption legal nationwide (Why is it still legal to fire people for being gay?)
• Devote the full brunt of state power to fighting discrimination
— Nate (@inthesedeserts) July 1, 2018

And how would the socialist characterize those who oppose him?

We don’t need the incorrigible racist vote. We don’t need your Meemaw or your Facebook Uncle. We just need people who don’t vote to realize that all of this is within reach if we want it badly enough.
— Nate (@inthesedeserts) July 1, 2018

Also if you agree with this or like the direction this is going, join @DemSocialists and help organize your community. With enough of us working together, this can happen. We don’t need the fash vote, or the racist vote, or the misogynist vote, or the nativist vote. We need us.
— Nate (@inthesedeserts) July 1, 2018

Whoops; that list wasn't complete!

Also, I forgot:
• Blanket student loan forgiveness, no questions asked
• public / community-owned investment banking nationwide
• postal banking nationwide
• reinstate Glass-Steagall
• financial transaction taxes
— Nate (@inthesedeserts) July 1, 2018

I have also made a critical oversight: there needs to be an absolute guarantee of healthcare, nutrition, income, accessibility, treatment, and social support for people with disabilities and those unable to work
— Nate (@inthesedeserts) July 1, 2018

And some free instructions:

Hey everyone if you like this thread and want policy details, read this book entitled “Red Bologna” about the ways that the Italian Communist Party used people-centric policy to improve lives and civic health in Bologna in the 1970s
— Nate (@inthesedeserts) July 2, 2018

Doesn't that all sound great?

I want a unicorn that shoots lasers!
— Monika (@MonikaMusing) July 2, 2018

Ah, the clarion call for America to become Venezuela.
— Jim G (@AxialEquatorial) July 2, 2018

Then the socialist got a dose of reality:

I want:
-Personal responsibility
-Personal accountability
-Basic financial literacy for all
-A return to having a sense of humor
-And people to stop being whiny b*tches all the time

Oh, and ice cream. Can't forget the ice cream.
— Carol Roth (@caroljsroth) July 2, 2018

Which he promptly twisted in the good ol' leftist way:

Let me translate this. Carol wants:
-The cops to murder people she doesn't like
-Never to pay taxes
-Smug z-grade interpretations of the Chicago school listed as canon
-To be allowed to be racist online
-To be very racist online
— Nate (@inthesedeserts) July 2, 2018

Waaaaaahhhhhhhhhhh.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/32552/ludicrously-funny-read-socialists-list-demands-hank-berrien?utm_source=cnemail&utm_medium=email&utm_content=070318-news&utm_campaign=position4

I am sorry for this is so sick but needed to be posted!!

Pro-family activist in Canada under bizarre nationwide arrest warrant -- for passing out ‘anti-LGBT’ flyers. Will turn himself in to police Friday.
Canadian MassResistance ally Bill Whatcott charged in two “hate speech” cases. Being sued by “gays” for $104 million.
Protest planned outside Calgary Police Dept by churches as Whatcott arrives.
Is this what the future of the United States looks like?
June 21, 2018


Bill Whatcott, an extraordinary pro-family activist in a hostile country!

What is happening in Canada this week should be frightening to all of us.

Here in the United States the government tries to force businesses to make “gay” wedding cakes and schools to have “transgender” restrooms. But in Canada, that train is much further down the tracks. It leads us to wonder: Is this our future?

Earlier this week Bill Whatcott, long-time anti-abortion and pro-family activist and MassResistance Canadian ally, was suddenly informed that there is now a national criminal arrest warrant issued for him – for a supposed “hate speech” crime that took place two years ago in Toronto!

"To be honest I am still shocked myself,” he told MassResistance. The "crime"? “My ministry bringing the Gospel and the truth about homosexuality to Toronto’s homosexual pride parade in 2016.”

“I’ve indeed been persecuted for using accurate MassResistance resources for years,” he says.

So now Whatcott is being dragged into courts in two provinces on criminal “hate speech” charges. For one of the incidents he is also being sued by homosexual activists for $104 million.

All of this for simply passing out pamphlets that the LGBT movement doesn’t like.
National Arrest Warrant shocks supporters

The unusual action of a national arrest warrant being issued against Whatcott — especially for something fairly minor that took place two years ago — has shocked his supporters. As Whatcott’s lawyer, Charles Lugosi, told The Toronto Star:

Usually, a Canada-wide warrant is issued with somebody alleged to have committed a very serious crime, like murder. Normally, with something like this, it’s never done. It’s abnormal.

Also, Whatcott has appeared when summoned in the past, and his lawyer has made it clear that he intends continue to cooperate with the police now, though he will certainly challenge every charge against him.

According to published reports, the Attorney General of Ontario personally authorized the criminal charge against Whatcott.

Why did they wait two years before charging him with a crime? It’s not clear at all. According to The Toronto Star:

[Toronto police spokesperson Const. Caroline de Kloet] said part of the reason the warrant was issued two years after the incidents is because police had to “liaise” with the prosecution to approve the charge.

This clearly demonstrates the power of the LGBT movement in Canada.
Whatcott to turn himself in to police on Friday – amid protest

Whatcott has announced that he will turn himself in at a Calgary police station at 10:00 a.m. on Friday morning, June 22. Local churches have also announced that there will be a protest outside the police station to support him.

Members of the Toronto police "hate crime" unit have reportedly already traveled Calgary and will transport him to Toronto.
What did Whatcott do?

Bill Whatcott’s current “hate speech” charges are from two incidents where he handed out flyers that the LGBT movement didn’t like: (1) the 2016 Toronto Gay Pride Parade, which resulted in this latest arrest warrant for a criminal charge and also attracted a $104 million civil lawsuit; and (2) the 2017 British Columbia provincial elections where a man purporting to be a woman ran for Parliament and lost after Whatcott exposed him as a phony “woman.”
The 2016 Toronto Gay Pride Parade

In July 2016, Whatcott used an assumed name to successfully register to march in the Toronto Gay Pride Parade. He and a group of supporters called themselves “The Gay Zombies Cannabis Consumers Association,” wore green body suits, and handed out approximately 3,000 “zombie safe sex” packets.


Marching in the Toronto Gay Pride Parade. Note the naked men right behind them.

It included medical-related information, plus graphic images of anal warts, genital warts, and a blotched corpse labeled an “AIDS fatality.” It also criticized the Prime Minister and other Canadian political figures for their homosexual activism, and how they have led Canada “on a destructive journey toward sexual anarchy and homosexual inspired oppression.”


The "safe sex" packet with the flyer inside. They passed out 3,000 of these that day!

A month after the parade, homosexual activists filed a civil lawsuit charging defamation and “hate speech.” They asked for an absurd $104 million in damages to various LGBT groups. They demanded that not only Whatcott but the other marchers in the group (who have never been identified) and anyone who supported the effort financially or otherwise be held liable. This was obviously done not only to bankrupt as many pro-family people as possible, but to frighten any others who might also hand out pamphlets against the LGBT agenda.

The lawsuit would also ban Whatcott and his group from leafletting or even posting their information on a website. It would also ban them from marching in any “gay pride” parade.

A judge later ruled that the plaintiffs could not claim defamation for an entire group, only individuals, but that the lawsuit could go forward. He also ordered Whatcott to disclose the names of the other “zombies” who marched as well as all their financial backers. Whatcott’s lawyer is appealing that order.

Such a lawsuit demanding “damages” be paid to the homosexuals seemed particularly hypocritical because the parade itself was a disgusting display of full nudity (particularly by males) and include a large dose of bigoted anti-Catholic and general anti-Christian imagery, according to photos of the event that we’ve seen. But the judges and other officials simply ignore that.


Toronto Gay Pride Parade participants. Exposing one's sexual organs to a child is a crime there (as it is just about everywhere else). But the police and authorities simply ignored that and went after Bill Whatcott's pamphlets.

Whatcott’s lawyer filed a very well-written defense brief that makes a very good argument that the parade was a state-funded and basically political event, where all views should be allowed. But the judge, not surprisingly, ignored those points.

(The current warrant for Whatcott's arrest is on a criminal charge of "hate speech" at the Toronto parade.)

Some of the Canadian-based media has written about this (the best is from LifeSiteNews):

Lawsuit takes aim at anti-gay ‘zombie’ from Pride parade, Toronto Star, 8/12/16

$104 million lawsuit against Bill Whatcott threatens free speech, Canadian Catholic News, 8/31/16

Bill Whatcott fights $104 million lawsuit over ‘gay zombies’ Pride protest, LifeSiteNews, 11/11/16

Police issue Canada-wide arrest warrant for Christian accused of LGBT ‘hate’ crimes. LifeSiteNews, 6/20/18

Anti-gay activist wanted for promotion of hatred will surrender in Calgary, lawyer says, Toronto Star, 6/19/18

Exposing a British Columbia "transgender" politician

A second trial for “hate speech” awaits Whatcott in early September 2018 before the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal (i.e., “kangaroo court”).


Bill Whatcott is going to trial in B.C. for simply stating the truth. Incredibly, the judge has already said that the truth is not a legitimate defense in this case! Could this happen here eventually?

He distributed a flyer in 2017 criticizing a male-to-female transsexual running for Parliament. Whatcott simply alerted voters that the Vancouver socialist candidate was a biological man, not the woman he claimed to be.

I am writing this flyer this election to share my concern about the promotion and growth of homosexuality and transvestitism in British Columbia and how it is obscuring the immutable truth about our God given gender.

The truth is there are only two genders, male and female and they are God given and unchangeable. Ronan may have government ID that refers to him by the French female name “Morgane” and the media, NDP, and everyone in the riding might try to pretend Ronan is a woman. But the truth is Ronan's DNA will always be male, he will never have a uterus, and no amount of cosmetic surgery, fake hormones, or media propaganda is going to be able to change these facts.

“God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.” Genesis 1:27
An interesting question: Will the Toronto police let him out in time for his September hearing in British Columbia?
Whatcott a dedicated activist

Whatcott is used to legal harassment employed against him. He has been subject to other “hate” charges, including a case that went all the way to the Canada Supreme Court (decided in 2013). His flyers in question were entitled, "Keep Homosexuality out of Saskatoon's Public Schools!" and "Sodomites in our Public Schools."

Reading the articles about how the Court decided this issue conjures George Orwell – or Alice in Wonderland. The logic is confounding on how the Canadians determine what “hate” legally is. The flyers contained documented facts about homosexual behavior backed up by peer-reviewed studies. They also included the term “sodomite” which obviously distressed the Court.

See media reports:

Despite Supreme Court hate speech ruling, anti-gay activist plans to continue pamphleting, National Post, 2/27/13

Whatcott: Supreme Court labelled truth ‘hate speech’ in homosexuality case, LifeSiteNews, 3/4/13

What is Canadian “hate speech”?

As we have seen in the United States, so-called “hate speech” has no firm definition except what the liberal establishment decides it doesn’t like.

In Canada, hate speech is indictable under Section 319 of Canada’s Criminal Code and carries a punishment of up to two years imprisonment and possible forfeitures. The offenses include:

Public incitement of hatred – “communicating statements in any public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace,” or
Willful promotion of hatred – “communicating statements, other than in private conversation, willfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group”

Permitted defenses:
No person shall be convicted of an offence under sub-section (2):

if he establishes that the statements communicated were true;
if, in good faith, the person expressed or attempted to establish by an argument an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text;
if the statements were relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which was for the public benefit, and if on reasonable grounds he believed them to be true; or
if, in good faith, he intended to point out, for the purpose of removal, matters producing or tending to produce feelings of hatred toward an identifiable group in Canada.

In both cases where he’s being currently charged, Whatcott was simply telling the truth, and was also making legitimate religious arguments. There was no “breach of peace.” Thus, even by their own rules, he should not be held liable. But as in the United States, Canada’s activist judges mold the law as they wish.
Don’t let this happen here!

Obviously, Canada doesn’t have a First Amendment like the US. But as we’ve seen here with the Second Amendment, Constitutional guarantees are very tenuous and can start to disappear pretty easily.

As we say over and over, it’s absolutely critical for people to speak out and tell the truth as frequently as possible. That kind of confrontation forces the oppressors to back down. Otherwise the government simply takes over and fills the void with tyranny. Not enough people in Canada have been doing that, and so Bill Whatcott is taking the brunt of that.

On Friday, Bill Whatcott turns himself in to the Calgary police, amid a protest at the police station. We will have a full report on that!

http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen3/18b/Bill-Whatcott-arrest-warrant/index.html

DUMMYCRATS ARE SO CONCERNED ABOUT THE BORDER.........WHAT A BUCKET OF SHIT!!!

The recent media-generated hysteria surrounding border separations has led many Americans to believe that immigration horror stories only started under President Donald Trump, when, in reality, many of the terrifying stories were largely ignored during former President Barack Obama's presidency.

Here are four immigration horror stories that happened during the Obama administration:

4. Kept More Than Double The Number Of Children In Detention Centers Than Trump White House. Newsweek reports:

Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) Administration for Children and Families spokesperson Kenneth Wolfe told Newsweek on Wednesday that it had as many as 10,852 undocumented children in its custody—a significant jump from the 8,886 that were in the agency's custody on April 29, according to the Washington Post.

In fiscal year 2013, under the Barack Obama administration, the HHS Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) had as many as 25,000 unaccompanied children in its care across 80 shelters, according to a July 2014 article in Mother Jones.

The revelation that illegal alien children were being kept in cages came to light in 2014 when Breitbart Texas' Brandon Darby broke the story. On Sunday, Darby tweeted out a thread of 39 photos that he reported on in 2014 that showed the conditions that the children were subjected to:

And finally, image #39 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/RnEsxn9cSO
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

3. The Obama Administration Knowingly Let Admitted MS-13 Gang Members Into The U.S. The Washington Times reports:

The Obama administration knowingly let in at least 16 admitted MS-13 gang members who arrived at the U.S. as illegal immigrant teenagers in 2014, a top senator said Wednesday, citing internal documents that showed the teens were shipped to juvenile homes throughout the country.

Sen. Ron Johnson, chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, said a whistleblower turned over Customs and Border Protection documents from 2014 detailing the 16 people who were caught crossing the border.

2. The Obama Administration Held Mexican Kids For Months As Punishment For Border-Crossing. The Washington Post reports:

[Border Patrol agent Robert Harris'] intelligence analysts estimated that 78 percent of the guides smuggling other migrants were Mexicans younger than 18 — teenagers often hired or conscripted by drug cartels that knew they would not be prosecuted if caught — and he wanted to attack this loophole.

“Why don’t we remove these juveniles from the smuggling cycle?” Harris, the outgoing commander of the Laredo sector of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, recalled thinking.

Now, as a result of that decision, young Mexicans are being held for months without charge in shelters across the United States, sometimes without their parents’ knowledge. Since the program began in May, 536 juveniles have been held — 248 of whom have been deported to Mexico after an average stay of 75 days, according to Border Patrol statistics. Mexican authorities say some of these repeat border-crossers have spent as much as six months in U.S. custody while they await an appearance before an immigration judge.

1. The Obama Administration Placed Immigrant Children With Human Traffickers. The New York Times reports:

The Department of Health and Human Services placed more than a dozen immigrant children in the custody of human traffickers after it failed to conduct background checks of caregivers. ...

At least six children were lured to the United States from Guatemala with the promise of a better life, then were made to work on egg farms. The children, as young as 14, had been in federal custody before being entrusted to the traffickers. ...

In addition to the Marion cases, the investigation found evidence that 13 other children had been trafficked after officials handed them over to adults who were supposed to care for them during their immigration proceedings. An additional 15 cases exhibited some signs of trafficking.

"It is intolerable that human trafficking — modern-day slavery — could occur in our own backyard, but what makes the Marion cases even more alarming is that a U.S. government agency was responsible for delivering some of the victims into the hands of their abusers," said Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH), Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. "Whatever your views on immigration policy, everyone can agree that the administration has a responsibility to ensure the safety of the migrant kids that have entered government custody until their immigration court date."

https://www.dailywire.com/news/32064/5-horrifying-immigration-stories-happened-under-ryan-saavedra?utm_source=cnemail&utm_medium=email&utm_content=062118-news&utm_campaign=position4

Just for you perverted left brain dead fools who were to blind and to stupid to see anything during the Obummer admin! Take a look at this picture and then follow the link to see 29 more. Where were you lefties? Why do you hate Trump so much when Obummer, the ILLEGAL, was the worst POTUS ever!! All 30 pictures are of the Obummer border actions!!

https://www.westernjournal.com/ben-shapiro-unveils-forgotten-child-detainee-photos-from-obama-administration/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=newsletter-WJ&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=western-journal


https://twitter.com/brandondarby/status/1008502391124189185/photo/1 ............THERE ARE 29 MORE!!

Liberals are masters of using rhetoric to make their worldview sound like reality, but history tells a very different tale. Here are 10 historical “facts” only a left-winger would believe.

1. Columbus was an imperial conqueror who committed genocide

As with many other problematic historical figures, liberals are intent on erasing Christopher Columbus from history. “Progressive” cities across the country have replaced Columbus Day with Indigenous People’s Day, under the belief that Columbus was a greedy, conquering savage who murdered mass numbers of Native Americans in cold blood.

But the truth is much more nuanced than that.

First, as many Americans forget, in 1492 Columbus did not sail the ocean blue with the intent of discovering and conquering a new continent; his goal was to help finance the liberation of Jerusalem from the Ottoman Empire. Second, while Columbus did indeed treat the natives of the New World poorly, the vast majority of natives who died after his arrival succumbed to diseases. Columbus did not purposefully kill them, and he certainly did not commit genocide.

But liberals don’t care about historical nuance or fact. Columbus was a white man who mistreated people of color, and for that, he is an incarnation of evil who must be struck from history. (RELATED: Christopher Columbus Continues To Be Under Assault From PC Liberals).

2. The Puritans stole Native American lands

Continuing with the theme of white men disenfranchising people of color, liberals will tell you that the Puritans stole land from the Pequot people to establish the first settlements. However, that just isn’t true.

As Thomas Woods writes in “The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History”:

[…] while the king had issued colonial land grants, the Puritan consensus, evident in their words and their actions, was that the king’s charter conferred political and not property rights to the land, which Puritan settlers sought by means of voluntary cession from the Indians.

In fact, Woods continues, “The colonial governments actually punished individuals who made unauthorized acquisitions of Indian lands.” Roger Williams obtained title from the natives before settling Providence, and even though Plymouth obtained title after settlement, natives gave immediate consent.

3. The Union is blameless in the Civil War

Liberals believe the Civil War was an ultimate battle of good versus evil, with the Confederacy being the decidedly evil party. However, while the South is to blame for the start of the war, it was the North who acted truly despicable during its course.

While the Confederate army largely left the civilian population alone, the same cannot be said for Lincoln’s forces. After establishing himself as military commander of New Orleans on May 1, 1862, General Benjamin Butler issued Order No. 28, which essentially gave occupying Union soldiers the “right to rape.” When news of the order reached Europe, the British prime minister was so disgusted that he condemned Butler of being “guilty in cold blood.”

General William Sherman also infamously employed a “scorched earth” policy in his march across the South, robbing and destroying homes and firebombing entire crops. The destruction was so bad in Mississippi “that the residents had to resort to living in caves and eating rats, dogs, and mules.” Indeed, in the case of Meridien, Mississippi, where no Confederate force existed at the time of his attack, Sherman bragged that he had wiped it off the map.

Gives a whole new meaning to the term “War of Northern Aggression.”

4. The revisionist history of the Ku Klux Klan

Today, the Ku Klux Klan is exclusively associated with right-wing extremism. However, the first incarnation of the KKK was actually formed in an effort to further the interests of the Democratic Party.

The original KKK flourished in the late 1860s and sought to overthrow Republican state governments in the South during Reconstruction. Specifically, Klan members targeted Republican politicians and voters, both black and white, and intimidated and threatened them into silence. As Eric Foner, a Columbia University history professor, said, “In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who desired restoration of white supremacy.”

However, Foner then attempted to qualify the Klan’s actions: “Its purposes were political, but political in the broadest sense, for it sought to affect power relations, both public and private, throughout Southern society.”

Another scholar, James Marten, chairman of the history department at Marquette University, dismissed the founding generation of the Klan because it “really only lasted into the 1870s before it was driven underground, and it was not an overtly political organization.”

5. Republicans enforced Jim Crow laws and opposed the Civil Rights Act

Democrats claim that Republicans are responsible for embedding systemic racism in America, but history tells us the exact opposite is true.

Jim Crow laws were enacted and enforced by Democratic politicians (who were elected to office with a forceful helping hand from the KKK) in the former Confederate states beginning in the late 19th century. Nearly 100 years later, when Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower introduced the 1957 Civil Rights Act, it was Senate Majority Leader Lyndon B. Johnson – a Democrat – who gutted the bill. Strom Thurmond, a Democrat senator from South Carolina and staunch segregationist, sustained the longest one-person filibuster in history in an effort to keep the bill from becoming law. John F. Kennedy, the greatest icon of the Democratic Party, voted against the bill. When the landmark 1964 Civil Rights Act came to a vote, a higher percentage of Republicans voted for it than Democrats. Furthermore, Johnson, who was then president, switched sides and renewed the push for civil rights only because he believed doing so would secure the black vote for Democrats.

Just over 10 years later in 1977, Democrats elected former KKK officer Robert Byrd as their Senate Majority Leader. (RELATED: The Truth About Slavery and Civil Rights that Democrats Want to Hide).

6. Labor unions gave us the weekend

In an effort to undermine capitalism and free markets, unionism has long held that the trade union movement created the weekend. But that claim is, in a word, absurd.

The average U.S. workweek was 61 hours in 1870, compared to 34 in 2004. That’s a near doubling of leisure time – and Americans can thank capitalism, not unionism:

The shorter work week is entirely a capitalist invention. As capital investment caused the marginal productivity of labor to increase over time, less labor was required to produce the same levels of output. As competition became more intense, many employers competed for the best employees by offering both better pay and shorter hours. Those who did not offer shorter work weeks were compelled by the forces of competition to offer higher compensating wages or become uncompetitive in the labor market.

The forces of competitive capitalism also effectively eliminated the need for child labor and helped to establish workplace safety standards – both things that unionism claims to have done. In reality, the lobbying efforts of unions to further regulate and tax business has hampered the market economy, thus making everyone worse off economically.

7. Minimum wage laws help minorities and low-skilled workers

Once again, the exact opposite is true. Increased minimum wage disproportionately affects minority and low-skilled workers, who are most likely to be cut loose. This negatively impacts them in the long run, as they need these jobs to learn “grit, self-regulation, motivation, and the ability to work constructively with others” in order to “climb the economic ladder.”

However, it’s not just happenstance that minimum wage laws hurt minorities – they were literally designed to. Famed economist Thomas Sowell gave an uncomfortable historical primer on the racist intent behind minimum wage laws:

In South Africa during the era of apartheid, white labor unions urged that a minimum-wage law be applied to all races, to keep black workers from taking jobs away from white unionized workers by working for less than the union pay scale.

Some supporters of the first federal minimum-wage law in the United States — the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931 — used exactly the same rationale, citing the fact that Southern construction companies, using non-union black workers, were able to come north and underbid construction companies using unionized white labor.

Like many liberal policies, minimum wage sounds good, but it just doesn’t work in practice – and it harms the very people it’s supposed to help. (RELATED: $15 Minimum Wage to Cost California 400,000 Jobs).

8. Franklin Roosevelt fixed the Great Depression

Democrats love Big Government, so naturally, they love the massive expansion of federal power that was Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal. Indeed, Democrats and anti-free market Republicans credit the New Deal – and by extension FDR – with ending the Great Depression.

However, the truth is that FDR actually made the depression worse. In summary:

In their understanding of the Depression, Roosevelt and his economic advisers had cause and effect reversed. They did not recognize that prices had fallen because of the Depression. They believed that the Depression prevailed because prices had fallen. The obvious remedy, then, was to raise prices, which they decided to do by creating artificial shortages. Hence arose a collection of crackpot policies designed to cure the Depression by cutting back on production. The scheme was so patently self-defeating that it’s hard to believe anyone seriously believed it would work.

Roosevelt and his allies believed that American business needed Big Government regulation in order to flourish, but in reality, the exact opposite is true (are you noticing a theme?). Unfortunately, Democrats today still adhere to this nonsensical belief, to the detriment of business owners everywhere.

9. The War on Poverty worked

Only a liberal would believe that more government welfare would lead to less dependency on government. Enter John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson’s war on poverty.

When Kennedy first proposed a war on poverty, he said, “We must find ways of returning far more of our dependent people to independence.” Johnson later echoed this sentiment, proclaiming that the purpose of the legislation was to make “taxpayers out of taxeaters.”

That didn’t happen. Instead, the war on poverty created a welfare state. Thomas Sowell writes:

Ironically, dependency on government to raise people above the poverty line had been going down for years before the war on poverty began. The hard facts showed that the number of people who lived below the official poverty line had been declining since 1960, and was only half of what it had been in 1950.

On the more fundamental question of dependency, the facts were even clearer. The proportion of people whose earnings put them below the poverty level — without counting government benefits — declined by about one-third from 1950 to 1965.

All this was happening before the war on poverty went into effect — and all these trends reversed after it went into effect.

Handouts don’t breed self-sufficiency. Period.

10. Communism is a worthy cause

This is arguably the biggest and worst of all liberal “truths”: true Communism and/or socialism is a worthy goal.

Are you about to tell us “Socialism was tried in Russia” or “Look at Venezuela” etc? It has NEVER EXISTED! It comes AFTER global capitalism! pic.twitter.com/Rr1Ra0ugbE

— The Socialist Party (@OfficialSPGB) November 16, 2016

Communism is the absolute antithesis to the sovereign, self-sufficient individual, so of course, liberals love it. In 2017, The New York Times published an entire series eulogizing Communism and singing its praises. Have they forgotten that Communism killed 94 million people in the 20th century?

Disturbingly, Information is Beautiful found that famine killed 101 million people in the 20th century – and the major famines in that century exclusively took place in Communist countries.

Numbers don’t like: Communism kills. Yet there are a disturbing number of liberals out there who view the world through red-colored lenses.

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/historical-facts-only-liberals-believe/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=criticalimpact&utm_campaign=TPI_weekend_newsletter_6_16_2018&utm_content=1618d0568d4f0b4aa6473c7b9fa19141&source=CI

That maybe true Gatsby, but Satan is still using her every stinking day she is breathing!! Killery should have been jailed years ago!!

Zemirah, you are absolutely correct!! Once a dummycrat opens their mouth, you know who they are!!

Well, let's see, is Killery the Witch or Killery the Bitch.....I think both sums it up!!!

Hillary Clinton appeared as a guest speaker at a witch’s coven in New York City on April 3, 2018 and was awarded a lifetime membership in the coven, known as “The Wing.” While this might sound like “fake news” details on Hillary’s night out with a room full of occult-practicing feminist witches appeared in several news publications and we checked it out.

This is not information coming from a Russian bot on Twitter or a questionable piece of journalism on an amateur site. Hillary Clinton attended a coven of witches right out in the open and it was covered by a “mainstream media” magazine in New York.

Rumors about Hillary Clinton’s occult practices have swirled around her for years, but the media has always stepped in to denounce those stories as half-baked conspiracy theories. It will be interesting to see how George Stephanopoulos and other former Clinton employees — now gainfully employed as “journalists” — will spin this story.

The leadership of The Wing introduced Hillary as “the newest member of our coven” at the event. WND.com notes that in anticipation of Hillary’s attendance at the coven, the group tried to scrub all references to itself as a coven from its website (Spoiler alert: They failed.)

The Wing fashions itself on its website as a sorority of feminist, pink-hat-wearing, trendy, ultra-liberal chicks. The social media channels of The Wing’s founders are not so subtle, however. The founders of the coven include two women named Audrey Gelman and Lauren Kassan.

Actress Lena Dunham, who had a mental breakdown after Donald Trump’s victory and had to go talk to therapy cactuses in the desert after Hillary Clinton lost, is a lifelong friend of Audrey Gelman. Gelman and Kassan claim very openly that The Wing is a coven, not a sorority, on their social media pages.

Gelman and Kassan are very open about their occult practices on their social sites. A post by The Wing’s director contains a drawing of witches dancing around Satan and calling on other witches to join them to cast a hexes against the NRA and a curse against Donald Trump.

The Wing’s online store features hats and T-shirts emblazoned with occult symbols such as inverted pentagrams. Witches can purchase a beanie cap from The Wing with an occult triangle on them surrounded by the words, “Incantations, Shouts & Chants.”

Tennis star Venus Williams, actress Jennifer Lawrence and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) have all given talks at various Wing covens. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) was the latest politician to stop by and talk with the witches on Friday, April 13th. (The witches certainly love to chat with the anti-gun crowd for some reason!)

The Clintons and the media have vehemently denied that Hillary is an occult practitioner for years, in spite of evidence to the contrary. Former Clinton insider and “fixer” Larry Nichols admitted last year that when Hillary Clinton was First Lady, she used to fly out to California once a month to take part in a ritual at a witch’s coven.

Nichols’ job was to keep stories like that and of Bill Clinton’s trips to the Bohemian Grove out of the news (not that the media would have reported those things anyway).

Veteran reporter Bob Woodward recounted a story in the Washington Post in which Hillary Clinton refused to talk about Jesus Christ and frequently held necromantic seances in the White House, in which she would try to talk to the dead.

In another example, when WikiLeaks released a batch of Clinton emails in 2015, one message sent to Hillary Clinton from her friend and attorney Cheryl Mills contained a note from a senior government official who talks about “sacrificing a chicken in the backyard to Moloch.”

Moloch was a Canaanite god in the Old Testament that early pagans would sacrifice their children to. (Hopefully the “chicken” was not a metaphor in this instance.)

Hints at the Democrat Party’s fascination with the occult in general and the Clintons’ specific dabbling in the black arts have been around for many years, for those who have been paying attention. The Democratic National Convention in 2012 showed the true face of the Democrats when the membership voted three separate times against adding a reference to God (the God of the Bible) to the party platform.

On the third vote, convention chairman and Los Angeles Mayor Anthony Villaraigosa overruled the crowd, claiming that a two-thirds voice vote agreed to add God back into the party platform. Video of the incident show it was unclear which side had won the vote, but the DNC overruled the members.

The rank-and-file membership of the Democrat Party has no problem with showing its contempt for Christianity, but the leadership apparently understands that if its hatred of God, Christians, the United States and the American system of jurisprudence based on biblical principles were to be aired publicly, it would cost too many votes.

Thus, Hillary Clinton attends a witch’s coven on the weekend and pretends to be a Methodist during the week. Bill Clinton attends a voodoo ceremony in Haiti in 1995 and then invokes God on the campaign. Barack Obama openly and passionately references his Muslim faith and then George Stephanopoulos helpfully steps in and encourages him to pretend that he meant to say his “Christian” faith. And so, the charade continues and the media continues to gaslight the American voters about the occult practitioners among the globalist elites.

Why should we care about this, you might ask? If Hillary Clinton wants to attend a witch’s coven, worship Satan and cast hexes against The Deplorables, that’s a private matter and not something she should be judged for, right?

Wrong. No matter how much our increasingly secular society wants to deny it, a person’s inner faith sheds light on how they will govern if placed in a position of power. Hillary Clinton is uncomfortable talking about Christianity but appears overjoyed when she attends a coven of witches that casts spells against Donald Trump and the NRA.

Don’t you think the American people would have liked to know that fact before the election in 2016?

We’ve said it before and we will keep reminding people of this fact: America truly dodged a bullet when we elected Donald J. Trump as our president!

http://www.americanlibertyreport.com/articles/hillary-can-no-longer-sue-you-if-you-call-her-a-witch/

A sordid story about the FBI’s involvement with organized crime in Boston has shed new light on the character of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, a man that the media has assured us is “beyond reproach.” Mueller was a central figure in an FBI cover up that kept four completely innocent men in prison for decades, in order to protect the FBI’s reputation. Protecting the Deep State was so important to Mueller that he perpetuated an FBI cover up that allowed innocent Americans to rot in prison for more than 30 years.

During Boston’s mob wars in the 1960s, a low-level street criminal named Teddy Deegan was gunned down in an alley in Chelsea, MA. Deegan was killed by two Mafia gunmen who were also FBI informants, named Joe “The Animal” Barboza and Jimmy “The Bear” Flemmi. The FBI immediately knew that Barboza and Flemmi were the killers. In order to protect its informants, a conspiracy to convict four innocent men was hatched.

One of the men convicted of the Deegan murder in 1968 was a World War 2 veteran named Louie Greco. Mr. Greco received two Bronze Stars and a Purple Heart fighting in the Asian theater of the war. At the time of the Deegan murder, Greco had moved to Florida with his wife and children. Greco passed eight separate polygraph tests stating that he was in Florida at the time of the Deegan murder. Mrs. Greco testified that her husband was with her in Florida. Yet Barboza — the real killer — and the FBI convinced a jury that Mr. Greco was in the alley and participated in the Deegan murder. Mr. Greco died in prison in 1995.

Henry Tameleo, another one of the innocent men sent to prison for the Deegan murder, died behind bars in 1985. Peter Limone and Joe Salvati, who were also framed by the FBI, were finally released from prison in the 1990s. Joe Barboza killed dozens of people for the Mafia and continued his killing spree even after the government placed him in the Witness Protection Program.

If this all sounds vaguely like a Martin Scorcese film, you’re not far off the mark. Jack Nicholson’s character in “The Departed” is loosely based on Winter Hill Gang boss Whitey Bulger (remember that name). Bulger was an FBI informant and had several Boston FBI agents on his payroll.

How is a conspiracy to keep four innocent men in prison for decades perpetuated? Through the tireless efforts of public servants who are “beyond reproach,” such as Robert Mueller.

Barboza told numerous reporters over the years that Louie Greco — the disabled World War 2 veteran — was not in the alley the night of the Deegan murder. The FBI’s files named Barboza and his accomplices as the murderers. Journalists wrote and published books about the four innocent men who were rotting away in prison for the Deegan murder.

But year after year, the Massachusetts Parole Board refused to let them out. Two crooked FBI agents who were on Whitey Bulger’s payroll used to go to the Parole Board and intimidate its members, to keep up the conspiracy. The US Attorney in Boston also sent letters to the Parole Board, insisting that the innocent men were guilty and should be kept behind bars.

Spoiler Alert: Robert Mueller was the US Attorney in Boston in the 1980s.
So tell me just how Mueller IS NOT a dummycratic hence man who has surrounded himself with like minded scum!!!

As the US Attorney, Mueller knew exactly what was in the FBI files on this case. He would have read them annually before sending those letters to the Parole Board. Therefore, Mueller knew that Joe Barboza and Jimmy Flemmi were the real killers. Mueller lied to the Massachusetts Parole Board to protect Mafia hitmen and to keep innocent men in prison.

In 2007, two of the surviving men and the estates of the two who died in prison were awarded more than $100 million in a lawsuit against the Justice Department for wrongful imprisonment. Joe Barboza was never punished for the murder of Teddy Deegan, but the American taxpayers were! We paid for the injustice that was perpetuated by the FBI and the DOJ for more than 30 years.

So, please tell us again how Robert Mueller is beyond reproach, progressives. If Mueller was willing to let four innocent men languish in prison for decades over a crime they did not commit, do you believe for one second that an avowed enemy of the Deep State like President Donald Trump is going to be given a fair shake in Mueller’s investigation?

http://www.americanlibertyreport.com/articles/robert-muellers-dirty-past-comes-to-light/

You are welcome and you may use this any time you like!

KEEP JESUS OUT OF YOUR SOCIALISM

From the words of Jesus and the New Testament, ministering to the poor
and the needy among us is the work of Christian individuals and the
church, not the secular government. Jesus said, "The Spirit of the Lord
is on me, because He has anointed me to preach good news to the poor. .
. ." Today's Religious Left wants to change that to, "He has anointed
the federal government to preach good news to the poor."

The Christian gospel is a message of salvation, not a message of income
redistribution and raising our neighbor's taxes. Jesus said that the way
to serve the poor is by giving generously of our own resources. "But
when you give a banquet," He said in Luke 14, "invite the poor, the
crippled, the lame, the blind, and you will be blessed. Although they
cannot repay you, you will be repaid at the resurrection of the
righteous."

The Religious Left is very generous -- with other people's money. In
fact, I believe the founder of the Religious Left was none other than
Judas Iscariot. When Mary, the sister of Lazarus, anointed Jesus with
costly perfume just days before the crucifixion, Judas lectured her and
said, "Why wasn't this perfume sold and the money given to the poor?"

Notice that Judas put on a show of caring for the poor -- even though
the money was Mary's, not his! The motives of Judas, John 12:6 tells us,
were corrupt and self-centered -- and Jesus responded with a stinging
rebuke.

At least one of the Lord's disciples was a "social action Christian" in
the Sojourners mold: Simon Zelotes (Simon the Zealot). Just as
Sojourners president Jim Wallis was once president of the Michigan State
chapter of the militant Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), Simon
Zelotes was a young political radical who attached himself to Jesus
because he thought Jesus would lead a revolt against the Roman Empire.

Simon saw Jesus as a political Messiah who would topple the powerful
while lifting up the poor and oppressed. But Jesus was not a political
Messiah. He didn't attack the Roman Empire. He did battle with the Evil
Empire of Satan himself.

Jesus didn't tell the Roman government what its budget priorities should
be. Why? Because His agenda was much larger than the agenda of Simon
Zelotes or the Religious Left. His eyes were fixed on eternity. He said,
"My kingdom is not of this world."

The Religious Left has missed the meaning of that statement. Yes, there
is a place for Christian social action -- but that place is in a
personal lifestyle of generosity and compassion to the poor. Jesus
didn't tell the rich young ruler to become a political activist and
affect public policy. He said, "Go, sell your possessions and give to
the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me."

It's true, there's poverty in America, and some of the poor can't lift
themselves out of poverty without help. Some are physically or socially
disadvantaged. Some are down on their luck. They need and deserve
Christian compassion and the good news of the gospel.

But a huge number of people receiving government assistance are
substance abusers, welfare cheats, or chronically lazy. Doesn't the
Bible tell us, "If a man will not work, he shall not eat" (2
Thessalonians 3:10)? Why must the "makers" of society support the
"takers" of society? That's not compassion. That's theft. Wouldn't it be
more compassionate to encourage the takers to develop self-respect by
becoming productive citizens?

Would Jesus endorse government policies that encourage and enable
addiction, indolence, and welfare fraud? Certainly not. The Religious
Left should read His parables, especially the Parable of the Talents
(Matthew 25:14-30), the Parable of the Vineyards (Matthew 20:1-16), and
the Parable of the Tenants (Matthew 21:33-46). In those parables, Jesus
blesses hard work, personal responsibility, and the freedom to achieve.

Government programs can't separate the truly needy from the welfare
cheats -- but private Christian charities can. Private charities are far
more effective than government at meeting needs, changing lives,
eliminating fraud and waste, and dispensing compassion. Our stance as
Christians should be pro-compassion, not pro-bureaucracy.

The place for compassionate Christian social action is in the church,
and in the lives of individual believers. When the church becomes a
political pressure group, telling the government, "Confiscate more
wealth from those who earned it and give it to those who have not," then
the church has formed an unholy union with the kingdoms of this world.

Income redistribution is not Christianity. It's Marxism -- and mixing
the two only pollutes the Gospel and betrays the Great Commission.

The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are
willing to work and give to those who would not.

Thomas Jefferson

As always Kevyn, you are full of shit!! Perverted liberal shit that is!!