The problem with negating the traditional concept of marriage between a man and a woman, is that the basic concept of a nurturing family is destroyed. Men and Women have different natural concepts of life based on their ability to adjust to harmony in a society. Whenever we see one sex dominating the society, we find abuse and distortion. The harmony of the family requires a blending of these viewpoints for love to blossom. Two people of the same bent, are not a complete entity in that they are of a singular viewpoint. Essentially "one eyed people" They cannot see the expanded dimension of full vision. They are fooled into thinking they can, but it is impossible. What this would and will lead too, is disregard for the viewpoint of the other sex. It is too one sided, honoring the arrangement of one sided family groups is similar to the military in that they are unable to recognize the full potential of disparity. They can do one thing well, but not good enough for harmony.

filial love is not the same as sacrificial love which is required by opposite sexual unions for harmony and progress. It is really just lust. And has no redeeming societal value.

At the time of Sodom and Gomorrah, the homosexuals had congregated into the two isolated conclaves. They were separated from normal society. They did not interfere with the other viewpoint of sexual behavior. Maybe if they were concentrated again, they could live in harmony with themselves and not bother the majority of people that find that behavior repugnant. It would not bother me if they all got together and started their own society, instead of free loading on the (what is considered) normal society. Normal people did not interfere with them and they were happy as clams doing their thing. Why not separate now as before ? It is the infusion and diffusion of the practice that is causing all the trouble. How about separate neighborhoods for such as these, SF comes to mind as a start.

yes it does affect me, and you also. The effect is that they do not add to the population pool of new individuals. They are like a wart on society, Sure we can tolerate them, but they have no skin in the game of a functional society. They do not add to the work force by contributing functional new people.
They want a free ride on your back. They have no intention of adding to the gene pool or the basic concepts of society. It is not only their loss, but yours as well.

I don't care of they get a discount, that is not the point, but two people joining up just to get it is ludicrous. It does not amount to that much they would probably get along better by filing separately and listing all their deductions for each separately. Listing their income together puts them in a higher bracket. Not a reasonable gain, unless one of them does not work at all. What then is their point?

You are mistaken, it was declared in Genesis. Moses' time, which makes it sort of a baseline arrangement for procreation and harmony in civilization. However, in the beginning there was not much choice for selection of a man and a wife. So they were picking each other out of the same family. ??? What does that mean?

No, it mucks up the increase of sentient and willing progeny. Without an increase in population, those that are not supplying replacement workers are FREE LOADING, and really have no "skin in the game." These types are looking for all the benefits of civilization while messing up the value of increasing it. The only way to survive this life, is to form replacements. Homosexuals only muck up the system. Expecting special privileges for no actual participation in improvement. What improvement is there is homosexual enclaves? They don't support anything except themselves, not schools, not churches, not any GOOD issue of society. It is a purely selfish enterprise.

Every one benefits from fossil fuel. But it will eventually run out, and then we will devise another way to keep ourselves from freezing and migrating. What say we all stop breathing, that will reduce the CO2.

Any one can see, that the answer to excessive CO2 in the atmosphere is due to the decrease in O2 generation. Killing trees, excessive snow, shorter grouth of conversion plants, overpaving of nature, killing the ocean kelp, and all the hot air coming out of congress is really responsible. Just stop all the talk by liberal lunatics, and things will generally improve.

It seems to me, that marriage between anything except man and woman is a joke. Sure people can live together, and love together, but to elevate any other form is bizarre and stupid. It is only because of the financial benefits that anyone wants to call their association a marriage. The same benefits can be achieved with a "partnership" agreement without mucking up the concept of marriage as normally defined. What value is there in the term being misused for homosexual activities?

Well your way will soon be the highway, we have had enough of this mam-by pamby bull crap, It is time to clean up the area. Let us put some common sense back into the country. It is time for more of his minions to hit the bricks.

Thank you for the support. It seems that instead of building on the solution, More vegetation, everybody is trying to cut back on the wrong end of the problem. Sure it makes sense to reduce the generation of bad gases, but it makes more sense to provide for the future by increasing the ability of what we have to do the job they were designed to do. All we have to do, is keep the green side up. Now if the doubters don't want to plant trees, let them dream up a process that does the same thing, that trees do. Convert Co2 into wood and release the O2. The way to solve the problem, is to increase this activity, not decrease the other. Instead of going backwards we need to make a giant leap forward Build a system that sucks the "bad" stuff out of the air and puts in the good stuff. If we could invent a mechanical tree, the problem would be over.

Calling out fiasco's, miscues, and ignorant and even unauthorized activities is not demeaning speech, when it is true. If you cannot recognize right from wrong, you are bound to miss the truth when it is staring you in the face. If what Pres. Obama says something that is totally wrong and derogatory, it must be called out or Liberals will believe it. We do not want a socialistic, communist country. We want Freedom.

The major problem with liberals is that they are conditioned group thinkers. They do not look at alternative evidence for fear that they might be wrong. So they bull their way into an argument with derogatory and unfounded remarks. And when that is ineffective, they start with insults and character assassination. that is only static and no redeeming value to the facts.

A hoodlum is anyone that ignores good behavior and attempts to enforce or gain status by breaking laws and disregarding morality. If everyone did it, it would probably be considered normal, and in some population centers it is, but overall it is just destructive and degrading behavior. You can never achieve good results using bad behavior.

What has made you believe that color makes a difference to a hoodlum, There are hoodlums in any ethnic category. I believe the Italians were more prominent in hoodlum activities than any other, except the Asians. But, and I insist that at this moment in history, Blacks have the spotlight, They can quell all the negative ballyhoo about them by doing good. Most of them get it, most of them are behaving like star citizens. It is the ones that have not attempted to do good that are the troublemakers. You can never do good by evil means. If you want honor and respect you have to give honor and respect. There have been and still are many honorable black people in our society, But the media does not seek them out, it only seeks out the hoodlums. Don't blame me for hoodlums, blame the ones that have convinced them that bad behavior is the key to success. If you think that, you are deluded. Only good behavior gives no one a hook to hang them with. Get on the media, they are trying to keep black people in the ghetto, not anyone else. It is the socialist leaning dingbats that are holding them back.