One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Home | Political Digest | Active Topics | Newest Pictures(new!!!) | Search | Login | Register | Help
Posts for: Snoopy
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 61 next>>
Mar 26, 2017 08:35:48   #
Onelostdog wrote:
You're An EXTREME Redneck When...

1. You let your 14-year-old daughter smoke at the dinner table in front of her kids.

2. The Blue Book value of your truck goes up and down depending on how much gas is in it.

3. You've been married three times and still have the same in-laws.

4. You think a woman who is "out of your league" bowls on a different night.

5. You wonder how service stations keep their rest-rooms so clean.

6. Someone in your family died right after saying, ‘Hey, guys, watch this.’

7. You think Dom Perignon is a Mafia leader.

8. Your wife’s hairdo was once ruined by a ceiling fan.

9. Your junior prom offered day care.

10. You think the last words of the Star-Spangled Banner are ‘Gentlemen, start your engines.’

11. You lit a match in the bathroom and your house exploded right off its wheels.

12. The Halloween pumpkin on your porch has more teeth than your spouse.

13. You have to go outside to get something from the fridge.

14. One of your kids was born on a pool table.

15. You need one more hole punched in your card to get a freebie at the House of Tattoos.

16. You can't get married to your sweetheart because there’s a law against it.

17. You think loading the dishwasher means getting your wife drunk.
You're An EXTREME Redneck When... br br br 1. Yo... (show quote)


You might be an EXTREME Redneck if your richest relative calls you to help take the wheels off his "new" 1984 trailer.

Your pickup truck gains value in relation to the number of returnable beer cans in the bed.


Mar 23, 2017 07:39:54   #
eden wrote:
No American should take delight in the demise of any elected President. The political, social, and diplomatic upheaval that would occur from such an event would add yet another hazardous layer to an increasingly destabilizing world. Those that remember the Nixon shaming will recall the sense of loss of the value of the American character felt by all and yet what are we to think of this person who seems to have such low impulse control when it comes to something as simple as his cell phone? In his favor are some very serious and competent cabinet members who seem to be able to get on with the business of state in spite of the erratic nonsense being trafficked out of the Oval Office. Will they be enough to offset the Presidential recklessness and bring some common sense and gravitas to the stage? One can only hope so for all our sakes...

From the Wall Street Journal:

President Trump is clinging to his wiretapping claim “like a drunk to an empty gin bottle,” the Wall Street Journal said in a scathing editorial published Tuesday night. And that claim, floating in the president’s “seemingly endless stream of exaggerations, evidence-free accusations, implausible denials and other falsehoods,” is severely damaging his credibility, both at home and abroad.
“If President Trump announces that North Korea launched a missile that landed within 100 miles of Hawaii, would most Americans believe him? Would the rest of the world? We’re not sure,” the paper said.
The Journal slammed Trump’s evidence-free assertion that former President Barack Obama ordered the wiretapping of Trump Tower before the 2016 presidential election. Trump leveled his explosive charge on Twitter on March 4, and the White House has refused to back down, even after FBI Director James Comey dismissed the allegation as unfounded.
“He has offered no evidence for his claim, and a parade of intelligence officials, senior Republicans and Democrats have since said they have seen no such evidence,” the paper’s editorial board wrote.
The president has plenty of media critics, and the Journal’s editorial board was not particularly supportive of his candidacy. But the editorial is striking, given the paper’s traditionally conservative tone. Its owner, Rupert Murdoch, also owns Fox News, Trump’s favorite cable news network.
“Two months into his presidency, Gallup has Mr. Trump’s approval rating at 39 percent,” the editorial continued. “No doubt Mr. Trump considers that fake news, but if he doesn’t show more respect for the truth, most Americans may conclude he’s a fake President.”
The paper also pointed out how Trump’s refusal to back off his evidence-free claim has co-opted what could have been a positive news cycle.
“This week should be dominated by the smooth political sailing for Mr. Trump’s Supreme Court nominee and the progress of health-care reform on Capitol Hill,” the editorial said. “These are historic events, and success will show he can deliver on his promises. But instead, the week has been dominated by the news that he was repudiated by his own FBI director.”
No American should take delight in the demise of a... (show quote)


I guess you have not seen the latest report on info gathering on Trump and his associates.

Mar 20, 2017 13:50:36   #

And you think the alternative was better?

Mar 10, 2017 08:42:30   #
PeterS wrote:
They're pointing at the idiot who gave them guns....


The one with the ears is certified UN-Constitutionist.

The dog in the pants suit is an irrational, anti-gun air head.

Mar 7, 2017 06:27:23   #
Nutter wrote:
Good one


What has 64 legs and 2 teeth?

The front row of a Willie Nelson concert in Nashville.

Mar 1, 2017 23:13:27   #
tdsrnest wrote:
Are you a sick person


You continue to ignore the question . . . Why did Admin ban you? It is not a difficult question.

Perhaps your lack of knowledge of the English language, especially the use of the word "there" instead of "their",
prevents you from understanding a simple question.

Feb 27, 2017 19:24:04   #
tdsrnest wrote:
I did but the post by the right wing insults somehow got deleted by Admin it's you whiny little hypo rats that insult and when you get it back you children run to Admin. It's just like the orange haired lunitic the press is always picking on him


Try again. This time answer the question: why did YOU get bounced? If the Admin deleted the "right wing insults" they obviously saw them and decided they weren't as offensive as your posts.

And why do you insult the President of the United States . . . he has nothing to do with our "discussion".

Actions such as these suggest some sort of mental illness.

Feb 27, 2017 16:09:09   #
tdsrnest wrote:
I did and all I did was respond to the the right wing insults if you go back you will see there are a few people on OPP that threaten me insulted me but most of all they insulted a family member that had an incurable kidney disease and could not get medical insurance at any cost until the ACA and they insulted him and not being afraid of these gutless people I responded in the nastest way I could. But these right wing Trump loving extremist could give a damn about anybody but themselves, there guns, and there religion. You have to understand stand they wanted my son to die and they said so on many occasion but right wing people could care less they just think about themselves. They accused me of lying about his desease . And don't forget my son recieved zero government subsidies but they just continued with there nasty insults.
So sit back and just think for one minute I know it's hard for right wing Trump loves that have the attention span of a nat but if someone wanted you're kid to die what would you do.
I spent a long time working with Admin and explaining about some of these right wing extremist and apparently they understood.
I did and all I did was respond to the the right w... (show quote)


Put you brain on full power . . . Maybe a couple of cells will collide. YOU were throw out of OPP not any one else!

Did you get it yet?

Feb 27, 2017 13:25:44   #
tdsrnest wrote:
So typical right wing hypocracy all you look at is the insults I throw out there in response to right wing insults. Get real and look at the full picture not just you're narrow minded foolishness.


Looking at the full picture: Please explain why YOU were bounced from the OPP and not the other folks who insulted you!

Try looking back on yourself for the REAL answer.

Feb 27, 2017 09:29:30   #
tdsrnest wrote:
When I first started to post on OPP again I was absent due to insults towards right wing OPP bloggers and all I was doing was responding to insults directed at me. So Admin choose to suspend me from this site.
So what I am asking all liberal and conservative bloggers that take the time to do a little research and post a new topic to reframe from personal insults.
We have many bloggers on OPP that never respond with any type of logic but seem to just want to personably attack or insult the blogger.
Please transfer all personnel attacks or insults over to admin and I hope that admin will remove these people from OPP.
When I first started to post on OPP again I was ab... (show quote)


I have read many of your postings . . . the Admin was perfectly right in banning you from the site. Logic or not, insults do not add to the issue only degrade it.

BTW: the word is refrain . . . not reframe.

Feb 22, 2017 09:30:40   #
MarvinSussman wrote:
All mention of "person" in the Constitution apply to non-citizens as well as to citizens. Try arresting a foreign ambassador.


I point out that a foreign ambassador has diplomatic immunity.

Feb 19, 2017 08:20:26   #
Loki wrote:
Ah yes. the NFL. A bunch of multi-millionaire spoiled brat crybabies who are mostly so stupid if it weren't for football they'd be on welfare. They think wearing a helmet and carrying a football makes them special, so they don't have to stand for the National Anthem. I wonder if these pricks realize that millions of men and women also wore helmets and carried M-16's instead of a damn football to allow them the right to act like ignorant, butthurt ingrates.
Screw the NFL. Stop watching them and supporting them and see how fast they change their tune.
Ah yes. the NFL. A bunch of multi-millionaire spoi... (show quote)


I could not agree more!

The NFL should stick to football . . . stay out of politics.

Feb 15, 2017 08:45:11   #
Tomtrout wrote:
A litmus test for extreme vetting involves Sharia law. As part of the vetting process, all refugees and immigrants from ALL countries outside of the United States should sign a legal agreement as a part of the administration of visas and green cards that they disavow Sharia law and that if they practice Sharia law they CAN be deported. Many practices of Sharia is contrary to the human rights set by the constitution, local, state, and federal laws.

I am sure that many would ,at first, object to such an infringement on the rights of legal aliens. It would be political suicide to defend this position. Sharia denies the human rights given in our constitution to all women and homosexuals. Supporting Sharia would alienate most Americans as especially women voters. Homosexuality is punishable by death under Sharia thus the LGBTQ community certainly not embrace or tolerate Sharia.

After five years of being in this country, refugees would be required to pass a remedial TOEFL (Test of English as a Foreign Language) exam and prove proficiency in verbal communication. Refugees should also be required to pass an 8th grade level civics exam to prove that they have an understanding of our constitution and government. If they are unable to meet these requirements then they are and will be a burden on society and the American economy. If they cannot be self-supporting and contribute to our country they need to be returned. The lack of assimilation to our culture is evidence that they do not belong here.
A litmus test for extreme vetting involves Sharia ... (show quote)


Great . . . except I would change CAN be deported to . . . WILL be deported.

Jan 28, 2017 15:43:44   #
RETW wrote:

Some times I wish I could just beat these people till there head falls off. I absolutely hate the idea of any one taking advantage of older folks.

Just the other day I got a call from the Supposed " IRS ". The caller .... which was a recording by the way .... told me I had criminal charges pending from them, and I was to call a certain number.
If I did not call within the next 6 hours they would have there attorney file charges and issue an arrest warrant. Just another scam I thought. Later that morning I had an appointment with my eye doctor.
While there, I took notice of the fact, there were several older people there also. In talking to them, I mentioned the phone call I had receive that morning. Two of them told me they had received the same call. One of them, .... an 85 year old gentleman,.... said he was going to go to his bank and draw out
several hundred dollars and send it to them. After I explained it to him, he was going to call the police and ask them, if it was true or not.

So please be carful all you senior's.

RETW (show quote)


Send the offending phone number to the IRS website.

Jan 28, 2017 13:45:46   #

How's about giving lessons?

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 61 next>>
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use - Forum
Copyright 2012-2016 IDF International Technologies, Inc.