He may have violated certain Federal Laws.

Trump Jr. reply to a question by Jake Trapper about possible Russian meddling in the election: "Well it just goes to show you their exact moral compass. They’ll say anything to be able to win this. This is time and time again, lie after lie, you notice he won’t say, ‘well I say this’ — ‘we hear experts’, his housecat at home once said that this is what’s happening with the Russians. It’s disgusting, it’s so phony… I can’t think of bigger lies…It's disgusting. It's so phony. I watched him bumble through the interview, I was able to hear it on audio a little bit. I mean, I can't think of bigger lies, but that exactly goes to show you what the DNC and what the Clinton camp will do. They will lie and do anything to win." Is that just utterly despicable or what? This is the Trump coat of arms: deceit.

Trump Team's 20 denial of Russian collusion:
https://thinkprogress.org/timeline-trumpworld-russia-connection-denials-102adc089438

http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/11/politics/trump-campaign-denials-russia-contact/index.html

Sessions lied under oath about not meeting with any Russians, as did Flynn, Manafort, and Jared Kushner, who has had to amend his security statement four times now to include russiamensia, a common ailment in the WH.

The Donald was apparently targeted back in the spring of 2015 by the Russians. US Intelligence Agencies started tracking an unusually high volume of intercepts by Russians at that time mentioning Trump and his associates and mentioning numerous meetings. This did not initially raise any red flags but after Trump Jr.'s revelation, all that information is now under review.

Trump JR.'s email confirming the meeting to get dirt on Clinton was sent on June 7, four hours before his father publicly announced that he would make a speech outlining the dirt on Hillary.

The emails released by Trump Jr strongly indicate that he made a call to Emin Agalarov, a business associate of his father's, apparently to discuss the upcoming meeting with the Russian operative. Trump Sr. was in the building during this meeting, in the floor just above. To believe that Trump Sr. knew nothing of this meeting arranged by a trusted old business associate, attended to by his son, son-in-law, and campaign manager, at a time the campaign was struggling, is to believe in the Tooth Fairy.

Trump Jr. clearly violated the Federal Election Campaign Act for setting up and attending this meeting (solicitation) with a foreign government agent to interfere with an election. He should hope for a speedy trial while his dad is still in office to pardon him.

Trump Sr. is said to have okayed the lie of the meeting being about adoption. The other three lies before the truth came out may or may not have been his dad's.

I did.

How is the asylum treating you?

The NYT is getting extremely sloppy, over zealous in pursuit of hurting the Right, as was CNN. Too desperate.

My choosing is a lack of adjectives. And I am only speaking of your adjectives (sans ly).

Now, after all this, if we do not become great friends, the whole premise for my new book, Friends by Strain: Anatomy of Head-putting, will be undermined. You were to write the Forward.

Is killing, meaning presently, lol. Singular. I meant to add killing again, as that teacher is dead. The profuse use of adjectives (not appropriate) in your writing is sophomoric. You strain to appear smart, though I suspect you should not have to. Something for the crowd? Look at all my fancy words? Fetid? Use stinky. I like you, one of the few, maybe the only, on the Right that appears to actually look at things. Lately, however, you have gone feral. I like our banter yet I am at least as smart as you. And maybe not so quite as knowledgeable. We could put our exchanges to better use.

Maybe.

True. If I made final judgement upon many I have met on how our first few encounters went, I would be bereft of those I most cherish.

Please stop with the Sophomore vocabulary book. Your endless adjectives is killing my 2nd year English Teacher.

Okay. You are claiming that recorded spoken testimony, openly heard in Congress by both parties, is fake news and fake reports. Can you back that claim up?

Ignore list. Tempting. I am of two minds. But I think I would rather have my tread shredded by trolls than to ignore. Yet I do truly wish for open communication between opposing parties.

[quote=Loki]There would be no situation to exacerbate had courtesies been observed in the first place. I believe there is an old saw about [i]"practicing what you preach."[i] Excellent advice.[/quote]

Being a stickler for having courtesies observed in the first place, many marriages and great friendships would never have been consummated. My decades of experience has been that most lasting relationships are rams on first meeting, bumping heads. This includes my wife of forty years and almost all my good friends. For those who take friendship seriously, courtesies are not usually observed in the beginning: we each want to know who you truly are. Do you have grit? Do you stand for something? Will you stand for it? Rams! The affectation of courtesy is a rube. Judging another--no, making a final judgment on another--because of a perceived lack of courtesy is very small. Good people will often bump heads, and hard. It is demanded to be close. A curtsy of opinion is for the aristocracy in such pretentious behavior.

And I must add that you have not been so one-sided before.

Examples, evidence, would be good but I have heard obscenities from at least five, but that is not saying the others have not used obscenities. I do not recommend obscenities as a basic form of communication yet their use is not necessarily troll-like. It is better for appraisal to show in context. One on that list I know has used racial slurs. Maybe all of them but I have not seen it. Of five people on the Right I prefer not to name, all have freely used racial slurs. Lingua franca.