I know this has been brought up before, but it seems that people still think Trump is crazy thinking that anyone should discuss reducing influx of potentially harmful entities into our society. Some harm is by political difference and fear of terrorism, but also the monetary, safety, job, and American pride instability recognized with massive numbers of illegal immigrants who do little to increase in GDP growth in our country. Trump’s move to restrict potentially dangerous mass immigration of Islamics is much less traumatic for immigrants than what we as a nation have accepted as "NORMAL Limitations” but, for some reason it is viewed as un-American. Also his discussions about restricting the illegal flow of non-Americans into our country, seems to be causing people to question his strong desires to bring work back to Americans and make us safer. Here are the general statistics of Congressional pushes to limit immigration, reduce potential American threats with respect to questionable “new entries”. I know they have been put out there before, but it seems no one is remembering our struggles in trying to improve America for Americans. I'm certainly not saying all these actions were warranted. I'm just saying Trump is not a lunatic for saying the same things that were done before.

1. 1882-1940 immigration exclusion for Chinese ----When Congress excluded Chinese immigrants from the U.S. in 1882, the law remained in effect for 60 years without much complaint from anyone who wasn’t Chinese.

2. 1929-1944 mass Mexican Deportation- In an effort to reduce unemployment, One-third of LA's Mexican population that was now the highest Mexican population in the world except for Mexico City, was expelled between 1929 and 1944 as a result of these practices.
http://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2015/09/08/437579834/mass-deportation-may-sound-unlikely-but-its-happened-before
http://history.house.gov/Exhibitions-and-Publications/HAIC/Historical-Essays/Separate-Interests/Depression-War-Civil-Rights/

3. 1944-1945 immigration exclusion/restriction for Japanese- When the Roosevelt administration placed Japanese-Americans in internment camps during World War II including 1/3 of the entire population of Hawaii and over 100 thousand on the west coast alone. It would be 40 years before someone decided it was not constitutional.

4. 1943-1953- Harry Truman deported 3.4 million Illegal Mexicans to eliminate Social pressure in his desperate attempt at stabilizing the GDP.

5. 1953-1954- Another mass Mexican deportation- When President Eisenhower [under Operation Wetback] shipped 1 million Mexicans with another 1 million Mexicans leaving before deportation across the border in a desperate attempt to bring jobs back to Americans.

I totally agree

Like most sane people, I have compassion on those who have sexual orientation issues. Possibly because of compassion, many try not to say anything that might label them as having issues at all. I read the twin studies showing sexual questioning disorders are learned rather than having Genetic questioning disorders and the studies of the “Homosexual Gene” showing the predisposition was, in fact, potentially genetic. Possibly, the most important studies involved Fluorine and Human Growth Hormones [HGH] in meats and I don't see them pushed to any great level.

Fluorine- Noting that the Melatonin production to control sexual desire is produced in the Pineal gland and recent autopsies are showing large amounts of fluorine around the Pineal and calcification which is believed to reduce melatonin production in children so they do not get the normal control over sexual stimulation needed. This also shows up as early development of sexual characteristics. Two ways for entry of Fluorine have been identified - Teflon pans that have been scratched and from Fluorine forced into the drinking water. This higher level of stimulation presumably causes children to become more sexually active quicker and before they can correctly determine pheromone nuances that establish sexual order. It should also be noted that it increases the possibility of Alzheimer’s disease, but that is a different story.

http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/895/1/fulltext.pdf

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10821215

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/12/04/fluoride-exposure-may-contribute-to-early-puberty.aspx

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/fluoride-could-be-contributing-to-early-puberty-studies-show-100545174.html

HGH- seems to be doing the same thing. This is especially true if a pregnant woman eats food laced with HGH. The children grow breasts sooner, menstruate faster and become more sexually aware---too soon for Pheromone interpretation.

http://www.livescience.com/1824-truth-early-puberty.html

https://www.childrens.com/specialties-services/specialty-centers-and-programs/endocrinology/programs-and-services/growth-disorders/conditions-and-treatments/disorders-of-growth-puberty-and-sexual-development

There is no wonder that the rate of increase of sexually questioning characteristics is higher in the United States than the world population as a whole with about 4% currently claiming one of the more ”accepted” forms of sexual questioning characteristics. It seems to me we should be warning individuals about these potentially harmful agents in stronger terms. We routinely tell women not to smoke when pregnant, but very few sources describe the issues with drinking fluorinated water and eating HGH Beef which could have side effects that are equally damaging.

Sexual questioning disorders, for some reason have been limited to Gay men, Gay women, Men and women who have sex with anyone, and Transgender people who hate themselves so much they remove portions of their bodies that disgust them, but this whole sexual questioning goes well beyond this small subset. To me it seems that if we are trying to place a moral acceptance around these few aberrations, we should also add the following 4.

Why aren’t pedophiles on the LGBT list of reasonable sexual questioning disorders. The Gay communities “Men Boy Love Organization” seems to show its credibility and many hate crimes against this group have been noted. Even priests have been known to fit in this group. It seems like this is a more credible augmentation even than Transgenderism with all its body part removals.

Why aren’t necrophiliacs on the LGBT list of reasonable sexual questioning disorders. They don’t harm anyone, they don’t kiss in public.

Why aren’t beasteality-ites not on the LGBT list of acceptable sexual questioning disorders. I was told shepherds use it to make sure their sheep comes to them. There really have been no animal complaints about this level of sexual diversion and most do not put on any public display that could cause angst to those who do not love their dog nearly as much. I hear many veterinarians and horse owners “ARTIFICIALLY” ISEMINATE HORSES TO ASSURE breeding and I would hope they get a level of respect even if not recognized by LGBT specific individuals.

Why aren’t self gradifites on the LGBT list. Those who prefer self-gratification over a different partner does not hurt anyone as far as I know. I’m not saying the lone wolf that tries to scare little girls by his action under this disorder is necessarily good for America, but some have ridiculed this group rather than trying to give them respect.

We do not need to understand all Sexual Questioning individuals, but they should be given the common courtesy allowed by the majority. If the majority wishes them to tone down their actions, the minority sexual practicing groups should try to comply. If a baker refuses to bake a cake showing a man and his sheep, and they are not the only people in the world who could make such a cake, the baker should NOT be fined, in fact there should be no news about this type of thing at all.

What If Trump Has some thorns? People are right Donald Trump is a pompous, self- involved, egomaniacal, bombastic, womanizing, blow-hard and some will say Hillary has just as many unpleasantnesses. Any time we try to get a forceful leader, they will rub people the wrong way sometimes but we should be asking ourselves a few questions. Which one will do the following better? I don’t know how people feel about everything, but I just listed 24 things off the top of my head that get me thinking about voting Trump.
1. Who will create reasonable Jobs –Trump or Hillary
2. Who will make our military stronger - Trump or Hillary
3. Who will reduce Welfare slavery numbers- Trump or Hillary
4. Who will provide for the rights of American children not “officially” born- Trump or Hillary
5. Who will assure continuation of “the constitution right to bear arms”- Trump or Hillary
6. Who will assure “Government will not trample on the rights of the Religious majority in violation of the constitution - Trump or Hillary
7. Who will assure we begin to take control of the illegal immigration spiral- Trump or Hillary
8. Who will assure the moral decay expansion of our country is reduced- Trump or Hillary
9. Who will assure size of government will be reduced- Trump or Hillary
10. Who will assure the Obamacare Debt-machine is fixed- Trump or Hillary
11. Who will assure the College debt-machine that now cost Americans twice that of other nations with government taxes- Trump or Hillary
12. Who will assure that reduced corporate tax methods are tired to bring jobs back home- Trump orHillary
13. Who will assure more reasonable and simpler taxation methods are initiated- Trump or Hillary
14. Who will assure a constitutionalist type Judge gets put into the supreme Court- Trump or Hillary
15. Who will assure home grown energy companies are helped rather than destroyed with a vision of energy self-sufficiency- Trump or Hillary
16. Who will have a tiny possibility that our government will increase transparency rather than what it has turned into- Trump or Hillary
17. Who will assure we use the Congress to make law rather than the “Executing the Law” branch making their own laws - Trump or Hillary
18. Who will assure that the “Executing the Law” branch executes the law even if they think the laws stink - Trump or Hillary
19. Who will assure we use the Congress to make law rather than the “Judging of the Law” branch making their own laws - Trump or Hillary
20. Who will assure we cut back on printing money as much as possible- Trump or Hillary
21. Who will assure we change political correctness into just plane correctness- Trump or Hillary
22. Who will assure we push governing our country back more to the States as described in our constitution.- Trump or Hillary
23. Who will eliminate the “No Child Left Behind” and other scholastic destroying initiatives current used to destroy our schools.- Trump or Hillary
24. Who will assure that global change is investigated responsibly rather than turned into a circus bent on forcing Americans to believe burning coal will kill our planet. Trump or Hillary

I am not strongly swayed by some of these topics. The baby killing, for instance, isn’t the worst thing we do, but it certainly does add to the downward slope of moral decay that has caused the destruction of great societies in the past.

I'm not sure what Bible you read but as far as what a country should do for the poor, here is what the great disciple Paul said in 2 Thessalonians 3:10 --- “The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat.” This concept of making more and more poverty slaves by providing government everything for those not working is not Christian. It is criminal and will destroy America. What the government must do is to have a plan and method to promote the "general population welfare" and the "pursuit of LIBERTY outside of from government". THIS MEANS the main job for government besides the security of the country is to produce JOBS.

Additionally, it is true that the only places in the New Testament that denounce homosexuality are Matthew 19:1-8, Romans 1:18-32, 1Corinthians 6:9-11, Galatians 5:19, Ephesians 5:3-7, Colossians 3:5-7, 1 Timothy 1:10 , Titus 1:16, Jude 1:4,7,19, and Revelation 21:27, but that does not mean it was only considered a debasement in the Old Testament.

Absolutely, just making the rich richer is not good for the country, but to completely eliminate the moral direction of a country to coddle a small minority is not the way to keep America strong either. I think Jesus would be horribly ashamed of both of the major parties..

While I don't think the "Natural born" thing should still keep people from being president, it is in the Constitution so we have to at least make an attempt at reading it. You are correct that the "repealed law you quoted" does say the word "parents" rather than father, but rights of women would have been a question during the time that that law was still in use and his mom would have only been ONE parent rather than parents. As far as Ted Cruz's Cuban father. When Cruz got his Canadian citizenship, his father was not an American citizen and he would not become one until 2005. Cruz would not let his Canadian citizenship go until 2013.-----I know these are minor things, but these are the reasons people hope there is no later issue if nominations go forward with Ted Cruz.

The whole Natural Born thing would have been initiated to show there was no allegiance to another country, Ted Cruz's Canadian citizenship would make one wonder about allegiance.

I know the various courts have identified him as natural born, so who am I to say---especially when I believe Cruz to be a pretty good conservative and certainly more conservative than the others.

If some new law is passed by congress to punish the woman having her baby killed she should be punished. If the law does not punish the man who helped create a baby he should not be punished. No matter what the doctor should be punished. Just because a President is obligated to punish the woman, that in no way would mean the punishment would be similar to 1st degree murder, it depends on the law. No matter any president that stands up and claims that he will not follow the law when he is the HEAD of the Justice system should be impeached.