I made a general statement directed to all. Remember, the subject here is the alleged smoking gun.
If you use Firefox or Internet Explorer you don't have to add the http://
Great excuse though for avoiding some unpleasnt information
I submitted this two day's ago:
"However else this December 2009 Executive Order can be described, the directive was a serious grant of authority within the IRS to the powerful anti-Tea Party union."
This is an outright lie. Read the EO yourself. It promotes free communications among the affected parties. It does not grant any authority whatsoever of the union over the IRS.
Smoking gun? NOT!"
No one has even attempted a rebuttal. All the response I've received is so much verbal flatulence; aka ad hominem attacks
If my memory serves me correctly, the topic of discussion is supposed to be the alleged smoking gun.
Yes, I believe the Holy Bible is the Word of God, infallible in meeting our spiritual needs. It is not, however, a science book or a rule book. It is obvious to all, except Creationists, that the Genesis creation account is allegorical.
Its hypocrisy, not hypocracy, and hypocrites, not hypocrits. Havent you noticed the squiggly red underlines?
Going somewhere on someone elses dime is what the one per centers have been doing, and they certainly arent progressive. See the graph here: www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/10/income-inequality-america
No its not like saying America is a democracy. America is a Republic; with a representative Democracy form of government.
Regards
I dont admit to being progressive; rather I am pleased to be progressive, rather than regressive. I dont want to take our country back.: I want to take our country forward.
Regarding GOP and Creationists: I was merely stating my two different interests.
I dont dislike Christians. I am a Christian myself. My objection to Creationists is their literal reading of the Genesis creation account is an impediment that is driving people away from church in droves..
No its not obvious that I think all of you are Creationists. Virtually all Creationists are ultra-conservative, but not all GOP adherents are Creationists, thank God.
Regards
First, I have no interest in knowing what leaner means. From the tone here, I presume its derogatory.
If you had read the supporting materials for the article, as I did, you would have found the reference to EO 13522, conveniently presented as a clickable button.
This time Ill provide you the address: www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=86986
Im an independent progressive. I do not get my opinions pre-formulated by any one. My interest is in debunking far right GOP and Creationist propaganda where ever I find it.
Regards
The article says:
"However else this December 2009 Executive Order can be described, the directive was a serious grant of authority within the IRS to the powerful anti-Tea Party union."
This is an outright lie. Read the EO yourself. It promotes free communications among the affected parties. It does not grant any authority whatsoever of the union over the IRS.
Smoking gun? NOT!