It is tough to respond to this post intelligently. There are too many variables to make an accurate evaluation. Certainly, I would think, abortion should have only a minor effect, as birth control is a safer, less expensive and less troublesome way to avoid unwanted children. Birth control should, in short order, be the main solution to the problem, if you consider it to be a problem, at all. Muslims will assimilate, just as all other prior invaders have. Whether this creates, or solves the problem is the main question that must be answered.

The review misses the point. Hillary lost because the United States is not ready for a socialist President, or society. In essence, Hillary is out of touch with the voting public and what they want and need. My main recollection of her campaign is the time very early on, when she went marching through a New England town with a security fence set up by supporters who marched with her to keep the public away from her, as if the public were untouchables, as in colonial India. In essence, she wanted to be crowned Queen, not elected as President, where she would have to get her hands dirty and be beholden to public scrutiny.

Referring to your final paragraph: it may be too late for that.

If you want people to read your comments, you will have to go back to school to learn, at least, the difference between "there" and "their". If you can't put a sentence together, your comments will (justifiably) not be read by most people on this site.

Is your comment written in the English language? If so, please translate to American English.

Just as I expected: another maniacal anti-semitic rant. I do not know if the facts presented are correct,
but putting the blame on the main victims, is typical of ranters like this.

There are too many ifs. Is the world actually warming? If so, will that cause drastic changes in our weather? If so, is the global warming (climate change) due to human activity? We would have to study each of these questions for a few millenia to have scientific PROOF, sufficient to make a case. By then, a solution might be found. I, for one, plan to die before the proof is established. Therefore, please talk to me about something of more urgency, than something that is only a maybe and we can do nothing about, anyway.

My take is as follows: [Just so you understand, I am a lawyer.]

If the trial actually begins soon and finishes with a conviction before the next election, the verdict will likely be appealed. In such case, Menendez's fate will be in suspension. He will probably not be kicked from the Senate until the final appeal is exhausted. That could be years. In the meantime, depending on circumstances he can return to the Senate and continue his work. It is possible that the Senate Ethics Committee could take action against him before the appeal is complete, but we don't know that.

Conclusion: Do not put much faith in your scenario. The outcome is too obscure to make any observations at this time.

Proviso: Menendez could plea-bargain and end the trial that way. If the plea bargain results in even a misdemeanor conviction, your scenario could come about. Timing is the essential factor.

Good report, but check your spelling. People pay more attention to well-prepared essays and you get more bang for the buck.

Good report.

How can anybody be proud to be a Republican? Or, a Democrat, for that matter. If you were really proud, you would quit the Republicans and join the Libertarians. The Libertarians are more Republican, than the Republicans.

To me it was obvious that both sides were armed in Charlottesville. That is what the newsreels showed.

Your response is just plain dumb. If you do not allow a person to speak, how do you judge what the content of his speech was? What about "I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"? This permits all speech, even "hate" speech, which has different definitions for different people. It is up to the individual listener whether to accept, or reject, what a speaker says and it is up to society to ensure that the speaker has the right to say it.

IMHO, the concepts that these white so-called professors are proposing are so stupid, that one would already have to be stupid to sign up for a class with the curriculum mentioned. So allowing classes of this sort isolates the stupid students with the stupid professors and allows the more intelligent students and professors to proceed with their REAL education, without having to deal with true stupidity.

The problem is that Pres. Trump does not know politics; does not agree with the normal Republican agenda; does not understand the Constitution; has no intention of following the law; does not agree with the Rule of Law. In short, Donald Trump is not a Republican, not a conservative, is not knowledgeable about the functions of government. He is a disaster.