You belong back in the 19th century, with the "table thumpers".

"Play in his fields"? Are you comparing black folks to rabbits, now, Rodney?

What was your first clue?

And they have eaten away at the American moral "ecology".

Who says?

I keep trying to turn YOU off. Doesn't seem to be working.

Guess you're one of those who love living in a moral sewer. America, the moral cesspool. In more ways than one.

YOU go back to Africa.

My patience is at an end.

Here's more:

"Effects on Australia's ecology[edit]

Erosion of a gully in South Australia caused by rabbits
Since their introduction from Europe in the 19th century, the effect of rabbits on the ecology of Australia has been devastating. They are suspected of being the most significant known factor in species loss in Australia.[citation needed] Rabbits are believed to have had an immense impact on the abundance of natural resource availability, primarily concerning overgrazing. The rabbits would first deplete the natural pasture vegetation, and would then resort to consuming woody-vegetation, which included small shrubs, and the leaves and bark of trees. [11]The extent of plant species' loss is unknown at this time though it is known that rabbits often kill young trees in orchards, forests, and on properties by ringbarking them.[10]

Rabbits are also responsible for serious erosion problems, as they eat native plants, leaving the topsoil exposed and vulnerable to sheet, gully, and wind erosion. The removal of this topsoil is devastating to the land, as it takes many hundreds of years to regenerate.[12]


Don't EVER, moldy, tell Me where to go.

And don't EVER, reward someone, even a black, for her immoral and irresponsible behavior, at the expense of another.

I'm bad.

Why should I "go back to Russia"? What in the hell does Russia have to do with American slavery?

I thought you might enjoy this, moldy, from Wikipedia:

"At the time he had stated, "The introduction of a few rabbits could do little harm and might provide a touch of home, in addition to a spot of hunting," a prediction which has not aged well.[9]

The rabbits were extremely prolific creatures and spread rapidly across the southern parts of the country. Australia had ideal conditions for a rabbit population explosion. With mild winters, rabbits were able to breed the entire year. With widespread farming, areas that might otherwise have been scrub or woodlands were instead turned into vast areas with low vegetations, creating ideal habitats for rabbits.

In a classic example of unintended consequences, rabbits had become so prevalent within ten years of their introduction in 1859 that two million could be shot or trapped annually without having any noticeable effect on the population. It was the fastest spread ever recorded of any mammal anywhere in the world. Today, rabbits are entrenched in the southern and central areas of the country, with scattered populations in the northern deserts."

These protests?

http://www.rt.com/news/414915-iran-protest-fake-news-videos/

You might take this article in as well,

http://southfront.org/military-political-trends-2017-will-shape-2018/#comment-3693494394

Or, alternatively, see my topic: "The Merry Minuet": http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-121606-1.html

A reminder: If you snooze, you lose.

No, moldy. The white guy is to blame. They imported slaves into America. And therein lies the problem. Like rabbits in Aussieland. It seemed like a good idea at the time, but there were no natural predators.

(EDIT)

moldy, try not to think. You just, in the end, make it harder for yourself.

The pen is mightier than the sword, they say.

I don't need a savior. I am able to take responsibility for my own sins. And that doesn't mean I'm a Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist or etc. I'm an adult.

If Clinton had been elected, there would have been a 100% certainty of global disaster; with El Stupido it is only 95%. But we're working on it.

Don't have time to instruct you either, ee.