Welcome president Trump! I could hardly wait for the 2020 election results. President Trump has extraordinary abilities, and to my calculation, I think he is even greater than president Reagan. President Trump is not a politician, entirely different from all the elites and tenured politicians among the Republicans and among the Democrats.

He was not welcome by both parties, yet he chose the Republican party. Despite of all his innocence , he had undergone all obstacles on front of him, relentless harassment, insults, and 3 years of rabid investigations, starting from the 22 months of Mueller, a waste of time and money of the people for $35 million.

The Adam Schiff and Pelosi impeachment hoax, and all his family placed him on a very dangerous positions and shamed to the face of the American people. Despite of the fact that he had done nothing wrong. Proven by Mueller report and next is proven by the next Durham report and DOJ Barr.

President Trump could have retired in comfort and luxury with his family. But seeing that our country was going down rapidly, he came to the rescue. He does not receive his salary for his jobs but donate to charity or back to the US Treasury.

He came to office as multi-billionaire, has worked hard all his life, been productive and he continued to work for our country. Results? Our country now is number one, in financial security, and national defense system. The world is a safer place since the radical ISIS head was cut off. China has been disciplined in their unfair business practices with the US since many years before. The Intellectual Property thief China has been identified, tamed and minimized its thievery. President Trump works for all people regardless of party. This is because he is not a politician but a Pragmatist. He wants positive results regardless of what party benefits from it.

We the people now is much better off than 4 years ago. The stock market is soaring. Unemployment is 3.5%, while Hispanics and Blacks have reached the lowest unemployment in history. Women have gotten the top of their careers and lowest unemployment as well. He brought 9 million jobs since just 3 years. He sealed the US borders preventing terrorists and drug dealers to enter our country. He is an economic genius, who was able to negotiate with China concerning trade agreement. His skills in the Art of the Deal is working. He is replacing the NAFTA, with the better deal of USMCA which has fair and honest dealings with the countries of Mexico, and Canada.

He lowered the taxes, that triggered economic growth due to corporate expansions of businesses, and increased employment of our people. President Trump is the savoir of our country both in financial security and national defense protection. He increased the defense budget to $750 billion.
He minimized currently the entries of those millions of illegal aliens coming from the Socialist countries running away from poverty and hunger. He prefers legal immigration so that we Americans are safe and could filter and identify who are coming to our country.

Without president Trump US could have lost her status as the number one world power and economic power, replaced by China. But the president Trump restored that and he won't allow that to happen. Now we are back to number one among world countries. I am proud of president Trump; thus, I am praying for him and his family, for the sake of our country and people.

President Trump is the savoir of our constitutional republic. He carried that conservative ideals which are really the vision of our Founders. Thus, capitalism prospers, and our faith in God will never be taken away. We are a Christian nation. And we must stand firm together with that faith. And all these were done within less the 3 years of his presidency.

The most dangerous that could happen to our country is the rapid change of Socialism and the radicalization of the populace which is a travesty to all our dreams for the children. There is no hope to this means but future of poverty and desperation and loss of our Christian faith. These are the dangers lurking against the future of our children. The deceptive promises of Sanders or Warren are all false and dangerous. . Where are they going to take the $93 trillion to fund climate change? Where is Elizabeth Warren going to take the $62 trillion to providing healthcare for all people including 31 million illegal immigrants?

If Socialism takes over America, there will be a 100% transformation of this country to poverty and chaos, that could never return back to where it was originally.

Yet millennials are so indoctrinated by the progressive professors who have no interest in our national welfare.

https://www.heritage.org/progressivism/commentary/socialism-clear-and-present-danger

The democrats in Congress as well as the potential democrat ambitious presidential candidates are all deceptive and liars all for the sake of misleading the American people. Their objective is power and control and to corrupt the system. We must never allow this to happen, because the future it holds is poverty and sufferings of the people, and we will never regain our freedom back and our economic status down to the ground.

Thank you. God bless America and Merry Christmas to all!

No worries. He begins with a racial slur, moving quickly into what he believes are insults. Essentially a "yo momma" street talk.

His "case" for impeaching the President is hinged on his understanding of the word "malconduct" claiming that this was the intent of the Framers of the Constitution. He gives a blog as reference who gives their credit to Federalist Paper 65 where Alexander Hamilton uses the word one time in his elegant opinion on removal of a Supreme Court judge.

My contention is, the evidence of original meaning overwhelmingly supports the conclusion that, at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, the composite term “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” was a well-established, familiar legal term of art that the framers consciously borrowed from longstanding English practice and usage dating back four centuries. The term “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” had a broad meaning in English practice and in the American understanding, confiding to the two houses of the national legislature a sweeping range of power to punish those political bodies determined to be guilty of misconduct or abuse of power. The meaning of “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” was, so to speak, its own distinct thing. It was not a combination of “crimes” and “misdemeanors” or even commonsense as understood in today’s criminal-law sense. It was instead a unique legal term with its own meaning.

My argument was the Framers borrowed the phrase from the English Parliament with less pedestrian intent. I proposed the meaning at the time of the Convention meant a range of crimes that are “political” offenses: offenses against the constitution, laws, system of government, prerogatives of other institutions, or the rights and liberties of the people – as well as common law offences that might be punishable by ordinary criminal law. I also argued that the charges for impeachment must be a crime, not merely a dislike for an individual.

My esteemed colleague could not understand this, so he went on the offence with personal attacks and introduced modern day understanding of the "average man" determination on moral values. He then, in a very unique manner, dismissed me and my opinions as those of an ignorant white man.

Yes, all that from his misused word finds in his Thesaurus in hopes of sounding educated.

Go back through my posting, you will see that when I am wrong, I own my mistakes, apologize to anyone I may have offended or mislead. As for "master intellect", I do not view myself in a such lofty manner. But, having said that, I am well educated. My Poppa taught me that all material things can be stripped away at anytime and there are few things we can honestly claim as our own; memories and education. I have never had a memory problem, it is not exactly photogenic, but I remember everything I read...even those things I know are inaccurate. It is a curse! My formal education has not ended and will not until I either die or forget how to read and research.

I have presented accurate information in my writings to you. All of the information can and should be verified by you. As in all matters of life, you are blessed with the ability to sort through it, accept the portions that are proven and submit a rebuttal for where you disagree. A rebuttal should always be respectful, even when replying to someone you find arrogate, rude, and unreasonable. I try to keep in mind that no individual knows everything, we are not gods. This simply means that learning is part of living, even the dullest individual will know something that I do not...and the smartest person can have invalid or tainted assumptions.

So, to your point...I have been wrong and have no shame in being wrong..it is merely a condition of living. I am not of superior intellect for that connotes that I have studied and understand everything, making a drive to more fully understand the intricacies of life, people, environment, religion and a host of intellectual pursuits a mute point. That would render my life boring and frankly unnecessary.

Thank you. This pretty much parallels what I stated in my replies to you, but your blog cited the wrong federalist document for Hamilton. So, the Hamilton papers (79 and 81) address specifically and narrowly Supreme Court judges; and he did indeed use the word mal-conduct. That is the ONLY time the word was employed. Regardless, Madison with his mal practice or neglect of duty recommendation were disregarded as too vague. Hamilton's document, Plan of Governance was mostly adopted. The only portion that speaks to "the Governor" (the POTUS) quality for reelection is good behaviour. No indication of his meaning and "good behaviour" is vague and subjective. He goes on, in Article VIII, "Governor Senators and all Officers of the United States to be liable to impeachment for corrupt conduct...." One can presume, based on his document as a whole, he included the Governor (POTUS). However, the draft of the Constitution contains "some crime or misdemeanor" as conditions of impeachment of the POTUS. Even more interesting is "Impeachments shall clearly specify the particular offence ….."

As you know, all these considerations culminated to a condensed "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." But, the working papers do provide insight into the minds of the "framers." In conclusion, the requirement for impeachment is limited "crimes." That "crime(s)" need to be specific....***keep in mind, a misdemeanor is considered a crime of low seriousness....one step below a felony. Ergo, chiding NFL for being unpatriotic (Congressman green tried to push a tweet as a crime) and asking another nation to do our nation a favor is not a crime.

In conclusion... there are major issues associated with the articles of impeachment of President Trump. I can not see the defined crimes.

1. Who was the POTUS asking a favor for? Was it the USA as was transcribed? Or was it personal, as Democrats claim? If for the US, then the "law" was not even bent, not a scratch. If it was for himself, why would he include the distress or ordeal our nation has suffered? Thinking logically, if I want a favor done, I do not qualify my request... ordinary people simply say "do me a favor."

2. Intent. Recall that Killary dodged criminal charges because the FBI claimed they could not find evidence of intent. In the phone call, a request was made for investigation into corruption in Ukraine. That is a fact, no walking around it. As the POTUS, this was not a breach of law. The "permission" is the contract between the USA and Ukraine signed by B. Clinton. So, asking for the investigation was/is legal. So, it boils down to intent. Did the POTUS intend to use the information for personal use? If for personal use, then why ask the investigating entity to coordinate and provide the information to our Attorney General and not as a sealed dossier to himself? Recall the Steele Dossier was given directly to the DNC. The Steele dossier was to be used as ammunition in a smear campaign, dirt digging (common in campaigns, although questionable because a foreign entity was commissioned to get the dirt from another nation). Elias and his law firm, Perkins Coie, retained Fusion GPS to dig dirt on Trump in April 2016 on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the DNC who initially paid for the contract.

===============
Your blatant ignorance could not be hidden. I would not assume that you even know what you are talking about. The impeachment did not have any merits to pursue. Evidences were lies and falsified attempts of Schiff and Pelosi.

They think they are so smart doing the impeachment. But blatant violations of the president's rights and authority vested to him by the powers of the constitution.

Your added LIES, AND IGNORANCE do not add credibility to the facts of the case. Conclusion: No impeachable offense committed. Period.

Watch out, it will be Schiff and Pelosi who will be handcuffed, once the final report of the Durnham case is completed.

Read the debates by the founders arguing as to what and when a president should be impeached,The term High Crimes and misdemeanors was taken from British parliamentary law.They specifically were concerned about the president s conduct, and used a term referred to as mal- conduct.When they settled on the term misdemeanor,They had in mind mal-conduct - misdemeanor covering and being synomous with mal conduct.If you read the arguments by Morris,and Hamiliton.As was denoted in my topic post I made an analogy of an employee being under scrutiny for violations of company rules and regulations,and what is the reprimand that occurs when an employee is under scrutiny and deemed to have malfeased or have some degree of mal conduct so far as not adhering to company codes rules and regulations.In that era the term misdemeanor did not have the same connotations as it has today.Today misdemeanor means a crime not as serious as a felony,and punishable by no more than a year jail and probation and possibly a fine.In other words the term misdemeanor had not had technicality attached to it,having said this ,they could only have used the term misdemeanor to refer to mal-conduct.
https://constitutioncenter.orgblog/what-the-founders-thought-about-impeachment-and-the-president

Hey their PR I really enjoy your posts with all of your spunk and honesty!!!!!!!!!!! However, I think that impeachment your referring to should be Obama the traitor!
Semper Fi
Mike