Posts for: ron vrooman
Jan 22, 2019 11:05:57 #
(Main)
No you don't. He needs to be deported or incarcerated McCarron Walters Act. Ememy of our Constitutional Republic.
padremike wrote:
I need an interpreter please.
Jan 22, 2019 10:52:58 #
(Main)
Are you so illiterate you must use pictures to communicate???
Jan 22, 2019 10:19:34 #
(Main)
islam is a major issue with our Constitutional Republic form of government.
Brown skin huh! at what point on the spectrum of color does your unacceptable shade of brown start and stop?
It is not skin color, nor left or right. It is the NWO vrs. We the people of The United States of America.
Brown skin huh! at what point on the spectrum of color does your unacceptable shade of brown start and stop?
It is not skin color, nor left or right. It is the NWO vrs. We the people of The United States of America.
Bad Bob wrote:
Muslims and brown skin are going to take over America!!!
Jan 22, 2019 09:45:44 #
(Main)
Check this list against the claim filed into one supreme Court page 4. attached
padremike wrote:
Let’s break down the Muslim wins from federal to t... (show quote)
Jan 21, 2019 19:56:40 #
(Main)
yes her email is in messages. Testimony in the form of an affidavit of truth with a 21 day response time or they acquiesce 18 usc 3571.
I'm still on plan A.
I'm still on plan A.
Jan 21, 2019 14:34:51 #
(Main)
Yeah it is confusing. You're the nice guy. I demand and when they don't deliver, I call them on it. I will not permit any infringement upon my unalienable rights. Fvcking period. That's hard. It never ends.
Marilyn and Anna will not communicate. I have put them together and they refuse. So, two slightly different, maybe wrong points of view on Jural Assembly. Go figure. Take the next best step.
When I read the founding documents. I do not find a need for additional support. The individual is sufficient. I am.
Anna has started to apologize for islam again. Now, I called her on it. She deflects and makes excuses for muslims. A muslim has the koran and sharia. No exceptions. they are commanded to kill, convert, or collect a fee from infidel men; women are chattel. There is no compromise. Fvcking period. McCarron Walters Act( see attached)
Next subject. Stand and deliver. Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead. Doncha luv it?
I build no coalitions with enemies. I compromise not one inch from the founding documents. Fvcking period.
You seem to criticize that point of view. Please do. You are my friend.
Marilyn is the best bet so far. Do I trust her? NO. But I don't distrust her either. I distrust Anna. She lies and I've caught her at it, several times. And she will deflect and double down on a lie.
Tell the truth at least don't lie. so, who tells the truth? We may not find out until we are way down the road with a false leader. islam is evil. if one supports or apologizes for evil, they are evil. fvcking period.
all the best of every good fortune.
Marilyn and Anna will not communicate. I have put them together and they refuse. So, two slightly different, maybe wrong points of view on Jural Assembly. Go figure. Take the next best step.
When I read the founding documents. I do not find a need for additional support. The individual is sufficient. I am.
Anna has started to apologize for islam again. Now, I called her on it. She deflects and makes excuses for muslims. A muslim has the koran and sharia. No exceptions. they are commanded to kill, convert, or collect a fee from infidel men; women are chattel. There is no compromise. Fvcking period. McCarron Walters Act( see attached)
Next subject. Stand and deliver. Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead. Doncha luv it?
I build no coalitions with enemies. I compromise not one inch from the founding documents. Fvcking period.
You seem to criticize that point of view. Please do. You are my friend.
Marilyn is the best bet so far. Do I trust her? NO. But I don't distrust her either. I distrust Anna. She lies and I've caught her at it, several times. And she will deflect and double down on a lie.
Tell the truth at least don't lie. so, who tells the truth? We may not find out until we are way down the road with a false leader. islam is evil. if one supports or apologizes for evil, they are evil. fvcking period.
all the best of every good fortune.
Jan 19, 2019 16:19:47 #
(Main)
Trump Puts Schumer and Pelosi in a Brilliant Vise Grip
Jim Davis, AmericanThinker.com
The federal government shutdown has presented a unique opportunity for President Donald Trump to clear out the deadwood in the federal bureaucracy, saving U.S. taxpayers billions of dollars in salaries, perks, and rented office space for people who aren't doing anything productive.
At the same time, Trump can get rid of dozens, possibly even hundreds of Deep State operatives in the government, handpicked by Barack Obama and Bill Clinton for their loyalty to the Democratic Party, not their country or the law.
These people leak like a screen door in a submarine, mainly to CNN and MSNBC, the twin headquarters of Trump-hatred on cable TV. Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were choreographing their leaks to the media via text messages. Even though Strzok was fired and Page resigned, it's clear there are many others. They actively resist Trump and the Republicans at every opportunity. This is the core of the Resistance.
A high-ranking Trump administration official wrote four days ago in the Daily Caller that the shutdown enables Trump to get rid of people like this. As members of the Senior Executive Service, many of them can't be fired unless they're convicted of a felony, or of committing some flagrant misconduct.
This is indeed Trump's chance to "smoke out the Resistance," but he must do it carefully. Thomas Lifson has published two columns in the American Thinker, here and here, explaining that SES employees cannot be furloughed (laid off) under normal circumstances, but they can be removed during a Reduction in Force (RIF) when their positions are found to be unnecessary.
In the D.C. article, our unnamed administration official explains that roughly 80% of the federal work force in many departments, including his own, simply don't do anything. They plan shopping trips and vacations. They send out résumés for better-paying positions, perhaps without realizing that any new employer might expect them to actually get some work done.
My experience in employment law teaches me that all federal employees are working under some kind of written contract, whether it's a collectively bargained contract with a union or an individual employment contract. As of today (January 18), the shutdown is in its 28th day. At 30 days, even SES executives loyal to the Democratic Party become vulnerable to the RIF monster.
Lifson believes, and I also suspect, that Trump suckered the Democrats into a battle royale over the southern border wall Trump has proposed. By refraining from declaring a national emergency and then building the wall (with Department of Defense funds saved from the withdrawal from Syria), Trump can simply bypass Congress. He can order the Army Corps of Engineers to build it.
I believe that by making that threat and repeating it, but not following through on it, Trump has created a lingering atmosphere in which Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer feel compelled to stop him at any cost. In political terms, they're willing to die on this hill.
Immigrants, when they gain the right to vote for the first time, almost always vote for Democrats. A recent Yale-MIT study reveals that the actual number of illegal aliens in the U.S. is 22 million, which is roughly the populations of Sweden, Denmark, Norway, and Finland combined. The largest landslide in U.S. presidential history (Reagan vs. Dukakis Mondale, 1980) was 17 million. And the Democrats want all 22 million to have amnesty, citizenship, and voting rights as quickly as possible.
So Chuckie and Nancy want no wall. They want no ICE. They may not have openly expressed the latter sentiment, but several prominent younger voices in their party have done so clearly.
The longer-term goal of a vastly larger, mostly Latino U.S. voting population would be an enormous gain for the Democratic Party, but Trump may bait them into losing their Deep State network of loyal Democratic Party operatives in the bureaucracy.
As Lifson explains, and Michael Roberts explains at The Balance Careers here, on Day 30 of the shutdown, a clause is triggered in these federal employment contracts that enables RIF. The Office of Personnel Management oversees the RIF process.
A downsizing plan must be presented to OMB on Day 31. Trump's team needs to act fast. The plan must include all of the people who just sit around texting each other about their next leak to MSNBC, or planning their next protest march in a pink hat. It will take another 30 days to implement the plan. Roughly 800,000 federal employees could be permanently removed under this plan, with an annual savings of roughly $80 billion in salaries alone. Including the pensions; the government vehicles; and the rented office space, furniture, and equipment, it could be $150 billion.
In particular, removing the SES employees and their hefty salaries represents a huge savings. After the massive RIF, Trump could go ahead with Plan B, declare an emergency, and send that order to the Corps of Engineers. The Democratic Party will be faced with a Hobson's choice: lose the Latino vote, or lose the Deep State. I suspect that when presented with this possibility, Chuckie and Nancy will immediately cave in (they aren't that stupid).
At that point, Trump should raise the stakes. "Approve all of my judicial nominees immediately, or the shutdown continues, and the RIF takes effect. Then I declare an emergency, and I get my border wall anyway."
Since the Latino vote isn't a sure thing, they'll choose to keep the Deep State, and they'll cave in. The Latino population will gradually go from mostly pro-Democrat to independent, or even Republican, as so many Latinos in the Rio Grande Valley have done. Most people outside Texas don't know this, but Governor Greg Abbott (R-Texas) won with a plurality of the Latino vote – and a slender majority (50%-49%) of Latino males. If we can duplicate that in the rest of the country, the Democratic Party is finished.
We didn't hire Trump to go to church with us. We hired him to clean house. This is the best chance to get it done.
...
Jim Davis, AmericanThinker.com
The federal government shutdown has presented a unique opportunity for President Donald Trump to clear out the deadwood in the federal bureaucracy, saving U.S. taxpayers billions of dollars in salaries, perks, and rented office space for people who aren't doing anything productive.
At the same time, Trump can get rid of dozens, possibly even hundreds of Deep State operatives in the government, handpicked by Barack Obama and Bill Clinton for their loyalty to the Democratic Party, not their country or the law.
These people leak like a screen door in a submarine, mainly to CNN and MSNBC, the twin headquarters of Trump-hatred on cable TV. Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were choreographing their leaks to the media via text messages. Even though Strzok was fired and Page resigned, it's clear there are many others. They actively resist Trump and the Republicans at every opportunity. This is the core of the Resistance.
A high-ranking Trump administration official wrote four days ago in the Daily Caller that the shutdown enables Trump to get rid of people like this. As members of the Senior Executive Service, many of them can't be fired unless they're convicted of a felony, or of committing some flagrant misconduct.
This is indeed Trump's chance to "smoke out the Resistance," but he must do it carefully. Thomas Lifson has published two columns in the American Thinker, here and here, explaining that SES employees cannot be furloughed (laid off) under normal circumstances, but they can be removed during a Reduction in Force (RIF) when their positions are found to be unnecessary.
In the D.C. article, our unnamed administration official explains that roughly 80% of the federal work force in many departments, including his own, simply don't do anything. They plan shopping trips and vacations. They send out résumés for better-paying positions, perhaps without realizing that any new employer might expect them to actually get some work done.
My experience in employment law teaches me that all federal employees are working under some kind of written contract, whether it's a collectively bargained contract with a union or an individual employment contract. As of today (January 18), the shutdown is in its 28th day. At 30 days, even SES executives loyal to the Democratic Party become vulnerable to the RIF monster.
Lifson believes, and I also suspect, that Trump suckered the Democrats into a battle royale over the southern border wall Trump has proposed. By refraining from declaring a national emergency and then building the wall (with Department of Defense funds saved from the withdrawal from Syria), Trump can simply bypass Congress. He can order the Army Corps of Engineers to build it.
I believe that by making that threat and repeating it, but not following through on it, Trump has created a lingering atmosphere in which Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer feel compelled to stop him at any cost. In political terms, they're willing to die on this hill.
Immigrants, when they gain the right to vote for the first time, almost always vote for Democrats. A recent Yale-MIT study reveals that the actual number of illegal aliens in the U.S. is 22 million, which is roughly the populations of Sweden, Denmark, Norway, and Finland combined. The largest landslide in U.S. presidential history (Reagan vs. Dukakis Mondale, 1980) was 17 million. And the Democrats want all 22 million to have amnesty, citizenship, and voting rights as quickly as possible.
So Chuckie and Nancy want no wall. They want no ICE. They may not have openly expressed the latter sentiment, but several prominent younger voices in their party have done so clearly.
The longer-term goal of a vastly larger, mostly Latino U.S. voting population would be an enormous gain for the Democratic Party, but Trump may bait them into losing their Deep State network of loyal Democratic Party operatives in the bureaucracy.
As Lifson explains, and Michael Roberts explains at The Balance Careers here, on Day 30 of the shutdown, a clause is triggered in these federal employment contracts that enables RIF. The Office of Personnel Management oversees the RIF process.
A downsizing plan must be presented to OMB on Day 31. Trump's team needs to act fast. The plan must include all of the people who just sit around texting each other about their next leak to MSNBC, or planning their next protest march in a pink hat. It will take another 30 days to implement the plan. Roughly 800,000 federal employees could be permanently removed under this plan, with an annual savings of roughly $80 billion in salaries alone. Including the pensions; the government vehicles; and the rented office space, furniture, and equipment, it could be $150 billion.
In particular, removing the SES employees and their hefty salaries represents a huge savings. After the massive RIF, Trump could go ahead with Plan B, declare an emergency, and send that order to the Corps of Engineers. The Democratic Party will be faced with a Hobson's choice: lose the Latino vote, or lose the Deep State. I suspect that when presented with this possibility, Chuckie and Nancy will immediately cave in (they aren't that stupid).
At that point, Trump should raise the stakes. "Approve all of my judicial nominees immediately, or the shutdown continues, and the RIF takes effect. Then I declare an emergency, and I get my border wall anyway."
Since the Latino vote isn't a sure thing, they'll choose to keep the Deep State, and they'll cave in. The Latino population will gradually go from mostly pro-Democrat to independent, or even Republican, as so many Latinos in the Rio Grande Valley have done. Most people outside Texas don't know this, but Governor Greg Abbott (R-Texas) won with a plurality of the Latino vote – and a slender majority (50%-49%) of Latino males. If we can duplicate that in the rest of the country, the Democratic Party is finished.
We didn't hire Trump to go to church with us. We hired him to clean house. This is the best chance to get it done.
...
Jan 19, 2019 15:59:24 #
(Main)
Big Government: Leading Democrats are pushing an agenda that would more than double the size of the federal government. This comes as a new Gallup Poll finds that the public views government as the most important problem facing the country today.
Gallup regularly asks what are the biggest problems facing the country today. The latest shows "government" well in the lead, with "immigration" No. 2.
Another Gallup poll finds that, despite all the focus on left-wing celebrities like Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, the country remains far more conservative than liberal — with 35% saying they are conservative compared with 26% who are liberal. The rest fall in the middle.
More 'Socialist' Than Sweden
Nevertheless, many in the Democratic Party are rushing to embrace policies that would, if enacted, result in government controlling a bigger share of the U.S. economy than "socialist" countries like Sweden or Norway.
There's no doubt that each of these proposals has a bumper sticker appeal: "Medicare for all," "universal Pre-K," "universal free college," "guaranteed jobs," "paid family leave," expanded Social Security benefits, a federal $15 minimum wage. They all poll well, at least.
But the costs to implement any one of them would be staggering. "Medicare for all," for example, would cost, conservatively, $32 trillion in its first 10 years. The "guaranteed jobs" price tag is about $7 trillion over a decade. Universal Pre-K: $150 billion. Free college: $750 billion. The "Green New Deal" — untold billions.
When the Manhattan Institute added up the cost of this expansive agenda, the price tag totaled $42.5 trillion over 10 years, or roughly $4.2 trillion a year. And that's likely a lowball estimate, since government programs almost always end up costing far more than expected.
Exactly how big is this tab? Well, consider that in 2018, the federal government spent a grand total of $4.1 trillion.
So, we are talking about more than doubling the size of the federal government.
58% of GDP
It would result in the federal government controlling more than 40% of the nation's GDP. When you add in state and local spending, the result would be that government would control 58% of the nation's economy.
That's a bigger share than supposed socialist role model countries like Finland, where government spending accounts for 57% of that country's economy, Sweden (49%), Norway (48.8%), the Netherlands (44.5%), or the U.K. (42%).
In fact, this Democratic agenda would, if enacted, result in a bigger government than any of the other 35 industrialized countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. So much for Democratic President Bill Clinton's declaration that "the era of big government is over."
What would it take to finance a government of this magnitude?
225% Tax Hike
As it stands today, federal tax revenues are about 17% of GDP. That's about the average since World War II, despite the myriad changes in the tax code over those years.
To pay for those new programs — without adding to the already nearly $1 trillion in annual deficits — would require a 225% increase in federal taxes.
However appealing this agenda might sound. It would constitute economic suicide.
Gallup regularly asks what are the biggest problems facing the country today. The latest shows "government" well in the lead, with "immigration" No. 2.
Another Gallup poll finds that, despite all the focus on left-wing celebrities like Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, the country remains far more conservative than liberal — with 35% saying they are conservative compared with 26% who are liberal. The rest fall in the middle.
More 'Socialist' Than Sweden
Nevertheless, many in the Democratic Party are rushing to embrace policies that would, if enacted, result in government controlling a bigger share of the U.S. economy than "socialist" countries like Sweden or Norway.
There's no doubt that each of these proposals has a bumper sticker appeal: "Medicare for all," "universal Pre-K," "universal free college," "guaranteed jobs," "paid family leave," expanded Social Security benefits, a federal $15 minimum wage. They all poll well, at least.
But the costs to implement any one of them would be staggering. "Medicare for all," for example, would cost, conservatively, $32 trillion in its first 10 years. The "guaranteed jobs" price tag is about $7 trillion over a decade. Universal Pre-K: $150 billion. Free college: $750 billion. The "Green New Deal" — untold billions.
When the Manhattan Institute added up the cost of this expansive agenda, the price tag totaled $42.5 trillion over 10 years, or roughly $4.2 trillion a year. And that's likely a lowball estimate, since government programs almost always end up costing far more than expected.
Exactly how big is this tab? Well, consider that in 2018, the federal government spent a grand total of $4.1 trillion.
So, we are talking about more than doubling the size of the federal government.
58% of GDP
It would result in the federal government controlling more than 40% of the nation's GDP. When you add in state and local spending, the result would be that government would control 58% of the nation's economy.
That's a bigger share than supposed socialist role model countries like Finland, where government spending accounts for 57% of that country's economy, Sweden (49%), Norway (48.8%), the Netherlands (44.5%), or the U.K. (42%).
In fact, this Democratic agenda would, if enacted, result in a bigger government than any of the other 35 industrialized countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. So much for Democratic President Bill Clinton's declaration that "the era of big government is over."
What would it take to finance a government of this magnitude?
225% Tax Hike
As it stands today, federal tax revenues are about 17% of GDP. That's about the average since World War II, despite the myriad changes in the tax code over those years.
To pay for those new programs — without adding to the already nearly $1 trillion in annual deficits — would require a 225% increase in federal taxes.
However appealing this agenda might sound. It would constitute economic suicide.
Jan 19, 2019 13:07:33 #
(Main)
the former GOP will be gone by 2020. I like the New Communist + Dems
PJT wrote:
Still 2 parties. GOP and New Communist and their candidate...Hillary says she did win.
Jan 19, 2019 13:05:40 #
(Main)
PJT wrote:
Jimpack: 3rd party ? Communist? Socialist? No. Same as Dems party.
Jan 19, 2019 13:02:34 #
(Main)
the converted Dems and former independents are The Donald's base.
jimpack123 wrote:
perhaps but not the Democrats that voted for him or the independents
Jan 19, 2019 12:49:47 #
(Main)
yes 2020 will be interesting. The Donald will have converted the GOP into our GOP by 2020.
jimpack123 wrote:
If Trump was a 3rd party then he would have ran as one. not hijacked the GOP. 2020 will be interesting for sure
Jan 19, 2019 12:30:57 #
(Main)
I read it. Trump is a 3rd party. The Rep. and Dems. of the swamp, which is all of them, and the bureaucrats are against him. as is the DOJ and Cia and FBI. All things considered The Donald is doing well.
jimpack123 wrote:
You didnt read my post I said if Truth matters then a 3 party would have won . If truth matters someone else would have won the GOP nomination
Jan 19, 2019 12:12:13 #
(Main)
you went off the rails. we would be into NWO if killery had won. Trump is the first POTUSA that i voted for. I have voted in every Presidential election since 1956. Trump is very pragmatic. He likes Jew Bankers and BAR attorneys. No one is perfect.
jimpack123 wrote:
If truth mattered Trump won't be in the White House .If Truth matter a third party would have won the White House.If Truth mattered one of the other GOP hopefuls would have gotten the nomination. But Truth doesn't matter just ask Trump
Jan 19, 2019 10:58:23 #
(Main)
correct
PJT wrote:
Byronglimish: TRUTH YES!
IN OUR TIME TRUTH ISNT ENOUGH.
If Truth mattered the media would act differently.
If Truth mattered the Dems wouldn't have won the 2018 congressional elections.
IN OUR TIME TRUTH ISNT ENOUGH.
If Truth mattered the media would act differently.
If Truth mattered the Dems wouldn't have won the 2018 congressional elections.