One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: pafret
Page: <<prev 1 ... 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 next>>
Dec 8, 2014 09:19:50   #
Murder (abortion) is an issue for all, if you accept that there exists intrinsic values. Human Life is commonly held to have such intrinsic value and hence it is morally evil to end such life. Of course, if you are a moral relativist then all bets are off. Religion simply affirms that, which is morally true, it did not create the moral reality.

Blacksheep wrote:
Abortion is an issue because of religion, and only because of religion.

This is like the difference between Jews, Christians and Muslims. Jews say that Jesus was not the Redeemer, the Savior, and they're still waiting for him. Muslims say that Jesus was a great prophet but only a prophet and Mohammed was the greatest, and the last. Christians say that Jesus was in fact the Redeemer, the Savior, and that the Jews and Muslims are all wet.

It is impossible to prove any of it. It's what different people believe, not what they know, it's what they're taught from birth to believe.

Same with the religious flap over abortion. No difference. As long as there is religion, people will argue against science, against reality and in favor of beliefs.

This would make a great Arlo Guthrie song. "There on the group W bench...."
Abortion is an issue because of religion, and only... (show quote)
Go to
Dec 8, 2014 07:46:44   #
Kevyn wrote:
Not at all on this issue, as a man I can not get pregnant and I have absolutely no business interfering with the healthcare and reproduction choices of any woman. Also abortion procedures do not effect baby's or children they effect an embryo or fetus, please at least use the proper terminology.


There has never been a case of a human woman giving birth to a fish, a bird, a reptile, an insect, or any mammal other than Homo Sapiens. The embryo or fetus is potentially human at conception will inevitably develop into an actual human. At no time in its development is it ever a thing, it is always a person. As far as interfering with the euphemistic "reproductive choices" of women, it is your business to keep it in your pants or otherwise refrain, if you know the result of your actions will will be the murder of another. Else, you too are guilty of murder.
Go to
Dec 7, 2014 09:27:07   #
Loki wrote:
The vote means absolutely nothing. The important vote happens next week. The House has an opportunity to defund the amnesty. Whether they will do so or not depends largely on how much hell we, the voters raise.


Loki
You are absolutely correct, it seems that the congress didn’t comprehend the message sent from the people at the last election. We dont want accommodation on immigration; we want the laws of this country to be enforced and where those laws are causing significant harm, such as ACA, repealed entirely

The governments' use of fraud and deception to institute socialism and “progressivism” has to be stopped; you are correct that the only way to convince these people is to make our complaints and opinions known, to each of them. Theyu have to be made aware t6hat we are watching more than ever before.

Here are some links, which will provide all readers with the necessary addresses, to contact the government, your own representatives

http://www.congressmerge.com/onlinedb/

http://www.consumer-action.org/action/articles/make_your_voice_heard

http://www.usa.gov/Contact/US-Congress.shtml
Go to
Dec 5, 2014 18:04:04   #
Loki wrote:
:

Perhaps Kennedy was reading the tea leaves. LBJ's unsustainable "Great Society" and "War on Poverty" has repercussions today. Social Security is a train wreck. Wetbacks, usually poorly educated, willing to work cheaply, and with a high birth rate, provide a more malleable voter base than the more highly educated Europeans that the immigrations policies did favor.


Again, I am in agreement. One must still marvel at the idea that these uneducated malleable masses will be anything but a drag on society as a whole. Our political leaders are estranged from the necessities of earning a living and have a quasi royalty mentality. They will not have to contend with the overcrowded schools, hospitals and other public services. Their children will attend private schools and they will not wait in lines for medical attention.

No matter that they are degenerating the culture of America and debasing the quality of life for most, they have a whole new majority of 'gimmee' voters. This is essentially the situation Ann Rand was describing in "Atlas Shrugged".
Go to
Dec 5, 2014 17:15:57   #
[
That is the interpretation I got from reading those articles; these alien invaders are subjects of a foreign sovereign power and any children born here are not citizens. Leave it to a Kennedy to muddy the water in this manner.

I cannot fathom the liberal mindset that says because I have a loaf of bread and the rest of the world only has a slice, that I must allow anyone who wants, to come and help themselves. Charity is given, it is not a right.
Go to
Dec 5, 2014 11:37:51   #
Ricko wrote:
JMHO-Agree that the vote was symbolic because that is all they can do other than shut government down. Immigration-the republicans want a sealed border prior to anyone being legalized. However, I hope they are smart enough to realize that they are powerless to stop the Obama EA. The only entity that can stop Obama is the SCOTUS. The best thing the new congress could do is start implementing their agenda and send bills to Obama for signature . Work on meaningful legislation that will spur the economy and create jobs first and foremost. In time the SCOTUS will rule and we will know whether Obama did or did not overreach. To get into a shouting match with Obama at this stage is useless. Good Luck America !!!
JMHO-Agree that the vote was symbolic because that... (show quote)


Rick
Which action do you think is a greater crime, selling untaxed cigarettes without a Tobacco license or entering the country illegally and stealing from the citizens of this country? Our laws need to be changed such that if you are in the country illegally and you have a child then that child is not a citizen. Benefits should not accrue to those who commit crimes from the crime they are committing. The illegals should be shipped back where they came from as soon as they are picked up and being here illegally should be a bar to future citizenship. Repeat invaders should be jailed at some of those FEMA camps that I keep hearing about (If they exist), and after 15-20 years they should be deported. In the interim, military units should be deployed along the borders with shoot to kill orders for any illegal crossers. This would close the border to illegal entries by drug smugglers as well.

Then we can look at reforming our immigration policies. Perhaps we should start with the department in charge of losing legal immigration
applicant's paperwork.
Go to
Dec 4, 2014 18:25:51   #
Ronald Hatt wrote:
SOUNDS LIKE A GOOD IDEA!


If you liked that, try Shakespeare’s opinion.

“The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers,” appears in the play, King Henry the Sixth, Part II

In the later Middle Ages, two revolts took place in England within a fairly short span of time: the Jack Cade Revolt during the reign of Henry VI (1421-1471) and another which had taken place 69 years earlier, the Peasants’ Revolt under Wat Tyler in June of 1381. Shakespeare combines both rebellions to create the scenes in Henry VI.

The historical Jack Cade’s revolt — the one that actually did take place in the reign of Henry VI — was not a revolt of peasants, but rather of substantial, involved citizens.8 The demands they made of the king were primarily monetary, related to the abatement of taxes and the dismissal of corrupt public officials.9 In the actual Cade’s revolt, there were no complaints or demands from the rebels regarding lawyers, laws, or unjust oppression. The revolt began in Kent, swept through the countryside to London where it was eventually repressed with the rebels then retreating back toward the Kentish coast.

The earlier Peasants’ Revolt under Wat Tyler actually took place during the reign of Richard II. Unlike the Cade revolt, this rebellion was directed against lawyers and against what the revolutionaries considered unjust laws and oppressively harsh legal enforcement of those laws. The peasants revolted against the legal slavery imposed on them by law and their consequent lack of political and legal rights. The peasants viewed lawyers not as defenders of liberty, but as the instruments of slavery and oppression.
Go to
Dec 4, 2014 09:35:11   #
Tradition wrote:
Jonathan Gruber, an MIT architect of Obamacare, paid $400,000 (which BTW is the president's salary), has now admitted, ON SIX SEPARATE VIDEOS, that Obamacare was pushed through due to a DELIBERATE LACK OF TRANSPARENCY and PURPOSELY DECEIVING AMERICANS into believing that the bill was being paid for by Insurance Companies, not taxpayers. That made us "STUPID" and too ignorant to understand what was happening. Of course, that is why PELOSI urged that the BILL BE SIGNED FIRST - BEFORE WE TO LEARNED WHAT WAS IN IT!! LIARS!!!!

Gruber, welcomed at the White House at least 19 times, and also present in the Oval Office with the president, is apparently considered to be a brain trust - but he has no COMMON SENSE at all. He had to have known that he was being videotaped while admitting to the perpetration of a fraud on the people of the United States - SIX TIMES (so far) - and unless there is something underlying which is even more sinister than his admissions, his public confessions were more dim-witted than any insult he could attribute to us.

So here we are, with yet another scandal in which we are the victims of deceit, disrespect and disdain.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/11/15/Gruber-Found-in-Sixth-Video-Saying-how-Democrats-Lied-About-Obamacare-Mislabeling-Tax-Breaks
Jonathan Gruber, an MIT architect of Obamacare, pa... (show quote)



The arrogance of power! This man is completely convinced that we sheep will never escape what is being done to us, even if they show us the abbatoir were we will be slaughtered.
Go to
Dec 4, 2014 09:26:58   #
Ronald Hatt wrote:
NO.......It had to do with Cheney, being "responsible, intelligent, trustworthy, honest, honorable, & able to do the job! Any political party should have their donations "severely" limited, so as not to foment corruption, & obligatory paybacks! { NO PARTY! } At the present time, our election system, is so far out of control, {"on both sides"} that it is full of graft, corruption, & greed, at every level. The Tax payers, didn't want this to happen, & it must be stopped. ***Term limits***, limits, on pay, & benefits...."ONLY WHILE IN OFFICE"......These "law makers", are intelligent enough, by virtue of their education, & chosen profession, to set themselves up, for all kinds of "bennies", including extended vacations, & voluntary, "legal" corruption.......They never should be above the law, like EEErake Holder, & King Obamuslim, & "Al the rat Sharpton"!
NO.......It had to do with Cheney, being "res... (show quote)


I am very much in agreement with you, two 4 year Federal terms in any elected office (pick which one), no pension other than social security, no franking or other privileges (especially health-care) and no Air force one for any use other than US Govt. Business. Nancy Pelosi used free (to her) Air Force transport between coasts each weekend it cost us millions. The moneys being spent on the enormous secretarial staff for Mrs. Obama is insane, no one elected her to any position. One or two secretaries is more than sufficient.

Lastly, no laws to be promulgated which exclude any category of persons for any reason, all laws to apply equally to all persons. And while we are at it why not require full financial disclosure from each candidate, his immediate family and nearest blood relatives. Their finances to be examined annually (by the GAO) and if they are found to have improved their wealth by 30% through government grants, contracts, loans etc., they should all go on trial with the elected persons immediate dismissal from office.
Go to
Dec 3, 2014 16:21:13   #
Nickolai wrote:
When Dick Cheney left government following the election of Bill he went to work for Halliburton not as just anybody but as the CEO. Now Cheney had no experience in the business Halliburton was in so why did they hire him to be the CEO. Could it have any thing to do with Cheney going back to Washington and securing a five billion dollar government contract. When Cheney picked him self to be vice presidential candidate Halliburton gave him a $20 million going away gift.


Why else? ITT loaded themselves with Military Brass (Captains through Generals) for the same reason. When your primary customer is the government, it is immensely profitable and smart to have top level politicos and ex military in key positions. They secure the contacts and the rest of the company delivers the goods. The government needs contractors of this size and these contractors need the government. I certainly can't afford to hire Haliburton to pave my drive, or build a house.

Your only problem with the "going away gift" is that it went to support Cheney instead of the Democrats. You should be incensed that such huge sums can be contributed by any group to any Political Party --- they are obviously buying the politician and hence they own the government. Only a fool would think that there is no quid pro quo, no matter who receives the money.
Go to
Dec 3, 2014 12:33:03   #
moldyoldy wrote:
Oh you mean the old white peoples election. Wait for the other two thirds of the country to vote in 2016.


Hey Moldy. I think you are right, the folks paying the bills voted in the congressional elections, but who care what they think. Come 2016 all those getting free stuff will be out in force and together, with those who can't think, they will swamp the Repub-Conservative gang. Around 2017 the entire world should slide into a massive depression. Look for the mushroom shaped clouds coming to your neighborhood.
Go to
Dec 3, 2014 12:26:27   #
eagleye13 wrote:
A few more notables in Both Parties Serving Bilderberger’s CFR/TC/BB AGENDA:

Both Bushes - CFR,B (R)
Both Clintons - CFR,TC,B (D)
Jimmy Carter - CFR,TC (D)
Obama & Biden - CFR (D
Dick Cheney - CFR,TC (R)
Newt Gingrich - CFR (R)
Mitch McConnell - CFR (R)
Rick Perry - BB,2007 (D&R)
John Kerry CFR (D)
John McCain - CFR (R)
Zbig Brzezinski - TC, BB (D)
Henry Kissinger - BB (R) Paul Volker- CFR,TC,BB (D) Alan Greenspan CFR,TC, BB
Ben Bernanke BB
Tim Geithner - CFR,TC BB
David Rockefeller CFR,TC,BB
George Soros - CFR,BB
Albert Gore, Jr. CFR (D)
Donald Rumsfeld CFR ,BB(R)
Jacob “Jack” Lew CFR (D)
Robert Gates BB,CFR,TC (D




THE MEDIA:
George Will - CFR,TC (R)
George Stephanopoulos
CFR, BB (D)
William Kristol BB (R) William Buckley Jr. CFR,BB (R)
Tom Brokaw CFR
FOX owner
Rupert Murdock – CFR, BB
FOX SPINNERS
Dick Morris (D&R)
Charles Krauthammer CFR
Doug Schoen CFR
Washington Post owner
Katherine Graham CFR,TC,BB

David Richmond Gergen - CNN SPINNER BB/CFR/TC/92
Robert B. Reich CFR

Brian Williams - CFR
A few more notables in Both Parties Serving Bilder... (show quote)



What, no Kochs? How did those arch-fiends get left out while Saint Soros is in?
Go to
Dec 1, 2014 16:11:00   #
WhosetheBoss wrote:
All term limits do is increase the number of people we have on lifetime benefits!!! Think about that, America is broke and your solution is to increase the number of people we put on a lifetime, full pension paycheck with health benefits that if the rest of us had, they wouldn't need SS or the ACA!!!!


How about if we eliminate federal pensions other than social security for elected positions This will require a constitutional amendment so lets do it right. At the same time we could affix the pay raises to cost of living increases only. Two four year terms is enough for either house, then banishment from any elected Federal position thereafter.
Go to
Dec 1, 2014 15:56:20   #
Super Dave wrote:
Looks like a society that thinks communism is too capitolistic.


I agree -- who knew there were South African Obaminators?
Go to
Nov 29, 2014 16:00:14   #
RockKnutne wrote:
I've seen it first hand Loki. It is enough to make a person bite nails in half. I had a client who worked for a software company and was really successful too. He bought an old home in our black section of the city, put big bucks into it remodeling and making it nice and then, his poor neighbors went to work.

He and his wife lived in stark terror and he was broken into more times than a liquor store in Ferguson. They couldn't move out fast enough. Ever wonder why these poor neighborhoods can't ever revitalize?

Jealousy really does suck!

Back in the 70's I worked for Control Data Corp located in Valley Forge PA. A number of my Engineer colleagues were involved in real estate transactions, currently known as 'flipping'. They would renovate properties in minimum time and effect a quick resale at significant profits.
One of these Engineers was an extremely devout Christian, who was a member of a sect with a very pronounced social conscience. He decided that he would like to participate in the flipping game but with a twist. He bought property in inner City Philadelphia and renovated it with the idea that it would provide good low-cost housing for those less fortunate than he. He invested a huge amount of money (most borrowed) to bring the building up to code and rented the apartments at essentially his cost.
The tenants proceeded to rip out the copper plumbing and wiring, they stole the toilets and the appliances and then complained to the Philadelphia Housing Authority that the property was sub-standard. The city issued massive fines and court orders to him, to repair and replace etc. After a deliberately set fire and several iterations of repair, replace, fine, repair ad infinitum, he was rendered bankrupt. He owed an enormous debt to the city of Philadelphia in fines. He lost the building, his home, his savings, and his children's college funds.
The tenants (all black) had absolutely no appreciation that someone cared enough about their plight to attempt to provide decent affordable housing.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
I've seen it first hand Loki. It is enough to make... (show quote)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.