Ronald Hatt wrote:
NO.......It had to do with Cheney, being "responsible, intelligent, trustworthy, honest, honorable, & able to do the job! Any political party should have their donations "severely" limited, so as not to foment corruption, & obligatory paybacks! { NO PARTY! } At the present time, our election system, is so far out of control, {"on both sides"} that it is full of graft, corruption, & greed, at every level. The Tax payers, didn't want this to happen, & it must be stopped. ***Term limits***, limits, on pay, & benefits...."ONLY WHILE IN OFFICE"......These "law makers", are intelligent enough, by virtue of their education, & chosen profession, to set themselves up, for all kinds of "bennies", including extended vacations, & voluntary, "legal" corruption.......They never should be above the law, like EEErake Holder, & King Obamuslim, & "Al the rat Sharpton"!
NO.......It had to do with Cheney, being "res... (
show quote)
I am very much in agreement with you, two 4 year Federal terms in any elected office (pick which one), no pension other than social security, no franking or other privileges (especially health-care) and no Air force one for any use other than US Govt. Business. Nancy Pelosi used free (to her) Air Force transport between coasts each weekend it cost us millions. The moneys being spent on the enormous secretarial staff for Mrs. Obama is insane, no one elected her to any position. One or two secretaries is more than sufficient.
Lastly, no laws to be promulgated which exclude any category of persons for any reason, all laws to apply equally to all persons. And while we are at it why not require full financial disclosure from each candidate, his immediate family and nearest blood relatives. Their finances to be examined annually (by the GAO) and if they are found to have improved their wealth by 30% through government grants, contracts, loans etc., they should all go on trial with the elected persons immediate dismissal from office.