I would rather live in a nation of Christians, whose doctrine and actions are the greatest benefit to mankind
than fight to survive in a country overwhelmed with far left social justice warriors whose policies and activism have proven deadly to thousands of Americans.

Then the eleven disciples went away into Galilee, into a mountain where Jesus had appointed them.
And when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted.
And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.
Go ye therefore, and TEACH ALL NATIONS,
baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you:
and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen.
Matthew 28: 16-20

And you are telling us Jesus created a death cult?
You should stop pretending you are a Christian, witnessing truth, and spreading God's love,
There isn't a spark of love in anything you post.

Shall we compare Jesus' commission to teach all nations the good news
with the lethality of left wing social justice?

You have 800 million dollars worth of reasons for not watching Fox? That's weird.No one need suffer from Biden Derangement Syndrome.
It would be foolish to go mad over a doddering, demented old fool who is damn near totally deranged.

There is a difference between being deranged and being extremely concerned about what that mentally and emotionally deranged SOB is doing to our nation.

He displays his derangement every time he opens his mouth.

Biden's reaction to the reception he got on his little campaign excursion into his home state of Delaware was beyond pathetic. He should have just retreated to his basement bunker and cried in Dr. Jill's lap.
But no, he found a mic and, in what was undoubtedly a state of shock, he croaked out his bewilderment like a runover frog.

People lining the streets in his own neck of the woods were chanting FU! FU! FU! FJB! FU! FJB!,
and on camera, he cried about "kids, ten, 'leven, twelve years old" flipping him the bird.

He said something about flipping the bird at the POTUS demeans America.
Really? That's never happened before, has it?

Direct quote from your link,
Donald Trump talked about his Christian faith Saturday, but said he’s never sought forgiveness for his sins.
Your reasoning skills are not up to par, booby, see if you can tell us how your response failed to answer the question.

And, while you're at it, tell us the difference between a Christian nationalist and a hard left SJW.

You really should watch this, the Biblical connections are uncanny.
The Reign of Baal

The most distant naked eye object in the night sky is the Andromeda galaxy (M31). It is 2.5 million light years from our Milky Way, and on a clear night with no moon, you don't need binos or telescopes to see it.

Lake Michigan is 321 miles long and 118 miles at its widest.

From Chicago, viewing from 500 feet above sea level. a laser range finder would mark the horizon at around 27 miles. It should be obvious why you can't see the opposite shore?

FYI: the document you seek is already in the national archives. Someone beat you to it.

Treaty of Paris: Article 1st:
His Brittanic Majesty acknowledges the said United States, viz., New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, to be free sovereign and Independent States; that he treats with them as such, and for himself his Heirs & Successors, relinquishes all claims to the Government, Propriety, and Territorial Rights of the same and every Part thereof.

Where is the "Doctrine [sic] of Conquest", signed by George the king and George the general, that documents unequivocally Washington surrendering to the British crown?
Is there an instrument of surrender, articles of capitulation, an armistice, or peace treaty that documents this?

Treason is defined as levying war against your own nation, or giving aid and comfort to her enemies.

Here are some facts for you to chew on.
* The 13 colonies were subjects of the British crown.
* The Revolutionary War began in April, 1775.
* The Declaration of Independence was signed and published on July 4, 1776.
(This document includes the list of grievances by which the colonists declared their independence from the British crown.
* The fighting ended with the surrender at Yorktown in October, 1781 .
* The war officially ended with the Treaty of Paris in September, 1783.
* The Constitutional Convention took place from May to September, 1787 -- 4 years AFTER the war officially ended.
* The United States of America officially became a sovereign nation when the Constitution was fully ratified in June, 1788. One year later, in 1789, Washington became our first president.

IOW, the war was fought and officially ended five years before the United States became a sovereign nation,
therefore they had no nation of their own against which they could levy war, and the only enemy they could have aided and comforted was the British king and his troops. That certainly did not happen.
So, how can you possibly accuse George Washington and the American revolutionaries of treason?

In the event, the only one who viewed Washington and the rebellious colonists as traitors was king George.
The truth is, had Washington surrendered to the British crown, our Constitution would never have been written,
and we wouldn't have a sovereign nation.

So, again, show us the "Doctrine of Conquest" that specifically documents the surrender of the colonies to the British Crown. If you cannot produce something to that effect, then STFU.

If you are referring to the DC Metro police, you'd best do some homework on the Brady investigation into DC gun crimes.

Washington DC has some of the most stringent gun control laws in the nation,
yet has one of the highest murder rates per capita.
And with all those laws, it ain't getting any better.

With the growing gun crimes in the Den of Corruption, the Brady bunch decided to find out where the criminals were getting their guns. They targeted possible rogue gun dealers (FFLs), gun show loopholes, and, with Chicago in mind, guns coming from outside the Beltway, like from Virginia.

They didn't get exactly what they were looking for, and they were none too happy with what surfaced.

In March, 2021, the only remaining gun dealer (FFL) in DC closed his shop and got the hell out.
Mayor Bowser authorized the DC Metro police to become an FFL, supposedly to gain control of guns used in crimes.
IOW, the DC police could now sell or transfer guns. It was a neat package - background checks, waiting periods, transfers and sales all wrapped up and tied with a government bow.

When tracing the SN of a gun found at a crime scene, criminal investigators follow a process called "time-to-crime"
which involves determining the time between the date of the latest purchase and its use in a crime.
The average time is 10 years. No one really knows why, but that's what the data tells them.

Brady blew a gasket (and so did the ATF) when they found out that on a significant number of occasions,
guns found at DC crime scenes were traced to a DC Metro police FFL transfer and the "time-to-crime" was 20 months.

Speaking of pardoning people who "fought against police".

It wasn't Republican, conservative, or "MAGA" politicians and mayors who encouraged, enabled, and even participated in the 2020 summer riots, primarily against the police.

And it wasn't Republican, conservative, or "MAGA" politicians, governors, and mayors who launched aggressive campaigns to defund their police.

It wasn't the hated right wing who arrested and tried the anti-police rioters, slapped them on the wrist and turned them loose.

It isn't Republican, conservative, or MAGA prosecutors and judges and AGs that are releasing convicted criminals from prison. (The democrat run government of Oregon alone released 30,000 convicted criminals in less than a year.)

It wasn't a Republican, conservative, or MAGA administration who rolled the red carpet across our southern border, pulled down the walls, withdrew the guards, and welcomed everyone in.

It isn't Republican, conservative, or MAGA governors and mayors who proclaimed their states or cities as sanctuaries for the illegals they let in, which tragically includes drug mules and dealers, human and sex traffickers, gang bangers, terrorists, and other sorts of human scum. (100,000 Americans dead in one year due to illegal and very dangerous drugs.)

Maybe you should rethink your accusation that America's legal gun owners, the NRA, and other gun rights groups are, as you framed it, putting guns in criminals' hands.

That's one hell of a word salad, did you compile that all by yourself?
You made some egregious errors in contextual comprehension,
but with you, that is to be expected.

The answers to all your questions are in the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution, the Articles of Capitulation at Yorktown, and the Treaty of Paris.

Since you reject all that as bogus or fake or treasonous or whatever, and instead rag on about a "Document of Conquest" or some sort of instrument of surrender, then you've got some home work to do.

Generals do not surrender themselves and their armies by a gentleman's agreement.
The defeated general does not simply walk up to the victor, hand him his sword and say,"I surrender, sir, you win."
Then they shake hands or salute and it's all over.

Nope, when generals and their armies represent nations that go to war with each other, one army wins and the other loses, there must be a document, signed, sealed and delivered, clearly spelling out the terms of surrender.

I have provided all the documentation and historical context necessary to challenge your assertion that Gen. George Washington committed treason and surrendered to Cornwallis at Yorktown, and that the United States operates under the British crown, so now it is incumbent on you to provide some very convincing evidence that such a document exists.

And, regarding our founders view of property, here is an essay by James Madison, author of our constitution and fourth president of the United States.

James Madison, Property

29 Mar. 1792 Papers 14:266--68

This term in its particular application means "that dominion which one man claims and exercises over the external things of the world, in exclusion of every other individual."

In its larger and juster meaning, it embraces every thing to which a man may attach a value and have a right; and which leaves to every one else the like advantage.

In the former sense, a man's land, or merchandize, or money is called his property.

In the latter sense, a man has a property in his opinions and the free communication of them.

He has a property of peculiar value in his religious opinions, and in the profession and practice dictated by them.

He has a property very dear to him in the safety and liberty of his person.

He has an equal property in the free use of his faculties and free choice of the objects on which to employ them.

In a word, as a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his rights.

Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is safe in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions.

Where there is an excess of liberty, the effect is the same, tho' from an opposite cause.

Government is instituted to protect property of every sort; as well that which lies in the various rights of individuals, as that which the term particularly expresses. This being the end of government, that alone is a just government, which impartially secures to every man, whatever is his own.

According to this standard of merit, the praise of affording a just securing to property, should be sparingly bestowed on a government which, however scrupulously guarding the possessions of individuals, does not protect them in the enjoyment and communication of their opinions, in which they have an equal, and in the estimation of some, a more valuable property.

More sparingly should this praise be allowed to a government, where a man's religious rights are violated by penalties, or fettered by tests, or taxed by a hierarchy. Conscience is the most sacred of all property; other property depending in part on positive law, the exercise of that, being a natural and unalienable right. To guard a man's house as his castle, to pay public and enforce private debts with the most exact faith, can give no title to invade a man's conscience which is more sacred than his castle, or to withhold from it that debt of protection, for which the public faith is pledged, by the very nature and original conditions of the social pact.

That is not a just government, nor is property secure under it, where the property which a man has in his personal safety and personal liberty, is violated by arbitrary seizures of one class of citizens for the service of the rest. A magistrate issuing his warrants to a press gang, would be in his proper functions in Turkey or Indostan, under appellations proverbial of the most compleat despotism.

That is not a just government, nor is property secure under it, where arbitrary restrictions, exemptions, and monopolies deny to part of its citizens that free use of their faculties, and free choice of their occupations, which not only constitute their property in the general sense of the word; but are the means of acquiring property strictly so called. What must be the spirit of legislation where a manufacturer of linen cloth is forbidden to bury his own child in a linen shroud, in order to favour his neighbour who manufactures woolen cloth; where the manufacturer and wearer of woolen cloth are again forbidden the oeconomical use of buttons of that material, in favor of the manufacturer of buttons of other materials!

A just security to property is not afforded by that government, under which unequal taxes oppress one species of property and reward another species: where arbitrary taxes invade the domestic sanctuaries of the rich, and excessive taxes grind the faces of the poor; where the keenness and competitions of want are deemed an insufficient spur to labor, and taxes are again applied, by an unfeeling policy, as another spur; in violation of that sacred property, which Heaven, in decreeing man to earn his bread by the sweat of his brow, kindly reserved to him, in the small repose that could be spared from the supply of his necessities.

If there be a government then which prides itself in maintaining the inviolability of property; which provides that none shall be taken directly even for public use without indemnification to the owner, and yet directly violates the property which individuals have in their opinions, their religion, their persons, and their faculties; nay more, which indirectly violates their property, in their actual possessions, in the labor that acquires their daily subsistence, and in the hallowed remnant of time which ought to relieve their fatigues and soothe their cares, the influence [inference?] will have been anticipated, that such a government is not a pattern for the United States.

If the United States mean to obtain or deserve the full praise due to wise and just governments, they will equally respect the rights of property, and the property in rights: they will rival the government that most sacredly guards the former; and by repelling its example in violating the latter, will make themselves a pattern to that and all other governments.

You asked, "So, who should we be praying to?
I replied, "You can pray to whomever or whatever rings your bells."
Sounds related to me.

Which Annunaki god or goddess is your favorite?
Enki, maybe? Or, Enlil?
Or how about Ishtar? She's a hottie.
She's into all kinds of sexual perversions, orgies, gay sex, and changing men into women and women into men.
Her banner is, of all things, the rainbow.
Ishtar is sometimes referred to as the "Sacred Whore" or "Holy Prostitute".

HUMILIATING: Gen-Z Can't Answer the Most Basic Questions
College students fail miserably to answer basic questions.

Teach this to the children,

and this is what you get.


And this.

The following document is the negotiated terms of surrender at Yorktown, Virginia between General Charles Lord Cornwallis and General George Washington.

Articles of Capitulation

Settled between his Excellency General Washington, Commander-in-Chief of the combined Forces of America and France; his Excellency the Count de Rochambeau, Lieutenant-General of the Armies of the King of France, Great Cross of the royal and military Order of St. Louis, commanding the auxiliary Troops of his Most Christian Majesty in America; and his Excellency the Count de Grasse, Lieutenant-General of the Naval Armies of his Most Christian Majesty, Commander of the Order of St. Louis, Commander-in-Chief of the Naval Army of France in the Chesapeake, on the one Part; and the Right Honorable Earl Cornwallis, Lieutenant-General of his Britannic Majesty’s Forces, commanding the Garrisons of York and Gloucester; and Thomas Symonds, Esquire, commanding his Britannic Majesty’s Naval Forces in York River in Virginia, on the other Part.

ARTICLE I. The garrisons of York and Gloucester including the officers and seamen of his Britannic Majesty’s ships, as well as other mariners, to surrender themselves prisoners of war to the combined forces of America and France. The land troops to remain prisoners to the United States, the navy to the naval army of his Most Christian Majesty.
Granted.

Article II. The artillery, arms, accoutrements, military chest, and public stores of every denomination, shall be delivered unimpaired to the heads of departments appointed to receive them.
Granted.

Article III. At twelve o’clock this day the two redoubts on the left flank of York to be delivered, the one to a detachment of American infantry, the other to a detachment of French grenadiers.
Granted.

The garrison of York will march out to a place to be appointed in front of the posts, at two o’clock precisely, with shouldered arms, colors cased, and drums beating a British or German march. They are then to ground their arms, and return to their encampments, where they will remain until they are despatched to the places of their destination. Two works on the Gloucester side will be delivered at one o’clock to a detachment of French and American troops appointed to possess them. The garrison will march out at three o’clock in the afternoon; the cavalry with their swords drawn, trumpets sounding, and the infantry in the manner prescribed for the garrison of York. They are likewise to return to their encampments until they can be finally marched off.

Article IV. Officers are to retain their side-arms. Both officers and soldiers to keep their private property of every kind; and no part of their baggage or papers to be at any time subject to search or inspection. The baggage and papers of officers and soldiers taken during the siege to be likewise preserved for them.
Granted.

It is understood that any property obviously belonging to the inhabitants of these States, in the possession of the garrison, shall be subject to be reclaimed.

Article V. The soldiers to be kept in Virginia, Maryland, or Pennsylvania, and as much by regiments as possible, and supplied with the same rations of provisions as are allowed to soldiers in the service of America. A field-officer from each nation, to wit, British, Anspach, and Hessian, and other officers on parole, in the proportion of one to fifty men to be allowed to reside near their respective regiments, to visit them frequently, and be witnesses of their treatment; and that their officers may receive and deliver clothing and other necessaries for them, for which passports are to be granted when applied for.
Granted.

Article VI. The general, staff, and other officers not employed as mentioned in the above articles, and who choose it, to be permitted to go on parole to Europe, to New York, or to any other American maritime posts at present in the possession of the British forces, at their own option; and proper vessels to be granted by the Count de Grasse to carry them under flags of truce to New York within ten days from this date, if possible, and they to reside in a district to be agreed upon hereafter, until they embark. The officers of the civil department of the army and navy to be included in this article. Passports to go by land to be granted to those to whom vessels cannot be furnished.
Granted.

Article VII. Officers to be allowed to keep soldiers as servants, according to the common practice of the service. Servants not soldiers are not to be considered as prisoners, and are to be allowed to attend their masters.
Granted.

Article VIII. The Bonetta sloop-of-war to be equipped, and navigated by its present captain and crew, and left entirely at the disposal of Lord Cornwallis from the hour that the capitulation is signed, to receive an aid-de-camp to carry despatches to Sir Henry Clinton; and such soldiers as he may think proper to send to New York, to be permitted to sail without examination. When his despatches are ready, his Lordship engages on his part, that the ship shall be delivered to the order of the Count de Grasse, if she escapes the dangers of the sea. That she shall not carry off any public stores. Any part of the crew that may be deficient on her return, and the soldiers passengers, to be accounted for on her delivery.

Article IX. The traders are to preserve their property, and to be allowed three months to dispose of or remove them; and those traders are not to be considered as prisoners of war.

The traders will be allowed to dispose of their effects, the allied army having the right of preemption. The traders to be considered as prisoners of war upon parole.

Article X. Natives or inhabitants of different parts of this country, at present in York or Gloucester, are not to be punished on account of having joined the British army.

This article cannot be assented to, being altogether of civil resort.

Article XI. Proper hospitals to be furnished for the sick and wounded. They are to be attended by their own surgeons on parole; and they are to be furnished with medicines and stores from the American hospitals.

The hospital stores now at York and Gloucester shall be delivered for the use of the British sick and wounded. Passports will be granted for procuring them further supplies from New York, as occasion may require; and proper hospitals will be furnished for the reception of the sick and wounded of the two garrisons.

Article XII. Wagons to be furnished to carry the baggage of the officers attending the soldiers, and to surgeons when travelling on account of the sick, attending the hospitals at public expense.

They are to be furnished if possible.

Article XIII. The shipping and boats in the two harbours, with all their stores, guns, tackling, and apparel, shall be delivered up in their present state to an officer of the navy appointed to take possession of them, previously unloading the private property, part of which had been on board for security during the seige.
Granted.

Article XIV. No article of capitulation to be infringed on pretence of reprisals; and if there be any doubtful expressions in it, they are to be interpreted according to the common meaning and acceptation of the words.
Granted.

Done at Yorktown, in Virginia, October 19th, 1781.

Cornwallis,
Thomas Symonds.

Done in the Trenches before Yorktown, in Virginia, October 19th, 1781.
George Washington,
Le Comte de Rochambeau,
Le Comte de Barras,
En mon nom & celui du
Comte de Grasse.

I have compared the ancient Mesopotamian, Sumerian, and Babylonian creation stories with the Genesis account.
Not even close to being close.
Problem with the ancient accounts is there are many of them, with lots of conflict, contradictions, and even wars between various gods over supremacy.

Now, the onus is upon you to provide some convincing proof that the Bible was plagiarized from these various pagan myths.