I Found it!

woodie: You are counting your turds before they hatch!

lindajoy: The big mystery is to keep the negative about Trump in the limelight! No more no less! The tort is a two-way street!

ChJoe: And when the Fascist are finished with the useful idiots they simply kill them!

Lonie: Your chances of staying out of the crazy house just took another nose-dive!

Let this sink in America!

Thank you Monica! She knows how to continue making democrats famous!

Hey misinformed: The Chief Justice has no more power than any Justice on the Court! The word Chief is just nothing but "store candy" no more!

Actually, since democracy is essentially mob rule and is always unstable, disrespecting property rights and protection of the minority, it is more akin to a dictatorship than is our Constitutional Republic bequeathed us 232 years ago by the greatest group of men ever assembled in the history of the world outside of Christ and His Apostles ( whom, by the way, provided the moral framework for the Republic and the Culture!! But I digress).
Razor wire is but a logical extension of the process....protect those who do the stealing from their victims.

Radiance3: This case should have been afforded a new venue! Derek Chauvin will never get a fair trial, He followed guidelines in subduing the criminal. The truth of the entire matter was covered up! He will be a victim of a dual justice system because of the democrat mob syndrome! The drive-by media should be on trial in this situation!

ipn: You must be reading comicbooks again?

Arya: You are completely delusional as most libs are!!!!!

petie: Why don't you try to seek the truth instead of letting your hate and jealously get the best of you! Your credibility on this opp is essentially nill, has been for ages!

In Chief Justice John Roberts' entire tenure as a Supreme Court Justice, he has never stood alone as the sole dissenter on a ruling. However, that changed on March 8, 2021, when he shocked conservative lovers of freedom with his controversial ruling against free speech.

The case centered around a student at a Georgia public college who was forbidden from sharing his faith on campus except in exceptionally limited areas. Thankfully, the Supreme Court made the right decision today in ruling that this was unconstitutional in a decisive 8-1 vote.

Sadly, Chief Justice Roberts decided to instead stand online in support of this type of religious discrimination with his sole dissenting vote. This decision has shocked and disappointed a conservative base who count on Justice Roberts to defend their religious freedoms.

Uzuegbunam et al. v. Preczewski et al. first materialized after Chike Uzuegbunam, a student at Georgia Gwinnett College, was stopped by campus police for handing out religious materials on campus, a reported violation of the school’s “Freedom of Expression Policy,” which limited distributions and other expressions to free speech zones only with permission from the administration. Even after Uzuegbunam moved to the designated areas with permission, however, campus police attempted to stop him from speaking and handing out religious literature, prompting him and another student, Joseph Bradford, to take legal action against the university for violating their First and 14th Amendment rights and seek nominal damages.

The students’ attempts to sue the school, however, were shot down by both a district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit after Georgia Gwinnett College changed its “Freedom of Expression” policy to remove barriers on when and where students could speak on campus and filed a motion to dismiss the case as moot. The Supreme Court took up the case after Uzuegbunam and Bradford noted that their rights were still violated no matter what the university modified its policy to reflect and still required a ruling on nominal damages.

Justice Clarence Thomas authored the opinion of the court, agreeing with the students’ case.

“Applying this principle here is straightforward. For purposes of this appeal, it is undisputed that Uzuegbunam experienced a completed violation of his constitutional rights when respondents enforced their speech policies against him. Because ‘every violation [of a right] imports damage,’ Webb, 29 F. Cas., at 509, nominal damages can redress Uzuegbunam’s injury even if he cannot or chooses not to quantify that harm in economic terms,” Thomas concluded.

Unfortunately, this is not the first time that the Chief Justice has disappointed his conservative base. Many started to see his true colors when he voted in favor of then-President Obama's controversial healthcare plan. Chief Justice Roberts supported ObamaCare, but he won't support a young man using his constitutional right to free speech.

"Roberts had better be careful impeachment is now in vogue!"

Typical of the Drive-by