missinglink, do you remember when our great Muslim-in-Chief said during a Cairo speech that he knew that Islam has always been a part of American history? This alone should have told the one's that voted for his sorry hiney what a great mistake they made.

Has anyone here EVER been to a Muslim hospital? Or heard a Muslim orchestra? Or seen a Muslim band march in a parade? Or seen a Muslim charity? Or shaken hands with a Muslim Girl Scout? Or seen a Muslim Candy Striper? Or, for that mater, do ANYTHING that contributes poditively to the American way of life? So why did this imposter we have as president say in that Cairo speech that he KNEW that Islam has always been a part of American history?

I got this in my e-mail today and thought I would share it with everyone here. I think this says more about Obama then most articles I have read.



Maureen Scott column





Maureen Scott is an ardent American patriot who was born in Pittsburgh, PA, and
retired to Richmond, VA, in 2000. Free from the nine-to-five grind of writing for
employers and clients, she began writing political commentary to please herself and
express her convictions.





The accomplishment of which she is most proud is her volunteer work at an Army base
where she looked into the eyes and hearts of the service members who protect our
country.





Our Pledge of Allegiance, a military band playing the National Anthem, and the
wisdom of our Founding Fathers, inspire her passion and views. Her life is guided by
a firm belief that truth is the most important virtue, and that God knows what He is
doing with her.





ABSOLUTELY NO ONE, could have described this President more accurately. This
is a brief biography that articulates the man, his life and his goals
perfectly!





The Architect of Destruction







By Maureen Scott





Barack Obama appears to be a tormented man filled with resentment, anger, and
disdain for anyone of an opinion or view other than his. He acts in the most
hateful, spiteful, malevolent, vindictive ways in order to manipulate and maintain
power and control over others. Perhaps, because, as a child, he grew up harboring an
abiding bitterness toward the U.S. that was instilled in him by his family and
mentors…it seems to have never left him.





It is not the color of his skin that is a problem in America.





Rather it is the blackness that fills his soul and the hollowness in his heart where
there should be abiding pride and love for this country.





Think: Have we ever heard Obama speak lovingly of the U.S. or its people, with deep
appreciation and genuine respect for our history, our customs, our sufferings and
our blessings? Has he ever revealed that, like most patriotic Americans, he gets
"goose bumps" when a band plays "The Star Spangled Banner," (no. he gets goose bumps
when he hears the '''Muslim call to prayer"""(his words)))))or sheds a tear when he
hears a beautiful rendition of " America the Beautiful?" Does his heart burst with
pride when millions of American flags wave on a National holiday - or someone plays
"taps" on a trumpet? Has he ever shared the admiration of the military, as we as
lovers of those who keep us free, feel when soldiers march by? It is doubtful
because Obama did not grow up sharing our experiences or our values. He did not sit
at the knee of a Grandfather or Uncle who showed us his medals and told us about the
bravery of his fellow troops as they tramped through foreign lands to keep us free.
He didn't have grandparents who told stories of suffering and then coming to
America, penniless, and the opportunities they had for building a business and life
for their children.






Away from this country as a young child, Obama didn't delight in being part of
America and its greatness. He wasn't singing our patriotic songs in kindergarten, or
standing on the roadside for a holiday parade and eating a hot dog, or lighting
sparklers around a campfire on July 4th as fireworks exploded over head, or placing
flags on the grave sites of fallen and beloved American heroes.





Rather he was separated from all of these experiences and doesn't really understand
us and what it means to be an American. He is void of the basic emotions that most
feel regarding this country and insensitive to the instinctive pride we have in our
national heritage. His opinions were formed by those who either envied us or wanted
him to devalue the United States and the traditions and patriotism that unites us.





He has never given a speech that is filled with calm, reassuring, complimentary,
heartfelt statements about all the people in the U.S. Or one that inspires us to be
better and grateful and proud that in a short time our country became a leader, and
a protector of many. Quite the contrary, his speeches always degenerate into
mocking, ridiculing tirades as he faults our achievements as well as any critics or
opposition for the sake of a laugh, or to bolster his ego. He uses his Office to
threaten and create fear while demeaning and degrading any American who opposes his
policies and actions. A secure leader, who has noble self-esteem and not false
confidence, refrains from showing such dread of critics and displaying a cocky,
haughty attitude.







Mostly, his time seems to be spent causing dissension, unrest, and anxiety among the
people of America, rather than uniting us (even though he was presented to us as the
"Great Uniter"). He creates chaos for the sake of keeping people separated, envious,
aggrieved and ready to argue. Under his leadership Americans have been kept on edge,
rather than in a state of comfort and security. He incites people to be aggressive
toward, and disrespectful of, those of differing opinions. And through such
behavior, Obama has lowered the standards for self-control and mature restraint to
the level of street-fighting gangs, when he should be raising the bar for people to
strive toward becoming more considerate, tolerant, self-disciplined,
self-sustaining, and self-assured.





Not a day goes by that he is not attempting to defy our laws, remove our rights,
over-ride established procedures, install controversial appointees, enact divisive
mandates, and assert a dictatorial form of power.







· Never has there been a leader of this great land who used such tactics to harm
and hurt the people and this country.





· Never have we had a President who spoke with a caustic, evil tongue against
the citizenry rather than present himself as a soothing, calming and trustworthy
force.





· Never, in this country, have we experienced how much stress one man can cause
a nation of people - on a daily basis!





Obama has promoted the degeneration of peace, civility, and quality of cooperation
between us. He thrives on tearing us down, rather than building us up. He is the
Architect of the decline of America, and the epitome of a Demagogue.

© Maureen Scott

Full article:
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2610598/Group-US-switched-sides-War-Terror-facilitating-500-MILLION-weapons-deliveries-Libyan-al-Qaeda-militias-leading-Benghazi-attack.html

Benghazi attack could have been prevented if US hadn't 'switched sides in the War on Terror' and allowed $500 MILLION of weapons to reach al-Qaeda militants, reveals damning report

Citizens Committee on Benghazi claims the US government allowed arms to flow to al-Qaeda-linked militants who opposed Muammar Gaddafi
Their rise to power, the group says, led to the Benghazi attack in 2012
The group claims the strongman Gaddafi offered to abdicate his presidency, but the US refused to broker his peaceful exit
The commission, part of the center-right Accuracy In Media group, concluded that the Benghazi attack was a failed kidnapping plot
US Ambassador Chris Stevens was to be captured and traded for 'blind sheikh' Omar Abdel-Rahman, who hatched the 1993 WTC bombing plot

The Citizens Commission on Benghazi, a self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn't been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier.

'The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,' Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline.

She blamed the Obama administration for failing to stop half of a $1 billion United Arab Emirates arms shipment from reaching al-Qaeda-linked militants.

'Remember, these weapons that came into Benghazi were permitted to enter by our armed forces who were blockading the approaches from air and sea,' Lopez claimed. 'They were permitted to come in. ... [They] knew these weapons were coming in, and that was allowed..

'The intelligence community was part of that, the Department of State was part of that, and certainly that means that the top leadership of the United States, our national security leadership, and potentially Congress – if they were briefed on this – also knew about this.'

The weapons were intended for Gaddafi but allowed by the U.S. to flow to his Islamist opposition.

'The White House and senior Congressional members,' the group wrote in an interim report released Tuesday, 'deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy that provided material support to terrorist organizations in order to topple a ruler [Muammar Gaddafi] who had been working closely with the West actively to suppress al-Qaeda.'

'Some look at it as treason,' said Wayne Simmons, a former CIA officer who participated in the commission's research.

Retired Rear Admiral Chuck Kubic, another commission member, told reporters Tuesday that those weapons are now 'all in Syria.'

'Gaddafi wasn't a good guy, but he was being marginalized,' Kubic recalled. 'Gaddafi actually offered to abdicate' shortly after the beginning of a 2011 rebellion.

'But the U.S. ignored his calls for a truce,' the commission wrote, ultimately backing the horse that would later help kill a U.S. ambassador.

Kubic said that the effort at truce talks fell apart when the White House declined to let the Pentagon pursue it seriously.

'We had a leader who had won the Nobel Peace Prize,' Kubic said, 'but who was unwilling to give peace a chance for 72 hours.'

In March 2011, Kubic said, U.S. Army Africa Commander General Carter told NBC News that the U.S. military was not actively targeting Muammar Gaddafi. That, Kubic revealed, was a signal to the Libyan dictator that there was a chance for a deal.

Gaddafi responded by 'verifiably ... pull[ing] his forces back from key rebel-held cities such as Benghazi and Misrata.'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2610598/Group-US-switched-sides-War-Terror-facilitating-500-MILLION-weapons-deliveries-Libyan-al-Qaeda-militias-leading-Benghazi-attack.html#ixzz2zjjdZ000

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I just heard this morning that one of Obama's clones is suggesting a 2% tax on SAVINGS! Do saving accounts pay as much as 2% these days? Savings accounts pay so little today that I don't even keep one any more. What isn't in my checking account is elsewhere. I've even mailed some of it to my 4 grown stepchildren as a portion of their "inheritance". I don't have a lot, and I don't want the government stealing everything to help out the Muslims in the Middle East or to buy food and housing for every illegal Mexican in the states.

This is from American Liberty Pac - April 22, 2014 by Katie.

The Obama Administration announced Friday that a final decision regarding the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline has once again been delayed. According to both the White House and Debbie Wasserman Shultz, there was no politics involved behind the decision to delay.

Actually, that could not be further from the truth.

Many people don't know who Tom Steyer is, but he is a left-wing San Francisco billionaire former hedge fun manager and a radical environmentalist. He has promised progressives $100 million for key congressional races this Fall, so long as OBAMA DOESN'T MOVE FORWARD WITH THE KEYSTONE PIPELINE.

Now how is that for tyranny within our government?

If you can get arrested for hunting or fishing without a
license, but not for entering and remaining in the country illegally
you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is
run by idiots.


If you have to get your parents’ permission to go on a
field trip or to take an aspirin in school, but not to get an abortion —
you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.


If you MUST show your identification to board an
airplane, cash a check, buy liquor, or check out a library book and rent a video, but not to vote for who runs the government — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.



If the government wants to prevent stable, law-abiding
citizens from owning gun magazines that hold more than ten rounds, but gives twenty F-16 fighter jets to the crazy new leaders in Egypt—

you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is

run by idiots.



If, in the nation’s largest city, you can buy two 16-ounce sodas, but not one 24-ounce soda, because 24-ounces of a sugary
drink might make you fat —

you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is

run by idiots.



If an 80-year-old woman or a three-year-old girl who is
confined to a wheelchair can be strip-searched by the TSA at the airport, but a woman in a burka or a hijab is only subject to having her neck and head searched —

you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is

run by idiots.



If your government believes that the best way to eradicate trillions of dollars of debt is to spend trillions more —

you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is

run by idiots.



If a seven-year-old boy can be thrown out of school for
saying his teacher is “cute,” but hosting a sexual exploration or
diversity class in grade school is perfectly acceptable —

you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is

run by idiots.



If hard work and success are met with higher taxes and
more government regulation and intrusion, while not working is rewarded with Food Stamps, WIC checks, Medicaid benefits, subsidized housing, and free cell phones —

you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is

run by idiots.



If the government’s plan for getting people back to work
is to provide incentives for not working, by granting 99 weeks of
unemployment checks, without any requirement to prove that gainful employment was diligently sought, but couldn’t be found — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.



If you pay your mortgage faithfully, denying yourself the
newest big-screen TV, while your neighbor buys iPhones, time shares, a wall-sized do-it-all plasma screen TV and new cars, and the government forgives his debt when he defaults on his mortgage —

you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is

run by idiots.



If being stripped of your Constitutional right to defend
yourself makes you more “safe” according to the government — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.